Abrams vs. Tiger

>>34180925
Abrams would get shrekt due to the superior genes of the Nazis.

File: v4jd2srbn02z.jpg (106KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1920x1080px

>>34180925

Pretty much. The tiger is the pinnacle of tank design, practically invincible, the terror of the battlefield, the Abrams wouldn't stand a chance, much less a leopard 2.

A Tiger would turn an Abrams to scrap metal.

Shermans burned a lot because they used gas instead of diesel.

The Abrams uses JET FUEL

think about that for a second...

File: 55c67df5b691a72230ff8442fde3c729.jpg (85KB, 463x669px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 463x669px

>>34180925
Ask any black man on the street and he will tell you that looks > ability. Its never how good you are, its how good you LOOK doing it.

KT wins everytime.

The Abrams is basically a ricer tank. It pretends to be a Tiger but really it's just a bodykit over a Sherman. They even reused Shermans that had been knocked out in Europe to make most of the early Abrams.

>>34180925
Why do ameriboos insist their ronsons were so good when clearly, they were the shittiest of the war

>>34180925

The Tiger II sucked so badly that it couldn't even measure up against the T-55 during the brief period it was being used by the jews. It's a meme tank.

File: 103.png (77KB, 701x630px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 701x630px

>>34181490
wtf?

>>34181490

Syrians used Panzer IV's and Stugs

Israelis used American equipment.

>>34181465
https://youtu.be/bNjp_4jY8pY

>>34181465
>lelel I called it a ronson again
>they totally called it a ronson during the war despite the fact that slogan was made up post war
Fuck off Russiaboo go hide the fact the T-34 had a transmission that blew up faster than the Panther's final drive some more.

File: thishappened.png (64KB, 720x520px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 720x520px

>>34181536
Depressing comic week was the best.

>>34181653
fuck you

>>34182077
not an arguement

>>34181680
They do one every year, don't they?

>>34181465
I don't know, ask the soviet tankers that got issued the thing and praised it for how good it was.

So many nazi fanboys in this thread- Hey wehraboos, if your tank was soooo good then why'd the nazis lose the war?
Also OP is a faggot
>Modern MBT vs WWII era tank
>DU penetration rounds
>DU armor
>Modern targeting equipment
A tiger would literally get destroyed in seconds of coming in contact with an M1. Even if it could land a hit on the M1, its likely it would shrug it off considering it's modern armor. Not even a fair fight.

>>34183624

>DU penetration rounds
Useless against the Tiger's thick armor, they only work against modern composites.
>DU armor
Useless against the Tiger's massive 88mm shells they would smash right through an Abrams and come out the other side, turning it into a massive barbecue just like its predecessors.

>>34183703
>massive 88mm shells
you know the abrams has a 120mm gun right?
>turning it into a massive barbecue just like its predecessors.
shit on the sherman all you want, but a sherman isnt an abrams.
>muh thick armor
>only works against modern composites
sure buddy- I'm pretty sure a round designed around penetrating thick armor will still wreck some WWII era shit. Got any proof?

>>34183928
Not that anon but:
Long rod kinetic rounds only work against modern composite armor made of several thin layers of armor, against a single thick, high-hardened Krupp steel plate, the tip of the round will break apart and the body bend sideway.
Modern shaped charge weapons are also useless because die sloped armor of the KT can disable any mechanical fuse, while the zimmerit coating can render any proximity fuses useless.

The Abrams doesn't stand a chance just like the Shermans before it. Technology has stagnated since WWII in everything but IPhones.

Is everyone in this thread retarded or is this some new meme.

The Abrams has something like 4x as thick armor has a Tiger II. 120mm vs 88mm main gun. 50.cal/coaxial vs 7.92mm.The Abrams engine is literally twice as powerful as the Tiger II.

They are also somehow the same weight, which is hilarious.

>>34183624
>people wouldn't fall for such obvious bait

It was inevitable.

>>34180925
RPG 7 > M1 Bazooka

Are you autistic?

>>34185154
/k/ will reply to anything, that's the problem. Sometimes I feel like I'm just in a weapons themed /b/.

>>34181070
Have you tried to burn kerosene?

>>34181070
You must have a really big skull for the wind to howl the way it does when it blows against the side of your head.

>>34184304
You were doing fine until the bit about shaped charges, kinda believable up to then. But then you went a bit too far.
Shirt and sweet works better.

>>34181255
>They even reused Shermans that had been knocked out in Europe to make most of the early Abrams.

Oh you, /k/.

>>34180925
I really do wonder about the mental state of people who make these treads. You managed to make it through the Captcha when posting, so you cant be a bot either...

>"Tiger II over the Abrams...
Are you guys fucking autistic or something?

>>34185292
Forgot the other quotation
FML

File: X1A2 Stuart.jpg (59KB, 450x279px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 450x279px

>>34183703

You retard, the Abrams is a descendant of the TIGER, it was largely designed by Germans and split off from the MBT-70 along with the Leopard II. The only modern vehicle that shares the original M1 Combat Car's lineage is some obscure South American tank.

>>34180925
Obvious bait aside could the Tiger II's main gun penetrate the Abrahams and in that case what range and angle are we looking at?

Would a Panzerfaust 150 work on an abrams.

Great Grandfather wants to know.

>>34181070
Het fuel can't melt abrams armor, Yemen was an inside job

this entire thread fucking kek

File: fuckoff.jpg (54KB, 720x615px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 720x615px

>>34180925

Jagdtiger has a 128mm gun. Will that be enough?

File: Sturmtiger.jpg (19KB, 450x325px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 450x325px

>380mm gun.

File: PicsArt_06-07-08.01.04.jpg (48KB, 700x289px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 700x289px

>>34185317
>No, ABRAMS. I am your father.

>>34185154
Retard alert, the armour is actually thicker on the KT, Abrams just has (((composites))) and funny shapes which reduce effectiveness of modern rounds but do fuckall vs. old full caliber rounds

>>34186067
you're the retard though, the tiger had a 8.8cm gun, the abrams has a 12 cm gun. And if you think that being literally thicker is better than having a higher equivalent RHA rating in thinner lighter material, we all feel bad for your parents. Who's gonna wipe your ass when they die some day?

>>34186067
>>34180925
Also this whole thread is fucking retarded, The Abrams is modern, the crew-ability of the vehicle, with digital rangefinding and modern FCS would mean the abrams can hit the tiger from beyond the tigers visual range, with rounds that will destroy WW2 tech so bad the tiger would make a turretless t-72 blush, while moving

>>34185197
you are retarded

I was impressed by how long this thread kept the bullshit train rolling. Then someone had to spoil it by taking it seriously.

I think I'll start a thread like this in a few days, but using Japanese and Italian tanks.

Its a well known fact that the T-34 was able to disable the KT by driving into it very fast then which caused the KT to shatter and the T-34 just kept brummbrumm towards

>>34186507
*TOWARDS BERLIN


the faggot eagle on the fagstag was taken down by a T-34 driving into it too

>>34186507
only worked if they had high proof vodka in the fuel mixture to give it extra engine power. KT was pretty big.

>>34186521
Maybe for you, for the T-34 it was just a little mouse to be stepped on

>>34183928
M1=105mm
M1A1=120mm

>>34186507
A T-34 is able to shatter most modern mbts by driving into them due to its sheer awesomeness. From M1s to T90s they do not stand a chance.
Only mighty German machines such as the KT can stop it.

File: l04he.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

>>34181070

>>34187628
The sloped armor design of the superior T-34 deflects so called "tungsten (Read light bulb shit) perpetrators" skywards.

>>34186004
Nice

>>34186821
>120mm vs 8.8cm
>cm = 100mm
>Tigers mighty 880mm vs puny 120mm rounds
I don't even understand why people think a 120mm round, designed to injure a tank, can compete with an 880mm round designed to kill a tank.

>>34180925
>RPGs like the bazooka
Bazooka penetrates 76mm RHA
Most basic RPG-7 grenade, PG-7V penetrates 260 mm RHA.

>>34188925
>Fatnik coming up with bs to sell his underpowered and poorly constructed weaponry
Hahahahah oh wow

>>34181081
god damn what an ass

File: Pop Songs Can't Melt Steel Beams.png (616KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 1280x720px

>>34181070
But jet fuel can't melt composite armor...

>>34187628
>>34188192
No, it directs the bullet to a path like artiellry, it falls back into enemy territory

Also its sloped front causes enemy tanks to flip when the T-34 drives into them

>>34185317
Sure it's a decedent but it would be like an 80 year old boxer vs an 18 year old boxer

>>34185317

> it was largely designed by Germans

I think you mean the leopard 2 was largely designed by Americans

>>34189148
Just like Robot Wars!

>>34186067
>but do fuckall vs. old full caliber rounds
the fucking tanks being tanks site on facebook actually made that argument not too long ago

File: 1486754268050.jpg (187KB, 985x865px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 985x865px

>>34180925

P gud b8, almost got me

>>34189226
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fJ923CZwU4&app=desktop
And it's descendant, sport
All the other information in this thread is 100% factual, the King Tiger did have thicker armor than the Abrams, however, that doesn't equal its total effective armor value, of which the Abrams has much, much, much more than the shit tiger
Didn't one get knocked out by a baby combat car too? I remember an anon posted the picture of the report, a King Tiger knocked out by a shitty light transport

>>34191538
No it isn't you stupid nigger, it's lazy as fuck.

>>34191502
>facebook
>ever

File: da fuk bro.jpg (34KB, 640x478px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 640x478px

>this thread exists

File: 1480454742174.png (977KB, 595x845px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 595x845px

>>34191706
for real man. I can only imagine that wehrboos are really this delusional and they are being trolled.

>>34181465
If the American tanks were so shitty, why aren't you posting in German?

>>34181562
And the Syrians had 10 times the casualties.

>>34181070
Jet fuel can't even into melt steel beams.

>>34184304
The level of shitposting here is off the charts.

File: FailHard.jpg (23KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x375px

ITT: a shitton of /k/inderkommandos who only have knowledge of mechanized warfare based on video games and the opinions of their equally retarded friends.

>>34188798
Kek the math checks out

>>34192651

The Syrians were Arabs.

Who writes this nonsense do people realize the gun on the Abrams is a German gun same one on the leopard 2 it is devastating so everyone can both love it the Abrams is top dog and the tank world today just ask anyone who tried to go up against it in another tank the tiger was a great tank and its day 60 years ago the leopard and the Abrams are beasts no one wants to f*** with

File: 1460420295927.png (138KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 350x350px

>>34180925
It depends on distance

If the Tiger is far away, the Abrams will win

If the Tiger is in the Abram's crew compartment, the tiger would win

>>34194408
>same one on the leopard 2

>>34181465
Because you didnt just ask that in German.

>>34185766
It wouldn't do jack shit, there are very few if any man-portable HEAT warheads made before the 90s that have a chance of damaging a modern MBT

File: 1486384178142.png (8KB, 473x500px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 473x500px

>>34195197

>Abrams
>Modern

any serious reply in this thread is made by a 100% confirmed redditor

>>34194408
>do people realize the gun on the Abrams is a German
Thus the Tiger would instantly win when the enemy tank defects to the Fatherland