Are there any pointless, overpriced, impractical guns that you

.22 TCM 1911
STI 2011 Edge
Warfairy Type 1 w/ AR57

>>34572758
>SING BROTHER HECKLER

File: 0423171151~01.jpg (165KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 720x1280px

They're pretty slick, and are pretty easy to handle.

>>34572758
I love my MP5 clone but I can't justify a K model either. If I wanted a 30rd 9mm pistol I'd carry a glock.

File: bhd-m2157435jpg40661_zps1f91f9ff.jpg (45KB, 643x350px)

45KB, 643x350px

>be M14
>be worst battle rifle
>be aesthetic
>be used by Delta sniper Shugart to dispatch dozens of skinnies
>Springfield is shit

Dammit I still want one

>>34572758
Is the MP5K really that heavy? Holy moly.

File: 1491570985121.gif (2MB, 600x255px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x255px

>>34572775
I AM THE SCALES OF JUSTICE

>>34572817
yeah but it really doesn't feel that way

>>34572847

Dunno if it's different with a stock on, but my k-clone feels every ounce of 7lb if you try and one-hand it.

Not that anyone with a functioning brain would shoot it single-handed.

File: 1494188445905.jpg (252KB, 1800x1200px)

252KB, 1800x1200px

MUH DIK

File: kg99_mini#2.jpg (37KB, 1024x420px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1024x420px

>>34572758
get on my level

>>34572758
It is different as a bullet hose than a plinker.

Being able to create an instant cone of 9mm death in front of you is a very real skill.

>>34572758
M60, because Charlie's always planning something.

File: dboys.jpg (193KB, 933x447px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 933x447px

Yes OP.
Yes.

In a very particular order:

FAL - reason I don't: no reason I should have it plus .308 is spensive. reason I want: rhodieboo
M1a- see above plus its worst battle rifle. Reason: can yell "gooks in the tree line" when I shoot with friends.
M16 A2 civvy clone - already have a practical AR. Reason: same as M1a, but cheaper to feed
HK PSG1- Christ is this beast fucking expensive for no reason. Reason I want: Metal Gear plus the A E S T H E T I C

that's not even touching the pistols I want

>>34572789
>those autistic hands
every time.

>>34572758
I want an MP5 as a fidget spinner, the action is just so god damn fun to work.

File: Walther_WA2000.jpg (31KB, 466x256px)

31KB, 466x256px

>>34572758
Pic very much related.

>>34572813
Do yourself a favor and buy a fulton.

>>34573196
I've shot one.

Ironically the recoil impulse is less than that of a full length G3.

.308 roller lock's in full retard on not all that fun anyway.

>>34573495
PSG1's have a reason for being expensive.

Exclusivity.

why is the mp5 so heavy? i thought the point of the rollers was so you could have a light bolt and stamped sheetmetal should be lighter than milling. thats more than a basic m4 and im not seeing much advantages.

>>34573702
Steel parts are still steel. There's really no getting away from that.

>>34572771
>implying super 5.7 in a sexy frame is bad

File: end my life.jpg (21KB, 408x352px)

21KB, 408x352px

>grow up adoring the MP5
>finally hold one
>the ergos don't agree with me at all

>SPAS-12
>check out reviews and shooting videos
>"it sucks, even though it's cool"

I want a falling block rifle of literally any kind for pretend zulu hunting. Also I want to feel classy shooting a single shot instead of like a hillbilly.

>>34572813
The M1A is fun and it's close enough to an M14

File: save me.jpg (127KB, 2960x820px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 2960x820px

>pcc's are mostly outclassed
>want a bunch anyway for muh aesthetics

Stargate gun.

A MG42 if i wasent poor. Cant even afford the ammo let alone the gun.

File: 0369A148_EC9A_64D6_A1293960B0E521E5.jpg (18KB, 685x312px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 685x312px

>Too heavy
>ugly as fuck
>god awful SUSAT which will leak radiation into your eyes
>bitch to clean
>can slot a cunt 800 metres away in one shot

well worth it mate, well worth it

>>34573214
I've allways wanted to see one of those with a stock and a foregrip of some kind.

>>34572758
>7lb loaded

Do you have any proofs?

File: 308-1.jpg (144KB, 1620x749px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1620x749px

>>34572758
k&m 308 bullpup.

>>34572817
It's heavy as shit. I don't consider myself a weak shooter, but the gun really is a piece of damn metal. It weighs almost as much as a (loaded) Lee Enfield Jungle Carbine I have.

As for OP, I really want an FN P90. I have no reason to buy the thing and its ammo is pricey, but I just fucking love how it looks. You also normally can't get hold of the fully automatic model even straight from FN, which sucks.

>>34572817
MP5K is around 2000g. If you think thats heavy, you should probably invest in a water gun instead.

>>34574569
depends on the variant and ammo I guess but weights range from 5.5lb to 6.8lb for the regular non-suppressed versions. Magazines are 0.26lb-0.37lb. 30rd of 124gr 9mm is 0.83lb. HK's website has weapon and magazine weight. Wikipedia has the weights of each variant in a quicker list on the right side though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_%26_Koch_MP5
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/04/09/how-much-does-your-ammunition-weigh/
http://www.heckler-koch.com/en/products/military/submachine-guns/mp5/mp5/technical-data.html

>>34574569

HK's own website lists it as 6.5lb without a loaded magazine.

>>34574651
http://www.heckler-koch.com/en/products/military/submachine-guns/mp5/mp5k/technical-data.html

where

>>34574612
try 3100g, 6.8lb. It's not objectively heavy, it's heavier than expected. Most people are used to ARs which are about the same weight, sometimes lighter, despite firing 5.56.

>>34574662
ok so we're looking at MP5k not the regular version. Everyone talked about the weight of the regular versions

>>34574676
The mp5a3 is 3100g, yes. Mp5k isnt.

>>34574662
>http://www.heckler-
koch.com/en/products/military/submachine-guns/mp5/mp5k/technical-data.html

>weight without magazine: 6.49lb

>>34573702
he got the weight wrong for the K but its still pretty heavy

i want a zenith mp5k so bad but i cant jew any dealers down from 1500

File: replica_sawed_off_dbl_shotgun.jpg (454KB, 4271x1540px)

454KB, 4271x1540px

>>34572758
Yes

>>34574498
>>ugly as fuck
Get a load of this faggot, that's a pretty girl

>>34574753
Save up for it. Would still be a special little gun.

>>34574753

Layaway or find someone to finance it, my nigga. After trawling HKParts and gunbroker and shit looking at HK mag and part prices, though, for what you get in the box $1500 is a fucking steal.

>>34574753
>1500
Is that just the k model?
I've been hard pressed to find a full size model for under 1650 or so shipped, or any decent price on the package with the folding brace and wide handguard

File: 1486212781197.jpg (52KB, 758x547px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 758x547px

>>34572758
chiappa rhino and a pic related with extra sidewall on top

>>34574976
ya just the K

>1600 for a turkish mp5

Total rip off when PTR's go for less than 1k and are american made. Shame the market is so fucked. The MP5 is kind of a cucked gun only on semi auto too.

>>34575116

>wanting to pay for .308
The MP5 does kind of suck without a fun switch but it's a goddamn amazingly handy little gun, especially MP5K clones.

>>34572758
>>what even are ergonomics
What are you talking about pham, the MP5K has serviceable ergonomics. It just isn't meant for wrong-handed people

>>34574676
>try 3100g
Christ, that's nothing. People complaining about this should stop being lardass faggots and hit the gym instead.

>>34575372
>straight up useless push button mag release
>impossible to reliably insert a full magazine on a closed bolt

Those are my two big issues with it, really. Aside from that my particular gun is stiff as fuck when charging on a dropped hammer, and the safety lever takes more force to flip up than you can get without shifting your grip.

File: 1497537714005.jpg (30KB, 599x617px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 599x617px

>>34575002
That is one thicc gun

File: IMG_4717.jpg (2MB, 2832x1928px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2832x1928px

All the guns I want and most of the guns I own are impractical

>>34575689
>P90
>impractical

>>34575689
Indeed.

File: IMG_5459.jpg (321KB, 1854x874px)

321KB, 1854x874px

>>34575707
Impractical by the modern popular wisdom. I still don't think it would be a bad home defense carbine, but the masses will tear you to pieces for claiming so.

>>34575736
Isn't the point of the p90 for vehicle drivers and such to carry them as a compromise between size and firepower

i think the ps90s limitation in the US is ammo selection, or rather lack of.

File: reeeee.png (137KB, 799x327px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 799x327px

>>34573618

WHAT THE FUG

>>34575736
It'll be better than a .22 but by how much In really don't think matters when you have better options.

Also the krink is very practical.

>>34576350
Well isn't that just a sin against all that is holy.

>>34576375
How is the krink more practical? It's less ergonomic. It has a shorter barrel despite being a longer gun. The short barrel wastes the velocity potential of 5.45. It's extremely loud and brightly flashing. The sights are rudimentary. It has more recoil. And holds less ammo. By almost every metric the PS90 is more practical.

File: 1287746287.jpg (20KB, 450x347px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 450x347px

>>34574524
It's what they were meant to be, not the butchered version we got in the US

>>34575388
It's not objectively heavy, just more than anyone expects for a modern(ish) 9mm. People are used to larger, just-as-light AR

>>34575372
Lemme elaborate (6ft right hander here)
>safety hits web of thumb
>charging handle notch pinches skin
>mag release is right where I naturally TD, slightly too far to reach normally, but still close enough to accidentally hit
>pistol grip is pretty heavily angled (I much prefer those 90 degree AR grips)
>buttplate felt like total ass (it could have just been this single gun)
>cheek weld is 'ok' on the telescoping stock
>once I put the stock far enough out the gun is kinda front heavy
Some of this is lack of training. I only handled it once. My experience would be greatly improved with a steep pistol grip though, that would wash away the grip, safety, and LOP issues.

>>34577314
Those mag release buttons are way too stiff to accidentally press. Also the navy stocks are well known to be uncomfortable.

File: REMOVE INFANTRY.jpg (128KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1280x720px

>>34572758

File: GetImage.ashx.jpg (17KB, 731x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 731x400px

Something like this. Make a little baby .308 with a 16in barrel for popping deer and cans inside 500 yards. Probably throw something like the 1-8 strike eagle on in and not a big ass nightforce though.

>>34573524
this guy gets it.

File: Cheytac (intervention) Pistol 2.png (37KB, 1066x595px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1066x595px

>>34572758

>>34574498
It also has non existent ergonomics.
And fuck the retard who decided to make you have to use your left hand for everything, it's fucking stupid.

File: k_attempts_to_train_slavs.jpg (69KB, 579x960px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 579x960px

M240 (whatever the newest lightweight variant is)
M107 (May actually buy this one)
HK416
MP7
And maybe something like a MK23 or Deagle or one of those Glock conversions to shoot .460.
Also an AK I suppose, don't really need one with my ARs, but it would be fun.

>>34580809
>modern obrez
FUND IT

File: Cadex Defense Chassis.jpg (127KB, 1280x619px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1280x619px

>Never Shot Long Range before.
>But prepared to blow 10k on this Rifle setup to be "known as a Sniper"

>>34572817
It's not. They're between 4.5 and 5.5lb depending on the stock you put on them.

OP was talking out of their ass

File: mat49_01.jpg (16KB, 650x291px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 650x291px

MAT-49 I like the retro pressed metal box shape.

>>34574498

why the fuck is there a forward grip behind both the grip and the mag well

>>34582397
That's the LMG version. You hold the back grip when using the bipod in the prone position. Some MGs have handgrip-like stocks for that purpose but since the L86 is bullpup without a stock they have to ghetto on an extra grip.

>>34575818
yes its a PDW

>>34572789
>tiny hands
sorry anon

>>34575831
This, to get the only ammo worth shooting someone with (T6) you have to wait months for it just to be sold out in seconds.

File: 450px-M107A1_Scoped.jpg (18KB, 450x192px)

18KB, 450x192px

My dream gun, not impractical from a general sense, just from a what I need it for sense but holy fuck would I love one of these.

>stock photo related.
It's ridiculous, obnoxiously loud, and pretty pointless unless you slap a brace on it or go the she route.

Bought it anyway. Way too much fucking fun to shoot

File: IMG_4517.jpg (161KB, 900x599px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 900x599px

>>34583931
Forgot photo because I am a moron

>>34572813
What's wrong with Springfield?

File: battle catapiller.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>34572758
>pointless
>overpriced
>impractical
>cool
Literally every PCC ever made (with the exception of high points, obviously)

>>34572758
Wouldn't it be funny if OP got shot and killed with that gun?

>>34584224
thats from the monty python how not to be seen sketch, isnt it?

File: AS_Val_&_VSS_Vintorez_-_RaceofHeroes-part2-33.jpg (3MB, 2250x1455px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2250x1455px

>>34572758
How about these, OP?

>>34584331
Close. It's from Japan.

>>34584345
muh dick.

I at least want a replica in .22 mag or something. Suppressor included of course

>>34584345
>NEVER
>EVER

>>34577439
Hell yeah, Lahti

>>34572758
Dragunov

>>34581225
ugh, gaudy

File: IMG_3699.jpg (8KB, 299x168px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 299x168px

I said to my buddy that I would love a welrod. He went on about "bolt action pistols are pointless". I just explained that, whilst baffling, I really want one.

>>34582200

>4.5 and 5.5lb loaded

yeah, nah

quit pulling bullshit numbers out of your ass, faggot

>>34586024
>MP5KA4 – CAL. 9 MM X 19
>Weight
>Weapon approx. 2,000 g
4.4lb

>MP5K PDW – CAL. 9 MM X 19
>Weight
>Weapon approx. 2,530 g
5.57lb

http://www.heckler-koch.com/en/products/military/submachine-guns/mp5/mp5k/technical-data.html

try reading the thread, asshole

>>34588149
sorry that is unloaded. The guy you responded to never said loaded/unloaded

>>34575002
you need the sidewall to disable the grenade effect.

>>34581070
>M240
this guy fucks

File: Stechkin.jpg (88KB, 640x408px)

88KB, 640x408px

>>34572758
yes

>>34580809
>just fuck my whole arm

File: 1498790733011.png (297KB, 540x674px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 540x674px

>>34584224
so adorable, it's like a big caterpillar!

I still kind of want a Taurus Judge. Or the Smith and Wesson 9th Circuit Court Justice or whatever.

>>34586011
Ayyyyyyy

File: lol.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>34572758
>MP5K
>Not ergo as fuck
Does ur mom know ur gay : ^ )

>>34572817

Uzis are 9 lbs fully loaded.


I still love the fuck out of mine.l

File: Papita.jpg (934KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 960x720px

>>34583931


Fuck yeah, favorite gun I own. I've taken 47 Texas hogs with mine so far. It is absolutely perfect for handling inside a Polaris while driving around, popping piggies.

>>34592345

Whoops, this was meant for you:

>>34583936

File: 06309F95000005DC-0-image-a-7_1419376846538[1].jpg (112KB, 634x818px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 634x818px

pic related

File: 1500331804654-k.jpg (115KB, 742x1024px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 742x1024px

>>34573495
same regarding the FAL. Rhodieboo stuff + upotte are the reasons i want one even though arguably a PTR91 is more logical.

I will say this, a NICE FAL (SA58, good imbel build, NOT a Voyager) are smooth and sexy as fuck to shoot. you can feel the piston hitting the bolt, the bolt cycling and locking up, its orgasmic. And theyre pretty lightweight for battle rifles, are easy to clean, and function pretty well.

Theyre still innacurate, picky eaters, and expensive as all fuck compared to a G3 pattern or AR10 rifle, but muh bush war aesthetics

>>34572758
>>34572789
I have a hard time figuring out whats more aesthetic - the MP-5K with the Tri-lug or the full length, collapsing stock MP5A4.
I'm looking at getting a Zenith now as the prices are dropping and the full length Z-5 is aesthetic right out of the box

>>34573196
It's hot but I'd rather a MC51 and a full sized/K barrel HK21E

>>34575116
The price has been dropping, slllooowwwwlyyyy
They dropped after the election.

One issue is if demand gets too high they'll raise pricing, but if it gets too low - they'll drop it.
It will drop below 1500 mark my words

>>34584345
Integrated suppressors make my dick hard.

File: PAP m92 + folding psb & 4pc brake.jpg (1MB, 4160x2340px)

1MB, 4160x2340px

>>34592345

Aaaaaaay, just finished most of mine. Folding CNCwarrior hinge and an SB brace on a shortened buffer tube. Nice and snug and secure. Just need to add a rail to dust cover hinge and I'm ready to red dot up and get some hog.

>>34575149
It's pretty much the only pistol caliber carbine I truly want - I mean I wouldn't mind the glock mag Kel Tec folder if I found it cheap and I want the Mech tech carbine conversion for a 10mm Glock (not a full gun).

Also there is a newly available binary trigger pack for H&K (Franklin Armory) It's overpriced to hell and back, but there will be competing options eventually. It's no F/A but it's vastly superior to a bump fire stock

>>34575818
p90 was for rear echelon troops that would have to face an impending soviet paratrooper invasion. Infact the 5.7 round was specifically designed to penetrate soviet soft body armor.
All of that kind of didnt matter a few years after the p90 was fielded

>>34576350
>>34576412

That's a new manufacture rifle though, you would be dumb as fuck to buy it regardless.

>>34577661
Something like this but with a heavier profile barrel in either 16'-18' and a truly compact stock (maybe an MDT with a folder? - nah, perhaps something more minimalist)

>>34588149
So what makes the MP5K heavier? The folding stock? Is the barrel thicker?