US long range bombing capability

Call back when they have an active fleet instead of a prototype.

>>34262304
Y-ou want them to never call back? Rude!

>>34262273
You would think we already took China's advances into account before deciding to scale back

File: 1497500175610.jpg (18KB, 560x622px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 560x622px

>>34262304
>>34262307

I like how they used some tracing paper to design it

File: .jpg (171KB, 950x443px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 950x443px

>>34262318
100 % photoshop, all evidence points to the first flight of the prototype happening around 2020, and it's not expected to look exactly like the B-2.

>>34262273
>already on part with its B-2 equivalent
So what you're telling me is that they only recently were able to copy a design from almost 30 years ago?

http://thediplomat.com/2014/01/chinas-deceptively-weak-and-dangerous-military/

>>34262540
Holy SHIT.

>>34262273
Where do all these pics come from?

>>34262273

Because the US is moving towards the B-21, which will probably be stealth and supersonic somehow. Meanwhile there's probably a large catalog of black planes at Homely Airfield that blow everything else out of the sky.

But this is largely irrelevant, what matters is UAV capability because they're more stealth at 1/100th the cost. To this end the US has made great strides (more than any other country) in integrating UAV operations into the existing force (for example, F-35 pilots can fly UAVs in real time or hand it off to another F-35, a ship, or anyone connected to the network). This is especially true considering joint operations between UAVs and UUVs.

File: 1487049175806.jpg (470KB, 2560x1568px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 2560x1568px

>>34263000
what's Homely Airfield?

B-21 is not replacing the B-2.
It's replacing the B-1 and eventually B-52s

What will be replacing the B-2 is not yet known. It's just called the 2037 Bomber

http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/1999/June%201999/0699bomber.aspx

Whatever China is producing has yet to be on par with the B-2, which was unveiled in 1989 and produced in the late 80s.

>>34262304
no, have them call back when its not either CGI, a really super halfass bootleg, or a ed wood tier model posing as the real thing for the mentally retarded chinese state media.

>>34262318
its either a kite, CGI, or a remote control model kit from one of the shoddy knockoff factories.

File: stronk.jpg (146KB, 972x1296px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 972x1296px

yeah, how 'bout no.
until they can prove it's

1. not photoshopped
2. able to fly

i wouldn't even consider it

pic semi-related, pamphlet cover of China's new carrier.

>US destroyers
>Russian jet
>J-10 jets, incapable of being launched from carrier

>>34263054

The "official" name for Area 51.

I'm sure that the US is cared by a bunch of pixels

File: D22OrQ1.jpg (343KB, 1233x1028px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1233x1028px

>>34263141
gotcha

>>34263138
>dat comic sans

>>34262273

Because the US has shit China can only dream of. China would easily be BTFO. US pilots flex their biceps as they carpet bomb and precision strike slants. They have mirriors in the cockpit to 'mire their gains. I have seen this personally. The chink has never, in their 5000 year history, been able to do anything but lose, then say they won when the conquering peoples decide they like chinese food. Why do you keep shilling, comrade?

>>34263161
the chinese are so shitty at war, they cant even properly beat themselves.

it's an omega male of nations. If Japan is Kawaiii````` ugguuuu waifus, and korea is K-POP plastic hotties, then China is the gay brony tranny SJW midget cripple on an electric wheelchair with an exposed piss bottle, screaming about vegan options at a corophagia and cannibalism orgy when there is no wheelchair ramp.

>>34263195
> then China is the gay brony tranny SJW midget cripple on an electric wheelchair with an exposed piss bottle, screaming about vegan options at a corophagia and cannibalism orgy when there is no wheelchair ramp.

That's bad. I mean, you've really put some thought into that.

>>34263141
That would be Groom Lake.

>>34262540

It took me about a minute and 30 seconds of googling to link this pundit shit to the Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute.

I've no doubt that that the PLA is all kinds of corrupt and weird and backwords, but this idiot could tell me the sky was blue and I'd have to double check his shit for bias just to be sure.

>>34263095
>It's eventually replacing B-52s
Says increasingly aging air force for the seventh time.

>>34264540
>B-52s have a projected lifespan of 100 years
so yeah. it's true this time around.

Next

>>34264811
>It's true this time around
Says increasingly aging air force for the 8th time, moments before buying new equipment for the B-52 again.

File: Stuck in the 30s.jpg (120KB, 1119x458px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1119x458px

>>34262304

You morons act like the B-2 is some kind of high tech piece of kit, when it was based off of a flight platform created in the 30's by German amateur glider enthusiasts.

File: some faggot.jpg (28KB, 279x394px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 279x394px

>>34263195
>it's an omega male of nations.

What the fuck do you think the U.S. is now?

FAGGOTS in our military? WOMEN in our front line ranks? Our "leaders" more concerned about civilian casualties than they are about doing the fucking job they sent soldiers to do in the first place?

The U.S. is GONE, motherfucker, it's a nation of BITCHES now, and in 50 years, it will be called north Mexico.

>>34263152
When is that from? Looks cool

File: DO IT AGAIN BOMBER HARRIS.jpg (105KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 850x400px

>>34264985
Not so fast, wehraboo.

File: wait...what.jpg (75KB, 627x480px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 627x480px

>>34265070

File: 1497380061172.jpg (40KB, 447x599px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 447x599px

>>34265070
DO IT AGAIN HARRIS

File: UFO-pic[1].jpg (631KB, 1066x1600px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 1066x1600px

The US is well along in their B-2 replacement aircraft, the B-21.

Aircraft like pic related have been spotted flying high above the midwest for years. They aren't B-2s.

>>34263000
I seriously doubt the B-21 could go supersonic with those aerodynamics

>>34263141
Never heard that one before. Where you'd hear that?

>>34265070
Do it again bomber Harris

>>34264864
>>B-52s have a projected lifespan of 100 years
reading is hard

>>34263236
That is the Geographical location brah

>>34267700
Two of the same engines the f35 uses in a more aerodynamic package