Why can't Americans make fat subs?

File: 25-american-sub.jpg (26KB, 550x309px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 550x309px

We can.

>>34529612

thats a Hoagie.

>>34529625
Shut the fuck up you communist.

>>34529601
Big usually means inferior tech.

>>34529879
This

The Queen Elizabeth Super Carrier is far better technologically compared to the Nimitz and the new American carrier that I forgot the name of, I believe it's Fjord.

>>34529612
fpbp

>>34529625
It's a Hero

>>34530043
Norwegian here. That thing is too big for our fjords

File: 8b1.png (1MB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 680x510px

>>34529601
Typhoon SSBNs are some of the most aesthetic things the human race has ever put to sea. Burger subs are frumpy and career oriented, Russian ones are beautiful and also choke you to death in your sleep.

File: 1492492096037.jpg (17KB, 400x311px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x311px

>>34530098
I drive a Fjord F-150!

>>34530248
Absolute madman!

>>34530043
S K I R A M P

L O W E R P A Y L O A D S

File: 1454005060014.jpg (57KB, 492x675px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 492x675px

>>34530043

Best part of this post is that someone will give it a serious reply.

File: royalcaliphatenavy.png (3MB, 1772x997px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1772x997px

>>34530043
sure thing ramp boy

>>34530330
The Queen Elizabeth ramps are so technologically superior that Americans can't even copy it and just use old Steam Catapult technology. And the lower payloads are not a problem since it is far more accurate and deadly than the heavier American counterpart.

The Queen Elizabeth is made in the same vein as the far more sophisticated Chinese Liaoning Super Carrier.

File: 1447233834970.jpg (8KB, 249x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 249x250px

>>34530354

HE'S GOING ALL OUT

>>34530043
>ski ramps
>helicopter awacs
>F-35B only.

The QEs are glorified Wasps.

>>34530354
Yeah but were gonna go digital now, it's like super modern and shit

>>34529625
It's a grinder

>>34532123
Digital carrier, will it be as good as digital camo?

>>34532288
This.

>>34529625
Its a big fuckin' samwich

>>34529601
because we didn't need to make our SSBN launched missiles as big as the commies did.

>>34529601
They can, they choose not to. It's like asking why America doesn't have fast attack missile boats. It's not a matter of ability, it's a matter of doctrine.

Russia needs fuckhuge submarines because that's their entire blue water navy, practically. They can't take a surface fight with the US so they invested in large, advanced submarines. This isn't "lol russia btfo xD", it's actually the right thing for their strategic situation

>>34530354
>The Queen Elizabeth is made in the same vein as the far more sophisticated Chinese Liaoning Super Carrier.
neither of those have the Kuznetsov's ability to project a tactical smokescreen. Combined with its advanced ramp technology, the Kuznetsov has truly unparalleled offensive and defensive capabilities.

>>34529612
Dammit you reminded me I was hungry.

>>34529601

Shitposting aside, there are two main reasons russian subs tend to be thicc compared to US subs.

>beam to length ratio
>double hull design

Those apparently overly bulbous shapes are actually surprisingly hydrodynamic

Typhoons are considerably shittier than Ohio class boomers so maybe thats why