/script>
Post em
ARA Santa Fe, abandoned during the Falklands war after being hit by rockets from a helicopter
>>34320667
Another angle, scuttled after the war
K-219, lost during the cold war; notice smoke venting from silo six where a weapon had exploded.
>>34320687
Forgot pic
The submarine eventually sank, later investigation by the soviets revealed that some of the other silos had been forced open and their contents removed.
>>34320700
Another angle
North Korean submarine that ran aground while inserting special forces, 1996. Crew either committed suicide or were executed by their comrades.
Now on display.
>>34320748
The same boat.
North Korean missile boat, the Gorae/Sinpo class
Korean Yono class, allegedly responsible for sinking the Cheonan, a similar version is produced in Iran as the 'Ghadir'.
All deployed North Korean submarine types.
Bridge of a Soviet Akula class, obviously floods when the vessel is submerged.
WW2 Italian CB class midget submarine.
Rescue buoy of a Swedish submarine; detaches from the boat if it sinks, contains a telephone and cable to the boat.
Cuban foxtrot class
>>34320687
>>34320700
who the hell managed to get those warheads? this is scary as fuck
>>34320803
always wondered about that.
>>34323480
Wouldn't be surprised if it was the US. They did build a giant grabber claw to try lift K-129 up thousands of feet after it sank, and partly succeeded in doing so. Look up Project Azorian.
>>34323807
>Project Azorian
really cool stuff
Russian Sarov class; bit of an odd one, often purported to be a spy submarine (Russia has a number of these, very interesting in their own right - see the 'Losharik') but thought by some to be a testbed for the KANYON strategic weapon.
Diesel electric but carrying a nuclear reactor and fitted with a seemingly outdated screw/rudder configuration. Notice the lack of conventional torpedo tubes; the Sarov instead hosts a large bow door from which the KANYON would be released.
>>34320657
Why does the enlisted cuck look so sad next to the officer?
>>34324859
KANYON itself is an oversized torpedo, 24M in length and 1.6M in diameter.
So far only seen on leaked documents (seen on Russian TV in 2015, in response to US deploying additional missile defence) it ostensibly carries a 100MT nuclear warhead (for reference, the Tsar bomb was just over 50MT) and is designed as a strategic weapon to destroy coastal cities/bases. To operate over long ranges it carries it's own nuclear reactor, not unlike the US' own project Pluto.
Some are sceptical as to whether the system will ever progress past the prototype stage, but retrofitting a submarine solely for testing it is an indication that they are serious in my mind. When operationally deployed it is likely to be carried by the new Project 09851 'Khabarovsk' class submarine, carrying up to six weapons.
>>34324868
Wouldn't want to be posted on an outdated submarine in the PLAN myself tbqh
>>34324954
Seems like a really shitty strategic nuclear weapon, the most important aspect of these weapons is their ability to be brought on to the target quickly. A nuclear exchange can be over in just a few hours, it seems like a liability to try and use a weapon that would perhaps at best take the better part of a day to reach its target. That and it can only engage coastal targets. I'm thinking that they aren't seriously considering deploying the weapon (if they ever even built a prototype), but rather to see if they can't get the west to develop a costly countermeasure for a weapon they never intend to produce. Also the Sarov will be used to build a hydrophone line along Russia's northern coast, and the retrofitting might just be for the UUVs that it carries.
>>34325054
The idea that they're just doing it to force the US to adapt might hold some weight, but you should note that the US has a lot more money on hand to throw at a problem than Russia.
That the weapon would take (up to) days to arrive following a US strike is not neccecarily a limitation; for MAD to apply it does not matter when retaliation occurs, only that it is certain to occur. In a scenario where the US has the edge over the Russians in missike defence the Kanyon could play a useful role.
Alternatley, it would be an effective first strike weapon, silently moving into position in an adversary's ports and detonating without warning, allowing Russia's missiles to be used elsewhere (e.g. in reducing the enemies capacity to retaliate).
>>34324859
Profile of the boat
>>34325163
>silently
While this is a bit speculative, I doubt something like this would be easy to keep quiet seeing that it is carrying a reactor (that and there is the thermal detection method). That and the Russian's will have to spend a bit of money on this, a brand new, one of a kind sub will be required to even use this weapon, and with more budget cuts to be expected later this year (military budget took a HUGE cut in march already) there's a chance it would find itself on the chopping block. And to speculate a bit more, have the Russian's really ever been interested in first strike weapons? The entire purpose of strategic nuclear weapons is to deter the enemy from using their own, no army actually plans to engage in a nuclear war.
Finnish submarine Vesikko, the only survivor out the Finnish navy's six pre-WW2 submarines. It's essentially a prototype of the German Type II U-boat, designed by Ingenieurskantoor voor Scheepsbouw (a dummy company set up by the German navy in the Netherlands) and built in Finland, the deal being that the Germans could test the submarine for a time in Finland and then the Finnish government could buy it. Today it's a museum ship at Suomenlinna fortress in Helsinki.
>>34325371
>Finnish navy's six pre-WW2 submarines
Whoops, meant to write five. Besides the "proto-Type II" Vesikko, there were three submarines of Vetehinen-class and a single small Saukko-class submarine (originally intended to be used on Lake Ladoga).
Pic related, two of the three Vetehinen class submarines in 1942.
>>34325447
Its no wonder that that was the only survivor, you could walk from Estonia to Finland on all the mines without getting your feet wet.
>>34325470
Yeah, that's true, but they all actually survived the war itself (even Vetehinen, despite ramming a Soviet sub to sink it), but not the Paris peace treaty which forbade Finland from having submarines. They were all scrapped following the war save for Vesikko.
>>34325532
What's that long tube along the hull?
>>34325541
>all actually survived the war itself
Thats pretty damn impressive.
>>34325544
towed sonar array storage. when its out while submerged its a big long tail behind the boat.
>>34325565
How long are the strings? If it's coiled up all the way in that tube it must be really long.
>>34325574
you can look up tb29 towed array but most of the info isn't something you will be able to find.
its like a long power cable. i'm not a sonar tech so i don't really know much about it.
So what is /k/'s opinion on Cold Waters?
>>34320657
I work on a submarine.
>>34325659
It's missing a lot of fundamental controls, especially in the mouse-control department, but it's addictive as fuck.
>>34325641
>>34325665
The Soviet subs + 688i mod is pretty awesome, 42 knots in an Alfa is pretty nice and the acrobatics are amazing.
>>34325659
I enjoy it immensely.
>>34325664
nub in school here, any tips when i hit my first boat other than "get qualed nub"?
>>34325664
Is it /comfy/
>>34325699
Your already dinq nub. Also be humble and listen when people tell you to do shit. Dont talk back. Ask for help if you need it. What rate are you? Also where are you in the pipeline? Bess? ATT? TECHNO? or one of the faggy mm things?
Nazi subs tied up in Scotland before scuttling at the end of ww2
>>34325659
It's a Clunkier (and slightly more realistic) version of Tom Clancy's SSN.
>>34325711
Sorta. Its normaly cold so you get to wear a comfy fleece. Also while under way o2 levels drop so you can sleep longer. My record was 23 straight hours.
>>34320748
>shamefur dispray!!
>>34320803
Never actually bothered to look up images of the bridges on the sail. Always saw windows in photos and knew it wasn't manned when submerged but I never knew what was inside there.
Neat.
>>34325745
>sleep for 23 hours
That sounds amazing...
>>34325738
I'm in ATT right now. Quite a few days ahead currently.
Prospective rate is ETV.
>humble and listen when people tell you to do shit
>Dont talk back
>Ask for help if you need it
cool, i'm not an asshole so that works.
>>34325745
Does your circadian get fucked up?
>>34325771
I had to pee real bad afterwards. Also theres times where youll only get like 4 hours down in a 48 hour period. I just got home from work. 37 hours spent there since 0630 on tuesday. 2 hours of sleep.
HMS Conqueror with Jolly Roger flag coming back to Faslane after sinking the Belgrano
>>34325789
Is this image shopped or is the conning tower really that tall?
>>34325784
Oh and dont so stupid shit. Like drink and drive or cocaine or kill someone. Try to balance boat life with away from boat life. Have fun. Work hard.
>>34325785
Im thoroughly convinced that circadian sleep patterns are a myth at this point.
>>34325809
Not shopped
>>34325812
well, seems like ill be fine.
have some ARs
>>34325565
the 688(i) manual says 2600 ft
most of the research for that game came from Jane’s Major Warships 1997 and Sharks of Steel by Paul Stillwell so it is probably the best answer you're going to get without anyone getting their gonads torn off by the navy for breaking op-sec
>>34325825
Do you work all the time or do you have days off?
>>34325887
meant for >>34325574
>>34325881
This is my ar
>>34325809
Different angle, same Jolly Roger.
>>34325892
Right now monday to friday 730 to 1600 with duty every 4 days so you have to stay at work overnight. When you at sea its a 24/7 job.
>>34325789
>>34325909
LANKY
A
N
K
Y
>>34325739
Some more, 33 in total surrendered and were tied up in Loch Eriboll before being disposed of.
>>34325974
>how can USS chodelet compete?
Titchy.
>>34326003
damn, why can't the US have cool submarine names?
>>34326035
The old polaris/chevaline HMS revenge takes the win I think. Hms superb and splendid let the side down though
>>34325789
i wonder why were Argentine Navy such helpless against HMS conqueror.
Argies did have ASW S-2 tracker during the war
>>34325887
You don't know what op-sec is.
Nice try though.
>>34326035
what about Seawolf?
>>34326105
doesn't sound as good as Astute or Vengeance tho
>>34326095
There were nuclear subs plus a old diesel there, the s2 was in danger from the sea harriers and sea dart
>>34325664
>I work on a submarine.
You are missing your dolphins, NUB.
...
>i am not in the navy....
>>34326105
Copied a British navy missile name
>>34326095
That was on their carrier a blinking long way from the Belgrano and which subsequently spent the rest of the tiff hiding in port.
>>34325699
Hope you are short and thin.
>>34325745
>Sorta. Its normaly cold so you get to wear a comfy fleece. Also while under way o2 levels drop so you can sleep longer. My record was 23 straight hours.
Somehow I doubt that you are a sailor being allowed to sleep for 23 hours straight.
You might be a civvy who is just being transported around though...watch your op-sec.
>>34326090
Typhoon such a big grill
>>34326137
>Copied a British navy missile name
Nope.
Not unless the British Navy Missile predates WW1 (which it doesn't).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_H-1_(SS-28)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Seawolf_(SS-197)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Seawolf_(SSN-575)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Seawolf_(SSN-21)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Wolf_(missile)
Japanese submarine aircraft carriers. Meh.
my dad served in the cold war on a Victor I class Submarine.
he also told me storys of accidents that happened, like when 2 officers looked without eye protection at some parts of the reactor and turned blind instantly.
or how some dude he knew slipped between the pier and the boat which then crushed him in front of his eyes.
>>34320782
>>34323480
Let's just say that there's a reason why the USS Parche got so many goddamned unit citations in the late 80s and early 90s.
>>34326699
Think hms Conqueror got some for stealing a towed sonar from the back of a soviet ship in the 80's with some James bond pincers.
>>34320657
So I know next to nothing about submarines, can someone be in that area where there are the glass windows while submerged? Or is that so people can be in the tower and not be blasted by water?
https://maritime.org/sound/sealion/sealionfith3.mp3
>on the 17th March 1945 USS Sealion (Lt.Cdr. C.F. Putnam) torpedoed at close range and sank the Thai oiler Samui (1458 GRT) off the Malayan coast in position 05°18'N, 103°23'E
>a recording of the attack was captured using a wire recording machine borrowed from the Navy Underwater Sound Laboratory in New London
>*Thump*
>"Boy he went up in flames"
>"damn"
>"Ward(?) look at that fire god almighty"
>"Full ahead flank"
>"biggest(?) damn fire you ever saw up here"
>ywn feel that amount of glee over deep frying slants
>>34325447
I remember going to Suominlinna where they had the final surviving Finnish submarine on display. Fucker was tiny. So tiny, in fact, that in order to take a leak, you had to have someone go to the opposite end of the sub to not fuck up the sub's balance.
>>34326801
The belgrano sinking recording was quite bad, two torpedo hits sounded like glass shattering, then the huge bang when the boiler exploded when the seawater hit it.
If it looks right then it'll...
>>34325665
>>34325697
>>34325743
Is there a list of subs you can play as?
There's a serious lack of information on this game or my google fu is weak
>>34325664
>Boomerfag
How does it feel to be forced to stand Missile Tech's watches for them?
>>34327411
Playing it stock allows you to play with the skipjack, permit, sturgeon, narwhal, and los angeles. I use the the soviet subs mod that makes all the soviet subs playable.
>>34327577
Cool thanks anon
>>34326728
There was likely so much Azorian-style James Bond shit going on in the 70s 80s and 90s that we'll never hear a peep out of before the 80s.
>>34326291
That's a British submarine aircraft carrier though.
>>34325544
It is the Towed Array Fairing.
>>34329646
looks freakin neato
During the early parts of US involvement in WW2, the US Navy had some problems with their Mark 14 torpedoes, and that's putting it mildly. The torpedo's Mark 6 exploder frequently either failed to explode or exploded prematurely, and in addition, the torpedos would often run too deep, or most hilariously, sometimes they would run in a circle and come back at the submarine that fired it. US Navy BuOrd of course vehemently denied that there was anything wrong with the Mark 14, until the results had to be shoved down their throats.
Lieutenant Commander L. R. (Dan) Daspit, commander of the USS Tinosa was one of the several sub skippers who had to conted with the Mark 14's problems, and in one instance in 1943 he carefully documented his attempts at sinking a Japanese 19,000-ton whale factory ship Tonan Maru III.
>He fired four torpedoes from 4,000 yd (3,700 m); two hit, stopping the target dead in the water. Daspit immediately fired another two; these hit as well. With no enemy anti-submarine combatants in sight, Daspit then took time to carefully maneuver into a textbook firing position, 875 yd (800 m) square off the target’s beam, where he fired nine more Mark 14s and observed all with his periscope (despite the Japanese firing at it). All were duds.
>Daspit's log gives time of firing of each and states over and over again "fired [nth] torpedo. Hit. No apparent effect." Daspit recorded about the sixth one since Tonan Maru had become a "sitting duck", "... Hit. No apparent effect. This torpedo hit well aft on the port side, made splash at the side of the ship and was then observed to have taken a right turn and to jump clear of the water about 100 feet (30 m) from the stern of the tanker. I find it hard to convince myself that I saw this."
>yfw you're a submarine commander and a torpedo you fired at a juicy target bounces off it and JUMPS OUT OF THE WATER LIKE A FUCKING GLEEFUL DOLPHIN
>>34320700
I would love to see those picsvof the wreck sitting on the sea floor.
>>34327309
>The "Long Bin" boats did not handle well, with the launch tubes causing stability problems, and water flow around the missile fittings was very noisy
Wow, who would have thought
>>34323480
you dont want to know about russian nuclear submarine disasters
>>34325659
Super fun.
>>34326132
Are you retarded? The dolphins are right there on top.
>>34326180
Theyll changs the watch bill around while your under way. I was also a nub at the time so i kinds slipped thru the cracks
>>34327541
Hahaha theyd never put my ass in the prp!
>>34326498
Grandfather helped design coolant systems on later Soviet nuke boats including Akula (Typhoon in NATO-ese), the engineering side of things was just as insane as Ops
>>34320657
Britbong submariners stole a wallaby off us those cheeky cunts
Poor thing most likely died then became dim sims in Hong Kong
>>34320657
USS Cutlass(ROCS Hai Shih)
The oldest serving Submarine in the world.
Complete in 1945 and is still well and alive today.
>>34330349
All you have to do is look at the insane power densities of the Russian sub reactors to see how nutso things there were on the engineering side.
Serving on a Russian sub in the 70s or 80s DOES seem like the closest you could ever get to serving in the Klingon Navy IRL, and that actually does sound pretty badass...
>>34325054
it would be a first strike in my opinion...get close enough to bath iron works or norfolk and launch that thing...boop target erased.
What's going on in this thread?
*dips sonar*
>>34330430
That is a really good analogy, to be honest
>>34330639
DELET
>>34320657
I've always wanted to make a one or two person sized boat modeled after a type II or type VII. don't know if it's been done already
>>34330639
*flys out of submarine*
psssht nothing personal... kid...
>>34325738
>Faggy MM's
Implying you smooth crotch wire biters arent
>>34325784
Ha I have to go down to ATT often because students claim to get shocked. Have to do a safety investigation on it even though 99% of the time they just got poked
>>34330363
noice
HMS Aeneas is fucking 10/10 boat name I hope they made her motto Arma Virumque Cano
>half a shilling for a newspaper
fucking rip off lad
>>34331427
HMS Dreadnaught is a sick fucking name with a sick fucking motto.
Bongs have a unique ability of naming their naval ships fucking rad names.
lookit those curves
What a fucking beaut
>>34326699
Its sail is still on display outside a museum in Bremerton. Crazy amount of citations.
>>34331590
I can't get over how fucking xbox hueg and wide the mockup for the dreadnought class is
Like what the fuck
I wouldn't at all be opposed to a stupidly huge submarine but I thought it was jerry that made the impractical autism projects
trafalgar classes are also the most perfect "classic" sub design
Nothing too modern or out there, just the perfect dimentions for the tube with a tower
>>34326035
Our CSC once told us the Virginia class was originally going to be called the Centurion class but people thought it sounded too war-like, so
>hurrrr let's just do states again!
;_;
>>34331756
>a ship built for mass destruction and total war can't have a scary name because it's too war like
holy fuck is this a joke? or is the US that cucked?
>>34331590
>>34331708
Looks like a Typhoon going in reverse.
>>34331848
Source is a CSC, I wouldn't believe a word of it
>>34331848
>holy fuck is this a joke? or is the US that cucked?
subs in the US used to be named after mythical sea creatures. They Navy figured out long ago, if they want Congress to open up their wallet for them, they just have to name ships after the State/City of a member of congress as a trade off.
New French Barracuda-class ssn under construction, supposed to be launched next year. The Australians are getting an AIP version.
>>34331048
Have fun turn valves. Work smarter not harder suckers.
>>34332561
Actually I have a blast turning valves/wrenches
>>34325739
Kriegsmarine, not "Nazi".
The NAZI party didn't have a navy, they just exploited the one that already existed.
>>34332730
Hahaha what boat you on?
>>34325664
>reverse image search
no you do not faggot
>>34332823
Sure i dont.
>>34332859
BTFO
>>34332763
Was on the Dallas
>>34332913
The big D lol some guys i knew in sub school almost got arrested at the Mohegan sun and told the cops they where from the dallas hahaha
>>34332859
I too can buy a uniform and patch online.
>>34333045
You know what your right, i bought some patchs and put them on a nwu blouse just to fool some people on a tibetian self-immolation forum's weapons sub-board.
>>34325664
>>34332859
that's an interesting camo pattern. off topic, but does it make much sense to wear camo as a sailor? issuing solid color would cut the costs and make more sense imho. then again, i'm not in the navy.
>>34333143
We only wear those in port. At least in the sub community. We wear these underway
>>34333860
>>34333931
>>34333860
>>34333931
>>34333948
Anyone know what the elevated tubes are for and why a Romeo served after the cold war?
>>34333958
650mm torpedos that didn't fit into the Hull
>submarine thread
>No Alfa class
The first titanium hull ever, this shit is the Mig-25 of the deep, steaming at you at 43 knots armed with supercavitating torpedoes you wont be able to evade
Of course its loud as fuck because its so fast and was obsolete when it first sailed but its nice that russians had the balls to actually make shit like this
>>34325664
Does the remote prospect of a particularly horrible death bother you or do you just not think about it
>>34334106
I'm more afraid of dying while in an airplane. Being in a submarine doesn't really phase me. I'm not sure why.
>>34334100
Obsolete in what sense?
>>34334153
the concept of an undersea interceptor didn't work out, it was just too loud
It was meant to rush out if the russians knew the US boomers were coming, meet them halfway and BTFO them but shit going at 43 knots is going to be LOUD
The US Navy kind of panicked when they heard about it and the single Papa class that was even faster and they rushed the Mk48 ADCAP program to counteract it.
The russians have a Shkval torpedo that goes at 200 knots in a supercavitation bubble which is basically lightspeed in water but little is known about it other than it exists and is fielded
>>34334211
I read that the US and China were looking into supcavitating submarines, cool if true.
>>34334249
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval
>>34320803
Isn't that noisy as shit to have water rushing all over those inner spaces?
>>34331708
Um... is her skin supposed to look like that?
USS Dolphin, almost lost at sea, now in a musiem.
>>34335388
Rubber tiles get replaced every so often
>>34335220
I guess once it fills up and the windows are closed water just flows over it
>>34333232
right. that makes sense. thanks for the answer.
>>34335220
I'm no expert here but it's probably just a few small holes that water is able to get in from, it really just needs to ensure that there's no pressure differential between the inside and outside, during operation there's likely to be no significant movement of water through the bridge.
>Canada does not have proper submarines or anti-submarine weapons
>tfw Russian seamen in big black submarines are under our arctic RIGHT NOW
>>34331057
i got shocked in the classroom once. touched a gator clip and the ground on one of those little test cards. didnt say anything because im a real electrician and not some submarine faggot!
German here.
We're having a heat wave lately so I my request sub pics taken with maximum grey sky and dark waters in the background. Lemme see that it was cold when the pic was taken. I wanna freeze just from watching.
>>34339080
Sorry of the resolution of my pics is low, but I'm digging here through pics that have been on my HDs since the early 2000s
>>34339088
Arizona here
I'm on fucking fire
>you callin that a heat wave, son?
>>34333882
wasnt the US tossing around the idea of a submarine aircraft carrier?
>>34334100
Deda said one of these fucks was going to be equipped with molten salt reactor instead of lead-based system, would have been even louder/hotter/harder to run but uncle Dima claims might have done 75 knots (he's full of shit half the time, so take with a grain of salt)...
>>34325664
will stop fucking my women during shore leave?
thnx!
>>34325671
>when you have so much extra room you build a cozy slav hotel in your sub.
>>34325664
I do your BSP's fuck you faggot.
>>34339696
Its fun eating all your food and sleeping in your beds lol
>>34339689
It had a pool of sorts too
>>34341067
allegedly it had a lot of luxury so that the crew doesn't want to defect, so they stuffed the submarines with a lot of nice shit.
>>34341081
That says a lot about how the Soviet Union was
Borey w/Beluva. ameriboos worst nightmare. way ahead of us every bit as they were way ahead of us on amored fight vehicles for most of the cold war.
>>34341081
>>34341099
>imblying
every submarine service gives perks to that terrible duty. it isn't in order to keep them from mutiny.
>>34341127
Now is the Borei so small or the Typoon fuckhuge? n
>>34341165
i'd say they are both retardedly large although the borey has better more quiet engines
>>34341164
as I said, allegedly. I mean it makes sense to give them luxuries without the thought of that they might commit treason. But on the other hand Soviets were really worrying about such things
>>34324954
>classified info about a super weapon "accidentally" leaked on Russian TV
>>34341683
Maybe the russians is getting back at us for the Star Wars program
>>34334106
During normal operation it's no biggie; our shit's well-designed/maintained and our people well-trained. The only times I remember serious adrenaline surges were whenever the eng & edmc thought it would be good for us if they actually killed electricity and propulsion during flooding DRILLS. While UNDERWATER.
>k let's see how fast you nerds can restart this bitch
>tick-tock, battery's bleedin' dry
tfw to intelligent
>>34341947
I do volunteer work on a WW2 US Sub on my free Saturdays. Y'all wanna see anything? I've got pictures of most of it.
>>34342050
Show me engine room pics. My body needs it
>>34342095
She's diesel electric, four Fairbanks Morse diesels, 1400 HP a pop
>>34342104
>>34342050
>>34342104
>>34342112
the Pampanito?
>>34342176
Nope, Torsk.
Pampanito is an older Balao, Torsk is newer Tench, something like 28 were built before the war ended, only three are museums, with only two in the US, Torsk and Requin
>>34342188
oh wow didn't know we had any historic boats in baltimore. i'll definitley go down and see it some time
>>34342104
>>34342112
Nice. I've always been fascinated by propulsion systems. Got to tour the Midway this fall, pretty sweet when the engine room goes 3 decks in height
>>34342188
you'd think they could have given us something with an adequate war history. torsk itself was rather worthless.
>>34342194
Yeah we've got a couple,
Torsk - WW2 Sub, sank the last ship of the war
Taney - Prewar built Coast Guard Cutter, was at Pearl Harbor Dec 7. 1941, command ship at the Battle of Okinawa.
Constellation - Civil War sloop
Chesapeake - Light Ship (Basically a mobile light house)
We also have the SS John W. Brown, one of two liberty ships in the US, she also gets underway a couple times a year for a cruise out on the bay.
>>34342207
I haven't been on Midway in years, I did get to tour Hornet's engine room though last year when I was visiting San Fran.
>>34341165
The Typhoon is just that absurdly fuckhuge. Remember, it's got -two- pressure hulls side by side.
>>34342232
Two war patrols, 2 merchants and 2 patrol craft sunk (one being the last ship of the war) Destroyed 12 mines, took 7 japanese prisoner. Training submarine after ww2 until converted to fleet snorkel, Libyan Crisis, Cuban Missile Crisis as a blockade boat, also has one of the highest dive records in the US Navy at 11,884.
The only reason her war time record is so small compared to other subs is because she got into the war late. The Tench class subs weren't started on till 1944, Torsk didn't make it to Japan till 1945.
Sure she doesn't have a record like that of the Silversides, but she did quite a bit after the war, and Baltimore adopted her at some point in the 1960s, hence why she became a museum there. The last sinking of WW2 helped too.
God, i love how fuckhuge the Typhoon is.
>>34331590
It's spelled TWICE in the photo, and you STILL misspelled it!
>>34342716
how are miget subs supposed to get out?
>>34342733
The top is hinged I think
>>34342754
The Russians have so much cool stuff
>>34326003
looks like plymouth. i think i've seen it once or twice. subs in general look pretty sleek n' cool when they come in and out of the sound.
>>34330310
what is this and where did you get it ?
>>34341165
Remember that the Typhoon is about the same displacement, submerged, as a long-hull Essex-class aircraft carrier.
The Borei's are still bigger than an Ohio. The Typhoon is just THAT mind-warpingly gigantic.
>>34342733
Jesus, i thought the midged subs were the engine room of some sort. How high was the designers of this thing?
>>34334100
The Alfa. The closest humans have ever come to serving on the USS Defiant.
I can only imagine how much of a nightmare it was keeping its late 60s/early 70's slavic slave-rigged automation systems running. Shit must have been intense to serve on when it was running, though, operating a fucking SSN on a watch crew of barely a dozen men.
That, and the fact that it could beat the USS Iowa or the USS Enterprise in a drag race.
>>34341127
>way ahead of us every bit
>>34343093
Didn't they have some serious safety issues due to that crazy hot reactor design? Including losing a boat?
>>34342769
For what purpose
>>34342188
No shit I visted the Torsk about two Saturday's ago
>>34344483
Goin deeeep lad
Astute class
Also thread theme
https://youtu.be/prpdKVHt9Uw
Is this a shopped? He looks out of scale with the gantry behind him.
>>34345228
Nope. They're fucking huge.