Russia tests Zircon hypersonic missile system

File: 1489418313120.png (506KB, 401x713px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 401x713px

>>34158964
>trusting Sputnik

>>34158964
How many fucking threads do you need to start in one day? Christ.

File: 1492734318798.jpg (152KB, 1080x643px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1080x643px

Moar. Don't read the lang tho.

https://www.krsk.kp.ru/daily/26670.5/3692150/

>>34158981
wtf are you on about, autist?

File: X-51A_Waverider_on_B-52_2009.jpg (300KB, 2100x1500px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 2100x1500px

>>34159055
>vatnik government still uses the successfully concluded AMERICAN X-51 project in their graphics
How can vatniks ever recover?

>>34159535
last time I checked, X-51 was utter failure, Jose.

>>34159593
>He thinks the X-51 is the same as the DARPA Falcon

GTFO

>>34159593
>last time I checked, X-51 was utter failure, Jose
Last time I checked you where a malnourished subhuman, Yevgeny.
The only difference is that I'm right and you are wrong.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/hypersonic-x-51-programme-ends-in-success-385481/

As usual, the US is several years ahead of russia.

>>34160017
>that massive butthurt
kek'd. and I'm not russian.

>As usual, the US is several years ahead of russia.
oh yeah? when is US deploying hypersonic missiles? oh, that's right... NEVER.

>>34160095
>when is US deploying hypersonic missiles?

Stuff like SM-3 which can hit low satellites?

>>34158964
>trusting Russian media
>any year
I seriously hope you don't do this.

>>34160095
The HSSW is slated for mid 2020.
That is a reasonable timeframe unlike russias patented "a-any day now, p-promise!" estimate of fielding their missile this side of 2020.>>34160158

>>34158964
Here's the thing, Vlad. More faster = more fuel = less payload. But but but make it bigger to carry more boom boom. Then you need more fuel and also it makes more drag and slows it down. There's also such a thing of being too fast that your guidance systems can't correct in time. So in the end, you have a weapon that has high chance of missing it's target and if it ever hits, not do much damage. But but muh kinetic energy. Sure, but you could take out a small stationary target but that's about it. Also anything Russian Navy. Just give it up.

>>34159055
can someone pls translate the image?

>>34158964
You are aware the US has hypersonic interceptors right?
4,600 is also peak speed, not average.

>>34160744
>hypersonic interceptors
lol... missiles as well?

>>34161829
>a missile isn't a missile

fascinating logic

>>34162063
you sound retarded anon. go back to jerking off to BL porn.

>>34163507
stop projecting

>>34160713
>Here's the thing, Vlad. More faster = more fuel = less payload. But but but make it bigger to carry more boom boom. Then you need more fuel and also it makes more drag and slows it down. There's also such a thing of being too fast that your guidance systems can't correct in time.
stop being a fucking fag. We both know (well, I know, you might be too dumb) that hypersonic delivery systems is the future.

This is stated in the quadrennial defense review. Every major power will start fielding guided and evasive hypersonic systems in the next 20 years.

Kind of like people saying DF21D isn't feasible, then the US starting coverting their stockpile to the same functionality.

>>34163516
>that butthurt
stay mad Jose! or is it tyrone? kek

File: yaseen.jpg (157KB, 907x486px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 907x486px

>>34158964
>Russia declared today
>Russia declared
>Russia

Who exactly?

>its first test of a hypersonic missile, a year ahead of schedule
Pic related, they've been testing the shit out of it for a couple of years now.
If they meant first submarine launch then yes, but why name drop Peter Veliky?

Once again American 'journalists' show their incompetence regarding Russian military tech. It's almost at the level of Jane's.

Retard here, didn't the states already have a speedy missile in the 60s, the x15 or something?

File: russians.jpg (639KB, 1217x3303px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 1217x3303px

All this damage control over the Americans SUCCESSFULLY defeating a nuclear response capability and thus eternally BTFO'ing Russia's credibility.

Vladmir pls.

>A thread died so vatniks may sperg on crayon drawing of missile published on national Ministry of Truth site.
F

>>34164992
>hating on janes
Is this the latest shilling effort on putins continued war on truth?
Is it vatniks who get asshurt over people rejecting russias state controlled propaganda outlets?

>>34165111
>truth
Jane's is no longer the Jane's of the paperback era.

Most of those who are new there gets their information from amateur works. They are actually disseminating misinformation and uses the works of the ones before them so others will say they are trustworthy.

>>34158964
So lasers don't exist now?

File: 3017x1805xNorth-American-Aviation-X-15-56-6672-just-after-launch.jpg.pagespeed.ic.pUG6EvqyiB.jpg (526KB, 3017x1805px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 3017x1805px

>>34165024
X-15 was a plane.

>>34160095
>>34163552
What is it with russians and screeching about butthurt the moment they get BTFO? It is a well know fact that russians on average feel almost three times the amount of butthurt than your normal slav but they still like to throw accusations around like no tomorrow.

File: 1458222416385.webm (866KB, 484x360px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 484x360px

>>34165024
>>34165139
And we had a mach 10 nuclear defense missile for a short time, called Sprint.

>>34165131

Old Jane's used to get their information from actual military sources by illegal data. That's why data was pretty much spot on statistically.

New Jane's doesn't bother. Instead they get the data from randoms on the internet via social media and wikipedia to do the same as everyone else.

They aren't worth a subscription these days. Their journalism has dropped in quality since the 90s.

>>34160095
>when is US deploying hypersonic missiles
Has this nigga never heard of SPRINT

>>34165146
This.

The west has been Hyper-Sonic for decades.

>>34158964
>"Can't be intercepted!"
>Precious Vatnik doesn't know what a railgun is

>>34158964
>expected to be added into Russia’s arsenal between 2018 and 2020.”

Do they really expect that anyone other than the most die hard vatnik to believe them when they say things like that?
Remember back in 2015 when vatniks swore up and down that the PAK-FAilure would be the backbone of the russian airforce with several hundred in service by 2020 along with 2000+ T-14?

>>34165192

Russia has been in Wooden Screws mode for literally 25 years now. It's kinda sad.

File: 640px-Macchi_MC72.jpg (62KB, 640x416px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x416px

>RU tech thread
>Viable tech which even in its prototype stages bests US counterparts
>Not even 2 posts in, USIDF shills in FULL DAMAGE CONTROL
>Americas shill any thread not UN related in .002 seconds, yet still claim vatnik shills
I just want fat posters to die or fuck off back to the safe space allocated to them by Putin so I can discuss RU tech in peace, is that too much to ask?

>>34165226
You don't want to discuss Russian tech, you want to shitpost about vaporware. Decent b8 tho

>>34165226
>vatnik comes to AMERICAN imageboard
>"look at superior russian thing, how can america even compete, XAXAXAXA, fatniks lolololo, ROSSYIA STROOOONK, praise putin"
>gets BTFO, is shown how inferior russian tech is, gets told how the US is still years ahead of russia
>"s-stupid americans, y-you butthurt, why you always pick on poor poor russia ;_;"

Since you vatniks can't handle the heat and you get triggered by any kind of criticism, I suggest you fuck off back to vkontakte or the sputniknews comment section.

>>34165244
It really was.

Shit got me to reply instantly.

>>34165255
You just proved my point. That
You're aware you need to be 18 to post here right?

I think you should post in /b/, why are you even wasting your energy like this, it's pathetic

>American image board
Wanna know how I know you're new? ;-)

File: morton-salt-mine.jpg (258KB, 1200x960px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1200x960px

sure is salty in here

>>34165281
>three bog standard canned insults, none related to the thread
>underageb&, goback2/b/, newfag

Let me guess, they handed out a list of 4chan related memes and insults for you shillbots to use when you get your ass burned too bad, right?
It's like you're reading of a list of stale burns compiled by a joyless russian bureaucrat.

>>34158978
can I have your permission to save this pic?

>>34159055
>>34160739
>New hypersonic missile
>length: 8-10 meters
>speed: mach 8
>planned replacement for p700 granit, can be launched from all the same platforms
>range: 350-500km
>launch platforms include, heavy missile cruisers, destroyers and subs
>march 17 2016 first test was announced
>feb 2017 announced naval platforms testing
>april 2017 announced mach 8 reached in testing
>planned integration into service in 2018

>>34165139
That's even more impressive. How can big red even compete?

Didn't we just do a test this week of an intercept system that could handle this? Yeah, if it launched a nuke from a sub right off the coast we couldn't do shit but then it wouldn't matter if it hit that high-speed anyway.

>>34160095
subsonic LARSM will fuck Russian ass you prick.

>>34165647
>LARSM
agm-158 LRASM

>>34158964
>washingtontimes quoting sputniknews

this is just pathetic.

>>34165146
>was at mach 2 before it even left the silo

File: 735683458.jpg (248KB, 1067x767px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1067x767px

>>34158964

Once a missile goes terminal then essentially it is at the end of it's flight and very predictable. We have been shooting down terminal ballistics for years. Speed is only necessary if the missile has no room or objective to track a moving target before impact, essentially a guided weapon that can only behave unguided unless you want to throw it off. The material has to be so dense in weight and quality or else the fins will just sheer off. It will have to be long enough or wide in diameter only so the propellent fuel can burn long enough for it's intended range. A new speed of missile is not going to be long distance or stable guidance with poor angles of attack.

>>34158964
The US has successfully tested hypersonic missiles back in 2013, at which time russia still had trouble getting their missile to even start properly.

The problem the US faces is that there is no viable targets for this kind of missile which dampens the need to rush one into service.
The Syrian air base strike shows that regular tomahawks do just fine against targets protected by russian AD networks.

The us military half hour anywhere missiles is way ahead of shitty Russian wannabe hyper spinoff missiles.

>>34165159
STILL asshurt that Janes repeated manufacturer provided data about the PAKFA.

>>34166524

Reminder that the POOs, which have insider access to program information (as the ones sponsoring the Italy-tier economy on the PAK FA) are unhappy with its current specifications.

>But IAF has been unhappy with the Russian FGFA called Sukhoi T-50 or PAK-FA because the jet lacks proper stealth and its engine does not have "enough thrust", which are among 43 critical modifications or shortcomings it pointed out earlier.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/after-sukhoi-mistake-india-to-go-for-russian-5th-gen-fighter-only-with-full-tech-transfer/articleshow/57546519.cms

>>34166697
>the jet lacks proper stealth

S - D U C TS
ı
D
U
C
T
S

Does anyone know what the current official vatnik stance is on the issue?
It has been Radar Blockers, Comes With Production Engines, Just A Meme and RAM Coated Blades but they tend to rapidly shift between those depending on season and phase of the moon.

>>34166754
we still don't know RCS.

>>34166697
>india
Gods of trade.

>>34160095

Sprint missile, from the 60's.

>>34166697
reminder that poos are angry in this specific scenario, because the russians aren't letting them reverse engineer the 50, like the streetshitters do with literally every other piece of tech they get from russia

>>34168544
are you and the various other posters fucking stupid? like how fucking stupid are you? did you just compare a BALLISTIC missile from the 60s and various other projects to a russian hypersonic CRUISE missile? never mind the monkey who tried saying something about "well once it reaches terminal velocity, it's predictable, etc"

like are you fucking RETARDED?

the whole point is this russian missile here is a CRUISE missile, and your sprints and such shite are BALLISTIC missiles

imbeciles...

>>34158978
>Trusting CNN

>>34168422
Sukhoi themselves estimated somewhere between 1 to 0,1 m^2, no better than the super bug which admittedly does have some RCS lowering features.

>it's a vatniks get BTFO and move the goal posts episode

>>34165146
I love the white hot glow of the missile from friction at 25-28 seconds. That's mutherfucking fast.

>>34165189
I'll take metal storm for $800 Alex.