Is this the 1911 of polymer striker fired handguns?

>>34168215
>Is this the 1911 of polymer striker fired handguns?
What does that even entail?

>>34168215
no, now kys you retard.

File: Hudson_H9_Striker-Fired_9mm_Combat_Tactical_Pistol_8-660x330.jpg (50KB, 660x330px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 660x330px

>>34168215
No, it's not.

1911s are expensive and impractical, two things shields do in the opposite fashion.

>>34168215
No. Its not.

1911s are durable and rugged. Two things plastic does in the opposite fashion

If by that you mean looks and feels nice but sucks to shoot? Then sure.

File: 97b690fca9d816673190a255700e5e97.jpg (42KB, 564x423px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 564x423px

Considering it's not a Detonics STX or castle arms spectre...or was it specter..No.

>>34168215
>Is this the 1911 of polymer striker fired handguns?

I really have an idea that it is.
>ergonomic thumb safety that is well thought out like the 1911's
>can have a finely tuned trigger with Apex parts or an even better one with an ATEi trigger job
>grip angle is similar to a 1911

well, does the 1911 have an absolute dogshit trigger?

>>34168215
Yes, because it's unreliable.

So unreliable, Texas DPS had to drop it, NC highway cops had to drop it, and so on.

>>34168710
Lots of then do actually. The 1911 is capable of having a fantastic trigger. Being a 3.5lb glass rod isn't an inherent trait though

>>34168215
>>34168237
>>34168253
>>34168275
>>34168303
Similar ergos, thumb safety...put a flat face trigger in there and yes I'd say it's a fair comparison

>>34170587
>thumb safety
>OP's pic doesn't have a safety

>>34168215
They're both unreliable trash, so probably yeah.

>>34168696
I think you're thinking of the P-07.

>>34168808
I don't understand why the 9mm and .40 M&P's have all these shortcomings, while the M&P45 has consistently been proven to be one of the most reliable polymer .45's on the market. I'm talking a mean round between failure count alot lower than a Glock 21.
Several tests have concluded that it is only beat out in reliability by the USP45 and HK45 - and by a factor of less than 5k rounds.
~30k MRBF.

You'll shoot the shitty barrel smoothbore or cause a mag to go to shit before you induce a jam that is the fault of the gun

File: CkxUpF0UoAEWJ3a.jpg (111KB, 1000x530px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1000x530px

>>34168215
luv my 1911, points good, great trigger, flying ashtray is a great conversation stopper. You 1911 h8ers with same type of plastic in your guns as the dildo you use to fuck yourself in the ass will never know what a real trigger or double tap is.

>>34171244
Xdm 45 is better than g21/41 and m&p45. M&p 40 is thr best striker 40.

>>34168303
Leave a glock and a 1911 in a puddle and see how "durable" a metal frame is.

>>34171896
How? Like seriously how? Wheres the data?

Or are you just one of the hired Springfield trolls who's been shooting down anti-SA/RRA threads for the past 2 months?

I've never heard the XDM 45 being more reliable than the G21

>>34170587
>thumb safety
minority option, you know they make them without a external safety right and is what the majority of them are?

>>34172336

Becuase we all leave our 1911's and glocks in puddles before having a shootout with 10 niggers wanting to rape our churches and burn our women.

>>34170610
>>34172503
Aside from being one of the few plastic fantastics to offer an optional thumb safety basically from the start over a decade ago, the safety is quite 1911-ish. Striker pistols without safeties may be the cool thing currently, but thumb safety M&Ps are hardly rare or hard to get a hold of so I'm not sure what your objections to my post are.

>>34170695
Never had a failure in almost 2k rounds through my shield that wasn't due to me getting fatigued and limp wristing it

>>34172336
Lets leave a glock and a 1911 next to a fire or the sun and see how durable a metal frame is.

>>34168312
I felt the complete opposite.

>>34172336
>lets do something nobody does for any reason.

>>34172571
>I put x rounds through y gun under optimal conditions! It's super reliable.
Every fucking time.

>>34168275
>1911s are expensive
poorfag
>1911s are impractical
Not really
>two things shields-
I'm going to stop you right there since you didn't even realize that what OP posted was not a shield.