how come Sig doesnt offer the p320 in 10mm?

>doublestack 10mm

i second this

Is there a 10mm Sig that doesn't come coated in ugly ass camo?

>>34530516
no, its like sig doesn't like money

>>34530475
Because they already make it in .357 Sig. And if you are going to buy a weird cartridge, you might as well get the good one.

>>34530553
>.357 sig
>good
>10mm
>bad

It's okay Sig Sauer rep, the three people who shoot .357 sig enjoy it I'm sure.

>>34530475
>>34530544
>>34530596
Guess SIG does like money, thats why they don't make weird niche guns that only a couple hundred people will buy.

>>34530604
There can only be so many G19 copies.

>>34530604
if it wasn't financially viable then why did they design the p220?
the p320 already takes the .45, so the length of the cartridge shouldn't be a problem.
all it would require is a new barrel, mag (they could probably get away with the .45 mag), frame and ejector which is pretty much exactly what their x-change kits already do

>>34530634
not to mention that the glock 20 is like the 8th most popular glock gun

>>34530634
>if it wasn't financially viable then why did they design the p220?
That gun was designed like 40 years ago.

>>34530750
even more of a reason to release the p320 in 10mm

There's not enough people that don't understand how shit 10mm is to make it worth the lawsuit after one blows up.