Springfield 1903A4 Gibbs Sniper Rifle

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
Springfield 1903A4 Gibbs Sniper Rifle 2017-06-21 06:54:59 Post No. 34322950
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: perfect gf.jpg (180KB, 613x926px) Image search: [Google]

Springfield 1903A4 Gibbs Sniper Rifle Anonymous 2017-06-21 06:54:59 Post No. 34322950 [Report]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcc99z8PPQw&
MSRP $1250
What does /k/ think of it?

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:08:13 Post No.34323039
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:08:13 Post No.34323039 [Report]

>>34322950
i like ows, but i wouldn't spend that on a 1903 receiver i would never 100% trust.

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:21:20 Post No.34323139
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:21:20 Post No.34323139 [Report]

>>34323039
>ows
what

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:21:42 Post No.34323142
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:21:42 Post No.34323142 [Report]

>>34322950
Thats a nice sig

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:29:38 Post No.34323236
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:29:38 Post No.34323236 [Report]

>>34323142
Yeah, to hell with the 1903, let's talk about the 55x series and cute girls.

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:29:48 Post No.34323239
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:29:48 Post No.34323239 [Report]

>>34323139
old west scrounger, val owns both
http://www.gibbsrifle.com/

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:31:05 Post No.34323254
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:31:05 Post No.34323254 [Report]

>>34323239
oh, okay

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:35:16 Post No.34323299
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:35:16 Post No.34323299 [Report]

>>34323039
i saw they were made on Parker-Hale brit receivers,so i'd be much more comfortable shooting one.

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:45:02 Post No.34323388
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 07:45:02 Post No.34323388 [Report]

>>34323039
What's so bad about them? I thought Nat Mil receivers were the only ones not to be trusted.

Anonymous 2017-06-21 08:12:51 Post No.34323646
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 08:12:51 Post No.34323646 [Report]

File: Swiss Army Girl (2).jpg (54KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

>>34323236

Anonymous 2017-06-21 08:21:23 Post No.34323713
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-21 08:21:23 Post No.34323713 [Report]

>>34323388
those are probably fine
>>34323299