Cheapest precision rifle that can hit targets at 1000yrds+ ?

>>34359991
Bergara B-14 HMR is supposed to be promising.

>>34359991
CZ527 in .17 Hornet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42O9hiRfgEg

I use Tikka, not Ruger, but this looks cheap and seems like it'll do the same thing. You need to be really good with it though and buy good glass which will make it expensive. I recommend .308.

http://www.ruger-firearms.com/products/americanRifle/specSheets/6903.html
>>34360038
This also

God damn it's still only June...

File: Untitled.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>34360171
second for the tikka
I have a t3 lite in .300wsm and it's a tack driver

>>34359991
1000yds is actually pretty difficult of a shot, for hunting I would suggest half that, the bear ain't gonna see you at that distance.

Also I guess it depends on what kind of bear you are looking to hunt.
Like a black bear you can take with a .45 or .357 handgun, but they're honestly so timid and scaredy that you can plain walk up to one, slap him on the face and then call him a cuck, and he'll run away in panick. Unless they're being a pest (which they absolutely can be, mind you), then I'd almost feel bad shooting at one, it's like picking on the weakest and smallest kid.

Now, a fucking Grizzly, or Kodiak, there we have some big and meaty fiends, they won't have any of your shit, can't play macho with them, they'll rip off your head and shit down your neck, I'd recommend a real good .300WinMag hollowpoint or a real hot and spicy .45-70Gov't hardcast, if you dare get up close.

File: 20170620_200321.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>>34360294
Tikkas are good shit

>>34360457
Fuck yeah!

>>34360457
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Moscow_school_shooting
no

>>34360484
>killed a police officer and wounded another during a standoff
>15 years old
must be good if a kid can be proficient with it

>>34360484
>Finnish and Japanese guns
>Russia
Fucking lol

>>34360484
>small caliber Japanese BAR M1918
wat

File: Model700CDL_SF_84028_Beauty-3.jpg (41KB, 1168x564px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1168x564px

>>34360610
Is Remington 700 a good choice?

>>34360618
Not really, QC has been abysmal the past decade, broken off bolt-handles and rust are not uncommon.

>>34360618
new remingtons are hit-or-miss. Inspect it whenever you go to buy it and make sure it's solid.
Or you can look for a pre-freedom group one and be good to go.

>>34360583
Japanese had 7.92 BARs

>>34360660
>>34360679
Interesting. What about models that go to the military for M24 conversion? Any way to get a hold of those or are they the same as ones made for civilian market? I'd imagine that quality control would be much higher.

>>34360762
Those are basically rebuilds.
I don't know if they're even made by Remington, or if they sell it.

>>34360762
GA precision makes rifles like those, but you're going to pay a lot more since it's basically a custom rifle
http://www.gaprecision.net/mil-spec-rifles.html
http://www.gaprecision.net/mil-spec-rifles.html

>>34360801
Yea that's what I thought. I just liked the idea that I could potentially swap it between 7.62 NATO and .300 Win Mag.

>>34360816
$3600 for a Rem 700 without optics, that's insanely expensive, even if it's modified.

>>34360898
HS precision sells a M24 stock, but you'll still to provide the parts to finish it. You can get it with only adjustable length of pull or add the adjustable cheek piece
https://www.stockysstocks.com/h-s-precision-pro-series-m24-tactical-remington-700-stocks-adjustable-lop-and-or-cheek-pst-006-007-011-013-024.html