Why does the Glock point so high?

>>34659862
Your gripping it wrong.

File: 1500649241405.jpg (248KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 750x1334px

>>34659862
Because you're a faggot.

>>34659862
Why are you pointing your gun so high?

>>34659862
You fucking retard. Stupid idiot moron fuck off

>>34659862
Point it higher until you're set free from your cursed existence

>>34659862
Are you using the cheap factory sights? If so, when aiming you should hold it so the bottom 1/4 of the dot on the front sight is obscured by the rear sight.

I love glocks, but when I buy one, the sights are the first thing to get replaced

File: sightimages[1].jpg (12KB, 453x221px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 453x221px

which one are standard glock sights?

File: glock factory sights.png (27KB, 1193x581px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1193x581px

>>34660512
>when aiming you should hold it so the bottom 1/4 of the dot on the front sight is obscured by the rear sight.
This was my first thought too. If he's trying to put the dot in the cup, then the gun will shoot high, period.

>>34659872
No, I'm not. If I close my eyes and grip it naturally, it points high (no pun intended).
>>34660512
Not even talking about sight alignment. The sights don't align unless you bend your wrist down.

>>34660757
I'm not saying it shoots high. I'm saying it points high. I'm talking about natural point of aim.

>>34660849
Guns don't point, though. YOU point the gun. Besides, you can ONLY blame the grip angle or a gun's "pointability" for when you're drawing from a holster and shooting your first shot. 100% chances are that you're just standing still at an indoor shooting range, no drawing from a holster involved.

Get good, bro. You fucking suck.

File: headshot.webm (2MB, 1066x600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1066x600px

>>34659872
that's probably a part of it
>>34659893
this, where's you s\clean sight picture
>>34659920
mebbe could have been a (You) deice if it was the follow up post
>>34660512
>>34660540
>>34660757

>tfw every human being in existence shoots HKs with a combat holds but you have 5 of them and they all shoot "bullseye" style or "sight picture 1" for you because god is a bastard and he knows you want to duel him.

>>34660849
Are you even using your sights?

>>34660873
>What is natural point of aim?
>>34660979
Yes, but it takes an effort to bring my wrist down to an unnatural and uncomfortable angle. The picture in the OP was just a stock image. Glocks shoot fine. I'm just saying their ergonomics are terrible.

>>34661140
No, sweetie. Point shooting is something you do only when you can shoot the gun well using the sights first. The 16" spread observed in >>34659862 doesn't demonstrate any kind of mastery of anything gun-related. You don't know what you're doing with that thing and it's probably only a matter of time before you hurt yourself.

>>34661140
>What is natural point of aim?
something that varies from person to person based on handsize
no shit a mass produced object that fits everyone good enough wont be perfect

>>34660849
B....ut you point the gun. It points wherever you tell it to.

>>34659862
because you're too close

>>34660849
Its because the grip angle and slide length.

My natural point of aim with a full size sig 320 is how u describe, but with a compact slide, everything lines up perfectly without me adjusting my wrist.

Every glock ive held, ive had this problem, which is why i do not own a glock. Guns with 1911 angled grips and low sights are what fit me.