Worst Designs of All Time

File: johnsonm1941.jpg (167KB, 1280x226px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1280x226px

>>34667858
OK

>>34667953

YOU GET OUT.

>>34667858
despite being a bad design i still want one

File: Pistol Constitution Arms Palm Pistol.jpg (99KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1000x750px

This sexy beast can be yours for only $1350!

>>34668099
How could it cost that much?

File: 854x480_19360.jpg (40KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 854x480px

>>34667858
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMbCbAhwp_w

>>34667858
I want one of these only because I have a box of 8mm Nambu that some guy gave me.

>>34668099
is that a bayonet lug...

File: Bendysbreakdown.jpg (19KB, 490x430px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 490x430px

>>34668264
I don't know what is sadder, this guy who worked so hard and such a shitty gun or the commission who couldn't work up the heart to say no.

File: Nambu2L.jpg (162KB, 979x648px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 979x648px

Type 94s are not *that* bad (well, except for carrying). Actually pleasant to shoot. I notice OP is a bit biases by showing a late Type 94 (Dec 1944) as opposed to a gorgeous early one

>>34668412
>Pleaseant to shoot
because the cartridge is weak as fuck

>>34668412
If I were to get a type 94 it'd be a last ditch model. I prefer the simple wood grips and how something with such rough machining was actually used by a military

>>34667976
recoil operated rifles after ww1 are not acceptable.

>>34668364
He kinda of sounds like the Ed Wood of gunsmithing.

>>34667953
No, that gun is just too great.

>>34668791

> What is the Barrett M82

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

File: High_power_Inglis_(6971784217).jpg (108KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1200x798px

I've owned several. They feel like a half thought out design on many little details. Less outright hate than extreme disappointment on how great they could be with some minor updates noone has bothered to do for decades of production...except some expensive custom jobs.

>>34668522
The cartridge isn't weak. It's comparable to .380ACP during the time where most militaries carried mostly .32ACP.

>>34667953
FPBP

File: garbagerod.jpg (5KB, 288x216px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 288x216px

>>34667858

File: 1488051643576.jpg (56KB, 490x746px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 490x746px

>>34670889
you take that back nigger

File: triggering.jpg (206KB, 1500x271px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1500x271px

>outdated when it was designed
>outdated when it was adopted
>eclipsed almost immediately
>used to be an okay cheap rifle for poorfags
>>isn't cheap anymore