Gun design thread (/CAD thread part 3?)

Congratulations, that's the most retarded thing I've seen all day.

File: 1480820456674.gif (130KB, 400x350px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 400x350px

>>34596584
>Wasting your energy posting unoriginal insult instead of an actual argument
>Bumping something you clearly don't want to see
Very logical anon

File: a047b01bc1b34c09ebbbdab57a0e2e28.jpg (497KB, 5393x2674px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 5393x2674px

>>34596545
Someone has, it makes the gun too front heavy.

>>34597605
You misunderstood.

You can already hit the ejector rod with one hand. Thumb through the cylinder, finger hits the rod.

But why bother with a one handed ejector when you still need the other hand to reload. It would be any faster

>>34601150
Coupled with the fact that the method by which you use your left hand also provides superior control over the cylinder and wether it spins around or not.

Even if this item were invented I'd still use the old tool less method as it's cheaper, doesn't add weight, and actually provides a swifter reload.

>>34596750
You sure are upset no one likes your garbage.

File: mfw shit bait.png (175KB, 384x390px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 384x390px

>>34601150
I'm very doubtful that you can open the cylinder and hit the ejector rod on a revolver reliably with only one hand.
>why bother with a one handed ejector
Because faster reloads are better?
>It would be any faster
I agree.

>>34601181
>believing the noguns lies
Probably samefag but either way
>superior control
Damn cylinders always doing what they're designed to do and not affecting reloading
>cheaper
Damn 50 cents down the drain
>doesn't add weight
Damn one ounce

>>34601203
I live for the bumps anon, now do it again

>>34596545

street sweeper by cobray has this, but that's because the cylinder doesn't swivel out like a modern revolver