ID the rifle?

Is that a FAMAS?

>>34307741
Honestly, looks like a cast metal wall hanger

>>34307741
Winchester 1873

>>34307775
this

>>34307741
Photographer says it's his. Ask him

http://thegreatwukong.deviantart.com/art/Newest-western-unedited-1-191583509

>>34307775
Thanks. Was looking for the exact one, but according to >>34307757 it might just be a hanger. A shame coz it's sexy AF

>>34307791
Thanks anon

>>34307833
Actually on ebay they sell replicas of the 1873 that have similar looking engraving. Maybe it is just a wall hanger.

>>34307859
Damn shame.

At least I know the right model now so I can get something similar

File: Yeah, judge, shit on him.png (183KB, 500x276px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 500x276px

>>34307741
http://www.sword-wholesale.com/Replica-Winchester-Lever-Action-Engraved-Rifle-p/g011w.htm
It's fake.
Also pic is absolute shit, fucking talentless hacks on deviantart

>>34307872
Thanks for finding it anon.

And yeah, she's a gunbunny but w/e, found it on a GWG thread and thought it looked nice mid-jerk

>>34307872
So, post better

File: WRF16_534233140-Tang Sight.jpg (3MB, 8537x1849px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 8537x1849px

poor wallhanger attempt to duplicate the 150th Commemorative rifle. the janky barrel band and undersized magazine tube give it away.

http://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-1873/model-1873-past-product/model-1873-150th-commemorative.html

>>34307741
>shooting with an eye closed
>not shooting with both eyes open for increased tactical awareness and better vision

Fucking casuals.

>>34307940
must suck to have your non-dominant eye be so bad that you can keep it open

>>34307940
it literally doesn't matter when the sight is flipped up in the retard position

File: DSC_0126.jpg (623KB, 2048x1356px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 2048x1356px

>>34307902
I don't do portraits or save GwG nonsense.

Something looks funny about that ladder sight...

>>34307972
So, you're all talk. Got it.

>>34308114
I don't need to prove anything. I'm sure you're smart enough to see the imbalanced, softness slider cranked up, poorly composed, somehow both over and underexposed mess going on.
Also the hat is bad.

>>34308171
Post better

>using a hot model to make up for poor photography
>having her wear clothes
double amateur