Are Russian bombers too old to work in the modern times? Also

>>34214090
>russian bomber

lel

>>34214090
That's a B-1 Lancer.

It's American.

>>34214092
Is it a Chinese copy of a Russian bomber?

>>34214120
no, that's clearly an australian deception bomber. the plane is actually flying upside down.

>>34214090
Are B-52H and B-1B older than Tu-95MS and Tu-160? [spoiler]No, you're an idiot.[spoiler]

To be fair, the TU-160 and B-1B are similar in appearance and could easily be misidentified by someone who's not knowledgeable in these things.

>>34214090
If you by "work" means delivering payloads via the air then no, they probably work just fine.

Russia does not however, have the logistical or organisational capacity for strategic bombing or even prolonged aerial operations at all.

>>34214430
Syria much?

>>34214090
I don't get it. That's a Chinese Su-28 interecepting a Filipino F-111 stealth bomber. What's the connection with Russian bombers?

Wow, the Russians are flying B-1s now? I guess Trump really *is* colluding with them if he let them have those!