>tfw I prefer the finger grooves on Glocks and wouldn't buy a Glock without them
>tfw I replace the trigger and connector in my gen 3 Glock with factory gen 4 parts (dot connector and serrated gen 4 trigger bar with the "bump") because I prefer the feel of a gen 4 Glock trigger
>tfw traps are definitely gay
>tfw the PPQ has awful stock plastic sights but all anybody ever talks about is how great the trigger is
>tfw I have never bought a gun because of anime
>tfw I EDC a P938, but see no point in EDCing a pocket knife, flashlight, lighter or multitool
>>34657969
>glockfag talking shit about bad plastic sights on other guns
pottery
>>34657969
CZ is trash, Glock is for niggers that can't afford HK, Sig is for idiots, FN for retarded hipsters and everyone else is irrelevant.
>>34657969
That is one sexy girl, got any more of her?
>>34657998
Yes. I might post more if this thread gets 100 on topic replies.
>>34657988
It annoys me when you post facts instead of shitposting.
>>34657969
>ppq has plastic sights
This is news to me, my ppq came from the factory with metal sights. Are you sure you're not just a retard?
>>34658010
Sorry lad, at least you have good taste in guns.
HKs are prone to jamming. There, I said it.
>>34658018
Are you sure you own a PPQ and not a PPX?
>>34658036
Well if it says 'PPQ' on the gun, and was sold to me as such, then yes, I'm pretty damn sure.
>>34658059
Walthers are toys.
>>34658059
Take your fingernail to the sights and see if you can make an indentation in the "metal."
>>34658007
Yeah ransom the thread like a nigger
>>34658081
I've tested them with my teeth and my fingers. They're metal.
>>34657969
Do they cut her head off for not wearing her nazgul costume?
>>34658059
A little bit of googling is all it took to confirm what he said. http://www.waltherforums.com/forum/ppq/45652-ppq-sights.html
Sounds like you paid for a special edition, or you bought your gun used and upgraded and are lying to us.
>>34658102
Real talk, hijab or burqas (or whatever item the sect that they run requires for women) is only required for adult women, not children.
>>34658108
http://www.carl-walther.de/produkte/defense-waffen/pistolen/2813882.html
>Visierung
>Stahlvisier mit Phosphor 3-Dot
Steel sights with phosphorous 3-dot.
Asshat.
>>34657969
>>34657998
>>34658007
> Pedophelia?
> On my /k/?
It may be more likely when you think
>>34658171
>subject
>on my _______
I hate people that talk like you on any subject, you shouldn't post
>>34658212
And yet I'm going to keep doing it, enjoy.
>>34658160
>.de
>>34658171
That woman is easily in her 40s.
>>34658237
You're a cruel and evil man
>>34658262
And?
http://www.carl-walther.com/products/defense-guns/pistols/2813882.html
>>34658285
Well, the English site is inaccurate too, then. They come with plastic sights and they have come with plastic sights since forever.
>>34658312
You're wrong, they have had proper metal sights. Mine did, all the PPQs at my local range do, and all made in the future will likely have them too.
>>34658406
I'm not wrong, you obstinate kraut asshole. The PPQ that I owned had plastic sights. I know that because I replaced them myself.
>>34658494
Explain my sights then, and the descriptions on Walther's website.
>the right to bear arms applies to all citizens of the united states regardless of faggotry, niggerdry, or religumity
>>34658101
> that spoon thumb
>>34658554
I don't get it.
>>34657998
>>34657988
right about all except CZ
>>34658101
Yotsuba is impressed.
>>34659098
Go on.
>>34657969
>I also like the gen 4 grooves and trigger
>EDCing a knife and flashlight are both pretty handy, but I don't get the need some people have for these 15-20oz and 6" or larger tactical lights and folding knives people EDC
>>34657998
>feminine benis is for fags
>>34658612
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nail_clubbing
>>34659554
There's fanart of her? I'm impressed.
>>34659604
Oh. Well, I don't have that.
>>34659969
>I'm impressed.
You shouldn't have expected anything less from Shad.
He got endorsed by Smash Mouth for a reason.
>>34659980
How would you know? You don't even know the kind of sights that the PPQ comes with.
>>34660029
Because I've actually had physical checkups in my life. And you can check Walther's site yourself, and see what kind of sights they install on their PPQs. Here's the link: >>34658285
Is this taqiyya? >>34660076
>>34660201
Germany might be heading down that path, but they aren't completely mudslime yet.
>>34657984
This. Kek
Full metal jackets are enough for self defense.
Taurus revolvers work most of the time.
Mexican carry is actually safe if you're not literally retarded.
People shall go against the government in case their rights are taken.
You don't actually use your sights in defensive situations.
Carrying a gun must be a state of mind and it's actually more important than regularly shooting your gun.
Don't wait for the police.
.380 is actually a good round.
Backup guns are useless in most cases.
.32 acp is a capable caliber.
oh yea, american gun laws are SHIT.
>>34660964
>taurus
>mexican carry
Ugh.
>>34660029
>>34660201
>>34660076
Why can't you dumbfuck grasp the idea that Walter might install more than one kind of sight on the PPQ?
This one is plastic:
http://www.carl-walther.com/products/defense-guns/pistols/2813831.html
This one is steel:
http://www.carl-walther.com/products/defense-guns/pistols/2814773.html
>>34661083
Alright, I think this has gone on long enough.
The real reason why clapistanians think that all PPQs come with plastic sights is because they get the monkey model. European PPQs all have metal sights, hence the description on carl-walther.de and carl-walther.com.
This is the burger site:
http://www.waltherarms.com/handguns/ppq/ppq-classic/
>>34660997
it's not a lie, mexican carry is safe, as most taurus revolvers are ok.
if i said pistols it would be reasonable to question me, as not all models are good, but taurus revolvers are more often than not great budget pieces.
Oh god please does anyone have the >truck gun cancer photo I need it
>>34661252
Carrying without a holster really isn't very safe.
>>34659098
>no TD/10
Would not boom
>>34661310
You'd enjoy teaching her, rewarding her with dickings when she does well.
There's no good reason to use .357 Magnum over .38 Special +P for self-defense.
>>34657969
my first gun was HK USP and i never thought I'd find a better 9mm.
but then i did and it was magnificent.
>i learned of Grand Power from /k/
>>34657969
>no point in EDCing a [...]flashlight, [...]or multitool
That's actually really dumb.
I'd say that I've used my Surefire P2X Intellibeam and Leatherman Wave a million times more than my Glock, but that would be inaccurate because I've never even had to draw on anybody.
I genuinely can't understand how people get by without a flashlight and multitool.
>polymer has a definite lifespan, becoming brittle and fragile with old age
Many of the old 80s poly guns have already bit it. It doesn't mean that they're bad, but they do degrade
>>34661336
Looks lile one of the worser cz clones
.22lr and .25acp, ballistics-wise, are perfectly viable for self-defense
>>34661360
>implying you wouldn't just buy more guns
>>34661360
Modern plastics are considerably more stable than old stuff.
>>34658101
This pistol looks like, not only has it never been fired; but never seen the light of day. You can tell by the creases of natural fat that accumulates on the body and hands being essentially washed into every nook and carny of the pistol.
Its almost like it's been finger fucked a thousand times but never actually used.
Depressing as fuck.
>>34661368
its lighter and more accurate than a CZ because rotating barrel.
the company that makes them has full auto versions. so its design is at least as reliable as Glock/CZ/Beretta
>>34661390
Not that anon, but woul would you put for a lifespan? 30k rounds? 9 years? I'm curious.
A pistol made in 80x would be x more fragile than a pistol made in 2010? Not joking, the inovations people have made in polymer and metals are an interest of mine.
>>34661438
Unfortunately I'm not enough of an expert to answer questions like that.
>>34661459
>Modern plastics are considerably more stable than old stuff.
Followed by >>34661459
>Unfortunately I'm not enough of an expert to answer questions like that.
so a broad statement has no actual bearing?
>>34661478
I don't know enough to speculate about the exact lifespan but I do know that modern plastics are generally considered to be better engineered and have longer lifespans.