I fucking love this gun, /k/. The ergonomics are vastly superior

>>34332420
Has anyone tried 3d printing custom grip modules?

>>34332470
That's not a bad idea..

File: maxresdefault.jpg (47KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1280x720px

>>34332420
>The ergonomics
I'm do not think it means what you think it means

File: IMG_20160916_191605.jpg (3MB, 4000x2992px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x2992px

In for bedside and competition gun.

>>34332420
why do you type like this
trying to write a fucking poem?

>>34332494
>ergonomics
Sorry, I meant the grippy feely shapies.

>>34332474
i want a thinner compact grip with no rail that works with the full size slide. Also a 239 style trigger guard.

File: 0622171159.jpg (97KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1280x960px

excuse the potato cam

File: ronron.jpg (42KB, 600x404px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x404px

I'm all smiles for the P320 compact.

Does it have any of the meme problems that gets thrown around on /k/
Bore axis, sig rust, something like that?

>>34332713
No. No rust issues whatsoever. No bore axis issues if you have good fundamentals and aren't a spaghetti noodle.

>>34332420
I walked into my lgs fully intending on buying another g19. But walked out with a 320. Fell in love. It was also nearly $200 less making this decision that much sweeter. After putting 2000 rounds through it I'm even more in love, thus solidifying my new found sig relationship.

>>34332713
don't forget light primer strikes
I know a lot about this gun from watching mud test videos ;)

File: IMG_20170610_145238_736.jpg (841KB, 1339x1280px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 1339x1280px

>>34332420
You have impeccable taste

>>34332511
why are you retarded?

Thanks to the p320 I can't stand shooting my glocks. That bothersome glocks hump puts awkward pressure on my palm combined with poor trigger undercut it just makes shooting unpleasant. The p320 grip has nothing bothersome so gripping and shooting has been a pleasant experience. The trigger, which is pretty good out of the box, only gets better as the round count increases.

I also think the gun overall looks neat. The beavertail, higher slide height, and metal trigger all contribute to the look.

>>34332420

>piece of shit gun tries to imitate glock as much as possible
>WOW BETTER THAN GLOCK

nigga please

File: a-routemaster-double-decker-bus.jpg (58KB, 560x294px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 560x294px

>waits until version 2 when they suddenly realize they don't need a slide the size of staple gun for a striker pistol.

>>34332420
I carry a Glock 19 and shoot a 35/9mm for IPSC and I really want a 320. The last thing I fucking need is another 9mm tho

>>34333763
I'd like to see a full size pistol with the P938 slide and firing system. That gun has a bore height shorter than Glocks.

>>34333604
>imitates glock
>is different in every way other than also being striker fired
i wish nogunz wouldn't post

File: IMG_0456.jpg (10KB, 320x213px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 320x213px

>>34332510
This light looks like a fucking tumor on your gun. Pic related would be much better in terms of aesthetics.

File: muh sig.jpg (430KB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 2000x1500px

>>34332420
>post your P320s
Ok.

It's a shame the OD grips are so dark. There's barely a difference to the black ones.

>>34332420
I bought both full size and compact P320s, tried to like them, but ended up selling them both. I'm not a Glock fan, but the Glock balances better, has a better magazine aftermarket, and the recoil feels more controllable on a Glock, to me. It's very easy for me to deal with the springy motion of the slide coming back on a Glock. The P320 recoil feels more like a snap and a flip, just more complex of a motion to control for.

File: 20170622_142015.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

Reportin

>>34332420
K

>>34333975
I have one of these it burns through batteries when its not on. I will fuck with it and turn it on every 3 months or so and at least twice a year I have to replace batteries. Speaking of which i should check if the batteries have gone dead.

I have a 320 and recently the trigger has became a lot different.

The trigger press is not crisp anymore and the reset is very weak and crunchy.

Anyone?

>>34334787
Contact SIG man. Never know could be something small and safe now but it could become a bigger and more dangerous issue.

>>34334787
post a pic of the sear face and the little hook on the striker.

>>34332420
A local company recently released that they are working on an 80% p320 which would be a dream for 80% guns.

File: 1492838945677.jpg (11KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 200x200px

I'm a huge Glockfag but from the times I've played with the P320, I was always impressed.

It is the only striker fired pistol that could unironically be called the Glock killer. Shame about Sig's P320 team being disbanded.

>this entire thread

The 320 is made for women hands aka european girly hands. Its slide is designed to fit a hammer but yet sig felt no need to reduce both weight and size by making it smaller for the striker version of this pistol. Additionally, they still need sight replacements since the standard ones suck shit as much as glock sights do.

You just bought lazy resold junk that Sig barely did anything to and you retards ate it up like a bunch of sheep claiming it as a enormous improvement over glock, when in reality it's just another alternative trying to be glock.

>b-but muh US mil contracts
Remember when they picked the Beretta over the p226? Retarded.
If they had waited a little longer they could've had the Glock 17 also, but they were retarded then just like they are now.

File: 20170622_222535.jpg (1MB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2016x1512px

>>34338743
nonsense, I have massive bear hands and p320 with medium size grip frame fits me just fine

>post pictures of your p320s

k

>>34338938
The first part was me being facetious.

Look it's not like I'm stupid either. I see the pros of this gun clear as day. The trigger group module is what actually shines, and the guns implementation of a regular safety and ability switch frame sizes are features that should be on most polymer options these days.
I just can't get over the fact that a vastly improved version can come out soon enough to make me feel stupid for buying one, or ever be proud of our country adopting it.

>>34332470
not like they can be any lower quality than the factory ones.

File: IMG_5146.jpg (452KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1080x1920px

Had mine for about seven months now. I still like my G17 a tiny bit better though.

Unfortunately I will have to move back to California after this December.

Should I definitely pick the P320 X-Five up? I won't be able to get any other off-roster handguns. I already have a Glock 19 Gen 4, but I also wanted to get a P09 or HK45.

>>34333840
Then get it in literally any other caliber.

File: 1497133353648.png (178KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 500x500px

>>34338743
>Additionally, they still need sight replacements since the standard ones suck shit as much as glock sights do.

Your opinion doesn't mean shit since you think stock sights are okay regardless of what pistol you buy.

>>34337986
This.

Also your trigger assembly spring. Buy an Apex flat action enhancement trigger and order a replacement spring from the Sig Pro Shop.

>>34338413
This doesn't make any sense to me.

File: boopadeeboopadeeboop.gif (235KB, 182x200px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 182x200px

>>34338743
y umad tho

So I have a gen 1 320, what are the things they adjusted for the gen 2 models?

>>34340605
Yeah, Im this guy, but I got an XD9 and Im totally happy witht the stock fiber optic post and two dot rear, just sayin

>>34338563
>Sig's P320 team being disbanded.

Details on this?

File: 20170623_194823.jpg (588KB, 1700x957px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 1700x957px

>>34332420
P250 reporting in, just scooped this up on my lunch break.

File: 0229a6e4-95aa-43d9-bb5c-765adf01f11b.jpg (319KB, 1280x837px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1280x837px

>>34332470
Haven't seen anything for this gun, but this guy does make a bunch of custom 3d printed parts for guns: http://proletariat-designs.tumblr.com

I'm a poorfag so I'm wondering is it possible to buy this thing piece by piece? I want a fullsize. Where and how much would it cost to buy the firearm part of it and I know the frames cost around 40-50 bucks but what about the slide and barrel?

File: 1437900162625.jpg (30KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x640px

anyone else having this strange issue with the slide? It looks like there's a larger space between the slide and polymer frame on one side compared to the other.

>>34347861
Try switching your grip module out and see if it looks any different. If you haven't got one, try reseating the firing mechanism in the grip. That's an odd problem and I haven't got it.

>>34342725
The nature of your question is a deflection.

Anon is probably annoyed seeing this thread made on repeat, ever since the US chose the p320 as the cheapest pistol to issue. The p320 owners on /k/ appear to be remorseful buyers. It's almost like a Kia support group in here.

>I just, I think it's just as good..
>and it's cheaper somehow!
>No wait, it's actually better than the Honda guys!

When you are truly better, you don't need to constantly try and measure up to what you are imitating. There are 1911 vs Glock threads, because the two are fundamentally different as can be, as far as a semi auto handgun goes.

Here on the other hand, you are worried about if you measure up. You are worried you bought what amounts to another over hyped clone: xd, m&p, sr9, etc. Well you did. It's just sad people are this unrealistic, and uneducated.

You got hyped because it was new, and it got a contract. Just like .40, everyone is excited, but you haven't really examined what you got. It isn't the best, and deep down you poorfags know it. Next time buy a HK.

File: kloon.png (12KB, 541x374px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 541x374px

>>34348767
I've owned both long before the Army bought the contract. I can say without a doubt that I like the P320 a lot more than my Glock. Facts are tough. I'm sorry you feel so strongly about the market/guns/contracts/etc..

>that shit bore axis

File: 1496150506467.jpg (143KB, 900x512px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 900x512px

>>34343939
>Details on this?

iirc, Sig didn't have enough monies to fund them any longer.

Shame, there were legit good shooters in it like Tim Herron, Bruce Gray, Max Michel and Yong Lee. Jerry Miculek's daughter was in the team as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iA-yoC95pMU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK3gtIvg5Yw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGUjtDfzjXM

>>34343840
I'm the anon you replied to, the fiber optic sights on XD's are fine imo. Anything with some form of contrast beeats white 3 dots any day of the week.

[nospoiler]even though XD's have retardedly stuck on sights that are set in place with occult energies[/onkspoiler]

Just black out the rear dots with a sharpie and you should be good.

>>34348767
the P320c is the best pistol I've ever stuck pepe inside. I'm sure HKs feel nice too.

>>34347383
just put one on layaway or save up its not like they're going anywhere

File: IMG_20170519_220343137-2214x3936.jpg (1MB, 2214x3936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2214x3936px

Desk gun. Used a magnet from Amazon. I need to do a similar setup in my truck.

>>34338413

Two in fact! I wonder where they expect us to get all the small parts, though.

>>34338743
>Remember when they picked the Beretta over the p226? Retarded.

hahahahaha

>>34348931
The bore axis means nothing if you're a serious, experienced shooter and your fundamentals are sound. Bore axis is a meme.

>>34348946
She's got to be the one on right right. Her head's got the same shape as ol' Jerry.

>>34350182
jerry miculek has multiple videos on youtube explaining that u need to grip the gun as high as possible to reduce the bore axis as much as possible

File: daffo.jpg (11KB, 328x277px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 328x277px

>>34350206
You aren't, nor will you ever be, Jerry Miculek.

>>34350216
yes i will. maybe u wont tho since u own a sig

>>34340161
God trim your fucking nails faggot.

>>34350216
>You aren't, nor will you ever be, Jerry Miculek.

is that your response? congrats. enjoy your shitt afterthought gun from Sig, a company that seems to be too poor to actually design a striker gun from the ground up. instead they have to rehash one of their hammer abominations and slapp a striker into it. good job Sig! that'll undo the damage you did to your brand!

>>34332420
Still on the fence between a 2022 and a p320. The OD color option may or may not be the tie breaker. Can you easily get the p320 in OD or will I have to order the grips separately?

>>34350277
>good job Sig! that'll undo the damage you did to your brand!

actually it will since the p320 will be the new glock now since the military adopted it

>>34347383
The added price of the individual parts will most likely way, way higher than what the price of the complete pistol. The reason poorfags are poorfags is they are stupid with their money.

>>34332420
I've been thinking about replacing my P239 with one of these as a CC option..My 239 is in .357sig. What do you think?

>>34350346
>actually it will since the p320 will be the new glock now since the military adopted it

that's been said about every polymer striker pistol that came around the corner. it never happened. and it never will because every single one of them was trying to 1up Glock with some gimmicky "feature". what's the trigger group for in the P320? what was the army thinking? does the army have a limit on how many pistols they can own - which is the only scenario I can think of where this "feature" makes sense? nope. if you ahve a full size gun and you want a subcompact for carry you still need to buy a frame, a barrel and a slide - basically a whole new gun really. its a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

>>34350434
the same argument could be made against the ar15

>>34350438
>the same argument could be made against the ar15

how. walk me through it pls.

>>34334536
P320 with rmr.....ganzo knife.... bruh.

File: sms2-on-Glock-multi-small.jpg (282KB, 1711x1140px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1711x1140px

>>34350466
>with rmr
did you not rather eman to say
>cheap chink trash
???

because that most certainly isn't a RMR...

>>34350447
if u want to switch a full size ar to a compact one it costs just as much relative to the price of the whole gun as the p320 does

>>34350486
fine. which is why they don't do this in the first place. they don't just switch upper assemblies out on a lower. so I don't really get your point.

>>34350502
right so it's a solution to a problem that doesnt exist

>>34350434
>basically a whole new gun really. its a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

Makes life easier on armorers dealing with very large fleets who order non-serially controlled parts by the shitload and facilitates parts swaps to keep more of that fleet mission capable while deployed or where adding more serially controlled items is a hassle. Civilians need none of that and it also simplifies training for fobbits. Civilians very rarely wear out firearms.

File: 2016-06-16 19.41.18 (Copy).jpg (394KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1600x1200px

Love the P320. Actually planning to sell my regular one and get the X-Five.

>>34332420
Fuck thanks for confirming my bias. Now I really need one -.-

>>34334732
Yeah is it me or every Inforce product ends up having issues? I feel like they favor sleek "design" over rugged construction, namely with their obsession with using polymer where there should be metal. Their weapon lights are simply not durable enough for what they are meant to do. The only advantage their lights have over other cheaper options like Streamlight is their aesthetics.

>>34350502
Actually they would if they could dumbass. The Mk12 and Mk18 were both initially intended to be standalone uppers but issues with the trigger and gas/buffer system respectively made it impossible, or at least impractical. It is not when it comes to the P320. The trigger pack acts as the lower receiver itself (if comparing to an AR15), where changing the grip module would be akin to swapping the pistol grip on your AR. You can run a full size slide on a compact slide, so you could switch between a full size slide and barrel for duty or home defence and a compact setup for carry. Magazine compatibility makes capacity a non-issue. It's also very sound from a logistical standpoint and although civilians may never truly appreciate this feature, it at least makes for easier cleaning... So yeah it's nothing completely revolutionary but it is a practical improvement and a step forward from the Glock. Ergonomics and "shootability" are subjective and can be argued, but there is a new kid on the block and Glock fanboys are right to be scared and on the defensive.

>>34351205
how many money for a nitride barrel?

>>34352532
Like $75 total, after shipping. The place was in state for me.

>>34350277
why don't you just cut the bullshit and put on your tripcode?

File: kronsty.jpg (34KB, 200x201px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 200x201px

>>34350316
If you call the Sig Sauer Pro Shop in Exeter you can get whatever your gay little heart desires in any configuration with any modification. You do have to speak to an actual human being though, so you may want to ask your meemaw to make the call on your behalf.

>>34350381
smarts are never poorfags because poorfags are the dumb

>>34350408
Just get a P320 subcompact in .357sig, and buy a conversion kit for cheap if you ever want to change caliber or size. The modularity is what makes this gun a titty sandwich.

File: gtfooh.jpg (49KB, 590x555px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 590x555px

>>34350447
Please don't waste your time answering this troll post. If you can't see the similarities between the P320 and the AR platform you need to take a fucking walk.

>>34338938

this is exactly the pair i desire

File: 226_mk25.jpg (212KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 960x720px

>>34332420
Haven't bought one yet, so enjoy my boat anchor

>>34332420
When are the rest of us getting something approximating the M17? I want the thumb safety AND optics capability. I prefer the full size slide/compact frame setup as well.

Anybody got one of the safety models? curious how well it's executed, does it give tactile feedback when all the way on or off? does it stay in place positively? is it mushy?

>>34355481
https://pistol-forum.com/showthread.php?25688-Personal-SIG-320-Journey&p=613900&viewfull=1#post613900

>>34355530
Thanks friend, I've been wondering about that for ages. Really want a manual safety striker fired gun for carry and always heard the M&P safety was aids

File: 19264236_1465085516870431_851118515_o.jpg (281KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 2048x1536px

I love my 320

File: 20170624_222500-2014x1496.jpg (1MB, 2014x1496px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2014x1496px

I love my P320.

>>34348946
>Jerry Miculek's daughter was in the team as well.

That bitch is crazy as fuck.

File: sex.jpg (27KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x500px

>>34358385
>Jerry Miculek's daughter
exmaple?

>>34358411
Read the story on how she left her husband for a competitive shooter with no hands named nubz. It's why Jerry hasn't posted a video in a year. Her husband did the camera and editing work. She encouraged him to off himself.

I want to "covert" my P320 fullsize 9mm into a compact with FDE finish in .40 but Sigs website says the FDE compact is only available in 9mm and 357 Sig? What and why???

>>34351205
Is the flat trigger worth buying?

>>34333070
why were you going to buy another g19?

>>34332420
Glad you like it so much man. I've never really been a big fan of striker fired polymer framed guns in the past (just have a thing for alloy frames and hammers) but when the army announced that they were adopting the P320 has their new side arm and I went out and rented one and goddamn I loved it, great trigger, felt great in my hand, and I shot great with it. I was gonna get a CZ75 D PCR for my ccw but I'm strongly considering the P320 instead.

>>34350434
>that's been said about every polymer striker pistol that came around the corner. it never happened
None of those guns replaced the army's main sidearm until now, your argument is ded kiddo

>>34332420
I've got one in 9mm with the conversion kit for .45. Easily one of the nicest handguns I've ever shot, though .45 isn't as comfy to shoot from it as it is from heavier pistols.

Still can't believe the Army adopted a new handgun that's actually good. Too bad I'll never be issued one.

>>34332420
What is a manual trigger safety really for?

>>34358555
Yeah, it was a really nice upgrade for me, and it's only like $45. Installation is technically easy, but kind of annoying in practice.

>>34340200
>P320 X-Five

That is an affront to the good name of the X-Five.

>>34346510
Scoop it back and get you a 320.

Can't stand the mile long pull on my 250. It's a nice pull, but I can watch a movie and have a nice supper and still won't have brought the trigger back to the break point.