>>34218372
a glock
>>34218372
Probably a spear gun.
mg42
>>34218372
A big Blast o' Cheddar cheese flavor
Berthier rifle.
>>34218372
40mm granade launcher
ratshot
Vulcan's Sphincter
>20 rounds of 12ga
>birdshot only
>>34218498
not enough velocity
>>34218372
musket
nuke
M-29 "Davy Crockett" man portable tactical nuclear recoilless rifle.
>>34218372
>What would you use for literally shooting fish in a barrel?
>
AK47 should do the trick.
>>34218372
I eat ass
>>34218481
Ratshot would work, I think.
Maybe I'll buy a barrel and test...
>>34218372
>>34218372
fishing bow, i shoot fish in a creek, slightly trickier.
>>34218379
this is also an acceptable answer
>>34218738
don't think so
>>34218796
>Personally i think this is bullshit... I ran across this point quite a while ago. The only known reference to Mullein having rotenone in it is from Duke, everyone references him. He references himself on that from another rarer book he wrote that i managed to track down. Apparently he references Mullein having rotenone from a series of books called "The Wealth of India" if i recall. Those books are very hard to find and i have still not been able to find them to see what they say. However I am very skeptical of any of the chemical assay's that come from India. My personal theory is whatever tests they did, they got some specimens that were sprayed. Rotenone is a common spray that exporting companies spray on their herbs to pass the phytosanitary standards.
>No other non Duke referenced chemical assay on Mullein says anything about Rotenone. Duke is very knowledgeable however he does not always check the accuracy of his sources very well. Several times have I found errors in the chemical assay's he lists on plants.
>If mullein indeed had any significant source of rotenone i'm sure there would be major health problems being reported from its use, however as far as i have seen no one has had problems other then contact dermatitis using Mullein.
>Take this however you want but i seriously doubt the validity of mullein containing rotenone.
>>34218514
Maybe if the barrel is filled with 2 tiger sharks, but if it's just cod or catfish, birdshot 12ga will rip them apart.
>>34218372
Ruger Blackhawk, because that's what Captcha told me to use
Also i got all the bracelets wtf
>>34218372
drop one of these into there and run
a flamethrower
>>34218372
trick question. you cant shoot fish in a barrel because even like a 30-06 bullet will only travel a couple inches through the water before it loses all it's velocity and simply slowly sinks to the bottom. you'd need some kind of explosive to compress the water to kill the fish rather than a gun. hell you're even safe from a .50 bmg under 14 inches of water as seen here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvSTuLIjRm8
>>34218514
higher velocity tends to fragment the rounds as soon as they hit the water, with birdshot i'd be concerned about momentum/inertia
>>34219005
*laughs in soviet while underwater*
>>34218372
Spring powered airsoft gun
Any real gun since the mythbusters proved that the shockwave caused by the bullet hitting the water would be enough to kill all the fish
>>34218372
These guns right here. I'm going to punch so many fishes.
>>34218904
birdshot will only travel for about 3 inches with enough velocity to kill something in water anon.
>>34219262
this
Its about creating a shockwave in the water, not hitting the fish.
The correct answer is flechette rounds.
>>34218372
there is an episode of mythbusters about this. shotgun was absolutely hands down winner
>>34218372
#7 1/2 shot, 3/4 oz load, 2.75" 12ga shell.
So I don't put holes in the fucking barrel like >>34218379 this doofus.
A blunderbuss loaded with sewing needles
>>34218372
My dick
>>34218372
Depends how deep. My Smith and Wesson Model 29 .44 Mangum seemed to have the concussive pressure to kill fish when they swam to the surface.
Assuming the average barrel, and if they weren't swimming up top, maybe a 30'06?
>>34218372
5.56.
>shoot a couple of .223" holes in the barrel
>wait for water to drain
>magdump
>>34218861
Dude what are you on about
I'd use a shotgun that fires pool torpedoes
>>34219025
Fucking delta force 2 memories
An illegal SBR
>post about it on /k/
>ATF shows up
>shoots my pet fish in lieu of dogs
A cherry bomb
>>34218433
Undr8'd
>>34218372
>What would you use for literally shooting fish in a barrel
If I'm going to 'shoot' fish in a barrel, I'll obviously want to use a gun that has a large enough bore to fit a barrel in.
MP5/10 in 10mm with extra spicy loads.
>>34224290
>>34222825
> doesn't understand bullet physics in water
> doesn't understand glock physics in water
>>34224602
That would not work very well.
Red hot magnets propelled by a propeller.
>>34218372
Good ol' Acme branded dynamite.
>>34220218
In my experience it's even less than that.
.22lr was the most effective round we tried when trying to hit a point target. 5.56 would deform and veer off target upon impact, but hit with such force that anything within about a foot of where you hit got paralyzed and just sank to the bottom for easy collection.
>>34224718
>it shoots napalm
>napalm burns in water
It would work way better than you think
>>34218372
Shampoo.
Just pour that shit in and stir.
My over/under shotgun
first shell is dragon's breath
second shell is filled with old bay
>>34223122
that what that guy thinks is fish poison may not be fish poison.
Killing fish in a barrel with a firearm isn't all that interesting as most of the time, assuming your gun isn't an bb gun or something like that, they will die from the shock wave regardless of whether or not you actually hit them.
As such I would just use some form of explosive, for funsies.
>>34218372
A tazer
>>34226771
welcome to the point
>shooting fish in a barrel
>anything except underwhemlingly easy
>>34226771
>explosive
>first reply is 'a glock'
Jesus christ, at least TRY to go along with the joke
A .22 caliber break barrel air rifle preferably with pointed pellets for best water penetration.
I've actually done this with large frogs and small fish that are around a foot underwater. They get absolutely wrecked by a hit. A miss by an inch or two will stun them for around a minute without killing them like a firearm will.
Getting your point of aim correct to account for diffraction is the hardest part
>>34225182
The napalm would float on the water. You'd barely raise the temperature of the water a few degrees at most before you ran out of fuel. The heat capacity of water is extremely high.
>>34225182
Furthermore napalm does not have it's own oxidizer, so it could not burn underwater.
>>34218638
this.
a bucket of cum
>>34220048
Suck on soil lounge act!
Taser
>>34230890
>>34226841
>>34218796
>>34218861
>>34218372
22lr. The bullit will bounce around inside barrel killing all fish.
>>34219005
If that were actually the case, wouldn't you see more things using water as armor?
Pretty much any bullet is going to shatter and slow down as soon as it hits water, go with a spear gun.