So are we all agreed that in terms of magazine capacities for small calibre rifles, it's:
25>30>20>anything else
?
>>34479894
FAMAS?
>>34479894
Wait, in what way would 25 be more optimum than 30? Do you find 30 rounders too heavy or long or something?
>>34479962
He's manlet
>>34479894
42>Everything
>>34479894
30>25>20 Anything bigger will results in jams/ are too bulky until we can figure out how to unfuck 40 round mags
>>34479978
45>42
>>34479989
>Soviet shit cartridge in a gun designed for left handed drunks.
Nah, 42>Everything
>>34480011
5.45>5.56
>>34479894
>purposefully handicapping yourself with less rounds per mag
Noguns detected.
>>34480023
You can lie to yourself, but please don't lie to me.
Double column 40 rounds would be pretty neat desu if it were reliable and so on. Atleast as a first magazine, ie. the one you have in the gun before reloading it would be pretty nice.
>>34479894
32>every other capacity
8>all
>>34480033
He's right though...
>>34479894
>finest army on the planet
>has to ask british soldiers for equipment and how they conduct training
sure thing, pierre
>>34479894
nyet cyka blyat
>>34479894
>25>30>20>anything else
The G2 exists for a reason anon.
I'd prefer at least 60 rounds, preferably 100.
Such a shame that quad-stack magazines don't work so well in this universe.
>>34485639
They'd work fine if the gun is designed for it. The super deep magwells that 5.56mm rifles all have don't let us use chunky magazines as much as we'd like.