>1980s technology

>>34221116
Everything there is pre 80s tech. Glock just put it together successfully.

File: IMG_9637.jpg (236KB, 1766x1909px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1766x1909px

>>34221116
>2000s technology

File: M2.jpg (420KB, 2560x1037px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 2560x1037px

>1910s technology

File: IMG_9639.jpg (80KB, 661x496px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 661x496px

>2010s technology

File: IMG_20161218_183442.jpg (386KB, 1375x1021px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1375x1021px

>>34221116

Nothing wrong with 80s tech anon...kills bad guys dead just as well as anything else

File: IMG_20170101_140706.jpg (440KB, 1441x1070px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1441x1070px

>>34221116

>1950s technology

So what's the problem?

File: IMG_9640.jpg (87KB, 800x510px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 800x510px

>70 A.D. technology

File: IMG_9641.jpg (28KB, 350x226px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 350x226px

>>34222805
>1911s technology

File: WTW-G11-and-reloading-unit.jpg (29KB, 598x335px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 598x335px

>alternate timeline technology

>>34223040
What is that black thing on the side that looks like the hatch from a gumball machine?

>>34223132
Funny you should say that, it's the charging handle, and just like the gumball machine, you operate it by twisting it

>>34221116
Yeah it's surprising that in 35 years no one has came up with a more reliable no bullshit combat sidearm. Plenty of attempts but in the end they're all just knockoff Glocks.

>>34223132
Kraut Space Magic

>>34221116
Guns are inherently old. I doubt we'll see any breakthroughs in gun tech for atleast a hundred years

>>34223181
The Luger is over 100 years old and does better in the mud. ~Karl

File: 9964.gif (914KB, 242x202px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 242x202px

>>34222827
>shit talking a 30-round .22 mag

>>34223181
After owning many handguns I have decided the only things I want anymore are 1911s and glocks.

No roll pins in either. Easy take down for cleaning or repair. Great ergonomics on both. Parts available everywhere.

Both are creations of very smart guys.

>>34222989
Gee Bill, your Mom lets you have two lanyard rings?

>>34223271
materials technology is probably the only forthcoming advancement.

Hey, if something works, it works, especially with the inherent danger associated with firearms (ie operator error). Can't make it too easy for Joe Rando to negligently light up because he has an electromagnetic trigger that will discharge the weapon just by brushing his finger across a stud.

File: photo_011710_001.jpg (103KB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 800x640px

>>34222836
I honestly dont know if he meant to talk shit or praise.

File: 1382280711.jpg (349KB, 915x475px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 915x475px

>>34225195
... with a completely different action that is a sealed component...

That's the thing about all those inrange mud tests; god I love those guys but their fanbase cant think outside of a nutshell to save their lives...

>>34227677
He said reliable combat sidearm, not "reliable combat sidearm that uses the same action"

It's great how the glock fanboys are acting like every other fanbase now.
>i-it doesn't mean anyth-thing
>seals u-use the gee n-nineteen

>>34222799
I utubed this piece of shit.
You win the thread sir.
The ppl building guns in the 80s had a higher iq than just about 100 percent of naysayers

File: 20170605_010644.jpg (3MB, 4000x2557px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x2557px

>1890s technology
STOP WE NEED TO GO BACK

File: 4e878e8a0007f0a99655f70b77268dcb.png (55KB, 148x168px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 148x168px

>>34229056
>Shotguns nowadays can't slamfire

>>34231233
JB weld