Can somebody tell me is the warhead part on the PG-7VR same as the warhead part of a RPG-29?
Or just sameish with both warheads being tandem charges?
>>34204748
The warhead is identical, the rest however - is slightly different. See picture.
>>34204748
To elaborate what I meant - while the warhead part itself is exactly the same, the lower part of the grenade is different (propelling charges are attached differently, therefore the attachment points differ).
So they are not interchangeable.
>>34204827
Thanks! Just wondered since people make such fuss about the 29, but not about the updated RPG-7 round
>>34205022
Range? Accuracy? Dunno that much about infantry anti tank, but doesnt the RPG-7 suffer from range issues with newer, heavier warheads?
>>34205101
Nailed it.
RPG-7 has the ballistics of a cumshot, with the speed to match
>>34204814
noice, thanks