/k/ommandos what's your favorite ww2 plane?
There's only one acceptable answer.
>>34262566
Black Cats. PBY Catalinas that had the bomb sights removed, quad .50s added to the nose, and radar added. Used as night raiders in the Pacific. Also had a twin .30 turret on the nose, waist .50s, and could carry bombs and torpedoes.
>>34262566
Westland Whirlwind
>>34262566
This beauty. The only reason IL-2 1946 is still installed.
>>34262595
Their mission was basically "fuck with people." For example, once a Japanese airbase was cut off, and they knocked out the AA, the Black Cats would circle them all night. They'd randomly throw out empty beer bottles, which would whistle the whole way down. Every few bottles, they'd randomly mix in a handheld frag bomb. Once every few hours, they'd drop a 250 or 500 lb bomb, too. By the time the Marines arrived, the Japs hadn't slept in days or weeks.
They also did search and rescue during the day, and night raids on convoys. They could skim the wavetops using radar altimeters, drop torpedoes, and boogy on out, while staying so low they couldn't be seen, and the gunners couldn't depress their guns enough to throw anything heavy at them.
The planes themselves were obsolete before the war even started, but they eventually figured out how to use them to raise hell.
My forever planefu.
>>34262627
Sexiest twin prop
The Enola Gay
This nazi death-machine.
They put up to six 20mm cannons with high explosive shells on this fucker, to shred enemy bombers to pieces.
>>34262743
*pic
The Italians made some sexy as fuck fighters
https://youtu.be/aAobKbzxn50
>>34262577
This.
>>34262627
My nigga
>>34262618
manlets only
This thick beauty.
>>34262735
Mynigga
>>34262719
>ON ALL LEVELS EXCEPT PHYSICAL, I AM A SALAMADER.
>[disintegrates]
FW189 Uhu
>>34262996
Mi negro.
>>34263037
kek, it was a really good design, just developed and built within 3 months out of wood and flown by teenagers
>>34262719
Salamander a qt
E X T R A T H I C C
>>34263086
>mother won't believe that I got to fly a jet
>I hope she didn't die to bombing last night
>how do I land this thing
That's a tie between the Ju 87 Stuka and the Me 410 Hornet, got a soft spot for the Condor though.
>inb4 wehraboo
I'd say P-38 lightning but you'd say "oh of course you do, who doesn't"
>>34263531
ME410 with added KA-THUNK is the only option
>>34263556
and thats the wrong bloody one
>>34263556
>>34263564
Oh absolutely
50mm of eachshitanddiet-34
>>34262577
>Come to post the mosquito
>It's the first post
FPBP
>That's a nice dam you have, it would be a shame if anything was to happen to it..
>>34263564
Pardon me, good sir, but I just happened across this thread, and could benefit from some clarification. Am I to infer from this gentleman's response here >>34263600 that those mad cunts strapped a tank cannon to an airplane in the '40s?
Everyone else looses.
Most beautiful fighterplane ever made coming through.
>>34263980
They weren't the only ones.
>>34263980
the german fighters were often chanceless against the allied bomber formations that had overwhelming fighter support. With these cannons they could outrange them and knock some bombers out without risking to get in range of the defensive mgs
>>34263980
>>34264065
>>34264026
I see your Mk IX and raise a G.55
>>34264097
>>34264098
Oh, that's a pretty plane, but a little 'soft'.
I see your G.55, and raise you a Mk 24.
(Apparently not many of these still flying, especially with nice photos of them)
>>34263980
you aint seen nothing yet
the germans put a 75mm on a hs129
then the spagettis trumped that with a 102mm on a plane(p.108a)
pic related is the hs129
It could have flown against Germany or Japan, but neither really had an Air Force at the time.
It's a hard choice for me but I'd say it's either the pic related or maybe something from Germany like the Ta 152 H or Fw 190 D.
the flying suitcase
bumping with YER-2
>>34262614
Was the airframe used for the meteor?
>>34262566
>>34262577
Mah nigger
>>34263043
>Herren, herren, vat if R-Type vas a propeller plane?
>>34263043
ever seen this beauty?
Hellcat or her older sister the Wildcat
Outta my way fucking axis fucking shits!
>>34262566
P-40 is best Planefu
>>34262719
Heinkel was a good guy
Here's my planefu.
>>34262745
Good taste. Why are Focke-Wulf planes so
>A E S T H E T I C
?
>>34262614
If only the had given it Merlins...
>>34265872
Sexiest focke wulf
>>34264026
Needs more Griff->>34264213
Oh, there we go.
>>34262577
Grandfather worked on them and many others, he liked those balsa wonders.
She was outdated the second the war began, but by God did she put up a good fight regardless.
>>34270585
>Italians can't suppress an island protected by three outdated biplanes literally on their doorstep
Somehow I'm not surprised.
>>34270636
The Spaghetti-O's Airforce wasn't exactly a powerhouse.
>>34262618
fellow '46 player AND MiG-3 connoisseur? My man!
Another relic from the Italian military that could have been.
>>34263129
>>34264821
EXTRA THICC
(flew in March 1945, it counts, yeah?)
>>34270658
Yes, but you'd think with 1,000+ planes at their disposal they'd at least be able to achieve air superiority.
>>34264393
The GOAT
Practically untouchable for it's time.
>>34262566
PBJ- 1H
The us basically strapped a 75mm onto a Mitchell, and called it a day. Apparently the recoil would temporarily stop the planes movement mid air. It was deployed to destroy heavy bunkers and reinforced areas
>>34268154
You are a blast from the past.
PB4Y-2 Privateer
A e s t h e t i c flying pirate ship even though it did have a tendency to explode
>>34270768
>a roughly 14 pound shell having enough recoil energy to 'stop' over 20,000 pounds of aircraft moving at 200+ mph
No.
>>34270859
That’s why I said (((((Apparently))))
That’s what the pilots accounts said, although you could basically take those with a massive grain of salt. In my opinion I think it just feels a lot more pronounced inside the actual plane
>when you think you've decided on your favorite WWII plane and then immediately think of another that might be better
Favorite bomber is a tie between the Lancaster and B-17, but the B-29 is also there, and I can't ignore how fucking sexy it is
Favorite fighter has to be the P-51, Spitfire, or Bf-109
>ywn get to firebomb entire German city block with a Lancaster
>feelsbadman
>>34270859
Also, the large gun on the AC-130 generates about 93000 kg of force at maximum. Considering the the Mitchell is lighter, and lacks the recoil system of a c130, it’s kinda reasonable to assume that the plane would be slowed down pretty heavily, albeit not a complete stop
>>34262566
P-38
>>34262566
Fucking This
> supercharged engine.
>The F4U incorporated the largest engine available at the time: the 2,000 hp (1,500 kW) 18-cylinder Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp radial.
>Japanese pilots regarded it as the most formidable American fighter of World War II,[8] and the U.S. Navy counted an 11:1 kill ratio with the F4U Corsair.[9]
> 2,140 air combat victories against 189 losses to enemy aircraft, for an overall kill ratio of over 11:1.[64] Against the best Japanese opponents, the aircraft claimed a 12:1 kill ratio against Mitsubishi A6M and 6:1 against the Nakajima Ki-84, Kawanishi N1K-J and Mitsubishi J2M combined during the last year of the war.[65] The Corsair bore the brunt of U.S. fighter-bomber missions, delivering 15,621 short tons (14,171 metric tons) of bombs during the war (70% of total bombs dropped by U.S. fighters during the war).
Guns:
6 × 0.50 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns, 400 rounds per gun or
4 × 0.79 in (20 mm) AN/M3 cannon, 231 rounds per gun
Rockets: 8 × 5 in (12.7 cm) high velocity aircraft rockets and/or
Bombs: 4,000 pounds (1,800 kg)
>>34264098
The Merlin adds an acoustic aesthetic that gives the spit a huge advantage.
Video semi related https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xmDMRSLZqNU
>>34270887
I know, that's why I corrected you, now you won't have to say apparently.
>>34264393
How come we didn't bomb Germany with these? Was it the fact that ALL of them needed to bomb the nips since nothing else could? I always thought it would help since the Germans had better AA than the nips so a better bomber would help with that
The P-39 :
>Tricycle gear
>37 mm canon
>rear-mounted engine
>shark nose
>unrecoverable spins
>>34271045
by the time the b-29 was combat ready, Germany was already being invaded or the allies had airfields avaialable in very close proximity to the Reich. A B-17 or the like did the job just fine. In the pacific, the only way the Japanese homeland could be hit was through bombers, and the closest airfields were still hundreds of kilometers away from the islands.
>>34270918
>>34270945
best post
The F6F Hellcat doesn't get enough love for being the unarguable best performing plane in the Pacific.
>>34270770
>pic
That's a lie though, he's popped up a couple times since then, most recently last year IIRC.
>>34262566
For novelty value: The Hillson Bi-mono.
Built to test the concept of a detachable wing to allow interceptors to use shorter runways, then drop the upper wing and fly as monoplanes. (This was later tested full-scale on a Hawker Hurricane too.)
The best feature is undoubtedly that the maximum speed of the Bi-mono in biplane configuration was beneath the stall speed in monoplane configuration.
>>34262577
truth dubs
>>34263043
That's sexy
>>34264083
Which was dumb as shit because it didn't take the escorts into account at all.
>>34272205
>>34262566
Hello, William Lind
>Only one other BF109 post
...Fuck
B29 is the best plane
>>34273584
until the p-51 was introduced it worked because the fighters carrying the cannon had two engines and could outrun the fighter support.
The me-262s were sometimes also equipped with cannons or unguided rockets and were obviously fast enough to get away in time.
Admittedly the bombers were defended well in general.
>>34262566
Is this accurate?
>>34275780
there were a lot more planes, and the axis fighters are older than the ones picked on the allied side, but generally yes
>>34273976
The FW-190 was better in every way.
>>34275795
>>34275780
oh and i don't really think one could describe the p-38 and especially the bf-110 as interceptors, more like heavy/long-range fighters
>>34275780
>Night fighter
>Ju 88
I think the Me 110 fulfilled that role.
>>34275795
The planes were picked based on number produced. I tried to pick the most "typical" aircraft for each category.
>>34273072
I would have kept the upper wing. Tiny low wings scare the shit outta me.
>>34262618
>>34270684
Too bad the modding community uses shitty, fishy sites like mediafire for most mods.
>>34262996
Mon nigeur. P-47 is thicc indeed.
>>34262566
>>34262577
Myyy Niggar
>>34272163
>blocks your bomber formations
>>34276964
>>34262803
Too bad they might as well have armed them with meatballs and they flew like limpdick spaghetti.
>>34270945
MFW I have to go this far down the thread for the correct answer.
>>34270585
>>34270636
>in malta circa 2007
>wandering around valletta when i find something called "imperial war museum"
>hmm
>wandering around, minding my own business when i suddenly notice pic related
>is that a gloster gladiator?
>what's it say on the fuselage?
"Faith"
>fucking cold chills
He-111, it was outdated by the end of the war, but did many things right.
>>34271914
No supercharger, don't forget.
>>34278397
It was one of the few planes left to defend malta from the pasta and sausage people. Faith and hope i think the names were. There was a third one that got shot down, i forgot the name.
>>34278397
Faith, Hope and Charity were the names
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Far_Fighter_Flight
>>34262566
No one's posted this beauty yet?
>>34279258
>>34270945
>11:1 kill ratio
>>34279877
You should see the kill ratio for the Hellcat.
>U.S. Navy and Marine F6F pilots flew 66,530 combat sorties and claimed 5,163 kills (56% of all U.S. Navy/Marine air victories of the war) at a recorded cost of 270 Hellcats in aerial combat (an overall kill-to-loss ratio of 19:1 based on claimed but not confirmed kills).[43] The aircraft performed well against the best Japanese opponents with a claimed 13:1 kill ratio against the A6M Zero, 9.5:1 against the Nakajima Ki-84, and 3.7:1 against the Mitsubishi J2M during the last year of the war.[44] The F6F became the prime ace-maker aircraft in the American inventory, with 305 Hellcat aces.
>>34275780
Who made this shitty list and what video game he played?
twin engine heavy fighter Mosquito / Me 410
ground attack IL-2 / Fw 190
night fighter P-61 / Me 410
carrier fighter F4U / only real options are A5M and A6M
carrier bomber SB2C / B7A
torpedo bomber TBF / B7A
Day fighter depends on situation.
La-7, P-51, Spitfire / Ta-152, Ki-84
I choose N1K because others can't land on sea.
I fully acknowledge it was a meme fighter and resources could have been better off elsewhere, but.
>jet engined
>4 x 30mm cannons
>pushing toward 600mph
>those unbelievably futuristic sexy looks
Just something about the allure of the coming jet age
>>34270945
Best post
>>34278201
>flew like limpdick spaghetti.
but thats wrong
they were superb fighters and the germans even wanted to build G.55s instead their Bf-109s but 109s are easier,faster and cheaper to make than G.55s
THREAD NEEDS MORE SPAGHETTI
>>34282312
"when, after comparative tests against the Messerschmitt Bf 109G and the Focke-Wulf 190, the Luftwaffe itself regarded the Fiat G.55 as "the best Axis fighter"
>>34271045
>>34272082
germans also had the tendency to throw everything they had at a new enemy plane to see what it can do and what its purpose is and they actually had good high altitude interceptors which could touch the B-29 while the nips had no real chance at scratching the B-29s
>>34282328
And let's not forget the Macchi C.205!
>>34265716
>using kids as a last resort
>>34262577
This man know of what he posts
The single most versatile plane in WWII
>>34282328
I'm still surprised that it took the Italians so long to realize that their fighters were underarmed.
>>34284122
Don't forget how the G*rman butthurt it caused is only surpassed by the Lancaster.
>>34270768
>>34270859
>>34270887
Some noplanes probably misunderstood a pilot joking and actually believed it.
However, they would have to do sheet metal work on Army's 75mm equipped B-25Gs after a few weeks because the cannon would knock rivets loose.
It was build.
>>34272205
I think if it had come out much sooner the N1K2 shiden would have had something to say about that
Precision bombing.
>>34267572
Merlins wouldn't fit IIRC
>>34284808
Using which pilots? From 1942 and onward, Japan kept losing veteran pilots at an astounding rate and the Americans kept gaining them and sending them back home to train new recruits.
>>34284866
>precision
>>34285109
I thought they were used primarily against shipping?
>>34285126
they were.
>>34285140
I'm not >>34284866 , BTW.
>>34285140
two wannabe B-29s
>>34285046
Needed elsewhere.
Spitfire
Hurricane
Lancaster
Mosquito
Pretty much anything would take a Merlin "power egg"
eg
but demand was out stripping supply.
>>34284866
Tall Boy and Grand Slam were pretty precise all things considered
>>34285212
do you even disney bomb?
>>34285185
Brought to you by Fanny Lucy Radmall of all people. She basically paid for the engine in the S6.B Seaplane which you doubtless know the sound of.
>>34285239
Meh. What German capital ship did that sink :)
>>34285255
non, it was a bunker buster.
what was odd about it was that it had a rocket engine and could reach 990 miles per hour (1,590km/h). could go though 16ft (4.9m) of solid concrete
>>34283592
>he wouldn't want to spend his teenage years flying a motherfucking jet for glory of Hitler and Germany
Lmao, i bet you're an ally too
>>34262566
Typhoon, probably.
>>34285271
Did it bust any bunkers in WWII ?
>>34285333
>>34285333
sub pens to be exact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_bomb#Combat
>>34285347
So no. You didn't have any heavy bombers in Europe anyway so we can't blame you for not trying ;)
>>34280683
>I choose N1K because others can't land on sea.
:)
>>34285459
so the lanc is not a heavy bomber?
>>34275801
Thread was about favorite WWII plane, not superior planes
>>34286355
Murricans basically didn't.
B.29 could haul a Grand Slam only externally nothing American in Europe came close to a Lanc in payload and the B.17 was "quite a pretty medium bomber".
>>34286430
what about the B-24?
>>34286456
No room for anything big. It had a heck of a range on it but a Mosquito could carry a larger single device than her.
>>34286486
what was the normal payload of the 24? i know the mossie could carry a cookie
>>34286456
Wiki says 8000lbs short range for the B24, while the Lancaster's standard loadouts has a few in the 12000 to 15000 lbs range.
>>34286508
well i guess we english did somthing right
have a lincon
>>34270918
so beautiful
>>34286523
Yeah, you did prove to have a appreciable aptitude for aerial arson.
>>34286537
made me chuckle anon, thats how im putting it from now on
>>34286537
Most aircraft of the day were designed around the pic tiddlers on the left.
Some muppet wanted two torpedoes internally in a medium which led to the Manchester and eventually to its bigger brother.
>>34286591
the lanc was just a four engine manchester, were the engines didn't spit out connecting pins, as far as i know
>>34286630
More wing and a different engine.
Used successfully BTW as a dive bomber with a 12000lb bomb.
>>34286665
wait, the lanc or manchester dive bombing?
>>34286698
Lanc. But it was these guys.
>>34286712