Yes or No?

>normal ar height sights

Do you live in a ban state?

File: 1461026586548.jpg (31KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 384x384px

>mounting your optic on the fore end and not on the receiver

>>34458352
no, i just cant tell if its cool or not, its a bit off-putting i dont know if i like it or not

>>34458371
Its snowflake. If you want an AR but don't want to conform, get that. If you don't want to be a bitch, don't.

>>34458339
>5
Yes

>>34458339
that actually looks aesthetic

File: 14sijxz.jpg (115KB, 522x639px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 522x639px

>>34458339
When done right, yes.

>>34458339
Yes, definitely yes.

Why the hell not? Some people actually prefer the ergonomics of a traditional stock over a pistol grip, so they can have that with all of the goodies available in the vast AR market.

Gun looks alright to me too. It's kind of neat in a retro-futuristic kind of way.

>>34458811
The wood stock version is awesome

File: WP_20170303_15_24_24_Pro_zpsprmlghcw.jpg (165KB, 577x1024px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 577x1024px

>>34458836
>Wood SCR

You rang?

>>34458339
>AR15 Scout rifle

I feel like I should hate this but I'm strangely turned on.

There is literally nothing wrong with traditional stocks. An excellent choice for HD for dudes in ban states imho.

>>34458339
oh god yes, my dick just got hard right now

File: 1472442217303.jpg (24KB, 399x388px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 399x388px

>>34458359
i fucking hate when people do that

>>34458339
>muh scout meme

Again confirmation that anyone thinking the scout rifle is useful has chronic autism.

>>34458339
>keymod

Into the garbage bin it goes

>>34458754
I honestly love this setup. The problem is that it's illegal in the places where a lower like this would be a decent alternative to bullshit laws.
As for these rifles in free states, I don't see much of an advantage as opposed to a regular AR, except for, as >>34458811 said, preference ergonomically.
It looks cool though, so it's got that going for it.

So, in the end, yes.

File: BA-39-e1444882628101-496x660.jpg (70KB, 496x660px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 496x660px

>>34458981
>scout meme

The SCR was made primarily with the AWB in mind.

>>34458339
BRCC

Why does it remind me so much of Mat Best

>>34459042
because he probably owns the company

File: 1466535429248.jpg (380KB, 600x624px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 600x624px

>>34458339
>>34458754
>>34458858

This gun gives me the strangest boner.

>>34458350
CZ evo sights work for them.


Though really fight light should work on a set or two of flat top rail and hand guard rail sights instead of that nigger rigged set up with that clamp on fronsight that goes on their gas block.

Almost everyone who buys the scr is going to use their own normal AR upper.

>>34458754
I like it bigly.

>>34458981
>accuses people of autism
>spergs out on Polish claymation blog

File: 1487910270632.jpg (99KB, 717x510px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 717x510px

>>34458754
>hexmags
>keymod

>>34458858
Are those wooden rail covers?

>>34458339
I want to fucking hate this. But it just looks natural it feels right, this makes me extremely uncomfortable.

File: rofl.gif (2MB, 250x184px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x184px

>>34458754
>"Hey guys, how do I make this ban state rifle cool?"
>Just had to suppress and SBR it, and add 30 rd mag
Kek

Can I get/make one of these in 6.5 grendel without going full retard custom? I want a "Meanwhile in Bizarro World..." rifle.

>>34459983
Is it fully compatible with standard AR parts? If so, you'd just need a new bolt, barrel, and mags

File: 1488271228592.jpg (156KB, 1024x685px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1024x685px

>>34459983
>>34460036
I'm not sure what all calibers are AR-15 specific, but you could have various uppers for one lower.
> .223/5.56 upper
> 300 Blackout upper
> etc.

Don't think they've made the AR-10 version yet.

>>34458371
I agree with you. Its ugly but kinda sexy to, but I'm half fud.

File: basic bitch.jpg (541KB, 1328x747px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1328x747px

>>34458339
Is it worse or better than my AR?

>>34459983
>get
No.
>make
Yes, and the company that makes them has done some official testing with a few uppers. Ares_Defense on Arfcom.

>>34458532
*Snowflake in free states
Sadly its one of the best legal (state level) options for several sections of thisccountry

>>34458339
>>34458371
>>34458573
>>34458754
>>34458858
>>34459031
>>34459432
>>34460137

No buffer tube.
o

b
u
f
f
e
r

t
u
b
e
.

>>34460801
It does though, it's just curved.

>>34458754
>Hexmag

kys

>>34458359
>>34458963
What is eye relief....

File: 23472372346.jpg (83KB, 700x477px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 700x477px

>>34460816
I bet you like your recoil curved as well.

>>34458339
Looks kinda jenky but you do you op.

>>34460845
I mean, you can do it. But that doesn't mean you should.

That magazine release is really far up... Does someone make a paddle release for it?

>>34458754
>My mind is telling me no
>But dick is telling me yea

File: 1498079602341.jpg (2MB, 2553x1697px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2553x1697px

>>34460137
worse, dont let these poverty level scum confuse your pedigree, now go back to /arg/.

>>34460982
It's my cousin all over again.

>>34460137
What's the bar between the grip and butt stock on your are and why?

File: 20170528_234727.jpg (43KB, 276x280px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 276x280px

>>34458339
>>34458754
>Banshit AR15
>"hay guiz, look I maid it cool!"
Remove yourself from the gene pool.

>>34458339
1. Keymod = Hell no.
2. Mismatched upper/lower color = Only if it's obviously intentional, like FDE/black ot OD/black. Two different shades of black just looks mismatched and lazy.
3. Long eye reliaf/"scount" configuration = If it works for you great, but expect to hear everyone else talk shit about it.
4. round holder on rail = No.
5. Full length rail on fudd stock AR = Yes, but no keymod.
6. That sling = yes.
7. That light position = yes
8. Short mag =yes

>>34459983
you have to use their BCG, but you can drop in your own bolt and otherwise use your own upper

>>34458339
I just noticed that the same company that makes these also makes a belt-fed upper. Does anyone know if they work togethet? I can't seem to find any examples of them being combined.

>>34461342
Belt fed is off the table in cuckstates so nobody but SUPER SNOWFLAKES has reason to try. I suppose you could ask FightLite.

>>34460801
The buffer tube is the biggest negative of the AR platform and you're complaining about it not being there?

>>34461380
Ban compliance isn't necessarily the only reason to go with a lower of this type. I suspect you're right if you mean they're currently mostly sold in those states, though.

Realistically how much worse is this thing ergonomically than a proper pistol grip rifle? Would I be a fool to buy one and keep it as my primary sporting and personal defense carbine after I move to Real America?

could a rendition of this rifle be kept legally as a truck gun, if you're traveling through many US states?

>>34461566
it's all personal preference. you hardly see any professional skeet shooters with a full pistol grip over a prince of wales grip.
IMO full pistol is more comfortable.
i hate shooting my 10/22 because i have to hold the thing with a broken wrist due to its grip angle.

>>34461717
The grip isn't really my concern, I mean more like the wonky magazine release and charging handle.

>>34458532
>Owning an AR
>not a bitch
Pick one and only one.

>>34461798
since i'm not a bitch, i'll do whatever i want and pick "Not a bitch while owning an AR"

>>34461624
probably, would would just have to keep in mind the regulations that the van states have in place

File: 1498788201464.jpg (160KB, 960x756px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 960x756px

>>34458339
Yes.

File: Remington870FoldingStockw_zps1c3a87df.jpg (189KB, 576x286px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 576x286px

The lower supposedly works with 870 stocks. But the real question is if it works with pic related.

>>34461254
The fuck are you even complaining about?

>>34462998
No, or at least not without a lot of work, it still has a buffer tube.

>>34459955
I want to an ona hole in that

>>34463266
There are people out there that dont like what he likes.

>>34458339
Yes.
Silencer smooth is pretty good. to light for me. try some beyond black or just black.

>>34462998

I believe its the 1100, not 870

>>34458339
Yes to the coffee, yes to the rifle, no on putting your optic out that far. Stop this scout rifle buffoonery.

>>34461216

I'm not 100% sure about this, but it looks like it converts a deadly "shoulder thing that goes up" into a perfectly legal "shoulder thing".

>>34460993
Is that induced wear on the EOtech and "supressor"

>>34463381
spot on 1100 stocks work, it's "buffer tube" is in the grip

>>34463391
You don't actually shoot, do you?

>>34458339
If the optic were removed that thing would be aesthetic as fuck.

File: J SR BHP 1.jpg (1MB, 4030x1717px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4030x1717px

Fuddimus Maximus

>>34465022
If that ain't a .30 caliber that's jus a big ol varmint gun.

>>34461216
new zealand gay laws

I want an scr with an early ar10 style upper, 1100 straight stock, 20inch barrel.
Why? Because fuck you

File: servicerifle.jpg (99KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1024x640px

>>34465022
>>34465533

>>34460993
wat bickpik is this??

>>34458858
How do I wooden rail covers?

File: nf2onc.jpg (35KB, 640x336px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x336px

>>34458339
It's about as ugly as this "DC legal" AR15.

File: 1470807319918.jpg (159KB, 2047x646px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 2047x646px

>>34465910
Close enough?

Where goes the buffer tube?

Lools comfy as fuck to shoot though, unless the trigger is too far

>>34461717
After market stock. Saved my goddamn wrist. I use a tacstar.

>>34466306
Its curved into the stock rather than being straight

File: 19112241162.jpg (60KB, 655x443px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 655x443px

>>34459888
>>34460826

>>34465022
Patrolling the mojave males you wish for a nucular weiner

>>34458339
Overpriced for what you get, but if you already have a couple ARs, have the money to burn, and are looking for something different there's nothing wrong with that. I'd like one with wooden furniture one day, but I'm a poorfag and am looking to get a couple other guns before I start looking for things based on aesthetics alone.

The main con for me would be its proprietary "buffer tube" and I think the bcg is special too, but I could be wrong on that one. The main draw for a traditional AR imo is that parts are varied and plentiful, so limiting my options with this doesn't make sense.

File: 100_0730.jpg (156KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1600x1200px

>>34458339
could pic related be a way to get past fixed stock laws for ARs in Anti-gun states ?

File: WP_20160630_11_40_32_Pro1 2_zpsiaxvkjiv.jpg (142KB, 873x598px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 873x598px

>>34466046
Google search mentions some company called Megiddo makes them.

File: 20170402_163125.png (186KB, 1440x803px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1440x803px

>>34463266
calitards like you

>>34468625
You know the lefties are quick to write shit like this but then they're the ones doing the shooting. Ya know, Scalise.

>>34468704
Former lefty here, it's very true. They talk about love and acceptance but only hold rage and sadness in their hearts, masking it with smug smiles and narcissism. They're constantly projecting their own insecurities on others and I'm grateful they're at least showing their true colors now.

>>34467304
That would actually be a pretty sexy rifle it wasn't slathered in rails

File: 1337572399895.jpg (72KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 400x400px

>>34467304
>Megiddo