How many tanks did the USSR have during the Cold War?

>>34393089
About a dozen.

bout tree fiddy

>>34393089
Enough to make the A-10 THICC.

Maybe at least 7

>>34393089
The USSR didn't have any tanks. Stop believing in myths, slavboo.

File: 1492661923889.png (110KB, 386x386px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 386x386px

>>34393089
I think it would be easier to say how many good tanks the USSR during the cold war

>0

>>34393089
Look at this idiot, he thinks the "USSR" actually exists

>In 1990, the Soviet Army possessed:

>55,000 tanks, including 4,000 T-80, 10,000 T-72, 9,700 T-64, 11,300 T-62, 19,000 T-54/55, and 1,000 PT-76.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Army#Cold_War

>>34393378
wew

>>34393378
Tbh this doesn't include the few billion T-34 they could drag out of storage if shit really hit the fan.

File: 11.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

>>34393378
>tfw they had more t72s than american army tanks combined

>>34394645
~81,070

File: 1382249555626.jpg (483KB, 864x687px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 864x687px

>>34393089
A fuckton

File: 1498061196314.jpg (25KB, 400x404px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x404px

>>34394657
>and they were better than their american contemporaries from the t-54 up until the abrams

>>34394834
> Handful of 105mm gun Abrams in Europe for the cold war
>Doing anything to T-72 frontal armor past 500m

>>34396867
>t72 frontal armor doing shit against Davy crocketts

>>34393378
i can't even imagine 55k tanks pouring into europe. there's no way you could stop that no matter how much air power you have. would have been an interesting war to say the least.

>>34397246
>implying they were all in running condition
>implying the Soviets understood anything about supply chains and logistics

>>34397275
>implying the Soviets understood anything about supply chains and logistics
they learned from WW2 and Korean war