AR THREAD AR GENERAL /ARG/ AR THREAD GENERAL AR GENERAL THREAD

File: 3092.jpg (597KB, 2022x1174px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 2022x1174px

>>34225325
going back to a t2?

File: IMG_20170610_031332075-4008x2255.jpg (1MB, 4008x2255px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4008x2255px

I may have compromised my zero on my other scope so I threw my microdot back on here and zeroed it to the irons that I know are good.

Debating if I want to go back DESU. It's so much lighter.

>>34225325
Ill give you $250 for the pro without the mount.

>>34225325
It's not worth 500. 350 max

File: 20170611_120955 (2017x1104).jpg (2MB, 2017x1104px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2017x1104px

>>34225344
if i get what i'm asking i will

red dots are a crutch for people that cant shoot

File: giddy btfo.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>34225325
>Wanting $500 for a used PRO with paint on it.
Considering your financial situation you should probably drop the price.

>>34225372

I can shoot pretty good. Red dots make for much faster target acquisition over irons.

>>34225372
Not really. Red dots make it so you can get to your target faster than with irons.

>>34225372
At least they arent some shitty iron sights though.

>>34225372
Sights are a crutch for people who can't point shoot.

>>34225380
>lose money to spend more money
no, i should keep it considering the situation.

File: 1473477203180.jpg (99KB, 800x601px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 800x601px

>>34225372

>>34225392
Actually, yeah.

>>34225392
Just sell me it for $250 you dumb ass.

File: 1496624845501.jpg (575KB, 1183x1078px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 1183x1078px

What upper do i get to become gucci? I got 2000 dollars to work with, already got a lower put together minus the trigger.

>>34225399
see >>34225368

also, i'm gonna wait until i have the laser and see how it looks.

At this point it's be even funnier if giddy got some dumb skank knocked up.

>>34225420
KAC or Block II
>>34225428
Or just sell it for $250 and add it to your credit card payment for the month. Really you should just be selling off guns. No one should have that much debt without anything to show for it.

>>34225432
i'm not interested in your mom

>>34225420
That's a hot anime gurl

>>34225442
or keep the pro, consolidate my debt and get a better job.

>>34225447

You can probably pay it off in 4 years if you pay $600 a month.

>>34225442
And makes less that 20k a year while living at home

>>34225453
He couldn't. Not him.

File: 1495915488928.jpg (1MB, 4008x2255px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4008x2255px

>>34225465

Yeah you're right. It's a hilarious reality.

>>34225447
>buying into the debt consolidation meme
I'd get a better job first. Border patrol is hiring and they start at a good rate depending on where you are.
>>34225457
>100% debt to income ratio
People really need to teach their children about debt.

>>34225465
YOU DON'T KNOW ME

>>34225471
>depending on where you are.
NC

>>34225471
Hes at 150%

>>34225485
*175% now

>>34225481

I could probably get you a job with a concrete cutting and drilling company, if you want to go deaf and destroy your elbows.

>>34225470
And he really needs to add a child support payment.

>>34225476
Face it, you couldn't.

>>34225447
Calling and striking a deal even if it heads to collections will be your best bet to put it all behind you. You can settle for like 50% on the spot

File: 1489892676344.jpg (1MB, 2672x1503px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2672x1503px

>>34225493

It would be optimal.

>>34225493
you're right, i should just buy nvg, ammo, and go live in the woods

File: 1493784805383.png (136KB, 325x325px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 325x325px

>>34225481
Don't you make like $11/h? There are so many jobs you could do for more. Armed guard, TSA, toothy blowjobs at the adult arcade.
>>34225485
>>34225487
>bankruptcy intensifies

File: WP_20170611_002[1].jpg (1MB, 1528x1936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1528x1936px

Humidity sucks.

File: Ditat_Deus.jpg (75KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 630x420px

>>34225506
move to az

>>34225505
$6.25

>>34225506
eh, it's great for cutting

Anybody running the new J-Comp?

>>34225503
>>34225504
How many ARs have you built/bought?

>>34225520
>$6.25
I'm sure you've been endlessly bullied about it already, but dude, the fuck are you doing with your life? What do you do for a living? Literally any job pays more than that.

File: 20160816_141957.jpg (1MB, 3470x1952px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3470x1952px

>>34225528

3 total I guess. But that's 3 uppers and 2 lowers. Sold an old upper to a coworker. Thinking I am going to file for an SBR stamp on my other lower.

>>34225534
I've been thinking about a sub-11" SBR myself. I have been leaning towards .300 Blackmeme 'cause a friend gave me his reload die.

File: 1496163360490.jpg (710KB, 4008x2255px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 4008x2255px

>>34225552

I'm going to do 5.56. I think that I wouldn't be seeing a whole lot of benefit from .300 BO.

>>34225530
He lives at home and works for daddy since he can't get a job elsewhere.

>>34225585
>can't get a job elsewhere.
I refuse to believe this. My autistic, socially stunted, raised by a hyper liberal single mother, no skills upon entering the work force having ass makes $50k.

>>34225604
>>34225585
*won't

File: 20170526_163512.jpg (1MB, 2260x895px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2260x895px

>>34225325
Literally the worst optics ever made, and nobody is going to give you comp4 money for a PRO.

File: IMG_0131.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>2017
>owning AR's
bunch of FAKE OPERATORS

f1 race in 20min, on cnbc if you guys wanna watch

>>34225690
>Literally the worst optics ever made
What? They're not super duper awesome, but they're good.
>>34225775
Nice SMLE. I also have one of those. Goddamn Privi ammo doesn't match my sights though.

File: IMG_0137.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>34225785
ty. privi was shooting low at 100 but hits POA at 200 on the ladder

>>34225782
I'll give her a go

>>34225325
My T2 for your PRO+pics of your sister's ass. She can hide her face but there has to be a timestamp with one of your guns in the frame

>>34225848
That's a good deal. He should take it.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34225775
>doesn't have a 1903
It's like you don't want to operate operations as an operator.

I asked in the previous thread about building my first AR
I just checked out Areo Precision and saw their "Ghost Gun" lower
I kind of want it because of how memetic it is

>>34225825
Yeah, mine is a couple inches high at 200, but windage is exactly centered, so that's pretty cool.

File: images.jpg (8KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 259x194px

>>34225871
Don't do a memes unless you can fully commit

>>34225982
Good advice
I was at a store yesterday and a guy told me about a certain type of AR trigger with will switch over to the full auto setting but it fires on the trigger pull and the reset
I forget what they are called

>>34225782
I gotta go yank trees. Fuck the woods

>>34225996
dumb

File: 20170611_120331 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

good start

File: IMG_0047.jpg (3MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x3024px

>>34225869
what kind of garand is that

>>34225908
>but windage is exactly centered
same, i have an adjustment tool but ive yet to have to use it on any of my enfields. so far my no4mk2 is outshooting my garand but i need to put more rounds through it before i make a definitive statement on which one is more accurate. enfield has a much finer front blade which makes it easier to group with

>>34226000
Oh

>>34225996
binary trigger

>>34226102
That's it
Are they good triggers or are they memes that cost $350-$400?

>>34226121
Sure if you want to shoot ammo fast and waste ammo fast

>>34226121
>Are they good triggers or are they memes that cost $350-$400?
As someone who has put ~2k rounds down range in binary mode I'd say they are a lot of fun but im not sure how practical they are.

I've done the Gen 1, Gen 2 and Gen 3 Franklin BFS triggers. You can get them going pretty damn quick if you get the cadence correct, it takes some practice before you can go full BRRRRRRRRRRT. Out of the box you will be doing rapid double taps ezmode.

>hiring old men to be marshals
>have to push cars
>fall
that's why you hire fit young men

>>34226128
What about the standard semi-auto trigger pull?

>>34226145
On the gen 3 BFS its a decent pull, a little better than the GI trigger (less grit, lighter, etc) but dont expect something $300 semi auto trigger levels of good

>>34226134
Why would have a marshall push a car?

File: image.jpg (3MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2448x3264px

>>34226021
The kind that will supposedly blow up in your face if it's an early one.

Btw I added to collection and should have pictures next week.

File: FB_IMG_1494115808319.jpg (55KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 960x720px

>>34226121
100% meme

>>34226198
because the car broke but still rolls and there is no crane near by

someone sell me their PA rds

I want to add some stuff to my AR but I don't want to make it tacticool.

What's my best bet?

Just had a forward grip and a 3 point sling? Do I really need optics?

What stuff do you recommend? How do I add a forward grip to a standard M4 hand guard?

>>34226258
>its another "i have no idea what im doing, hold my hand and tell me what to buy" post

go google some shit nigger then ask for advice when you have some semblance of what you want

3 points are shit, get a two point

>>34226258
>3 point sling
dont bother

>>34226258
Add as much or as little as you want/have a use for. Some people like irons only, most like some sort of optical sight. Same goes for a grip. Only thing you should definitely change is the sling. Get a good 2 point like a Snickers.

File: Selfie.jpg (3MB, 3315x2196px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3315x2196px

>>34226258
>>34226258
1. Post AR
2. What distance do you want to shoot at?
3. Is this a home defense gun?

File: WP_20170523_005[1].jpg (3MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3072x1728px

>>34226258
>Just had a forward grip
These are usually pretty nice.
>and a 3 point sling?
These are objectively dog shit.
>Do I really need optics?
Irons work but optics can do a better job. That isn't up for debate.

File: 1322531276567.jpg (45KB, 600x1376px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x1376px

>>34226327
>centurion

>>34226340
2nding this

File: WP_20170514_008[2].jpg (937KB, 2425x1728px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 2425x1728px

>>34226340
Explain.

File: child-poverty.jpg (15KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 600x300px

>>34226327
>when an optic from the 80s is the nicest thing you own

>>34226327
Are grips with a bipod thing any good?

File: 1458106626711.jpg (11KB, 215x240px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 215x240px

>>34226379
no

>>34226379
No
>>34226374
>>34226374
I'll save him the post

>post AR

File: grumble.jpg (161KB, 583x685px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 583x685px

>34226374
>he posted, in a general dedicated to a rifle five and a half decades old
Looks like anon loses his (you)s again!

File: WP_20170510_011[2].jpg (1MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3072x1728px

>>34226379
No.

>>34226374
>hurr durrr the acog is bad

>>34226409
kinda is though, this is the age of the low-power variable scope

File: IMG_3042.jpg (1MB, 3008x1876px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3008x1876px

Glocks are still fucking garbage

File: RCO Reticle2.jpg (2MB, 4780x2689px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4780x2689px

>>34226374
>Optic from the 80s
The TA31 was released in 1995.
>inb4 it's bad because it's old
kys and then post AR.

>>34226424
> low-power variable scope
A fad

>>34226424
they perform much differently than what you can write on paper

>>34226424
>low-power variable scope
Post one that isnt a boat anchor with shit fov

File: WP_20170404_011[1].jpg (3MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3072x1728px

>>34226424
>have a bulkier, heavier optic with a shittier FOV that you're going to leave on max power 95% of the time
'Kay.

>>34226424
Variables have positives and negatives like other scopes.
>kind of is though
Something being possibly better doesn't mean the alternative is a bad choice.

>>34226445
dude he totally used a strike eagle which does a much better job than any acog

File: 1xic6R5[2].jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

You guys are plebs, KISS carbine master race reporting in

File: SPR_zpsd9900278.jpg (69KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x600px

>>34226379
depends

>>34226445
That's the problem. Variables have a bad FoV, and the ones that are good are heavy. It's funny because I said that a month ago here and everyone shit on me for not knowing what I was talking about and how variables are like totes awesome bruh.
>>34226477
>KISS carbine master race
That's not an XM177.

File: yIZc3ll.jpg (191KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1280x853px

>>34226433
>being able to shoot fast at close range is a fad
SAD!

>>34226441
but on a more serious note the 75th Ranger Regiment tested ACOG TA01s way back in the 90s when they were first released and found them completely unsuitable for any kind of CQB work. The magnification is a big impediment to being able to PID threats at close ranges and it only gets worse at night. Their input led to big Army adopting the M68 CCO in the first place and they ended up issuing ACOGs only to squad leaders and officers who would be the last to enter any structures in CQB.

>>34226445
>weight
of all the places to save weight the optic is not a good one. Adding 15oz (at the top end weight wise) to get true 1x and 6x, plus better reticle illumination is a no brainer to me. That 15oz of weight realistically is not going to hurt me enough to outweigh those benefits

>FOV meme
If the optic stays on 1x most of the time my FOV is wide as fuck. If I see something through my optic that I need to PID I'm going to zoom in and in that case FOV is irrelevant cause I've already located my target and the wide FOV is only important for scanning.

>>34226457
>leaving it on max power
you're retarded

>>34226379
Talking about the Grippod? No, they are sort of the worst of both worlds. Too big of a grip (unless you have monster hands), heavy, and the bipod feature isn't great. Plus if you stick them on a carbine, you'll find that you rarely if ever get any use out of the bipod feature anyway. Was issued one of these Grippods in the military, used it for a couple of months, then went back to a USGI VFG. On my normal civilian rifle I don't use anyVFG because I don't have as much mandatory bullshit stuck on the rifle foreend.

If I was going to be a total memester and hunt with an AR-10, what power of optic would work best for specific shot placement at up to 300 yards?

>>34226507
>variable optic
>true 1x
Lad

>>34226507
>being able to shoot fast at close range is a fad
Are you not able to shoot BAC with an ACOG, because I can and it works fine.

>>34226021
You're shooting PPU right? Wanna give me a pic of your bore and crown?

>>34226512
>300yards
Almost anything, a top end of X6 will get you there and seeing the deer no problem.
X4 might be a bit of a stretch

>>34226512
A red dot. If you can't hit at 300 without magnification you suck.

File: yespls.png (56KB, 395x458px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 395x458px

>>34226507
>ACOG TA01s way back in the 90s when they were first released and found them completely unsuitable for any kind of CQB work
>of all the places to save weight the optic is not a good one
>If the optic stays on 1x most of the time my FOV is wide as fuck
>the wide FOV is only important for scanning.
>you're retarded
This should be gud.

File: IMG_20170413_180344922_HDR.jpg (2MB, 3912x1383px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3912x1383px

>>34226529
There are a few

>>34226537
>>34226539
My eyes are shit. Astigmatism, and without my glasses on I can see like 6 inches in front of my face. Even with them on, things are blurry past 100 yards.

>>34226507
>but on a more serious note the 75th Ranger Regiment tested ACOG TA01s way back in the 90s when they were first released and found them completely unsuitable for any kind of CQB work. The magnification is a big impediment to being able to PID threats at close ranges and it only gets worse at night. Their input led to big Army adopting the M68 CCO in the first place and they ended up issuing ACOGs only to squad leaders and officers who would be the last to enter any structures in CQB.

I've tried using a TA01 for CQB training, and have used TA31s live and for training in CQB.

I agree that the TA01 is unsuitable for CQB. The reticle is built more like a traditional scope and the illuminated element is very subtle. The TA31 on the other hand has a massively bright element (even at night) that is very easy to get a look through.

I'd rather have a CCO for CQB, but a TA31 works. Between a TA31 and a variable power optic, I think the shooting experience is a draw. The 1x setting on a variable power optic is somewhat useless since it isn't true non-magnified and still requires eye relief. So since both the variable optic and the TA31 require eye relief and because shooting is happening with both eyes open, the variable has no advantage. The master race is still a good fixed power optic and an offset red dot.

Look even at modern operator guys- a lot of them are sticking mini red dots on top of their variable optics because they get that variable is also unsuitable for CQB.

>>34226553
>Astigmatism
Iktf sorry for my snark. 4x would work fine, 6x would be my max.

>>34226553
You could get a 3x-9x. The 9x would probably be fuckin' overkill, but somewhere between 3x and 9x would be your personal sweet spot.

>>34226507
Good think not every ACOG is a TA01 and they can accept dots. What's the point of having a variable again?

>>34226545
co-witness buis?

>>34226545
Weirdly enough, I'm about to get a SCAR17 and put my Kahles on it. We'll be like... Twinsies.

>>34226559
If you're going with a backup rds, why not just have a higher power fixed magnification main sight? Too bad the higher mag aimpoints are fuckhyuge.

File: IMG_20170429_104015896_TOP.jpg (4MB, 3744x2106px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3744x2106px

>>34226608
Im going to get a 16s and put the k16i on it.
Finding the 1-6 to be little less than what I want on a .308. Works when im just at the 100yd range. But when I get to a 500+ and shooting for groups, im finding it lacking.

>>34226609
Because anything much beyond 4x is overkill for a rifle meant for short to medium range work, especially if you're completely fucking your FOV in the process

File: Xu7oPcb.jpg (51KB, 720x432px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x432px

>>34226532
I am able to and it's not as fast or as precise as with a red dot or LPV. Because of phoria it's a complete bitch to shoot small targets at close range with BAC (Think hostage rescue shots, placing a shot into a loophole, or shooting into a narrow gap like a doorway at an angle).

>>34226544
>no rebuttal only opinions
yes it's going great

>>34226559
The problem with the dual-illum TA31 is that in certain lighting conditions it gives you shit for illumination, like if you're in a dark room shooting into a lit street.

>Look even at modern operator guys- a lot of them are sticking mini red dots on top of their variable optics because they get that variable is also unsuitable for CQB.
Depends on which variable. The biggest reason to use a micro red-dot on your LPV is because you don't have daylight bright illumination in your LPV.

The Vortex Razor HD 1-6x has a better eyebox than most ACOGs and very good illumination. Look at what top 3-gunners are using and almost all of them are using variable power scopes even on short-range heavy matches.

>>34226604
Putting a dot on top completely fucks your cheekweld giving you very little tactile index for your headposition while shooting, making it a lot harder to bang out rapid-fire followup shots. The idea being that if your head is attached firmly to the stock, when the gun recoils your head is coming with it and the reticle stays centered in your vision. When you can't get any kind of real cheekweld the gun is recoiling while your head stays still and the reticle floats in your field of view.

If you go the offset/angled route it sucks for shooting off the other shoulder.

>>34226507
What is BAC for $500 Alex

>>34226652
nigga you think they didn't try that?
read above

>>34226609
If you want higher magnification, that is something that can work. For general use though, 3-4x is good for intermediate range and fairly quick shooting. (This is all talking about a tacticool gunfight context, of course. )

Higher magnification on a battlefield makes it harder to scan, bring up the rifle quickly, and use it for suppressive or quick shots. There are guys who rock high magnification scopes, but those are specifically marksmen guys. A variable scope that starts at 3x and varies up makes more sense than one which starts at 1x.

>>34226639
For groups? Yeah. More mag the better. You'll just have a bit more weight to hump around.

>>34226645
>Think hostage rescue shots, placing a shot into a loophole
Oh boy.

>>34226658
No one is going to be taking precise shots (like anything involving a hostage) with an acog m8

>>34226645
>Putting a dot on top completely fucks your cheekweld giving you very little tactile index for your headposition while shooting
Cheekweld is important in CQB but FOV and target acquisition when you're within 50 yards of your opponent apparently aren't.

Your priorities are utterly fucked.

>>34226668
Ringing steel, the 1-6 has been fine to like 800yds. But I dont really get out to a range where I can do that often. Waiting for a good 1-8/10 to come out.

File: 26-17-1L.jpg (163KB, 705x527px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 705x527px

>>34226645
>Look at what top 3-gunners are using and almost all of them are using variable power scopes even on short-range heavy matches.

And most of them are sticking offset micro optics (or irons, depending on their competition class) on to the rifle.

>>34226693
6x is perfect for a 308 battle rifle going for combat hits.

But if you're looking to make 3 inch circles at 500 yards, you'll want to pump it up.

File: havetwoofthese.jpg (47KB, 317x433px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 317x433px

>>34226645
>>no rebuttal only opinions
I figure shit opinions require shit responses. Case in point;
>The problem with the dual-illum TA31 is that in certain lighting conditions it gives you shit for illumination
And in every situation ever a variable is going to offer you inferior FOV while being heavier and bulkier and generally less useful in close quarters than a fucking RMR on an ACOG.

Like, this is what you're doing dude. Your countering general issues with variables by pointing out circumstantial flaws with the ACOG that you have less change of encountering than not. It's fucked, dude. In every situation, a variable is going to be weighing more, taking up more space, not providing a better 1x experience than an ACOG-mounted dot, and not offering a comparable FOV. Every. Fucking. Time.

>>34226645
>Putting a dot on top completely fucks your cheekweld giving you very little tactile index for your headposition while shooting, making it a lot harder to bang out rapid-fire followup shots. The idea being that if your head is attached firmly to the stock, when the gun recoils your head is coming with it and the reticle stays centered in your vision. When you can't get any kind of real cheekweld the gun is recoiling while your head stays still and the reticle floats in your field of view.
You're over emphasizing this to an absurd point.

File: IMG_5913.jpg (1MB, 3011x2056px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3011x2056px

Glock 34 for sale 600 shipped to your ffl three mags, and the back straps and case.

>>34226742
I'll trade you a PSAK47

File: 1414969915193.jpg (54KB, 649x638px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 649x638px

>>34226742
pls no my wallet finally has money

>>34226742
cordan was interested

>>34226754
Only trade ill takenos a 19 with 100 cash

>>34226756
Sry bbe

File: 1490576650562.jpg (53KB, 485x428px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 485x428px

>>34226766
>mfw I just sold my 19 for $300
Fuck my life.

File: IMG_0012.jpg (25KB, 320x272px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 320x272px

>>34226776
Ouch

File: rjqpm0 (1).jpg (308KB, 1599x1066px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1599x1066px

>>34226683
>never seen what a good LPV looks like at 1x.
>never heard of shooting with both eyes open
if you still think FOV is an issue with a LPV at 50 yards you need to get your head checked. At 1x (perfectly adequate for that short range) the FOV on a lot of these scopes is 3 times wider than an ACOG's FOV and feels pretty much exactly the same as shooting with a regular red dot. If anything the eyebox is maybe more forgiving than a RMR's tiny window

>>34226717
There's no reason to shoot off your weak side shoulder in 3gun but there is if you have to use your rifle in combat. Nothing wrong with the micro dot but it's not strictly necessary with the right scope.

>>34226731
>still thinking optic FOV is important at that distance when you shoot both eyes open
k m8, i dunno what to tell you. Go to the range, set up some wide transitions (>90 degree swings) and try a good LPV vs a piggyback red dot. My experience has been that the LPV on 1x wins every time.

>>>34226738
>hurr the shooting disadvantages are not important but 10oz extra weight and a negligible FOV difference at 1x is too much for me

ok

that was a pretty great race

>>34226785
>hurr you need your face cemented in place to be able to use a parallax free RDS properly because 5.56 recoils so much it'll just throw your sight all over otherwise
Right back at you fag.

File: 1451364704684.jpg (46KB, 312x312px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 312x312px

>>34226807
>no qd

>>34226808
I don't "need" any of this shit, we could all go shoot irons. Better is still better, dumbass.

File: morenukespls.gif (2MB, 550x309px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 550x309px

>>34226785
>If I keep downplaying these general flaws and focus on little nitpickings maybe people won't notice
Nah, fuck urself son.
>LPVO
>feels pretty much exactly the same as shooting with a regular red dot.
Lmao, I'm done.

>>34226807
How do you like your Geissele MRO mount?

>>34226823
Post your AR

File: 20170529_190508 (2017x1135).jpg (3MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2017x1135px

what are you idiots arguing about?

>>34226834
Turbotard can't understand why people wouldn't want a variable power over an ACOG, spergs out heavily when people explain why.

>>34226822
Oh no, I need to have a 1/2" wrench to remove my mount I'll probably never remove.

>>34226834
Who are you again?

>>34226828
It's sweet, especially considering I paid like $65 for it.

File: IMG_20150605_124118-e1433565684877.jpg (525KB, 3255x979px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 3255x979px

Anyone use a BCA upper? I'm browsing for a nice upper for my first AR.

>>34226823
>When you can't get any kind of real cheekweld the gun is recoiling while your head stays still and the reticle floats in your field of view.
>I don't "need" any of this shit.
>Better is still better
Well that's what's up for debate isn't, dumbass? Post AR and relevant experience or fuck off. This isn't an operator thread or a gear queer thread so stop posting shit that isn't you or your shit.

>>34226858
Is it light or heavy for its size?

File: 20170515_183959 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

>>34226845
oh, what a moron

>>34226846
>I'll probably never remove.
how boring

>>34226822
>qd on a red dot you can just look through if it runs out of batteries

now i know why you're going to die a debtor. almost as retarded as an ACOG fanboy

>>34226824
Hi done, nice to meet you, I'm Dad.

But seriously what is your experience with LPVO? cause it seriously is very similar if you're not retarded and terrible at shooting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzYyXlHIVlo

>>34226878
You are quickly devolving into straight up b8posting, I hope this was your angle all along.

>>34226878
keeping dead weight is how you die, you clearly don't oper9

>>34226878
>post SupersetCA
>using the guy who doesn't even aim on 1x as proof that 1x works.
He points the gun in the general direction of the target and shoots at 5 yards. He's a gun racer. Considering your autism about lack of precision in BAC I'd expect better from you.

File: no.jpg (225KB, 728x1032px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 728x1032px

>>34226878
You're not getting a single further (you) until you post your AR.

>using sights
>using binary organs like eyes
>not using long range satellite targeting
>not using direct cranial links

>>34225520
how do you make less than the Federal min wage?

>But Special Forces use it!

I hate cherrypicked pictures of operators using this gear or that gear. People understand that Special Forces / SOCOM are still issued stuff that's outside their control and don't have 100% control about everything they use.

>>34226975
Works for his daddy, since no one else will hire him.

He's 26, deep in debt, thinks he's Speed Racer, and has no life skills other than fucking stuff up and digging holes.

File: 1496883910602.jpg (3MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x2268px

>>34227003

>>34227018
>Never any wear on the paintjob on the stock, grip, or fire selector

So, like do you guys ever actually shoo?

Is Fluffy kill?

>>34227031
I shoo all the time. Flies are bad during the summer.

File: [REDACTED].jpg (4MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3120x4160px

>>34227031
>So, like do you guys ever actually shoo?
Giddy? No, of course not

>>34227031
Giddy actually does shoot. That's how he keeps destroying his silencer.

>>34226946
The last thing I need is a cranial over scan virus that pastes gaining futa porn everywhere in my retina.

>>34227041
Reborn. He got a job, said his prayers, and the Lord blesses him with a new not shitty life.

Soooo that guy gonna post his AR with his super hot LPVO or what?

File: woops.jpg (1MB, 4005x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4005x2000px

>>34227064
or he's dead somewhere in a ditch
whatever

File: argument-typo.jpg (32KB, 735x541px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 735x541px

>>34227047
>>34227043
Yeah, yeah.

But seriously, senpaitachi, the lack of any sort of every day wear on the paint or textures of grips, buttstocks, and other spots that would get touched during shooting is kinda confusing. You've got these expensive rifles that are like wallhangers or something.

>>34227064
proofs?

File: welcometothefamily.png (180KB, 940x940px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 940x940px

>>34227070
Probably not.

>>34227053
>not having a 4x4 cubed firewall
>not enjoying furry futa porn

File: Capture.png (327KB, 332x455px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 332x455px

>>34227072
>no wear on the buttstock

File: gun toss.webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>34227072
nobody shoots their guns, now fuck off

>>34227106
The top. Where you would actually put your face when shooting. Usually that bit gets worn.

>>34227120
Are your cheeks made of sandpaper?

>>34227120
Are your cheeks made of sandpaper?

>>34227120
Do you grow sandpaper instead of a beard?

>>34227120
Are your cheeks made of sandpaper?

>>34227128
>>34227133
lmao. nice anon

>>34227120
heh, i got this...
are sandpaper made of cheeks?

kek

File: 38156-longshot.jpg (157KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 640x360px

>>34227070
>>34227100

>>34227079
Ring a bell and his Angel will appear.

>>34227071
He's probably been working overtime at the local gay club glory hole.

File: IMG-1634-zpsqabxcvui-191044.jpg (79KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x768px

>>34226728
Thats why im waiting for a good 1-8/10x scope to hit the market. Handle the low end and the mid end well. I dont regret the k16i in the slightest, I just think it is better suited for a 5.56 gun, so thats what ill put it on.

>>34227176
Whats the total weight of that scar?

File: IMG_20170603_190116841.jpg (2MB, 4062x1401px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4062x1401px

>>34227187
That one isnt mine, going to have that setup, with a longer MREX, different FH (dead air), and a different mount.

My 17s is pretty light for a .308 gun though

>>34227209
Somedays I just get the desire to sell my FAL and PTR and buy a scar

File: Fluffer.jpg (51KB, 320x280px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 320x280px

>>34227251
>selling good guns

>>34227251
My MWS with the same brake and a lot heavier kicks harder than the 17s. Both are about moa with the right loads.

>>34227273
>G3
>good
It's aged better than other cold war rifles but it's not nearly as good as modern options.

>>34227251
>selling guns
>not buying so many guns you need a summer house for them to live in

>>34227273
Theyre ok guns compared to a scar. I'm still gonna keep them though

>>34227273
>fa(i)l
>good

>>34227292
No shit retard
>>34227311
Dont you own like 4 guns total?

>>34227311
Oh you're dead to me kiddo. I'll down you in the toilet if I get the chance.

I never understood the whole 'gotta get em all' gun buyers. To me it seems like collecting old tools. Why use a hand auger if you can use a power drill?

>>34227120
Ar eyour sandpaper cheeksss madof?

File: 1492290079462.jpg (3MB, 3264x2383px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2383px

>>34227330
just 1

>>34227331
good luck when i shut your water off lmao got em

>>34227338
Oh, you have less guns than fluffy. How sad.

File: Poverty.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1920px

>>34227311
As expected from someone unironically looking at a primary arms 4-16 scope. >>34227295
a PTR fits you juuuuust right

>>34227347
is joke. sadly i have sold two and only bought 1 in the last month.

>>34227364
muh 1k budget sniper

>>34227338
>doesn't have quality or quantity

>>34227334
>>34227147
>>34227136
>>34227133
Ok my dudes have fun. Just sayin' you know it to be true that you spend more time posing rifles for photo ops than shooting them.

>>34227347
Well for 1, quality over quantity, and 2 hes fucking with you

>>34227368
what did you sell? Update me on your current arsenal.

>>34227368
$1000 budget, and your dropping under $200 on the glass. Holy hell. Get a $300 savage and put a used SHV on it.

File: DSC_0434.jpg (1MB, 1920x1276px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1276px

>not having a poverty tier rifle

>>34227375
>pb
>quality

File: 1482027114193.jpg (2MB, 2500x1406px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2500x1406px

>>34227389
shotgun and mosin. bought a savage sniber rifle

>>34227396
maybe i will anon

File: 1405109167948.jpg (203KB, 494x817px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 494x817px

>>34227397
>his self respect and ambition : gone

File: ammo5162017.jpg (223KB, 900x1600px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 900x1600px

>>34227373
You could just accept the fact that a lot of us regularly shoot our rifles. I probably have more ammo in stockpile than you've ever shot before

File: Resized_20170305_134255.jpg (1015KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 1440x2560px

>>34227373
>Just sayin' you know it to be true that you spend more time posing rifles for photo ops than shooting them.
K. Keep me posted.

File: IMG_20170603_175057860_HDR.jpg (1MB, 3708x1085px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3708x1085px

>>34227397
muh poverty rifle

>>34227419
Just how short are you?

>>34227403
I have one of those SHV scopes and they're pretty nice for the price.

File: Range 3.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

>>34227397
This

File: GetSerious.jpg (3MB, 4021x2401px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4021x2401px

>>34227397
This

>>34227447
5'10" My dad is 6'4" and fucked a hobbit so I got put in between.

File: battle raifus mugi.jpg (3MB, 1679x2718px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1679x2718px

>>34227462
Post your fa(i)l

>tfw you need to go zero your shotgun but don't feel like going to the range
i'm just not in the mood

File: PTR11.png (2MB, 1597x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1597x720px

>>34227462
>>34227456
>>34227397
are we poverty posting now?

>>34227481
make /brg/ .....err.... /arg/ great again?

File: BestBRs.jpg (3MB, 3901x2113px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3901x2113px

>>34227478
True

File: range day.jpg (2MB, 2448x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x1836px

>>34227481
Always

>>34227497
Thank

>>34227501
Maybe someone will take the b8 this time

>>34227455
ill see if i can find one. i was real bummed that vortex isnt available anymore

File: 2016-10-21 16.03.53.jpg (2MB, 918x1630px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 918x1630px

>>34227463
Many such cases. Sad!

are trijicon acogs as good as ppl say

File: Not a BlockII.jpg (4MB, 4780x2689px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4780x2689px

>>34227517
Tell me about it. Everyone on my moms side is short as fuck despite being pure Scandinavian (actual literal 2nd generation norwegians and swedes). My daughter is taller than everyone in her class so maybe she'll break the cycle.

>>34227563
They really are.

>>34227563
better than the nay sayers but not as good as the fanboys say.

>>34227338
What happened to the Garand?

File: LuWj09T.jpg (495KB, 2048x1368px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 2048x1368px

>>34227415
When the fuck is the next Venture Bros. supposed to come out.

MSD, got any good goat porn?

>>34227574
dicknut

>>34226534
which rifle

>>34227866
the one in your pants

>>34227775
hey i was supposed to ask you, how do you like the XC1, does it perform well as a carry light?

Can I own an AR15 if I have Aspergers?

>>34228129
yes you'll love it

>>34227900
>does it perform well as a carry light?
yes

>>34228195
what holster do you use

File: 511201718344.jpg (483KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 720x1280px

Good enough

Zeroed at 25 and this was the result at 100

>>34227775
like every 3 years or so

>>34228138
I already do love ARs Ive shot a lot of them. I have a $1000 budget should I build or buy the rifle? That is without a scope since a friend will sell me his mro for $350

File: 5112017183413.jpg (2MB, 2268x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2268x4032px

after shooting at 100, I took the Red Dot off and then put it back on and it maintained zero. That's good, so now I don't have to buy a QD mount

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-11 at 6.28.12 PM.png (1MB, 2204x1102px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2204x1102px

who here

/R A R E/

File: 5112017183421.jpg (3MB, 2268x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2268x4032px

Rapid fire while walking backwards starting at about 5 ft

http://m.ebay.com/itm/wilson-combat-sight-5-56-to-7-62-/132162210064?hash=item1ec57b4910%3Ag%3AqCEAAOSw5UZY9Mt8&_trkparms=pageci%253A03468000-4ef7-11e7-b4ae-74dbd1800a01%257Cparentrq%253A9951182e15c0a86bd440af6afff7af9a%257Ciid%253A10
Is this rear sight any good

>>34228195
why does everyone hate on it and tell me i need a 600 lumen x300u

>>34228319
>325

for what fucking purpose...

>>34228343
Looks like it went through a house fire. May as well get a new mbus at that price.

>>34228319
seems like something giddy would waste money on

thinking about getting a kac vfg in taupe for this

File: IMG_0154.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>34228561
fug

>>34228292
Build they arent that hard

File: rumplyblanket.jpg (1MB, 3000x2374px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x2374px

>>34227031

I do.

>>34228542
you clearly don't know me at all.

File: thicc.jpg (335KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1280x720px

Rate my upper. Yes, I keep forgetting to buy some zip ties for the light switch cable.

>Rainier forged upper
>Cryptic phosphate bcg
>DD 10.3 chf barrel
>Geissele "muh thicc" mk8 9.5" ddc
>SFMB
>M300 scout on arisaka inline mount
>AXTS brand AXTS Raptor
>Aimpoint T- "Giddy jelly" 2
>Mark Laruse Tactical micro mount
>DD A1.5 front

>>34225420
KAC or LMT piston

File: sanmakko hyväskyy potsakesi.jpg (53KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1000x800px

>>34228658
good job/10

>>34228658
listened to arg/10

>>34228202
dat incog

>>34228410
not sure

>>34228658
8/10

>>34228658
I like it a lot but the Geissele rails have lost some of their Gucci with all the normie adoptions

name one thing wrong with that upper

File: 1496451087123.jpg (2MB, 4008x2255px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4008x2255px

>>34228710

That's why it turned out so nice. Duh.

File: 1494612952403.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>34228658
you've done well

>>34228720
>>34228718
I got you senpai

File: best seasoning.jpg (1MB, 2116x1776px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2116x1776px

>>34228722
HEY THERE!
i would appear you've used the wrong dust my dude!

File: IMG_20170519_173700004.jpg (883KB, 2250x4000px) Image search: [Google]

883KB, 2250x4000px

>>34228738

That's impossible steak dust is delicious.

Although tonight I used olive oil, salt, and pepper. Was pretty good.

File: PDWMode.jpg (2MB, 4160x1952px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x1952px

>>34228722
>putting shitty dust on your steak
>isnt even larue meme dust
Grilling that one up for jamal?

>>34228741
>olive oil, salt, and pepper
there you go

>>34228726
I'd say it looks awesome on the lower I should be receiving a stamp for any day now, but that's strictly theoretical

Kekwave is not aesthetic

>>34228744
>>34228753

I'll put whatever I want on my steak damn it. Next week I'll soak it in itallian dressing if you don't give it a rest.

>>34228741
>olive oil
Worchestershire sauce, salt, pepper is the only thing that should ever go on steak.

>>34228767
Velveeta

>>34228790

I'm going to try Worcherchire sauce next week.

>>34228794

Mmmmmm velveeta.

>>34228767
why are you threatening us with making your food taste bad?

>>34228790
so you put a wet steak in a dry pan?
I apologize on behalf of your taste buds

>>34228798
>I'm going to try Worcherchire sauce next week.
Good man, you won't regret it.
>>34228810
>pan
If you're not grilling your steak just leave. There's no point talking to you.

>>34228818
>grilling
that's fine then

File: IMG_20170101_170123860.jpg (1MB, 3555x2001px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3555x2001px

>>34228810

Because I like the way I cook it and I wouldn't cook it like that if it weren't tasty.

This is literally as bad as me shooting M193 and a bunch cock goblins running in screeching about how I should be shooting M855. Fucking pointless.

>>34228818

My goal is to eat as many tasty steaks as possible before I get tied down with another vaginal jew.

>>34228828
>My goal is to eat as many tasty steaks as possible before I get tied down with another vaginal jew.
...wut? What does having a woman have to do with eating steak? More so, what kind of women are you dating that don't actively enjoy steak? My wife literally has me on the front porch in 10F weather when she wants top sirloin.

>>34228845

Yeah but buying 2 steaks is slightly more expensive, and takes more work.

Good point though.

File: 1495856676469.jpg (25KB, 642x792px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 642x792px

>>34228828
>My goal is to eat as many tasty steaks as possible before I get tied down with another vaginal jew.

>>34228855
>Yeah but buying 2 steaks is slightly more expensive,
Oh yeah, point there. I guess I'm just used to getting 2 packs I don't consider it anymore.

>>34228868

I have been going to the counter lately instead of getting something from the case.

Although today I bought this 3 pack of thin bonelss ribeyes and ate 2 of them. Those were pretty good.

It's just steak
Who cares

>>34228888
winnar

File: 1494023506879.png (669KB, 626x621px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 626x621px

>eating animals
sickening

File: 2017-05-29.png (49KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 160x160px

>>34228888
>It's just steak
>Who cares

>>34228888
quads have spoken.

File: 51DTtqT.jpg (4MB, 2848x4288px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2848x4288px

I'm building a ultra mega shitty ar15 with a $27 lego lower:
http://www.primaryarms.com/tennessee-arms-company-hybrid-polymer-lower-receiver-with-marine-grade-brass-inserts-black-null
a $199 complete upper:
https://www.bearcreekarsenal.com/upper-assemblies/ua223cm41619-p-shg
and a chinese ultra cheap lower parts kit. I'm also throwing a chinese optic and rear irons on it bringing the grand total to $305

Give me ideas on what shitty airsoft tier rails or accessories to slap on this turd and suggestions on how to paint it.

>>34228951
Whats a good chinese lower parts kit?

>>34228951
holy fuck nigga that cheap shit's gonna blow up and take a hand with it. then again that's true with any AR

>>34228951
y u do dis

>>34227757
nothing

>>34228810
because he been cucked too hard. he doesnt know which way is up anymore.

>>34228969
There is not one that I know of, I want this thing to be power glove bad.
>>34228977
I know what I'm getting into, your concern is appreciated.
>>34228979
for science