Parts compatibility

>>34650566
Yes, next question.

>>34650576
Let me clarify. A training bolt you use with the German DAG ammo.

>>34650589
Yes. CETME and HK's have a 90% parts compatibility.

>>34650589

A c308 is literally a CETME kit with a PTR receiver. Considering the receiver is literally made by PTR, a PTR or HK bolt not working in there would be massively retarded.

If it were anyone but Century I'd give you a flat yes. So, assuming Century didn't fuck up, yes.

>>34650566
Why would U bother with a c308 in the first place?

>>34650622

And the bolt is one of those 10% of parts that are not compatible. However, the C308 uses a PTR receiver, not a CETME one. So it probably should work. Maybe. Try it and find out, if it blows up, it wasn't compatible. Or it was, and you just got century'd.

http://blog.cheaperthandirt.com/faqs/hk-91cetme-faqs/

>>34650630
Because they are cheap, and with a training bolt I could shoot the training ammo which cots less than 9mm Tula.

>>34650630
This. Stop buying garbage

>>34650566
Trick question, the C308 doesn't actually work at all

>>34650628
>assuming Century didn't fuck up
That's a pretty hefty assumption to make.

>>34650815
It's only a little bit cheaper than a PTR91 but is an absolute shitshow, please for the love of god do not buy a C308, do not do that to yourself.

File: download (1).jpg (7KB, 371x136px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 371x136px

No. Cetme is not g3/ptr spec

File: download.jpg (11KB, 194x259px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 194x259px

>>34653689
Cetme is older different internal design than G3/ptr

>>34650815
Good job never learning to handle recoil fag. Maybe you just cant afford to shoot the gun if you're already looking for cheaper than steel cased .308 kid.