7.62 FAGS BTFO
5.56x45 IS SUPERIOR
>4 wounded, no fatalities
>Two wounded released same day
>Muh stopping power
>Muh heavier round
WEW
E
W
>>34263364
>Chinese made variant of the popular AK rifle
Uhh..
What?
How the fuck does the media get guns so wrong. God damn 5 seconds in Wikipedia could tell you that's wrong.
Also
>bernout using inferior commie shit
>zero kills
Top kek
>>34263364
>/b/ tier thread
Why does someone's bullet preference rustle your jimmies so hard, anon?
>>34263364
actually, you're wrong. If anything, what happened demonstrates the poor marksmanship of the shooter, or the poor accuracy of the gun.
He only got 1(one) center of mass hit, on the congressman's hip. He's had like 3 surgeries, multiple blood transfusions, and is still in critical condition. Had he not received immediate attention from the best medical professionals in the country, he'd probably be dead.
This demonstrates (for the millionth time) that shot placement is king, and that most centerfire rifles are plenty powerful.
lol sks is a joke which is why vietnam lost
>>34263364
Considering buying a para SKS from a guy in my area
Should I /k/?
>>34263501
Yes
>>34263519
that was fast
why?
>>34263364
>Chinese made variant of the popular AK
No....but
>Chinese made
Another nice Norinco taken off the streets by the man :^(
>>34263455
Objective, accurate, and insightful...... the fuck are you doing posting in a bait thread?
>>34263501
No.
You should only really buy an SKS at this point if you're really into what the gun stands for (history, aesthetic, etc), rather than what it is actually capable of. The prices have gone up such that you're better off getting something else. Para SKS's don't even have the history behind them since they were designed purely for the consumer market.
>>34263455
OP here. That's actually not a bad point. Not sure I'd call hip center-mass, but there's still plenty of vital shit down there.
That said, do you think with the same lucky hit 5.56 would've done the same job?
>>34263377
>>34263455
>>34263599
what did kek mean by this?
>>34263568
Because for the next couple montgs the prices are foing to go through the roof.
Guessing he's wanting.. whar 450-550?
>>34263579
Now the chinese are interfering with our politics!
>>34263625
It is hard to say. At that close of ranges there is a good chance that 5.56 would have preformed very well if US war proaganda is correct.
>>34263650
If I remember correctly, KE= ½M•V2
Twice the mass, twice the energy
But twice the velocity, four times the energy.
Long and short, it's more effective to go fast than it is to be fat. Up to the point that you're drilling clean holes, anyway. Terminal ballistics is complicated to say the least.
>>34263625
It probably would've done about the same.
I am of the opinion that if the shooter had stepped out with a 10/22 and better shot placement, he'd have more kills.
>>34263633
Is it only going to go up from there?
>>34263468
You must not understand his to because that was hardly a loss on their part