Show me your favourite pistol.

>>34596039
get the fuck off my board nazi

File: yes i have a clitler.jpg (209KB, 1400x672px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1400x672px

>>34596051
shhh baby youre lost

>>34596051
I just like cool guns.

>>34596039
This is more of a /pol/ job.

Also cool gun, i personally want to make a ww2 handgun collection.

>>34596105
I own one myself, but I'm not a collector. It's fun to use.

File: 1308502598852.jpg (996KB, 2304x1728px) Image search: [Google]

996KB, 2304x1728px

:^)

File: IMG_1349.jpg (65KB, 750x469px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 750x469px

>>34596039
I find the Walther P38 to be Aesthetic as fuck
>>34596051
Go eat a foreskin jew

>>34596190
Yeah my boi, now we're talking.

all the German hand guns shot a pussy round, .45 acp is where its at brother

We have the connan 1911, why don't we have the coonan luger?

File: 1291184054125.jpg (97KB, 694x448px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 694x448px

>>34596190
>missed the $250 P1 boat

File: 2017-03-21_00-42-24.jpg (289KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1920x1080px

I fell in love with .32 ACP pretty freaking hard

>>34596213
https://youtu.be/5lPRZzTC084
dumbass

>>34596238
I don't think you understand the level of FUCKED the Lugers design is. Mechanically? Yes, it works.
Look at the documentation and try to tell me anyone would even go near attempting to make one.

The whole problem is that the entire paradigm behind hand manufacturing at the turn of the century is completely removed from any resemblance to modern machine manufacturing. The Luger requires something like 70-90 different end effectors to manufacture, and something like forty steps per part using more than half of those bits to perform them. Not fun, but not impossible by hand. Changing out the bits on a machine to do these things would require more man hours than actually making the gun. A factory set up to manufacture Lugers on a scale allowing a reasonable price point would have to be larger than most military contractors today in order to fund and house all the individual machines doing as many steps as they possibly can. Yes, it's a complete tradgedy.

File: 20170716_165426-1.jpg (789KB, 2561x1952px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 2561x1952px

>>34596039
My FDE long slide M&P 2.0. Distinct and reliable, but still poorfag friendly.

>>34596239
I found some for like $350 at a gun show a few weeks ago.

>>34596287
But they're nice to use. And stylish.

>>34596287
>Changing out the bits on a machine to do these things would require more man hours than actually making the gun.
5 axis and an automatic tool changer. The cost has been reduced to a single operator.

>>34596302
So is the Krag. Yet neither are made. They were fine when made but now they're behind the curve AND incredibly hard to make. The Luger is s Rube Goldberg machine compared to guns just 10 years younger than it

>>34596355
Show me a 90-tool changer.

>>34596178
hows 5th grade going?

File: chain-type-automatic-tool-changers-tacpxxl614.png (483KB, 748x666px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 748x666px

>>34596375
If you're thinking of the type that use a spindle, they don't exist. But that type that use a arm to get them from a rack or matrix, can easily house hundreds. Here is one that is neither of those designs and has ~95 (I counted and then extrapolated)

File: IMG_2436.jpg (104KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1024x768px

>>34596287
What a surprise, the Germans made an overengineered product. Who would have thought.

Incidentally, here's a beaut. I really want one, but from the looking that I've done, the barrels are typically in pretty rough shape.

File: histandard01.jpg (124KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 600x450px

>>34596497
So rebarrel it.

File: bhp_2grips.jpg (868KB, 3140x1125px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 3140x1125px

My first and only pistol.

Is it bad if I want to get another hi power? I haven't mastered shooting this one yet.

File: .0.jpg (416KB, 1600x833px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1600x833px

>>34596692
Mine was purdy

>>34596247
I see that you are a man of refined tastes.

File: 400px-Mod._G36-1-[1].jpg (13KB, 400x238px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 400x238px

>>34596039
Niggers

File: Baer Mountain.jpg (319KB, 960x908px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 960x908px

Finally posting a 1911.

I'm also a fan of >>34596497 for Star Wars related reasons.

>>34596287
If flintlocks and early wheel guns are manufactured today for relatively cheap, is it possible that in 50-100 years we'll see affordable replica Lugers and C96s?

>>34597428
Probably not commercially, but the 3d printing meme will have died out in 10-20 years and in about 50 years we will see home cnc start to develop.
eventually 5 axis mills become as commonplace as a tablesaw in the garage.
The trek from industry to home is a long and slow one.

>>34596295
How the safety on those? mushy or nice and snappy? does it stay in position positively? thinking about getting one of the compact 2.0s whenever they finally come out.

>>34597530
Very snappy. Stays in position well and takes more than accidental force to move.

>>34598240
Beautiful, i've heard the gen 1s were quite the opposite.

>>34598372
The gen 1 M&Ps were okay at best. A contrarian glock, really. The 2.0s are huge improvement and are heavily underrated

>>34596051
get the fuck off this board you faggot

File: pol enters the thread.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>34596051
>my
>implying /pol/ and /k/ aren't two sides of the same coin

I think you're lost >>>reddit

>>34596239
I saw one for $210 a few months ago at a gunshow and ive kicked myself ever sense for not buying it

>>34598665
Honestly i thought the gen 1s were alright guns in general and offered enough to be a viable competitor. Certainly more ergonomic(imo). That being said the safety models safeties supposedly do leave a lot to be desired.

Then again im one of those people who think that a safety is a perfectly reasonable addition to a striker fired gun, perhaps a desirable one even.

File: 380 Hi-Point (2).jpg (629KB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 3264x1836px

Affordable, indestructible very good looking

>>34596039
.357's are good you can load them with half as much .714's ammo

>>34599469
Fugg :DDD

File: 357s.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>34596039

File: Glock-27-40S-W_main-1.jpg (115KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1000x1000px

>>34596039
Baby glocks! :)
>>34599469
That's something an ork would carry. Oh wait.

File: 20170303_234543.jpg (1MB, 1536x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x2560px

>>34596039

>>34600334
WAIT....WHAT

>>34600359
Day of the Sickle soon, Capitalist pig.

File: 1475413341837.jpg (411KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1920x1080px

>>34596039
the Meatball is definitely my all-time fave. If we're limited to pistols we actually own, I choose the S&W 686.

>I also like .357 Revolvers.
good taste.

>>34596064
>>34596084
>>34596190
>>34599063
>>34599256
>giving obvious bait like this a (You)
I think you're the ones who need to leave this board.

File: 01.jpg (187KB, 1000x470px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1000x470px

>>34601972
blow me you commie bitch

>>34599256
>implying /pol/ is this successful at anything

>>34596497
can be converted to take detachable mags
add a barrelshroud and youve got a tec-9