Aimbot

The UN does not like it so they banned it.

Are you that same slav shitposter from last summer that wanted to patent the concept of an aimbot?

>>34594263
The UN also doesnt like anti semitism

>>34594271
>Implying antisemitism is acceptable under any circumstances

>>34594271
Good, this is a Jewish website.

>>34594223
They are real.
I also have a stat tracker on my glock 19.

>>34594265
>same slav shit
No.

>patenting aimbot
lel

Now I do wonder if the reason people havent adopted is because it can't be patented, thus if you invest money into it, competitors will copy and make a better version and bankrupt you.

File: 1473795536359.png (6KB, 267x189px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 267x189px

>>34594287

>>34594325
So make one that can't be beaten, it's not like there is much to it. What's with the defeatist attitude?

>>34594280
Not if this hook nose has anything to say about it

>>34594338
You mad goyim? Go work for federal reserve notes

I don't like the idea of surrendering control of a weapon to anything. I'd be onboard with some kind of threat identification and highlighting system, but triggers should stay analog.

>>34594453
Aimbot is different from triggerbot

Triggerbot shoots. Aimbot simply autoaims and locks on target.

>>34594223
How would it handle proper identification of foes? What would happen if such a weapon is captured? Can the system be spoofed? How would it be in various environmental conditions? On paper aimbots might sound like an interesting concept but there are many practical hurdles present that make the concept questionably useful at best.

>>34594271
Nah, they're fine with it, just ask the Arab voting bloc.

>>34594486
Shekels>Votes

>>34594528
>Implying the Arabs don't have more oil money than the Jews could ever dream of

>>34594486
>proper identification
I'd assume you'd only really draw and point a gun at a threat yourself. So identification depends on you? Collateral is a fact of war if used in war.

>captured weapon
Happens all the time. What happens when enemy captures your missile launcher? Or your grenade? Or your machine gun? etc

I'd say with modernized weapons, personal dog-tag rfid-type system or thumb prints system could probably be used for locking/unlocking weapons making it more secure than any traditional weapon.

>spoofing
depends on software

>environmental conditions
Same as before or better with various tiny sensors. It wont be worse for sure.

As per >>34594461, the main thing a aimbot weapon needs to do is lock on target and make the weapon harder to unlock automatically. Suppose you wildly swing your aimbot sniper rifile around without looking. When your aimbot gun finds a target, it would make the swinging of the gun that much harder as the gun aim would be locked(there would be an unlock target button or system that clears the target if pulled hard enough). The main trigger pulling is dependent on the user itself. Main aim of the aimbot gun would be acting like a stabalizers (video stabalizer/chicken head videos). Its meant to lock on to the target.

>>34594535
>Implying oil matters more than jew paper when it can only be traded in digital jew paper

>>34594223
>the new user interface thats new
Closed the tab
Anyone who thinks this is good writing is retarded

>>34594223
This is pretty cool
I could see someone making the barrel mobile so basically you just use the scope to mark your target and the barrel does the actually aiming and you just pull the trigger
It would probably be pretty clunky and heavy having moving parts that control the barrel but its a start

>>34594271
Jesus fucking Christ that screenshot about /pol/tards being the new furfags is 100% true.


The tracking point rifle systems are basically aimbots

File: JEW.jpg (131KB, 602x1024px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 602x1024px

>>34594280
HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG

>>34594223
>no bluetooth
>no wifi
>no sd card slot
>no iff

I like the Russian one better

>>34594564
>When your aimbot gun finds a target, it would make the swinging of the gun that much harder as the gun aim would be locked
A gun is a metal tube that is not perminantly attached to you, without adding a large mechanical rig how do you suppose the gun makes itself harder to move?

Also what happens if you have a system like that can do that but you need a different lead on your target, for example you aimbot is tracking the target at sprint but you are preempting a jink after he hears the 1st round fighting the weapon would cost more shots than it gives

>>34594638
It also means you would never be able to properly align the recoil axis, guarenteed muzzle drift after each shot

>>34594760
There will be a day when the system can accurately tell the target's speed and direction, and possibly predicted route as well.

Friendly fire

>>34594794
Not until humans are removed from the equation.
Soldiers often take shots for the purpose of supression or corralling target, if you are forced to aim for the current lead point you cannot do that.

But before that, You haven't answered the basic question before that.
A gun is not attached to your body, how do you propose to have the gun exert force against the user?

>>34594760
>runner
In that case, the gun's "disable aimbot" function could help? Or the gun can accurately predict the velocity and the direction of the target and calculate that new position in place?

>metal tube
Disjointed barrel? That locks in place with magnetic/locking-unlocking mechanism for free aim?

>>34594280
>under any circumstances
>don't you dare say anything about Jews because reasons and things

>>34594835
>Disjointed barrel? That locks in place with magnetic/locking-unlocking mechanism for free aim?
So that introduces off axis recoil so shot wander will be horrific
If its magnetic and can be turned off that means electro magnets which means large batteries
How do you plan to actuate the movement of the barrel? Hydraulics? reponse times will be shit, electric motors? more battery issues

Every issue of this adds weight to the user, and for any military soldier every gram of unsupported important and will slow you down

>>34594223
Are you fucking retarded? Silly question; of course you are.

You aim the gun WITH YOUR HANDS, not literally with the sights, so until we shadowrun nao what you're thinking of is pants-on-head-retarded.

File: 451234123.jpg (49KB, 682x383px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 682x383px

>>34594223
http://www.tactical-life.com/news/aimlock-stabilized-weapon-platform/#aimlock-stabilized-weapon-platform-2
>Soon™

>>34594883
Thats an engineering question that I'm sure gun engineers can solve.

When I was making this thread, I was mainly thinking about the heavy guns like sniper/machine gun/etc. Snipers would benefit the most from this. Machine guns too. Both are somewhat stationary and heavy, so little bit of extra weight wouldn't be too much of a deal.

>>34594899
Humans are not good compared to machine in any precision work. This is why we are moving towards automation manufacturing, automation car driving, automation stocks, automation healthcare analyzation, automated music, automated art, automated animation, etc Its going to replace many things humans used to think that machines could not replace.

>>34594917
> I was mainly thinking about the heavy guns like sniper/machine gun/etc.
>*edgy music starts playing*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txakchuLO3U

>>34594271
Actually the UN hates Israel and has done almost everything to screw Israel at every turn since their inception

>>34594832
Nanomachines, son.

>>34594917
>Both are somewhat stationary and heavy
Wrong in also every use case in the real world for snipers. because of far too many variables for 1.
Also GPMGs are not a stationary system, they are expected to move up at the same rate as rifle sections to provide fire support, Weight is an even bigger deal for them

The amount of weight your talking about is not a little bit, it would be literal orders of magnitude higher than the current weapon systems, what you are describing already exists on vehicles as RWS or other gyrostabilised units

>>34594972
Exactly, this is Cod kiddies the thread

>>34594917
Ok, first you're wrong about music and art, there's noway to automate art, only digitize it, which requires creative human input. Secondly, combat isn't a precise repeated set of steps that need to be accurate within thousandths of an inch.

The problem here is that you don't know what you're talking about. Not only do human combatants NOT want to be controlled by a computer, but the fact of the matter is that a gun is in your hands, cannot push you around, and even it HAD an articulating barrel (which is a horrible idea concerning durability, cost, complication of use, battery life/powersources, etc.), the fact that you can move the gun around with your hands means that the "aim bot" in question probably will only throw off your aimed shots by trying to compensate for your hands movements.

on top of all this, until we have portable quantum computing your brain is FAR better than any electrical system at calculations like ballistic trajectories- you can intuit them (i.e. Kentucky windage and similar actions) on a small-arms scale, and anything long range enough to use a computer -SHOCK- *already does*

TL;DR you ARE retarded

>>34595114
>creativity
Automation of art and music are already happening. With or without you believing in it. Its not "good" (subjective) but its its happening.

>calculation
Computers are far better at ballistic trajectory than you think of. Modern processor the size of a small nickle will outperform any human, all humans on earth combined, when calculating any physics/math related issues. This includes ballistics trajectories both small scale and large scale.

The reason why we don't do it small scale is simple. Cost effectiveness and redundancy.

>>34595198
>Modern processor the size of a small nickle will outperform any human
Now add all the sensors needed that a human has built in.

Wind, Temperature, Humidity, Range finding, target leading, barrel windage, target awareness, target escape paths, does the target know or have an estimated position on you, will that affect his evasion, What temperature is your ammo at, how will that affect the power burn rate and dozens of other calculations are done instictually by humans

>>34595266
>rangefinding
small laser the size of a bullet
>wind, temperature, humidity
small sensor the size of a penny
>target
small camera the size of a penny

Overall you'd have extra weight in few grams range and at max 1 kg extra.

Just fyi, your modern smartphone can already do most of that calculation for you. And thats just optimized for the huge 5-6 inch screen. The real dimensions of the sensors would fit within few cubic inch or so.

>>34595114
>until we have portable quantum computing your brain is FAR better than any electrical system at calculations like ballistic trajectories
Yeah this why tanks use ballistic fire control computers with laser rangefinder and staff. And effective tanks gun ranges like quadrupled since the times tankers used only brain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH5L_kuOUxo
Human sucks with precision tasks and calculations.

>>34595198
Theyre not happening, they're simply moving to digital mediums that are still human controlled and generated, and no, processors the size of a nickel are NOT as good at complex calculations as an organic neural network, while they ARE better at a higher number of simultaneous simple operations.

It's not a matter of my belief, it's a matter of fact.

And even *if* you were right about either of those things, and the system wouldn't cost too much, weight too much, be too bulky, not have a practical power source, be incredibly complex and maintenance dependant, be failure prone in a device that needs to be reliable- it still can't compensate for your imperfect human hands, that your brain can compensate for, because it's not connected to your nerves like your brain is.

There are very good reasons that for the most part only projectiles with whole seconds of flight time are guided by a computer, and not just a human, and adding a bunch of stupid bullshit that doesn't exist to your gun won't change that.

File: 52345.jpg (132KB, 984x731px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 984x731px

>>34595266
>Wind, Temperature, Humidity, Range finding, target leading
>implying humans can estimate anything of this with prciosn that worth mentioning
>baseline = using brain

>>34595352
Fuckin lol
>Small arms
>moves goalposts to 120mm cannons mounted on 65 ton fighting vehicles.

You aren't holding the fucking cannon in your hands or aiming it with manual dexterity

>>34595451
>missing the point
>missing
>human
>predictable

>>34595340
In actual cost-effective terms, none of those are that small or light buddy, a laser rangefinder isn't your cat's laser pointer

>>34595458
Hardly missing the point, the OP's point was literally about individual maksmanship, not hitting moving vehicles from whole kilometers away with a gun so big you can't even hold it to point it, that needs a crew in the first place, that has it's own built in power supply to run an FCS that you couldn't lug around with you.

>>34595473
OP video has a gun with laser range finder as well as couple other tricks in there.

Modern ranger finders are getting smaller and smaller with more and more accurate readings.

Infact the whole laser industry has been getting revitalized within the last decade due to few things laser weapon hype and lidar.

To put this out, 5-10 years ago, lidar that can scan ~50m would have costed upwards of 100K. Today you can buy a tiny, the size of a an average "cat laser pointer", lidar that cost within couple hundred bucks. Its cost is projected to go down even further with the advent of autonomous driving due to demand.

You can even buy an even tinier lider/laser range finder the size of a small penny for ~30-40 from online but those have weak range within few meters.

>>34595266
Humans are good at receiving sensory information and providing a processed response, computers are good at compiling specific measurements and information and calculating a result.
Humans cant work with specific numbers from sensory inputs, only a responses to general information.

>>34594223
per that video. i want to see everyday joes and teens/ ladies using it to prove the real effectiveness of the system
otherwise its probably not what it seems

>>34594271
This is why I love /k/.

File: CaitlynJenner.jpg (964KB, 1436x2250px) Image search: [Google]

964KB, 1436x2250px

>>34594949
>UN hates Israel and has done almost everything to screw Israel

illegal settlements are like crack to your kind right? you don't know what you're doing, just that it feels good? when you lose one to sanctions you stumble around looking for a new hit. "oh they really screwed us with those sanctions" you say as you burn down a palestinian orchard. you start building a settlement on the ashes, "wow this ground is so fertile" you say as you plant a tree where and old lady's intestines fell out a month ago. Better watch out for that pesky UN, here they come again saying what you did was 'wrong' and 'illegal' but what do they even know? the land was unoccupied when you got here! the govt told you the farmers abandoned it to dig a terror tunnel, but it caved in on them. Israel never does anything wrong.

File: vlcsnap-8971420.png (421KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 640x480px

you don't need aimbot with bullets that track you down

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX8Z2MDYX3g

>>34598100
They should stick to razor knives.

File: hello.jpg (24KB, 308x331px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 308x331px

>>34598100

>yfw you realise they get anally violated by the firing pin