Glock Fags on Suicide Watch

They did make one

>15 minutes ago

>With the exact same image and subject

LOOK AT THE FUCKING CATALOG YOU STUPID CUNT

newfags can't into catalogs

>>34216997
Yaaaaaawn

>>34217027
I am not Op, I was posting in that topic and the faggot ass OP of that thread deleted it for you information.

File: 1489339967147.png (980KB, 1752x1342px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 1752x1342px

Gonna need a Glock form of this.

>doing 15 takes just to get enough mud into the slide
>hurr durr even hipoint is better

lmao what a shill
it's not like anyone would dump their glocks into moving sand.

hi-point for the win

>>34217498
B-but clearly they doctored this video and that isn't what really happened.

Kek

>>34217590
Dozens of tests have been done on the G17/G19, the glocks ran flawlessly. Are you telling me with a straight face that these hacks are legit?

>>34217620
And there's dozens of tests where they also failed. It happened. Get over it. Or keep pretending, idgaf

>>34217620
Ian and Karl are absolutely legit. How new are you?

File: glock fanbois.jpg (80KB, 1000x618px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1000x618px

>>34217620
muh glock perfection™

>>34217620
newfag gtfo

File: 1446428917291.jpg (204KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 600x400px

>>34217620
LURK
BEFORE
YOU
FUCKING
POST

>>34217620
Ian fucking carries one, one in which he has invested quite a bit of cash to mount a red dot
(LOL should have waited for MOS)
I doubt he would try to make Glock look bad

>>34217620
>glocks ran flawlessly

PHASE
THREE
MALFUNCTION

They should do a mug test on revolvers
a S&W and a nagant.

Both saw lots of combat action all over the world.

I think they will fail but not in ways you would expect.

A mab15 would be interesting too, it has a rotating barrel.

File: 1495183900378.jpg (77KB, 750x390px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 750x390px

>>34216997
>mfw the Luger did better than the austrian tupperware

>tfw you will never ameliorate with a stick

File: 2,w=1489,q=low,c=0.bild.jpg (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>34216997
Why is this shit so important to you americans?
Afraid you´ll have to clean your gun after you´ve dropped it in your mayo-jar?

I enjoy Ian's channel but he comes off SO fucking much like one of those tryhards who never joined the military (for whatever reasons), so he always has to compensate with his "superior knowledge". Karl too slightly, but Ian even more so. I do enjoy the mud tests, but I can only have so much respect for grown men who constantly talk about war this war that, dress in combat fatigues, love military history, but failed to serve themselves

Inb4 a bloo bloo welfare queens you fuckers know I'm right

File: 1422385232487.png (230KB, 316x376px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 316x376px

>>34217620
Holy shit.
First day bud?
Welcome I guess

On this episode of; we stuff mud into chambers of guns and they don't work for some reason.

A more realistic test would be firing a bunch of rounds without cleaning or firing a bunch of rounds with the gun being slightly sandy but that isn't youtube material.

>>34217776
Afraid we're on to your tricks östnigger?
Cats out of the bag, there's a reason hk rejected Gaston's design.

File: IMG_0525.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34217806
Actually Deutschnigga. And I prefer swiss guns.

>>34217787
That's expected of any gun, even the much maligned 1911 is easily capable of running with carbon and a little grit in it, when built as a service weapon of course, not a lightly sprung double stack .40 cal unlimited race gun.

Point being we already know what guns can do that.

It's hilarious how all of the modern semi-auto pistols have gotten beaten by 100 year old designs that have a reputation for being fragile and unreliable.

File: Coast Guard WINNING.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>>34217779
>when you can't use a mud test as confirmation bias so you resort to ad hominem

:^)

>>34217821
Swiss guns are GOAT, you have good taste, I'll rescind my statement.

>>34217836

Yeah but there are more useful statistics to be gather if one gun has a misfire after 1200 rounds vs 2000. I think lucky gunner did an AR ammo test where they fired several thousands rounds of different ammo through identical guns and results where very interesting.

>>34217856
Thanks. I had to back out of buying a used Sig 551 recently. Shit sucks.

File: Screenshot_20170509-132215.png (448KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1920x1080px

>>34217787
At what point did they put it directly into the chamber? And funny you should say that, because many armies have had full mud submersion tests in pistol trials.

File: Well-Damn-meme-6682[1].jpg (24KB, 600x412px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x412px

>>34216997
I hope to God this means I can get a cheaper G19 trade in.

>>34216997
these guys are obvious trolls. they have done this shit multiple times. they take guns known for reliability like glocks and aks with a lot of fanboys and then they keep doing mudtests on it until it eventually fails in one hard and they put that one up on youtube like it was their first try or something. this causes a lot of butthurt online and their channel gets tons of views

>fanboys being so invested in their favorite gun being 100% perfect that they just can't deal when it is shown to have faults

File: 1496675288606.jpg (388KB, 1340x1528px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 1340x1528px

>>34217620
>questioning the lagitimacy of gun jesus
>muh glock perfection
You need to go back

My everyday carry is now ruined

Fuck Glock, who wants to buy all 6 glocks I have?

>>34216997

This tmdoesn't bug me one bit, seeing as most guns fail that test. My glock is for CC, and I live in a city type environment. so I dont see that happening to my gun. You're also a retarded faggot, this thread has been done multiple times, just with did youtubers. Check the archive next time, faggot.

>>34218082
So do you carry 6 Glocks at the same time or do you switch them out like T-Shirts?

File: happy_scout_by_non_recyclable-d8hspb9.jpg (354KB, 900x650px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 900x650px

>>34216997
>hipoint performed better than glock in the same mud test

where is your god now you shitty glock fanbois

>>34218088
The vp9fags said the same thing.
Not necessarily an incorrect assessment of your needs but it's interesting regardless as I remember that being said before.

>>34217935
More denial

Kek

File: 1495957989006.gif (2MB, 350x255px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x255px

>>34216997
>the Steyr 1912 outperformed the Glock

>>34218608
>a war gun created to out live the soldier
>vs
>a gun created for tactical operators that probably will never be used
:thinking emoji:

>>34216997
>mud test

I feel like the internet takes these way more seriously than Ian and Karl intended.

As in, they make these videos because they generate a lot of traffic, they're lighthearted fun, and I assume they enjoy sharing the experience with us.

The internet turns around and takes the videos and uses them to spew vitriol, usually at a brand that doesn't give a shit about the criticism in the first place or other random people on the internet for relatively little reward.

>>34218671
>The literal autist turns around*
fixed it for you

>>34218679
this

>>34218646
Didn't a lot of SOF dudes switch to Glocks recently? Looks like they'll be switching again

>>34218646
even the P08 worked better
and this wasn't a "war gun"
in fact, the Steyr 1912 wasn't a "war gun" either
it was a military issued pistol, just like the Glock

That's brutal that they couldn't even field strip the thing to get it functional again.

File: IMG_5210.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

I've never had any problems with my weapons system. Fires when wet.

File: IMG_5211.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

>>34219145
Fires when dirty. How will you recover

>>34218691
I'm sure they were watching with baited breath from Yemen and the like, anon.

>>34219145
>>34219166
>ensuring your life with rubber tubing
Lmaoing at your """weapon""".
Sticks and stones using bio-mechanical propulsion is the fucking way to go.

>>34217779
How would you ever have gathered that from the way he presents himself

So why is it that everyone jumps on MAC's video showing the VP9 failing under extreme circumstances, but Glockfags defend the 19 against Ian's test?

Both tests are bullshit and both pistols are great. Maybe people will be more aware of their confirmation bias now.

>>34217886
Because as stated, shit like that has been done by various people and various guns including every military that's ever had a small arms trial.

http://pistol-training.com/archives/4966

>>34217935
Or ya know, the just remind everyone in real life anything can fail. They could have run 6 G19s side by side and one, several or non of them may have failed in the same way

File: IMG_5208.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>34219280
>ensuring your life with rubber tubing
>not having a back up
First time operating?

>>34219445
>needing a backup
>expecting your weapon to fail
ZERO CONFIDENCE

>>34216997
>they used steel cased ammunition
this invalidates the test immediately

>>34219445
>throwing a glock out of your slingshot
That shit won't even go 50 feet, it's not aerodynamic at all.

File: IMG_5195.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

>>34219483
>ZERO CONFIDENCE
>>34219668
>That shit won't even go 50 feet

>>34218671
Oh they are totally not intended to be any kind of scientific X is better than Y videos. Doesn't stop people from gloating or crying over it though.

Eh, I saw the M&P choke in MACs test. I still have mine and carry it(though I've been carrying my M9 for shits lately). I've tested mine in what I'd consider most likely in my area and it performed, that's all I need.

>>34219742
Ok, a dead squirrel.
What exactly is it supposed to prove?

File: IMG_5193.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34219804
>What exactly is it supposed to prove?
The lethality of my weapons system in urban combat.

>>34217779
>military historians and/or firearm collectors must have military service to be legitimate

>>34217779
sauce

>>34219557

You realize it's nickel plated brass, right?

And even if it had been steel, it failed to chamber due to obstructed recesses + dead trigger due to striker being blocked in dirt, not because oof a fialing with the ammo itself.

Go be a butthurt Glockanade fag elsewhere.

>>34220091
I feel like you took bait... then again.. I almost took it too

>>34217764
They already tested a garbage rod. The bolt seized and then the magazine broke. It got out a total of one round.

Personally, I couldn't really see a difference between the normal bolt operation and the seized one, but hey. Garbage rod.

>>34220266
Apparently you didn't actually watch the mosin vid. Also he is talking about a Nagant, bit a mosin. How new are you?

>>34220285
Not a mosin*

>Damnit

>>34220285
>a Nagant, bit a mosin

was the nagant radioactive? is that how the mosin nagant was created?

>>34219300
Nobody ever learns anything and we are doomed to a eternity of bullshit arguments about stupid shit that doesn't matter

File: IMG_0232.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>34220302
The only real nagant contribution to the mosin was the magazine system. What the hell are you asking? Radioactive? No he, and I, are talking about the Nagant Revolver

>>34220319
Memes are literally to blame for this.

Just strap in and enjoy the ride, there is no saving humanity.

File: 1335928615394.jpg (55KB, 342x533px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 342x533px

I can't watch these fucking mud/sand test videos because to imagine racking the slide with that shit in there and feeling the grinding gives me the heeby-jeebies.

File: 1472085365577.jpg (382KB, 1752x1340px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 1752x1340px

>>34216997
Another one bites the mud.

File: 1473566492803.jpg (1MB, 2094x1729px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2094x1729px

>>34216997
I'm laughing so hard right now
8 years of dealing with "perfection!!" retards.

Licking their tears is so great. I'm fucking hard.

First T. Rex has scales now this.

>>34217776

Because we can pretty much own anything we want, and nobody has time for shitty guns.

Plus its an entertaining video

File: 1350633312840.gif (3MB, 360x176px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 360x176px

>>34220737
>that image
Fuck. Can't believe I've never seen that

>>34217027
This is an important topic and two or more threads are necessary to discuss it.

File: 1464554548617.jpg (9KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x168px

>>34217620

File: BA458SOCOM300-2.jpg (587KB, 1024x944px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1024x944px

I used to very heavily shoot IDPA, 3-Gun, and all that. Tens of thousands of rounds through many different makes all 9mm and have some contacts in the industry.

Gen3 Glock 17/34s are the only ones that tend not to have issues, but general QC has been down since the Gen4 introduction. Even Gen4s are cracking slides at 1/3 of normal lifespan. Otherwise, their durability is great, and the biggest advantage is the drop-in parts to fix any issues.

The only pistols that I would say are uber reliable are the Beretta 92s and H&K USP/P30s. Sig Sauers used to be great, but they have taken a huge dive, and I bet the M17 will be a fucking shitshow for the first 5-10 years of deployment.

>>34218030
>gun jesus

FALSE PROPHET!

>>34221143
The QC issues with sig and Glock are depressing as fuck.
From what I can tell at least for now hk is holding together.

>>34221162
>implying such a strong implication
BLASPHEMY!!!
STONE HIM!

>>34221143
You may be more right than you know. The Sig 320s have already had their first major problem, I think before the military test took place. They had bad firing pins, or bad firing pin springs. Something like that. They were taking back guns no questions asked last I looked into it

File: 1496486711417.jpg (42KB, 300x397px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 300x397px

>>34218671
This. It's the autists that don't know when the memes end and reality begins. The mud test is meme tier. The Glock 19 is THE MOST tested combat firearm of this generation. It's been used by everyone and their moms the past 15-20 years in the middle East. Autist 1 and Autist 2 dropping shit in mud IS NOT a fucking standard to hold anything to. Quit sucking their dicks so much dudes, neither of them have even used a weapon system in combat

>>34216997
Thiiiis... Guy talks... liiiike... He has Autism

There is nothing wrong with my g19 and there's a reason glocks have the most longest reputation for reliability. I'm not crawling through mud either and if I do I'd water it off right after.

The tears of Glock haters are delish. You gays are immature.

File: blogimage_LoseYourReligion4.jpg (21KB, 241x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 241x300px

>>34221245
Youuuu follow a false prophet!
HEATHEN!

>>34221423
You dare question the teachings of the gun jesus prophet.
You vile, blaspheming HERETIC!

I left my 19 in a creek for about 10 minutes once to see what would happen. Tons of silt got in it and it totally killed the gun. Similar to what happened here. Had to hammer on the back of the slide to get it to go into battery. Managed to get a few shots off (hammering every time) but felt like I was breaking something.

Washing it out in the creek didn't fix it, had to take it home and detail strip it. Runs normally now.

I did my SGL-31 at the same time and it shut it down, but after manhandling it enough it got back running without washing it out in the creek.

I still fucking hate Ian, everything he says is so goddamn snide.

File: you-just-went-full-potato-man-never-go-full-potato (1).jpg (68KB, 554x376px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 554x376px

>making mud from Arizona dirt.
>ignoring the YEARS of different military and law enforcement trials.
>believing Ian.
>EVER.

/k/ I am disappoint.

File: 1495052874742.jpg (87KB, 603x452px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 603x452px

>all these glockfags in denial
quite sad, to be honest.

>>34217934
>I hope to God this means I can get a cheaper G19 trade in.
and I might find a used USP for less than $700

>>34216997
That does not make any fucking sense.

>>34218232
As a VP9fag, I would be lying if i said I don't enjoy the Glockfags doing damage control as us fanboys did.

>>34220331
>joke
>anon's head

File: Hunter S Pepe.png (47KB, 318x317px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 318x317px

>DAILY REMINDER IAN AND KARL ARE BOTH AUTISTIC AND HAVE NEVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY, NEVER TESTED IN COMBAT, NEVER USED A FIREARM IN COMBAT, AND ARE HIPSTER CONTRARIANS.
>DAILY REMINDER THEY SHOULD NEVER BE HELD AS AN ABSOLUTE ON THESE PRINCIPLES ALONE
>DAILY REMINDER THE GLOCK 19 IS SINGLE HANDED THE MOST TESTED/VERSATILE PISTOL OF OUR GENERATION( SEE MIDDLE EAST)
>DAILY REMINDER THAT ONLY AUTIST LOOK AT IAN AS A GOD
>DAILY REMINDER HIS FACIAL HAIR LOOKS RETARDED AND HIS WIFE LOOKS LIKE A SENIOR CITIZEN

Yah I'm a Glockfag, but I ain't lying

>>34222078
Cool your jets, son. I'm a VP9fag but I don't have to validate my purchase to a bunch of anonymous posters on a website.

I'm sure your Glock will serve your purposes just fine.

>>34221609
THE MURDER/K/UBE WILL SKIN YOUR SCROTUM AND DISPLAY IT FOR ALL TO SEE WHEN DURING THE GREAT CHAMBERING

>>34222078
The glock would fail no matter who dropped it in mud.

File: image.jpg (49KB, 575x548px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 575x548px

>>34222078
I'm surprised you felt the compulsion to type all this out

>>34217669
That reminds me I saw a stellar Sig P238 at a pawn shop for $320. Need to head back and see if the guy will sell it for less. Picked up a Bodyguard w/ laser that was listed as $225 for $140 when I mentioned the rebate and how a Democrat isn't president. Case plus two mags was good deal.

hey guys...my name is IAN
IF I putz a rock in dah chamber
Do you tink sumb ting bad will habben.

>>34222078
>DAILY REMINDER IAN AND KARL ARE BOTH AUTISTIC
That makes 3 of youses

File: matt-leblanc-smile[1].jpg (50KB, 396x594px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 396x594px

>>34216997
MFW The Luger BTFO'd everyone

>>34217620
Considering that Ian shoots competition and carries a fucking Glock, I doubt he's biased against it.

The point of these mud tests is that different guns do well in this whereas they might fail other reliability tests, and vice versa. The AK/AR videos are prime examples on this. The AK is an open design with loose tolerances, it might do well to get solid debris out of the action, or parts of the action will work regardless of a blockage, but when you introduce fine mud into the gun the open design and loose tolerances mean the gun will fail to function. AR is a very sight and sealed system and will function well in this fine mud whereas it may fail in sand or other environments. Ian and Karl do have their biases obviously, Ian is a Francophile and Karl is a bit of a Wehraboo but that doesn't discount the validity of these tests. Both of them - Ian especially, own a wide variety of guns and shoot competitions with a wide variety of guns. It's not like they have a personal emotional stake in the matter like a lot of autists and even normies do.

>>34218671
They even mentioned in the RDB mud test that it's a bullshit test because anything is going to fail if you cram clay into an open action. The only things that will do well are things where mud can't access the action, like an AR dust cover or you know... Any handgun because there shouldn't be openings into the action. The glock failing this test is inexcusable. That was an irreparable malfunction that would put you out of the fight. Something with a sealed action shouldn't do that. Glockfags indeed btfo.

>>34221209

Dude, I've had so many out of spec Glock extractors during the switch to MIM it was unreal.

I will say in Glock's defense the G43 is one of their best pistols, and I think the Gen5/Ms are going to be actual upgrades over the Gen4s since upscale G43s.

>>34222078

You don't need to be in the military to put a machine in mud. All striker-fire pistols are inferior to DA/SA in mud/gunk just by design.

I still cary a glock, because I like it.

File: 213431241324123.jpg (145KB, 1111x597px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1111x597px

>>34216997
"Muh perfection" fags will never recover from this, any time anyone ever brings up the glock again the first reply they'll be greeted with is "hi-point did better :^)"

File: 4k7E1TW.jpg (6KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 236x236px

>NEIN IST TOD

>>34219742

>2017
>shooting squirrel corpse .45

>>34222078
Why is it a bad thing that he's not a ZOG bot?

>>34216997

how will they ever recover fuck?

>>34220737
can someone working in a meme magic division make a glock version of this?

i'd do it myself but i dont have the credentials to operate paint

>>34218646

The Steyr Han was not a military weapon, it was a civie one pressed into service.

>>34222078
God I love the Glockfag salt, it's so nice and salty.

>>34217779
>Anon likes space and rockets
>hurr Durr fuckin loser, go join the astronaut corps
That's your logic, and you should feel retarded

>>34222332
Yah I know I'm just talking shit but I still watch their channel. I just hate how you fuckers hold them to God status

>>34223172
There's no such thing as a Glockfag. It's a dumb made up term. No single fucking autist on this board exclusively owns Glocks.

File: 1497147835919.jpg (603KB, 1752x1340px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 1752x1340px

>>34223089

>>34223204

>No single fucking autist on this board exclusively owns Glocks.
Yeah sure about that?

>>34223214
Not out of any sort of fanboyism. That shit meme has perpetuated this board from /v/ crossovers for years. I'm sure there are a few anons who are still really new and have maybe only purchased an HD/CC gun. But yes, I'm speaking for myself and thousands of others.... generally people who have been shooting for more than a few years or a decade own/owned multiple brands of pistol. The same flavor of tactical will get boring, Glocks are just tools nothing more nothing less. It's still the most tested/true tool for the job

>>34223229

>Not out of any sort of fanboyism.
Again are you fucking sure?

And even if a glockfag would own another gun like a target pistol or a rifle, it still doesn't detract from his glockfaggyness. Because he will still place the Glock on a pedestal.

File: tumblr_inline_ojvsvpOPND1ux0x7o_500.gif (1MB, 420x236px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 420x236px

>>34223210
Lol goddamnit I hate you fuckers. Will they put the fucking Sig 320 in mud already so we can end this shitshow

>>34223229
I find them a standard workhorse pistol. People rice em, but most of my friends and family who one (Mainly 19 and 17s, my uncle has a G36 for CC) don't really flash em out and race em up. They simply work in most general day to day urban duty situations.

File: 1496019683564.gif (249KB, 1024x924px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1024x924px

>>34223239
I didn't have clearance for MS Paint XP, so Paint.net had to suffice.

File: 1488047012694m.jpg (44KB, 266x1024px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 266x1024px

>>34223236
Well Glocks should be on a pedestal, nothing is time tested or proven all around as decent. It's mostly their ease of maintenance, it's the only pistol you can truly fix yourself with little to no tooling, and a fuck load of after market goodies. SIG will catch up but it won't detract from all of Glocks contracts worldwide, not to mention what there actual proper next generation stuff will be, if it ever happens

>>34223240
I have a 19 for my carry I've had for 10 years now and a 35 with 9mm KKM barrel, springs, Dawson sights I use for competition. It's a perfect competition pistol for the price, I can compete with the race guns without dropping $3k+

>>34222422
Will they ever do a test with actual muddy ground? this is mud you could swim in. realistically, any AR exposed to this type of mud would get more that just mud shovel onto the reciever. if it got into the muddy water, it would be in danger of exploding if you tried to shoot it.

File: 1495748340818.jpg (11KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x242px

>>34223268
really nigger

ar15 did fine inside mud soup

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAneTFiz5WU

>>34223268
It's mainly a clickbaity sort of "Let's jam it with dirt and see if it can shoot!" deal. Honestly, if I dropped my sidearm or rifle in mud during combat, I'd be pretty fucked for not slinging and/or securing it properly.

>>34223255

>Well Glocks should be on a pedestal
No they shouldn't, there is nothing besides the modular design that the Glock has over any other double stack handgun of it's day.

>it's the only pistol you can truly fix yourself with little to no tooling
Because you don't actually fix anything you simply ditch the broken part and replace it, thats why no tooling is required.

>>34223279
New Industry Thinking: Replace instead of Repair.

>>34223284

Also known as planed obsolescence.

File: 1488120555615m.jpg (176KB, 1024x730px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1024x730px

>>34223279
Like I said no other striker weapon is time tested nor barely even field tested like the Glock 19/17. And the easy to exchange parts/modularity are what put it on the pedestal. Nobody has done it all around better yet, Sig might but the jury is gonna be out for awhile on that. You Glock contrarians are worse than us "fanboys".

>>34223276

AK fags will never recover. The levels of cope in those two videos.

>>34223278
Well you might have to lowcrawl, or you could simply trip and fall but it shouldn't be as dirty as they videos and of course you'd immediately knock as much mud away from the action/receiver as possible

>>34223312

>Like I said no other striker weapon is time tested nor barely even field tested like the Glock 19/17
Because that is irrelevant when all of them are pretty much the same gun underneath all the polymer and marketing. It's like going back a century ago and trying to figure out which European small bore cartridge revolver is better or which 32 acp pocket pistol is better. When all it's said and done there is no real difference between them.

>>34223340
That is definitely relevant. It takes time to see if some platforms or weapon systems have any known inherent flaws to them. Not sure what striker fired is your go to exactly but they're all really fucking new compared to Glock. Half of these assclown just started mfg them within the last 6-7 years. They aren't all the same, Glock is time tested, has easiest maintenance, largest surplus of aftermarket, affordable parts, generally most reliable (besides autists baking it in mud)... We're talking about overall here to include combat roles. None of these new striker fires have seen any combat or harsh conditions.

File: 34133135.jpg (130KB, 660x873px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 660x873px

>>34222240
>worshiping Feintien's wet dream
>not worshiping the true god
may Mormons knock on your door 12 times a day without mercy

>>34218121
>not carrying a six at once
it's like you don't even value your life

>>34221824
what is going on in this picture?
jihadi bed time story?

File: 6-shooter.jpg (95KB, 456x679px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 456x679px

>>34223867
Would they be used like grenades or like a pirate's bandolier?

>tfw you can buy any handgun now without hearing "muh perfection" because Glockfags are going to be licking their wounds for a while.

File: 1496585483704.jpg (68KB, 587x800px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 587x800px

>>34224511
>implying other modern plastic service autos would do any better

>>34219842
Urban combat in a forest against squirrels.

>>34224612
That's the point, smart guy.

>>34221805
Ian has the best mud. If you think you have better mud, then post pics faggot.

File: nigga.png (166KB, 540x373px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 540x373px

>>34217620
>Ian
>Hack

Maybe Glock will lower their prices now and stop being overpriced.

>loljk like that'll ever happen

>>34219445
>arm brace
>long fork
Shit slingshot dude.

>>34224612
They haven't tested a usp yet

>>34217620
you really stepped in it this time, didnt ya, kid!

isnt there a subreddit you should be posting on instead?

>>34217847
>That webm

Wut

File: _DSC6151.jpg (554KB, 3000x1987px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 3000x1987px

>>34217669
>the glocknade hand
I usually carry a g19 and this made me kek.

>>34222078
Pretty sure Ian was in the Army.

>>34225199
>Shit slingshot dude.
>no slingshotz detected
The wall just got 10 feet higher sven

>>34225319
I samefagged half those replies you autist lmao. Here I'll even show you which ones are me.
>>34217662
>>34217669
>>34217680
>>34217691
>>34217782
>>34218030
>>34221140
Also Ian is an actual autist who makes 20 minute videos calling out people who leave mean comments on his videos LOL imagine that, manchildren worshipping a manchild

File: nice try.png (95KB, 1594x769px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1594x769px

>>34227362
nice try nigger

>>34227362
>jee nein teen fails
>ohnoesmygodisfail.jpg
>better call the tester an autist
Yep, that sure showed them.

>>34222078
>REMINDER IAN AND KARL ARE BOTH AUTISTIC AND HAVE NEVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY
Ian was a scout sniper you braindead newshit. He was in the Marine Corps for 12 years.

File: 1482447005487.jpg (300KB, 799x974px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 799x974px

>>34227892
This.
He was honorably discharged after receiving a traumatic brain injury, which resulted in his left handedness.

>>34216997

G17 owner here. Loved the video. I'm not even gonna attempt to move the goal posts or play it off as anything other than what it is.

Do we have some more documentation on the "Glock-nade" meme?

Nearly 20k rounds through my pistol without any issues, though..

>>34229053
thank you for your service

>>34229053
lmao what a cuck!!!

>>34229053
Christ could you be any more passive aggressive? Fuck people like you.

>>34225404

You got some small hands bro.

>>34216997
Serious question: how do you disassemble a Glock under those conditions?
Is there an alternate way to drop the striker?

>>34230376
First of all, you're going to need to find the nearest garbage bin.
The next step is to toss it in.
Finally, you're going to need to locate a new firearm.

>>34225361
Costa is big in Japan.

>>34216997
muh maritime cups

>>34230376
You have to remove the back plate off of the slide to get to the striker. Not a quick fix.

>>34223239
I believe Dugan's video involves mud

>>34217691
Holy shit, my pic!

>>34223236
glocks are great pistols though

>>34231849
Good to know.
Not something you could do while somebody was shooting at you, but not the end of the world, either.

>>34216997
It'll be hilarious when they mud test a revolver.

>>34231858
Hell fucking yeah it does. He runs that bitch over with a jeep into some muddy track and hurls it harder and further than mac when he threw the vp9 and broke it's mag release.

>>34223276
Really nigger? Try getting some dirt in the barrel for example, or having a dirty mag inserted instead of just mere drops on the receiver

The recently published Mud Test: Glock 19 video has been incredibly huge in regards to shares and views in a very short duration of time, more so on Facebook than even YouTube. Full30, of course, was barely a blip on the radar. It has been the fastest growing video in regards to views and shares that we've ever had.

So, with this huge volume of shares and views and comments, we'd think we'd see a some uptick in something like subs or Patreon supporters, right?

Nope. In fact, per YouTube analytics, it generated us 14 subscribers as of today.

There has been a huge uptick of stupid comments, though.

So, while it's still very early in regards to statistics as the video only published a few days ago, here's a question for you guys as our core (again):

If InRangeTV were monetized via ad revenue then the lesson here would be to do nothing but mud tests on the most controversial items possible for the rest of time. Thankfully that is NOT our model. While I certainly do find some of these mud test videos interesting, I also think it's usually (with exceptions) our least intellectually interesting content.

This video is the canary in the coal mine example, in my opinion, of why advertising fueled mass media is what it is.

What do you guys think?

~Karl

>>34234229
(I'm not Karl btw, just reposting interesting comment)

>>34234229
Man I was JUST about to post that, you fricking... fricking... y-you... fricking... homo...

>>34234229
Ayy fucking lmao this fag just cant get over the idea that sometimes people are silly on the internet.

>>34234229
lol told u fags theyre just faking this shit for views. see here: >>34217935

Still like mine just fine OP. Not even a single jam 5000 rounds in.

File: ians-bioligical-father.jpg (226KB, 1476x1000px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1476x1000px

It's been what, 3 years, /k/? And we're going to keep ignoring that Fred Oakland's illegitimate son is still out in Arizona, pouring mud into perfectly good firearms for ad revenue?

When will this madness end?
Someone call up Fred or Dan and put a stop to this.

Ian and Karl have said like ten times that these videos aren't meant to be taken as the absolute deciding factor in how good or reliable a gun is but you autists flip shit
Both sides are wrong and should feel stupid, the ones screaming that a test with a sample size of one is indicative of how any Glock will perform, and the Glockfags insisting that the tests are fake because they hurt your feelings

>>34225361
This isn't even the cringest part.

>>34217847
What the fuck

I broke a Glock. take down bar and spring broke and fell out. never noticed because the gun kept running. found out when I released the slide with the hammer back and it slid off. replaced the parts, still carry it. not bad for 40k something rounds

>>34217498
>no true Glock owner
stay buttrekt

>>34217767
Do not speak ill of Austrian tupperware.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEdSdUlbwmc

>>34236267
Want to know how I know you're full of shit?

Glock haters don't realize they're just as terrible as Gluck fanbois. Check mate.

File: 1481138709927.gif (4MB, 700x298px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 700x298px

Ohhh the butthurt

>>34216997
>clickbait video shows another firearm known to be extremely reliable not working well when used in a way which it was never designed for
Shocking

>>34216997
I've never understood mud tests.
I don't fill my guns with mud.

>>34234876
This. He threw a semi-tantrum over internet trolling.

Way to talk about "least intellectually interesting" stuff.

Mud tests are /k/'s Nurburgring.

Stop making these godawful threads.

>>34236485
>I've never understood mud tests.
Providing a comparison between firearms serviceability with as few variables as possible.

>>34236468
I've never had a Glock fanboi come up to me to say how much better his Glock is than my cz I was shooting but I've had Glock haters come up to me and say how much they hated their last Glock while I was shooting a Glock. Glock haters are worse than Glock fanbois, fanbois who generally keep to themselves and don't bother me.

>>34236497
>as few variables as possible
>literally no controls, just dump a random amount of mud around the action of a random gun
Choose 1

>>34236553
>as possible
choose one.
You fuckfences would bitch if it was sea level.

>>34223276
>>34223276
Confirmed newfag. Everyone knows ARs will explode after being submerged, which is why it's pointless to use a mud this watery and then just shovel it on the receiver.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjMH94PuT_I

>>34236581
>actually thinking this is anything approaching scientific or controlled
You would be laughed out of a highschool science fair for trying to present these videos as evidence of anything. They are purely to keep the channel relevant.

File: mmhmmmmmhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.png (26KB, 717x262px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 717x262px

>>34227362
how old are you, buddy?

>>34223210
perfect

>>34236447
sure. give it your best shot

>>34234887
That isn't at all what he said.

>>34236695
Well for starters...
>glock
>hammer back
>hammer

I'll let everyone else figure out the rest

>>34236621
You're missing the entire point you mong.

It's there to show how effective any particular gun is at keeping mud out of its guts, not how "reliable" each gun is.

>>34225404
Hey I also have that hat

>>34216997
just a reminder the hi-point did better :^)

File: 33.jpg (129KB, 1000x660px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1000x660px

>>34216997
>Ian: gotta buy a new Glock

just another example of the tremendous foresight of the glock's engineering solutions. the back plate is plastic and can be easily torn off even with just a swiss army knife, releasing the striker and enabling you to take the gun apart now without pulling the trigger. the plastic plate is a 1$ part. If you have a metal punisher aftermarket plate you are dumb.

Glock still rules supreme fanbois.

>>34236826
And it does so badly, retard. It doesnt matter what theyre "testing" if they dont take any measures to try and do so scientifically

>>34236808
hah, sorry, meant TRIGGER. trigger to the rear for disassembly

>>34236895
>And it does so badly
Only because you're a triggered glock cuck lmao.


>dont take any measures to try and do so scientifically
n..n.no true mud test!!

>>34236949
I dont own a glock or any of the guns used in a mud test except the AR and a couple milsurp rifles

>>34236949
>n..n.no true mud test!!
yeah, that's why the army just chucks one gun into mud once and that's it, right? no. you need to test this a bunch of times because the odd sand grain will kill ANY gun but isn't really necessarily statistically relevant. because of this, I can produce a mud test on YT showing the exact opposite of Ian & Coral tests for every gun they tested. It's all just thinly veiled Clickbait.

>>34236972
yeah k bro stay triggered lmao

>>34237001
>Unironically being a brainlet
Top kek

>>34236998
A: they are not the Army
B: they are not trying to prove reliability of one over the other
C: both of them have stated multiple times that the test isn't a factor of inherent "reliability".

>>34237015
>t-the test isnt testing anything. I-its just because
Clickbait

>>34237015
>A: they are not the Army

clearly they are not, they are YT beggars.

>B: they are not trying to prove reliability of one over the other

so what's the point then? they clearly said they proved that the AR is better suited for "trench-mud-warfare" than the AK?

>C: both of them have stated multiple times that the test isn't a factor of inherent "reliability".

and yet we got this thread about 50 times since the video was posted. I'm not even talking to I&K here, but to /k/ really.

File: donald-trump.jpg (49KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1280x720px

>>34236596
>using a video from HK marketing


hahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhaa

>the subhuman thinks he has won an internet argument reward

hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahah

File: 2f7.jpg (94KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 601x508px

>>34234226
stay MAD nigger

why don't you throw dirt in the barrel of your AK? Or at the very least so a video of someone doing so

>dumbass slavboo nigger thinks that bore obstructions is western propaganda

hahahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha but here's another video to embarrass your dumbass

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYenZXvGhDs&t=158s

>BUH BUH BUH MUST BE VIDEO EDITING MAGIC AR15 SUPPOSED TO BLOW UP AND KILL OPERATOR

what a dumb piece of shit you are

take your slavaboo trash and kill yourself with it

>>34237021
>>t-the test isnt testing anything. I-its just because
wrong.
>>34236826
>It's there to show how effective any particular gun is at keeping mud out of its guts, not how "reliable" each gun is.
>>34237025
>so what's the point then? they clearly said they proved that the AR is better suited for "trench-mud-warfare" than the AK?
>>34236826

>and yet we got this thread about 50 times since the video was posted. I'm not even talking to I&K here, but to /k/ really.
Ian and Karl can't control what /k/ucks do.

>>34237107
So if the test isnt scientific and it doesnt provide evidence of anything, as ian and karl have stated, exactly what is it good for? Its almost as if its just an anecdote put up to generate views. Really activates ones almonds.

>>34237251
>>34237107

Nothing. But I'll happily wait for the USP, P320, fn 509 etc. to be tested too - only that ain't gonna happen. we know why.

>>34237292
I know the P320 will gobble up that mud like a bukkake porn actress and fail wil that fuk hueg trigger hole....

>>34237251
>exactly what is it good for?
>>34236826
>It's there to show how effective any particular gun is at keeping mud out of its guts, not how "reliable" each gun is.


As many times as it takes for you to finally learn to read.

>>34221279
>You may be more right than you know. The Sig 320s have already had their first major problem, I think before the military test took place. They had bad firing pins, or bad firing pin springs. Something like that. They were taking back guns no questions asked last I looked into it

Eh... I think the SIG thing is overplayed. The majority of their issues are new models or spring related. The newer guns are much better made on CNC equipment compared to the older guns. Don't buy Gen 1 and get some extra springs. The glocks seem to be worse in construction of frame or slide which isn't a quick fix. I don't see many HKs in competition but I still see plenty of glocks and SIGs.

>>34231785
>Costa is big in Japan

Most white people are big in Japan.

>>34237057
>implying you aren't liking stinky tuna smelling cumb off you r face after I SPRAYed you
lololololol, arfagbtfo.

>>34236519
>I've never had a Glock fanboi come up to me to say how much better his Glock is than my cz I was shooting but I've had Glock haters come up to me and say how much they hated their last Glock while I was shooting a Glock.

Quit being a glock hater hater, fgt.

>>34238382
Yeah its not a big deal, and anything part of a huge military contract seems to have some problems. Beretta did too.

>>34238717
>Yeah its not a big deal, and anything part of a huge military contract seems to have some problems. Beretta did too.

It takes some time to "marine proof" anything. No matter how good it is, some marine will cover it in Elmer's glue and eat it.

Not a knock to the marines, just an observation.

>>34221143

"über" reliable beretta 92 ok... how about locking blocks 3rd generation now? Its a part that has a limited lifespan of around 10.000 rounds according to them... which was less in previous itinerations of the model...

Sure they are reliable but that part fucks them up and its a critical component.

Glocks are ubiquos is a fine firearm as much as anyother in the market today at taht price range period

Gen 3 vs Gen 4 debate is unfunded there is no clear evidence of that. I trust your word and experience but we cannot make a rule out of it.

File: 1481351934290.jpg (79KB, 874x684px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 874x684px

>>34238678
>being so buttmad that you use piston AR marketing to cry about ARs in general


hahahahahhahahahahhaha the desperation is over the top

slavaboos are such sad pieces of shit

I've never seen so much damage control in my life.

All those years of Glockfags crucifying people for not sucking Gaston's dick.

All the "Get a G19" responses.

All the "Muh LEO/SF/Ranger/SEAL" arguments.

Glocks are good pistols, but this shows they are about as good as any other pistol in the price range.

>>34234226
So uh, you want barrel blockage videos? Because every single gun ever designed will blow up if a severe enough blockage forms lad

>>34240929
Not a Hipoint c9. On a Iv8888 video they hammered a 3/8" bolt down the breach and the gun didn't kaboom. The bolt stayed in place, gun was still intact.

File: 1497320190395m.jpg (112KB, 810x1024px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 810x1024px

>>34216997

At least its not as bad as the m&p

File: 1497303737786m.jpg (33KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1024x768px

>>34242665

Even after he took a wire brush to it.

>>34242669
>>34242665

>>34237026
the thread.

File: 1485324881775.png (3MB, 2174x1780px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2174x1780px

>hurrrr durrrr I drop my pistol in mud 24/7 every single day so I need a gun that can chamber rounds in mud so I can continue to fight the mud people

File: download.png (4KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 183x275px

>>34242979
>BUH BUH BUH ONLY TEST MY GUN IN THE MOST IDEAL WEATHER CONDITIONS BECAUSE YOU KNOW I CAN'T USE THIS HERE MUD TEST FOR MUH CONFIRMATION BIAS

>>34225361
>>34235943
Yeah he goes prone and they all squeal like little girls. Needs sound.

>>34237251
Because it is just turnabout for all the glockfags who take anecdotal evidence about other firearms being inferior.

>>34217064
▲
▲ ▲

File: Yo Fryman.png (53KB, 790x1010px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 790x1010px

>>34217779
goddamn you are a giant faggot pls kys

>>34219300
not even a HKFAG, but I dont trust anything MAC has to say about anything.

the reason he got salty and made that video was because HK's check hadnt cleared and he needed more money for 10 year old chinese boys.

>>34222078
youre a faggot, and im stealing that pepe.

>>34238933
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_5_4/160140_High-round-count-pistols--100-000---observations.html&page=1

Pretty well shows multiple Gen 4s going tits up with slide cracks early in their life while Gen 3s have no issue. Also Beretta did very well with regular maintenance.

>>34243691
>I can tell you that even though I am not a "Glock guy", it is the most reliable handgun in our inventory and I would trust it with my life.
>We use Gen1-Gen4 17's on the line and they are the most hassle-free handgun we have.
>[When the slide cracks, they] will continue to fire most of the time but the rounds group at the top right corner of the target.
>The factory recoil springs are amazing because the just keep going.
>The Glock gets used probably 10X as much as our Beretta M92's so it's not a fair to say the Beretta is more reliable[...]
>[...]Glock will replace our cracked slides under warranty.
>Also, I don't meant to give the impression that breake slides all the time but it would be fair to say that they get at least 100,000 rounds before cracking.
Wow, it's fucking nothing.
Even the "early" Gen4 slide failures mentioned later in the thread were happening over 30k rounds in; i.e., after $6500 or more of ammo.
If you're shooting that much, you can afford to have a spare Glock to shoot while the oter one's in for warranty work and, moreover, you can reasonably expect to break in one way or another any gun that you choose to adopt.
Are you, by chance, a journalist?

>>34217847
His thumb placement is triggering me

>>34244270
?

>>34244238
>Wow, it's fucking nothing.
>Even the "early" Gen4 slide failures mentioned later in the thread were happening over 30k rounds in; i.e., after $6500 or more of ammo.
>If you're shooting that much, you can afford to have a spare Glock to shoot while the oter one's in for warranty work and, moreover, you can reasonably expect to break in one way or another any gun that you choose to adopt.

You could just say "huh, that's interesting" and move on or you could get totally butthurt and try to do damage control, making yourself look like a fool.

I see you chose the latter.

>>34236889

>IF YOU GET MUD IN YOUR GUN JUST SMASH IT APART ON A ROCK AND THEN YOU CAN MAYBE GIVE IT A BATH AND GET THE MUD OUT AND WAIT TWO WEEKS FOR SHIPPING AND THEN YOUR GUN WILL BE FIXED
>CHECKMATE FUCCBOIS

File: IMG_2277.jpg (118KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 800x800px

>>34216997

>Hurr durr glockfags btfo. I left my Glock in a septic tank for a week and it malfunctioned. Guess my **insert special snowflake gun of the month here** is better.

When would anyone ever encounter this sort of situation? Glocks can run fine dirty, but there's a limit. You can pretty much make any gun fail. Thanks but I'll stick to my personal experience of Glocks running flawlessly the vast majority of the time.

>>34245422
The point of this test is that it shows that Glocks are about as good as most striker fired pistols near the price range.

Not necessarily a diss on Glock, but more of the fanboys who won't shut the fuck up about them. Cool your jets.

File: glock A GAY.jpg (469KB, 1267x1266px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1267x1266px

>>34245422
stfu fanboi why did the highpoint run the mudtest better than your block

>BUH BUH BUH MY GUN IS SUPER RELIABLE IN THE MOST IDEAL CONDITIONS

gee what a surprise you stupid ass fanboi