Public Service Announcement

>>34158960
I was thinking of buying one of these for my first pistol. It has an amazing trigger

File: 20170604_144028.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>34158960
I shoot a 226

File: IMG_5028.jpg (197KB, 1598x929px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1598x929px

The X series is going to totally dominate the market for years to come. Nothing else can compete.

File: laughinggirls.gif (3MB, 445x247px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 445x247px

>He bought a retrofit P250

>>34158986
Its nothing like the 250 you fucking mongoloid

I swear sig320 shills must all be false flaggers

>>34158960
This
i bought a Beretta 92 because its what the military uses so it must be good!!!
but unfortunately for me the day i ordered and paid for the Beretta is the day they announced the Sig p320 is the new service pistol!
Now im stuck with this useless piece of garbage i cant pass off onto anyone!!!!!!!!!

File: 1495945872589.jpg (177KB, 505x960px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 505x960px

>>34159025
BUY BOTH

>>34159025
You think you have it bad? I am an old fag. Same thing happened to me when I got my 1911. Seriously I sold it at a loss and got a flintlock same thing anymore. Better go buy a sig.

File: mk23.jpg (2MB, 3528x2276px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3528x2276px

>Still not using a MK23 as your service pistol.

Look at all the manlets.

Too much plastic for my taste.

File: P30L Flowers.jpg (520KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 960x720px

It's so very plebeian in here

>>34159078
Probably walletlets

>>34158960
Yawn

File: 1494434240611.jpg (28KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x300px

>>34158979
Fuck that looks nice. I shoot Glock 35 KKM 9mm barrel for IPSC, Dawson sights, but not gonna lie reallllllly want one of these Sigs. I feel like I could really do some work with that model

>>34158960
> 10 years later
> LOWEST BIDDER STRIKES AGAIN.

File: sig_sauer_p320-4.png (641KB, 1000x603px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1000x603px

>>34158960
>>34159025
>>34159073
Don't worry about it, I did the same thing as you, I, or any red blooded American would do. The military adopted the 1911, so I have a 1911. Great gun. Then they moved on to the Beretta 92fs, again I got one. Great gun. Now the Sig..... Well if history repeats itself. Don't feel bad guys.

>>34158960
Too bad they're being sued for Patent Infringement.

>>34160692
Source? I'm interested in reading

>>34158960
>the US army knows their shit
BRB gotta go buy some hot 115gr ball for my EDC and m855 for my HD carbine

>>34160775
>hot 115gr ball
NATO standard is 124gr ball isn't it?

File: ColtNavyRepro.jpg (4MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3120x4160px

>>34158960
I rather shoot a black powder gun over a Sig anyway :^)

>>34160750
http://taskandpurpose.com/sig-sauer-p320-steyr-arms/

File: 20160913_143904~2.jpg (2MB, 2341x3118px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2341x3118px

>>34158960
>Not using a navy seal approved pistol..

>>34158967
It might have a good trigger for a striker fired gun but in no way can it be amazing like a proper single action trigger.

File: 1492132075086.png (631KB, 681x681px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 681x681px

>>34158960
>The US Army knows their shit /k/, just accept it..
Fuck you guys so hard. I was eyeing this gun back it was way cheaper. Now, not only is it stupid expensive, but it's cool to bully if you have it.

>implying we dont know sig is god tier

FUCK OFF summerfag

>>34158991
Its a striker fired action shoehorned into a p250 slide and frame.

File: Intron Depot 3.jpg (4MB, 2992x4000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2992x4000px

>>34158979
HURRY THE FUCK UP AND START SELLING X-FIVE GRIPS REEEEEE

>>34159078
>Y-yeah... manlets, right guise?

>>34160786
you may be on to something there

File: 1489817065962.gif (115KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1024x1024px

>being a corporate shill

>>34161399
da jooz

>>34159710
>hurr durr muh glawk

>>34159149
P30s and vp9s look like they can be cracked apart by squeezing them tightly.

>>34160866
>Navy seal approved

Nit anymore, they upgraded.

https://sofrep.com/74600/will-glock-19-work-navy-seals/

>>34161901
The armorers are happy not the shooters they hate it.

>>34158979

>X-CARRY
>ported slide so lint and shit can get in the gun when you're carrying it
>fucking huge beaver tail so it can't be concealed easily

great job, sig

File: IMG_20170520_150929.jpg (2MB, 2387x1542px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2387x1542px

>>34158979
Holy shit the TALO is nice.

Should I sell my P226 Extreme and get a P320 Tacops Carry?

>>34158960
>US Army knows their shit
>wants to readopt 7.62 NATO because they want it to penetrate armor it currently can't penetrate

>>34159710
>glock sells to LEOs for years with heavy discount, underselling virtually all their rivals by significant ammounts
>SIG undersells glock to US .mil
>glockbois cry out "THEY CHEATED BY UNDERSELLING AT ~$207 PER!!! SEE ITS JUST HOT GARBAGE SHIT!!! REEEE"

>>34162215
I mean, a lot of our contemporary rivals (RF, PRC) are starting to/have already been fielding individual armor. Now that everyone is getting on the Level III and Level IV plate-train, we need to start considering that and planning around it. If anything, I really hope this spurs development for recoil compensation, since in the next 20 years the average grunt may be expected to handle 7.62 Real Fucking NATO rounds. Not saying it absolutely will happen, but it's a possibility as armor proliferates. Or we just go full-retard with the boom boom like with the XM 25, but that poses a lot of issues with regards to collateral damage.

Not everyone will be fighting with their sand-dresses on.

File: 1494051366321.jpg (36KB, 500x397px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x397px

Nah, I don't care for polymer frames and most striker-fires. I appreciate the P320's lack of a trigger safety and better than average trigger pull but I'll stick with my CZ's and 1911's.

If the Hudson H9 actually releases and proves to be a good handgun I may give it a looksee.