Does China have the strongest navy in Asia, or is it Japan?

Its America.

>>34391986
1. America
2. China
3. Japan

>>34391986
The United States has the strongest navy in Asia

>>34391986
The US has the strongest Navy in every drop of water they desire.

>>34392001
>>34392050
I don't know... The Chinese have a lot of container ships.

>>34392205
>America crashes destroyers into all the container ships
>Chinese can no longer flood rich countries with cheap crap
>Chinese economy collapses
>US allocates several hundred billion dollars to rebuild the US Navy
>US economy grows because Keynesian stimulus

Your move, Mister Chinaman.

>>34392245
Railways through siberia. What could go wrong?

File: Seal_of_United_States_Fleet_Activities_Yokosuka.png (335KB, 459x459px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 459x459px

>>34391986
JMSDF(nips navy) is quite powerful but has no strategic deterrence and is lack of force projection capability.
Instead, while being dependent on US navy, it usually focuses on air defense, regional maritime patrol, ASW, anti mine warfare.

Despite PRC's massive(yeah just massive) navy buildup, JMSDF might still be world's #2 navy in near future only if Japaneses remain defensive.

anyway in conclusion
current
1. US navy
2. Japan (mainly for defensive role and partially auxiliary to US navy)
3. China (modernization and buildup are in process & seeking blue water navy)

>>34392205
US pacific fleet is stronger than China counterpart
dude

File: butthurt.jpg (35KB, 316x384px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 316x384px

>>34391986
Even their ships all look the same...

>>34392508
>trains arrive to europe
>everything was stolen on the way

>>34393146
>trains arrive in Europe
>they're full of immigrants
Fuck

>>34393111
Retard.

>>34393974
>China navy versus third & seventh fleet
>>a retarded carrier(STOBAR) and shitty ships versus 5 carrier strike groups and one of them is always forward deployed.

>>34394214
Thick retard.

>>34396760
>>34393974
this is some weapons grade butthurt levels

>>34399082
The guy is calling you a retard because you're too slow to understand the joke. Just saying.

>>34391986
Is that pic their whole surface Navy?

I thought you guys told me that China had a large military.

>>34392245
>>America crashes destroyers into all the container ships
so....how many container ships do you think China operates?

>>34399128
>that ""joke""
>funny

>>34399187
I didn't say it was funny, only explained to the retard why he was being called retarded.

>>34391986
That would be the USofA, brother.

>>34399148
We upgrade everything to have a reinforced bow, and make like the ancient greeks and ram them. Or we'll just use chinas destroyers (the ones that don't sink).

>>34393964
>mongolians come crashing out of stolen train cars
>Genghis Khan 2.0 commences
>They wipe out the muslims
>Conquer Europe
Good enough I guess

>>34400215
I'll just armored up all the container ships.

CHECKMATE.

File: 03cc0296-9ebf-4764-ac56-f22aedac37bb-2060x1236.jpg (598KB, 2060x1236px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 2060x1236px

>>34391986
DPRK is the only navy that is actually sinking ships.

>>34391986
>China's Destroyer 055, the imperial bodyguard of aircraft carriers

File: big.jpg (904KB, 2700x1266px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 2700x1266px

>>34405062
http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0629/c90000-9235034.html

CHINA BECOMING IMPERIAL AGAIN CONFIRMED

>>34392245
1 Container ship can sink all the US destroyers

>>34399187
not him but you're doing the
I WAS JUST PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED