Should I buy this Rifle? Also recommended Rifle thread

File: henry.jpg (53KB, 1004x277px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1004x277px

tube mags are ok

File: 1489823500882.png (13KB, 561x1091px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 561x1091px

>>34326927
do you ask to go potty

It holds 10 I'm pretty sure, 11 with one chambered. Around $700

>>34326974
Sometimes, just wanted to see if there was a better alternative

>>34326927
Yes
I think having at least 2 guns in every caliber cant be bad
I was trying to find a M1 carbine in .357 mag and a lever-action in .44 mag

>>34326927
>Are there other rifles of the same caliber that would perform better?

Winchester has restarted production of the 1892, Chiappa makes a nice 1892s as well, and Browning used to make what is often considered one of the best 1892s although it is tough to find one in .357.

>>34327034
> m1 in 357 mag

Is there even such a rifle?

I own one and It's a fun gun to shoot. Took the buckmark sight off and added a Skinner peep rear and front sight. Descent accuracy and good for deer below 100yd

>>34327081
Yeah
I think chiappa makes one and maybe someone else
I have seen a far rarer 5.7 M1 in person, but no one wants that

>>34326927
>I wanted a rifle with the same ammo type
No, you don't. You want a rifle. You have no idea how much more powerful a rifle is than a handgun. Get a 270.

>>34327034
>I think having at least 2 guns in every caliber cant be bad
I kind of disagree, I'm still working to get something in most of the major calibers.

I've got a 9mm, a .38, a .45, a .22 rifle and a .22 handgun, a 12ga and a nugget, but other than the .22s I don't think I'll be doubling up on any caliber for a while

>>34327075
I've got a Browning Hi-Power 9mm that works great, a bit bulky magazine but pretty accurate. Tangent sights are kind of excessive on a pistol but they come in handy

>>34326927
>Should I buy this Rifle?

Yes

>>34327116
I hear ya, .308 is next on my list. Just want to be able to swith up if something gets a little closer than expected

>>34327116
What 270 would you pay decent money for?

>>34327101
Thank ya, that was the main goal, fun andaccurate

>>34327136
I didnt mean you had to have them immediately
More of a long-term goal
Also not EVERY caliber, just the ones you want

>>34327116
Doesn't 357 get quite hot out of a rifle length barrel? Not saying it's up to scratch with a rifle caliber, but it's worth keeping that in mind.

>>34327379
It does
You can fire the real hot stuff too

>>34326927
I have one in 16.5" nicely made.

I recommend Skinner Peep sights too, buckhorn a shit

>>34326927
Do it anon, they rock. Rossis and Marlins are a bit cheaper, but the catch is you've gotta find them. Henrys are pretty easy to find.

>>34328441
> marlin
> cheaper than anything in 357

U wot m8? 357 marlins have been out of production for a few years, so anything and everything 357 marlin are expensive, like up to 1k expensive.

File: woodmaster.jpg (90KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x480px

I found a Remington Woodmaster 742 in 30-06 (pretty old, good condition) for sale at a local pawn shop for $300. Can anyone tell me why a semi-auto 30-06 rifle should sell for $300, even in working condition? Did they just pump these out like candy, or do they actually suck? I honestly can't understand how a 30-06 semi could go for this cheap.