Recent aquisitions

>>34286418
Not sure about the repro sight. But that's a pretty bitchin find man. I bought one off a dude for $350 and dated it when I got home. Made in 1927. It was a steal. Have you shot her yet? Any issues?

>>34286503
It's mechanically perfect. One tang screw is missing and the other one is incorrect and one buttolate screw is gone. Really having a hard time finding replacement ones too.

>>34286418
So they made 32000+ of these in one year?

File: makarov kingdom of the spiders.png (705KB, 546x972px) Image search: [Google]

705KB, 546x972px

shitty picture but whatever.
got a polish makarov for 230 today.

>>34286671
iirc the serial numbers are continuous from the Henry rifle onwards

>>34286418
Just got this CZ 512. This little .22 Is going to be the gun I baby, any tips to make this a modest little firearm?

File: IMG_0416.jpg (4MB, 4032x2820px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x2820px

>>34288106
Fucking forgot the pic

>>34287957
It wouldn't be so bad if you didn't focus more on the poster. The light reflecting off it is fucking everything up. Put the gun on the counter in your kitchen and focus it on that.

>>34286671
uh, yeah. do you know how popular Winchesters were?

http://www.winchesterguns.com/content/dam/winchester-repeating-arms/support/faq/serial-number-reference/Winchester-Manufacture-Dates-by-Year-2012-Scanned-Documents.pdf

>>34287957
>polish makarov
REEEEEEEEE

>>34286418
I'd try numrich or that guy at the gun show with boxes of unlabeled parts.

>>34286418
How was the sight incorrect? Winchester would practically do anything for a customer.

>>34287975
That only works for 1866s.

>>34291280
It was a modern sight bought a long time after the original gun was made I figure the original one broke but I don't know for sure.