Is there anything wrong with this movie besides >RRRREEEEEEEE

>>34387188
Not really.

Also, the entire absolutely retarded end scene.

>MUH INVINCIBLE TIGER
You'll get a kek out of this if you haven't seen it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rcxwSsucRo

File: download.jpg (7KB, 286x176px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 286x176px

>>34387188

Here are some I saw,

>The loader needs to fire the Coax M1919 manually
The Coax is fired by the gunner via a solenoid

>The whole tiger fight was done by the 4 shermanz meme

After they shot smoke, the smoke alone could fuck up as the smoke is toxic and when drawn into the tank via the blowers or the open hatches will cause the crew to gag and become sick, and in many times the crew bailed.

While the smoke is doing it's thing the 75mm tank would pump HE into the tiger as the HE fucks up the running gear, optics, gun barrel... etc

This while the 76 tanks go for the tiger's flank and gets a profile shot on, this is why you need 4 tanks to do the job... not the it kills 3 / 4 meme

>The tiger has weak armor in the rear plate meme
The Tiger's gas tanks are on the side right behind the turret, Behind the rear plate where they shot the tank in the movie there is a cooling fan / radiator cluster.

That and the fact that the 76mm at the range you see in the movie could penetrate any point on the upper hull on the tiger's side, which is where not only the gas tanks are located, but the ammo storage as well, not to mention the crew compartment

File: 0lBXFeW.png (108KB, 400x381px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 400x381px

The fact that 5 guys in a disabled tank held their own for hours against an entire SS platoon armed with panzerfausts

>>34388180
That actually happened tho, except it was one guy.

>>34388180
This

>>34387200
>Also, the entire absolutely retarded end scene.

Which is similar to an actual real life event. The only difference as far as I can remember is that the German soldiers getting cut down were old people and kids.

>>34388035
>HE
>fucks ups "CASUALLY" WoT tank modules
Eat shit fagot.

>>34387188
The last fight was written and directed by quentin tarantino for some reason.

>one crewmember dies
>gets replaced by a typist
>typist refuses to kill and is probably a CO

Already fucked up

There were 8 tanks in the opening minutes, 4 of them were used to pickup guys elsewhere and move forward

Even a random soldier would have fared better than a guy fresh out of boot camp

Also in the first 30 minutes the Germans were shooting like Stormtroopers, missing all their AT guns against slower targets

File: 1497378151104.gif (4MB, 425x425px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 425x425px

>>34388842
>Buthurt wehreboo detected

File: 4ea.gif (4MB, 426x213px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 426x213px

>>34388842
>fucks ups "CASUALLY" WoT tank modules

I'm sorry I don't play shitty games, can you explain what that means to someone who has a life?

File: 0YFME4m.gif (2MB, 300x164px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x164px

>>34389089
>i dont play shitty games
>i have a life
It's like you're contradicting the fuck out of yourself.

>>34387188
The end scene

>Germans shooting MG 42s at a tank
>Soldiers with Panzerfausts missing the tank at point blank range
>Panzerfaust projectile that does penetrate the tank doesn't even do anything when it should have killed the entire crew

>>34388193
>That actually happened tho, except it was one guy.
That guy didn't kill hundreds of soldiers

>>34389099
>Contradicting
In what way exactly? Please explain

>>34387188
People bitch about tracers but it looks cool so fuck them

File: 1492230751259.jpg (121KB, 855x960px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 855x960px

>>34389108
this

>>34387212
If it was a realistic movie the tiger would have ran out of gas and caught fire before being wasted by a half dozen US AT guns.

>>34388180
they were all like walking aimbots too, whereas the krauts were hosing them with mg42 amongst other things and were largely ineffective.

File: 1494020315024.jpg (413KB, 1000x1435px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1000x1435px

>>34387212
>That epilogue

File: 1478930636717.jpg (68KB, 582x405px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 582x405px

>MG emplaced outside of the treeline alongside the firing line fully exposed except foxholes
>PAK Crew misses multiple times from a very easy range to get hits from
>Tiger rolls in towards shermans instead of mantaining position or reverses
>Final scene
>Mfw at the movie theater

3/10. Impressed with the special effects/deflection. Reminded me of RO: Ostfront 41-45

>>34389108
>that guy didn't kill hundreds of soldiers

He was also facing German armour, and only had a heavy machine gun to fight them off.

Brad being like thirty years too old for his role

>>34388035
They did fire the coax via gunner, when they did that first big fight scene against the AT guns, Shia uses the coax to lay into a panzerfaust while the new kid is reloading his gun.

https://youtu.be/9x8yXtcFKg4?t=3m15s

still not really defending the movie as a whole tho.

It was a bit unrealistic and I feel like it tried too hard to be this grimdark edgy war movie. Like every three seconds someone was dying horribly for no reason or some awful tragedy was happening and there was even a point where one of the characters was yelling "YAAAARRGH THATS WAAAAARRR REEEE" while some really emotional music swelled up in the background. just felt a little heavy handed for my taste

>>34389108
>Panzerfaust projectile that does penetrate the tank doesn't even do anything when it should have killed the entire crew
Warheads fail and weapons misfire. Just one of those things that happen in real life.

>>34392775
It was as if the screenwriter read deathtraps and thought that it needed more hyperbole and rumor.

Was a decent action flick for the fuck of it

That one scene where the crewman bursts out of his flaming tank then shot himself was pretty funny

>>34387188
>playing heroic music whilst gunning down unarmed German POWs
>raping random German girl
>Tiger tank meme why is it that every American movie has tiger tanks when the were pretty rare especially on the western front
>tiger tank fucks up Americans then leaves firing position to charge ?!?!?!?!?
>very multicultural American forces even when blacks were mostly support and supply roles
>5 guys fuck up an entire SS platoon ?!?

American war movies are terrible especially war movies with Brad Pitt in them

Would've been a better film if directed by Mel Gibson

>>34389489
i watched a youtube documentary on it and tank veterans on both sides agreed sherman tanks were cheap pieces of shit that german tanks would just mow down

File: 1496294544361.jpg (2MB, 2125x1719px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2125x1719px

>>34392987
BP sucks in war movies...His last something in Iraq..God did that movie suck!

>>34393039
And yet Shermans were the safest major tank of the war.

>>34393121
except for the loaders

>>34392987
>>5 guys fuck up an entire SS platoon
It's at the tail end of the war it wasn't a true SS Platoon but rather one of conscripted youths and old men. If you pay attention you'll see that.

>>34393121

That's like saying the civic is the most reliable honda compared to a can of arizona

>>34393142
>were did those goalposts go?

>>34393142

I'd argue any tank not under constant allied air attack is safe

>>34393039
Except the actual data doesn't support those anecdotes. Yes the US took armor losses but so did everyone. The real hard information on the matter doesn't suggest key engineering flaws or any disproportionate loss of Shermans.

Also remember that the key factors in winning an armor engagement aren't paper stats. Most of it comes down to the situational. The quality of the crew, cover, who sees who first, angle of engagement and so on.

>>34387188
Eh, it was goofy but I enjoyed it enough. Brad Pitt playing a caricature of a WWII soldier, what's not to like?

>>34393136
What? The SS battalion we see in the film is almost exclusively filled with young fit men. We literally see only one youth in the entire battalion.

File: 485488.jpg (38KB, 635x477px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 635x477px

>>34392691
I was referring to the end battle, where the punisher used the coax 1919.

>Dat tree line scene
As much as I have issues with that film... I will say that the tree line scene was pure porn for a shermanophyle like myself
Also was very refreshing to watch a tank film free of any fake cancer slavshit

>>34387188
It uses Death Traps as a basis for its tank combat.

File: 1485350417213.jpg (11KB, 179x267px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 179x267px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdBNYvrLeJ4

I don't know how accurate these sfx are but the main reason I love this film is how it depicts tank shells bouncing off other tanks and just fucking off into the horizon.

>>34393121
That's wrong, though. The Churchill tank was the safest tank of the war.

>>34389063
What the fug is going on in that gif?

>>34394967
The treatment for serious butthurt.

>>34394957
Not if you compensate for the Sherman being fielded and in active combat in much larger numbers. Proportions buddy, they teach you that in grade school.

>>34392987
Inglorious Basterds was great tho

>>34393244
This. We lost most our Shermans in Western Europe where the Allies were on the offensive and the Germans on the defensive. They could set up ambushes and almost always had tactical advantages, especially in the Bocage and urban settings. Armor warfare for the allies was reactionary due to situation. There was rarely large mobile armor engagements like there were in the eastern front or Africa.

File: nervous man.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>34394957
Lindy pls go.

>>34396966
lindybeige is a dipshit

>>34397012
ur a dipshit LMAO

>>34393173
number of afvs ko'd by air would argue theyd be pretty damn safe eitherway

>>34394954
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH_TSKVa1VY&t=02m30s

>>34394954
hit at a very oblique angle, so realistic

File: 1495934853513.jpg (82KB, 406x431px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 406x431px

>>34389089
>can you explain what that means to someone who has a life?
>Posting on 4chan

You're not fooling anyone

>>34396966
>152mm of frontal Armour
>not safe
huh makes u tink there

>>34392775
>that part where the guy was on fire and shot himself in the head

>>34389063
Actually im into rusky tanks.
That doesnt change the fact that all you knowledge comes from that shit game.
>>34389089
Yeah act a fool keyboard tank commander.

>>34388180
by the end of the war the SS was nothing compared to the early war SS. pretty much all of the experienced and highly trained ones had long died. they also dropped the standards years earlier to recruit more people due to shortages.

File: free-shrugs.jpg (50KB, 449x642px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 449x642px

>>34397095
But I don't play those games there annon, I just spent my time and yeas studying and analyzing the real ones and how they were used,
>but whatever.

File: 1497487387823.gif (930KB, 200x133px) Image search: [Google]

930KB, 200x133px

>>34397070
>Implying that I don't have a life b/c I post on 4chan,

>Implying that I don't surf on here from time to time when taking a lunch break

>>34387188
Where the fuck did Brad Pitt get nigh on unlimited ammunition for his STG-44?

Except everything, nothing.

>>34393136
Lol no
They're all adults with maybe a few teenagers here and there

>>34397805

Don't forget he gets shot multiple times by a sniper and keeps going it like it never happened because muh heroic willpower.

>>34397306
Doesn't matter
You don't have to be some elite veteran to be able to take out an immobile tank
They had 300 fucking guys with anti-tank weapons

One thing I find pretty ironic about this movie is the fact that Wardaddy executes a German soldier for having American equipment when the inside of the Fury is covered in stolen German medals and equipment

>>34387188

>First half of the movie
>Sherman tank gets hit by a panzerfaust
>Tank gets completely obliterated in seconds, entire crew is burned alive

>Second half of movie
>Sherman tank is hit by 3 panzerfaust
>Each hit makes a small, clean hole in the side of the tank, barely inflicting any damage, only 1 person dies

>>34387188
the shitty Hollywood ending

File: 1489012779790.png (587KB, 625x918px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 625x918px

>>34387188
>Hand grenade detonates in buttoned up tank
>opens hatch dead brad pitt still in one piece only with some boo boos, and not resembling hamburger meat

>>34395030
And even with this in mind, US armor performed extremely well at it's job. Also note that averaging casualties, only one man was killed per tank knocked out. This means that quite often all the crew survived a combat kill and when someone did die it was usually the unfortunate crewman nearest the impact.

This is helped by the fact that the Sherman was actually really easy to evacuate from, compared to most Panzers and the T-34, which were much more difficult to escape in a crisis.

>>34397842

Ever since Saving Private Ryan, it seems like every American war movie goes out of its way to portray executing POW's as some sort of right of passage where the young, innocent soldier must earn his manhood by shooting a helpless person.

File: troy.jpg (338KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 960x1440px

>>34393075
>BP sucks in war movies
i think its more that "most" of the war movies he has been in, have sucked. there's a difference.

Troy was ok. not my favourite movie or story. but waaay better than any of his recent war movies

>>34392775
ten bucks the screenwriter read deathtraps and thought it was the greatest book ever.

>>34397087
this bit was retarded.

The guy wasn't even that badly on fire. He was completely recognizable and had enough compunction to pull out his sidearm, cock it and shoot himself square in the head

>can't stop drop and roll despite this

>>34397824
The whole movie seemed to be an ego exercise for Brad.
>hurr I stole an STG-44 because I'm a badass
>I use a revolver rather than standard issue US Army 1911
>etc etc

Also the part where the SS Sniper blows off an old german man's head instead of the obviously important American soldier Brad Pitt was fucking retarded overhyped 'Nazis were le evil'

>>34397074
>Dry side ammo storage
>burning on 80% of penetrations
Pick two
By Normandy American M4 tanks where the least likely tank to burn thanks to moving the ammo to the bottom of the hull and surrounding it with water.

>>34397911
>when someone did die it was usually the unfortunate crewman nearest the impact.
or the loader, who didn't have a hatch for most of the sherman's production run

>>34398115
>By Normandy
nigger please tell me how many wet stowage saw action at normandy

>>34398167
100% of all shemans with a 76mm gun where wet, during summer 1944 75 armed shemans where being field upgraded to be wet storage.

>>34397842

That's how the shit works.

>you kill Germans
>take their shit
>it's cool because fuck them

>some German cunt kills your guy
>takes his shit
>it's not cool because that fucker killed your dude

It was a "fun" movie. The last scene is somewhat believable because even in the movie they show the SS as having a lot of young and old fucks. They were singing, yes, but fervent believers of the cause and young bendable minds will do that kind of thing.

>>34398220
you didn't answer the question

>>34397864
I can't remember, but they might have been different panzerfausts. A pf 30 and a pf 100 are going to have different effects inside the tank. might also have been different sherman models or hits to "empty" space versus the ammo rack/gas tank.

>>34398237
I answered it to the best available information ALL 76 armed M4 Sherman tanks had wet storage from the factory and American 75 armed M4 Sherman tanks where converted to wet storage starting summer 1944 if you want an exact statistic one is unavailable.

>>34398453
your original post implied all us shermans by normandy were wet stowage. you are being disingenuous at best, since the vast majority of us shermans were still dry stowage, and the relatively few 76 mm tanks shipped in time for the invasion were deliberately kept out of the line until opeartion cobra. wet stowage did dramatically help stop fires, but they were rare enough in actual fighting in normandy to be considered nonexistant

>>34398490
Sorry I guess I forgot normandy was 43 instead of 44.

>>34387188
How about "muh tough muricanism?"
"The horror" I've seen.

Get fucked you pussies.

>>34398550
i asked if you had any proof that wet stowage was common in the field by normandy. it was not. you had your chance to show us, kid.

>>34388180
>5 AMERICAN guys
Invincible! They saved Europe, nay, The WORLD, from Hitler!

>>34388193
>>34389108
Yeah, he probably killed half a dozen and the Germans just though it was more trouble than it was worth and went around him to kill more Americans.

>>34398618
Another thing I've found was all M4a3's where wet not just 76 armed ones. Which started production feb 44.

>>34398665
>all M4a3's where wet
and praytell where have you found this?

>>34398674
Literally resorting to wikipedia because almost all links about wet stowage link to nuclear fuel rod stowage even when specifying about M4 tanks.

>>34398713
i haven't read the wikipedia on wet stowage, but not all m4a3s were wet stowage. if you want a better website, try this one off the top of my head: http://afvdatabase.com/usa/m4sherman.html

>>34387188
It's not a very good film. Bad flow, bad development, no actual story, bad characters (aside from maybe war daddy), storm trooper Germans, storm trooper Americans, waste of a working fucking tiger, the end bit, people fawning over it when it came out because they mistook 'miserable with a grey colour pallete' for 'gritty, realistic war film'.

The movie heavily relied on the "Late war, so Germany mobilized all available units" attitude too much to excuse Fury's blatant plot armor. Not even going into the retarded finale. But the Tiger engagement pissed me off. The Tiger has enough experience to place themselves in a perfect ambush position and make a 600-800yd (cant remember what they called out in the) movie) on a moving target. But dont shoot leading tank, which is clearly a M4a3 76

>>34388842
>Running gear, tracks, muzzle brakes and periscopes are all rated for 75mn HE rounds
Whatever you say friend.

>>34392987
Hispanics weren't segregated

>>34389144
>I have a life
>Posts on 4chan
That's the oxymoron he was alluding to.

>>34389562
I agree with most of your post, but I remember when reading Blood Red Snow, he recounted that whilst in a defensive position their CO made a pair of then man a forward fozhile, away from everyone else. They all thought it was retarded and they'd just end up dead, but orders are orders.

>>34398815
*Foxhole

>>34397864
Wow it's like duds are not a thing.

File: 1479971738800.jpg (192KB, 508x784px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 508x784px

>>34387188

>>34399035
"Death Traps" is a book that is largely responsible for shaping the perception of American tanks as being inferior to their German opponents. Written by Belton Cooper, this book paints a very unflattering picture of the M4 Sherman tank which served as the main battle tank for the USA during WW2. Cooper served as an ordinance Lieutenant in the European theatre of the war, and in this book he characterizes the M4 Sherman as a poorly designed tank, wholly inferior to the German tanks that it went up against.

Cooper paints himself as an expert on this subject, but his book has many issues which hurt his credibility. Despite being framed as a memoir, Cooper frequently exposits upon events which he had no direct connection to. For example, he criticizes General Patton for delaying the development of the M26 Pershing tank (which Cooper regards as vastly superior to the M4 Sherman) when there is actually very little evidence that Patton impeded the M26 in any way. Patton was a field commander and thus he had very little influence on the development of new tanks. A more detailed overview of "Death Traps" and its flaws can be found here:

https://tankandafvnews.com/2015/01/29/debunking-deathtraps-part-1/

The important takeaway here is that Cooper's book had a huge impact on how the M4 Sherman was perceived after the war had concluded. He was frequently invited into documentaries as a "tank expert" and thus his views leaked into the documentaries, which in turn were absorbed by viewers as factual.

Educate yourself before posting that garbage child.

>>34399035
it this real or just a fairy tale?

>>34388035
What if...
What IF...
Instead of the 75mm HE, you just load a lot of gold ammo?
Certain pen right?

>>34387188
The entire ending, maybe some lucky bounces.

>>34388035
>using WoT to determine wether something is realistic or not
Cmon anon. If you're going to base it off of a game at least use War Thunder.

>>34399172

The Sherman should be perceived as a piece of shit because it's named after a fucking war criminal

File: dumbfaggotgarbage.jpg (126KB, 1320x821px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1320x821px

>>34387212
stupid as fuck, faggot

File: fullsizeoutput_2b5.jpg (11KB, 229x316px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 229x316px

>>34400235
Are you fucking stupid? We're talking about the tanks physical characteristics not the origins of its designation. Just call it an M4 if it's such a problem.

>>34399172
>somebody who has clearly attempted to educate themselves says something you think is inaccurate
>punish them for their interest by acting like a fucking sperg about how everything everybody knows about Thing X is actually wrong
Come on, you're being "that guy."

>>34397913
Which is not only morally pretty wrong, but also mostly hollywood bullshit not properly supported by historical fact

The Germans at the end suffer from a particularly bad case of running around pointlesslly to get mowed down like retarded movie mooks, even actually untrained ragheads are portrayed as less inept in modern movies.

Not that I'm a wehrboo, but it's so hamfisted that it breaks my suspension of disbelief.

File: What are you doing.png (6KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 224x225px

>>34400305

>>34392783
Weren't panzerfausts a HEAT round? If it misfired wouldn't it just have clunked off the side of the tank?

File: 1496620559560.jpg (29KB, 348x321px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 348x321px

>>34400235
>Found the southerner

>>34387212
I noticed a surprising lack of transmission failures with that tiger. Also at the end it should say "The battle lasted about half an hour before the complete and total Allied air superiority forced the Germans to surrender, also the Tiger broke down before it even reached the battle and it took FOUR DAYS to swap the single broken valve out".

>>34401679
Nah this was one of the rare APDSFS panzerfausts /s.

>>34387188
Didn't kill enough Nazis.

>>34392987
>>raping random German girl
implying that doe-eyed foundling typist was capable of rape, it was made pretty clear through the scene that it was a spontaneous expression of lust in an environment where they were both likely to die.

Stfu werahbos the Sherman can pierce the tiger from the sides and back also the tiger broke down a fuck ton the jadpanzer was better.

File: 1498166887455.png (54KB, 402x344px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 402x344px

>>34387188
>Is there anything wrong with this movie besides

Yeah, basically, the entire movie is a comic book version of WW2.

>>34402182
it's a movie, not a documentary

The whole gritty war movie angle was destroyed by the ending. If they would have shown the actual state of the German army at that time and distorted the "heroic last stand of the last few men" trope into more like the last few real soldiers in the theatre at the time mowing down malnourished pensioners and teenagers. It would make the typist's final decision to participate in the slaughter even more in vain and the final scene in the movie where he is spared by the German looking straight at him is now basically like a fate worse than death living with the guilt for the rest of his life.

>>34397864
Think they ran out of ammo to detonate inside the tank.

boring shit with meme tier cast barron

File: 1475887686001.jpg (38KB, 807x689px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 807x689px

>>34402188

And yet there are movies that attempt to get it right, and then there are shit flicks like this that don't even bother and just pile on the cliches and hope the crowd is too young and stupid to have read any books or seen any black and white footage from the war.

>>34402359
Okay what did it not get right then?

>inb4 SS platoon
Face it, the SS were no where as effective as your naziboo revisionist history believes.

File: [laughs in female].jpg (25KB, 429x501px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 429x501px

>>34398748
>he still thinks they damaged the tiger more than just driving it cross country

>>34388842
>implying a 5 pound chunk of metal and explosive filler flying faster than the speed of sound repeatedly hitting the front of a machine wouldn't break that machine in any way

lol k

File: 4.-Panzerjager-Triebwagen-51w-fig.1_8331-copy-2.jpg (215KB, 1683x927px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1683x927px

>>34399172
I wasn't defending Death Traps, just pointing out it was the primary source material for the movie. This seems to be news to the people posting about it, which is particularly amusing when they then try to speak with authority regarding it. At least you just copy/pasted someone else's thoughts.

>>34399172
>"Death Traps" is a book that is largely responsible for shaping the perception of American tanks as being inferior
Criticism of the Sherman started before the war even ended. Yellow journalists turned it into a proper scandal after the Bulge, which is why you have still-active servicemen defending it as far back as 1946;
http://www.digitalhistoryarchive.com/uploads/2/5/4/1/25411694/article_by_us_army_tank_battalion_commander_-_tank_versus_tank_1946.pdf

>>34399465
>it this real or just a fairy tale?
It's obviously exaggerated, though some aspects lend it a bit of credibility. For example the practice of bouncing HE shells on cobblestones when advancing on roads and into towns did happen, though wouldn't have been common knowledge outside of armored units.

The idea anyone wanted to watch a shitty Saving Private Ryan rehash where Uppham is the main character and the only survivor.

>>34387188

the last stand was elder god bullshit tier

the rest was palatable

I really liked it
its a fucking movie who cares if it's realistic you fucking autists

>>34389525
That's like every action movie though

>>34387188
Tigers don't tank duel

Waffen-SS don't wave attack.

the only problem with this movie was tanks charging long barrel 75mm AT guns.
The tanks would of been massacred.
Then the Tiger vs Shermans was dumb from BOTH SIDES.
The Sherman's at that range didn't need to flank the Tiger, The long barrel 75mm gun could pen the Tiger's front plate at that range easily.
secondly the Tiger would of been able to kill all 4 tanks at 2km where it WAS immune to their guns.
LAST BUT NOT LEAST. in the final scene where they are flanking around the rear the Tiger commander for some reason thinks instead of reversing and turning to keep the front of the tank pointed at the sherman he should go forward instead. making it easier for the sherman to get behind him.
It was a good movie and i enjoy seeing authentic equipment. but it was hollywood as fuck.

>>34404615

also the final scene was retarded.
In real life they would of just abandoned the tank and walked back to HQ.
But nah, gotta get that american heroism in there.

>>34400235
>1865 + 152
>dixies still this fucking assblasted about not being able to have niggers as property

>>34392775
'Execute this POW so the audience can see war is hell'

'That German girl you just sexed is now dead so you can now be a killer'

>>34402359
>Okay what did it not get right then?

Everything. From the comical depiction of combat, to the genocidal grimness. It's basically a shit flick made for clueless Millennial audiences, WW2 viewed through the prism of modern popular culture.

>>34393401
>I was referring to the end battle, where the punisher used the coax 1919.
IIRC the reason they were firing it manually then was that they had some sort of problem with the coax and had replaced it with the 1919 from the commanders cupola ring but i am not sure, was a long time since i saw it.

>>34404290
This is probably the best summary i have ever read.

>>34400235
Sherman was too lenient

>>34387188
Old fag Gulf War 1 vet here. I can't speak for too much else in the movie, but the tank battle looked like the most realistic tank battle I have ever seen on film.

>>34405361
Thank you for your service.

>>34403049
>http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Battle_Mechanics#HE_Shells

lol k

>>34398648
This

>>34395020
It was great when I was 16 I tried watching it recently and couldn't finish it.
This Jewish revenge porn is unwatchable

>>34397913
Guess who makes those movies that suggest executing nazzies is cool

>>34404290
Kek

>>34394957
Incorrect, the Panzer VIII Maus was the safest tank of the war, nobody ever died in a Maus

File: image.jpg (261KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1024x768px

Since this thread seems to have lots of Sherman-fags, explain this tank to me.

I saw it at a museum a couple weeks ago, as far as I know it's built from parts from various different Sherman models, the front of the hull is an early cast hull, but it's been cut apart and wielded to the boxier wielded RHA hull making up the middle and rear of the vehicle, resulting in a raised seam clearly visible on that little extra armor plate on the side.

Was stuff like this common?

>>34405409
Are you seriously quoting table top game rules as evidence? Fucking autism.

>>34398012
>I use a revolver rather than standard issue US Army 1911

That part is a nonissue and you're autisically nitpicking without being autistic enough to know the facts.

There are plenty of soldiers that were issued the S&W 1917, it was also a standard issue gun that was in use before the 1911.

>>34405725
M4a6 was a test variant with a cast front hull welded to a rear welded hull. It also had a multi fuel powerpack. Never saw service.

File: 1455159843701.jpg (30KB, 400x458px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x458px

The real test of autism, did you see this movie with friends or did you watch it by yourself in your room like a fucking loser

File: tiger became obsolete by 1943.png (1MB, 1908x776px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1908x776px

salty werhaboos in this thread, give me the (you)s

>>34389209
This picture is a physical representation of sand hill

>>34405823
anon i think hes ridiculing
>>34388035
out of
>>34388842
>>34400166
>>34400233
So whatever you are trying to do you just prove that you dont even read the thread and just jump into shitposting and conclusions.
I hope emotionally unstable fagots like you dont ever have guns.

>>34406013
that's not an m4a6.

>>34405725
late production m4s (that is, M4A0)made by the detroit tank arsenal had a hybrid cast/welded hull like the one in your picture

>>34392987
>>very multicultural American forces even when blacks were mostly support and supply roles
barely any blacks in this film. the hispanic dude and the nisei guy at the beginning are completely legit depictions

File: Istabbedhim27timesinselfdefense.jpg.jpg (76KB, 550x403px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 550x403px

>>34406509
no1cares