Why do people love Glocks?

>>34155642
Old tech
Grenades
Fanboys
Can't approach the quality of other funs unless you replace 1/2 your Glock
Did I say fanboy droning already?

Good marketing + Good guns

>>34155666
>Good marketing + Good guns
>Good
>Better
>Best
Kiwifudd, I agree there are two tiers above Glock

The company has excellent marketing teams.

People have the ability to ignore things to justify their purchase

Enough of them get together and make a psuedo cult, like apple.

i love cocks

>>34155642
Glocks are trash for poorfags that want something "German" but can't afford an HK.

Glocks have this utilitarian look on which they have capitalized.

>>34155679
*Glocks

My boss, who is a great guy, doesn't buy anything but glocks. I will never understand why someone who could buy whatever they want likes nothing but glocks.

File: IMG_1509.jpg (76KB, 587x800px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 587x800px

People who buy a glock solely as a range toy are uncreative and unimaginative, unless they're buying a 9mm or a larger version of their glock carry piece so that they can train cheaper/ more comfortably. Glock 20s are also a fun range piece, though I like to carry mine.


People generally love glocks, because their reliability, durability, simplicity of operation and capacity for size (42,43 notwithstanding) are incredibly reassuring

Good marketing and a massive aftermarket. I mean short of the 1911 what other handgun has the aftermarket Glock does?

>>34155642
A lot of people use them as range toys because we're civilians, and going around shooting people is generally frowned upon.

>>34155797
Honda Civic has an aftermarket
Those tards are called ricers
Glock fanboys are ricers
FACT

modular
A E S T H E T I C
cheap

>>34155681
I thought glocks were Austrian ?

>>34155677
>Glock
>CZ?
>HK

>>34155642
You listed why people like them, but I can't explain why people obsess over them other than people are weird.
Sure Glock has the biggest aftermarket, but eh.

File: IMG_1436.jpg (948KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

948KB, 1000x1000px

>>34155890
Don't engage him

>>34155681
Hey bud you hear about what happened in London? The day of the rope for muzzies in the US is coming soon my murdering, raping, shit covered friend.

I'd guess an attack in the US with about 30 casualties perpetrated by some of your al'iikhwa is needed before we finally decide extermination is the best solution

>>34155829
also this

File: 1491985603206.gif (252KB, 447x415px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 447x415px

>>34155844
>that gif
DELETE THIS.

File: 2017-06-02 08.05.22.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34155642

G17 Gen 4 owner here. It didn't really have to be a Glock when I purchased this pistol, but I didn't want to risk getting a gun that wasn't 100% reliable for self-defense. I also didn't want to mess around with an external safety if/when I really needed to use it.

That combined with years of proven reliability and a fair price made it an easy choice.

File: 1281165690529.gif (1MB, 214x153px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 214x153px

>>34155844
Why are snake owners such trash?

>>34155642
Glocks are decent guns. They are not the best, but they are far from being the worst, too. Glocks are the standard by which all new guns are measured. I see them like PCs - jacks of all trades that can be customized into any role. The price of the guns and magazines is also a factor of their success.

>>34155877
>cheap
"cheap"
cheap is NOT a good thing

>>34155926
>I didn't want to risk getting a gun that wasn't 100% reliable for self-defense
Ok so just marketing. And i'm sure you tested yourself before buying, right?

>want to mess around with an external safety if/when I really needed to use it.
Ok so you don't want to train either.

>>34155704
>utilitarian look
A gangrenous, moldy stick of rotten butter look?
You call that "utilitarian"

>>34155926
>17
Why? Why not just get the 19?

If you're going to go 17 you might as well just be carrying a 20 or 21, they're the same dimensions just .07 of an inch thicker.
Either way you did fairly well

>>34155926
>100% reliable

>Googles "Glock malfunctions"
>100% is IMPOSSIBLE
>Fanboy outed as Glocktard

>>34155681
>have HKs
>have Sigs
>prefer Glocks for duty and personal defense

>why do people obsess over them?

this is a question you might ask yourself. the frequency of these threads indicates you are a bit obsessed with them and their owners as well.

>>34155962
Nice objectivity there, I'm sure you do full 32-point testing on everything you buy too.

>>34155962
>glock aren't in the top 3 of most reliable handguns in the world
They used to be tied for #1 imo but some of their problems with the g43s and g42s has put them a bit below H&K.
The dual recoil spring issue was only with low powered range ammo, though it still shouldn't have happened

>Defending manual safeties
Into the trash it goes

>>34156000
Trips confirm, great point made.

I think a certain subset of /k/ is so insecure that their firearms are in someway inferior to Glocks, that they have to trash them at any opportunity. The others do it because they can get guaranteed (you)s

>>34156004
>g43s and g42s

yea, fuck those guns.

File: IMG_1536.jpg (212KB, 660x779px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 660x779px

>>34156022
Not only are they unreliable, they are also incredibly size inefficient, something glocks are usually pretty good at.

>>34155962

I tested about 50 rounds at the indoor range at the gun store, but I guess you could say it was marketing, yeah.

Another thing that was a part of my decision is that the Norwegian military uses the G17 as standard issue (known as the P80), which means that I can train with my civilian firearm and be equally proficient with military issue when that is relevant.

The last part of your post is not really an argument, and therefore will not be receiving a response.

>>34155972
See the previous response.

>>34155992
Not an argument.

>>34156041
>Not an argument.
The statement of "100% reliable" is a blatant lie. Everything you say afterward is also a lie. I'm not arguing. I'm stating a fucking fact, you retard.

>>34156041
>Norwegian
Why bother owning a "self-defense" firearm if you can't use it?

>>34156059

I have almost 15 000 rounds through my G17 with zero malfunctions of any kind. I've used different types of ammo and haven't seen anything resembling a failure to feed, failure to eject, double feed, light primer strike etc..

>>34156066
No law can prevent me from defending my own life. Besides, times change. With increased risk of terror attacks, I carry IWB (yeah, a full size gun). Those who don't like it can fuck off.

>>34155972
he's only allowed to own one gun per caliber
lmao

>>34156101

That's not true. I am only allowed to own one caliber per listed reason for having said firearm. That means that I can have a 9mm for one branch of competition, another 9mm for another etc..

>availability
>grip that makes sense
>simple controls
>good stock trigger
>reputation for being very reliable

>>34156083
>I have almost 15 000 rounds through my G17 with zero malfunctions of any kind. I've used different types of ammo and haven't seen anything resembling a failure to feed, failure to eject, double feed, light primer strike etc..
This is loaded with fallacies
Your personal experience is also filled with lies
>15000
False
>Zero malfunctions
False
>No FTF, no FTE
False
Ignorant fanboy liar

File: 1465683778932.jpg (280KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1024x768px

>>34155962
>Ok so you don't want to train either.
Not the guy you responded to, but successfully eliminating a step from your manual arms is never a bad thing. You're also assuming.

>>34156155

You know what? I really don't give a shit about you, some random stranger on the internet, believes me or not. That's just how it is.

Why do you even care about what pistol people buy? What's it to you?

I happen to own a STI 2011 as well, but I guess that's not Gucci enough for elitist cocksuckers like yourself, huh?

Now piss off and continue jerking off to your pillow waifu, neckbeard.

>>34156184
>WEEGIE IS GETTING ANGRY

topkek

>>34156220

Don't confuse resentment with anger, sub-human.

File: IMG_1538.jpg (136KB, 760x570px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 760x570px

>>34156230
u mad mohammedans are succing your girlfriends cunny?

File: 1496388377626.gif (923KB, 424x240px) Image search: [Google]

923KB, 424x240px

>>34156261

I take it this isn't the first time someone has called you a cocksucker or a neckbeard. This means that you are the common denominator, not everybody else.

We're done here. You don't even own or have any experience with Glock pistols, yet somehow feel like your opinion matters (pro tip: it doesn't).

Enjoy your anonymity. It's the only thing that allows you an audience, where you otherwise would be screaming at the walls.

>>34156290
I actually was defending Glocks in this thread, I just saw that I could get some rare, juicy, weegie rage.

Enjoy your caliphate my friend!

File: 1495645188821.gif (2MB, 500x391px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x391px

>>34156301

File: fallacies.jpg (733KB, 1600x1131px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 1600x1131px

>>34156290
>You don't even own or have any experience with Glock pistols
Study this, you ragetard

>>34156318

After you.

File: 1495745912799.jpg (275KB, 750x560px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 750x560px

>>34156301
>I just saw that I could get some rare, juicy, weegie rage.
/k/ used to be about guns and shit. I liked it a lot better when people didn't know what 4chan was and when /pol/ didn't exist.

File: IMG_1539.jpg (23KB, 236x353px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 236x353px

>>34156318
I see your picture and I raise you the fallacy fallacy good sir!

*tips four winds

>>34156004
>>34156022
I'm amazed to actually find other people who acknowledge that the G42 and G43 are horribly overrated. I can't tell you how many times I've ended up in arguments with Glock cultists who believe that they are as reliable as something like a G17 or G19 simply because they have a Glock rollmark on the slide.

Furthermore, as >>34156040 said, their size sucks as well. They are too large to pocket carry except in things like cargo pants, but they only hold 1+1 more shots than a damn snubnose revolver.

File: IMG_1540.jpg (90KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x426px

>>34156350
>>34156339
Oh god this is too much fun

>superior Nordic bloodline
>erased by a single wave of pakis

>>34156387
Agreed and if your going to carry a g43 iwb, you really might as well carry a g26 since it is so easily done.

>muh opinion is law rreeeeeeeee

This thread

>>34155833

And the USP is a VW bug, the VP9 is a Passat, so on.. None of the plastic pistols or sub 2k 1911s are ferraris..

The Glock is the smallest and lightest pistol in its class. It's also the least complicated- only 34 parts. Tires (magazines) are far cheaper than competitors and finding a holster is easy mode.

Aftermarket is king. Why settle for stock when you can completely customize the damn thing? Glock is the AR of the pistol world.

>>34155972

>If you're carrying a G21 you might as well carry a Mk23
>If you carry a mk23 might as well carry a double bbl sawn off
>If you carry a double bbl sawn off might as well carry an RPK
>Should have gotten a Carl Gustav m8

>>34156450
>The Glock is the smallest and lightest pistol in its class.
False
>Why settle for stock when you can completely customize the damn thing?
Why buy inferior?
>Glock is the AR of the pistol world.
False. There is no pistol equivalent of AR.

>>34156450
>Glock is the AR of the pistol world.
This wins the dumbest fucking statement ITT

>>34156387

The g42 is pretty much identical in size compared to a snub, with much less recoil (faster follow up shots), faster reloads and at the very least, has 30% more ammo on board with a flush 6 round mag. ETS makes a flush fitting 7 round mag, and extended 9/12 round mags. A 9 round mag that sticks out 1.5" gives you 100% more capacity than a snub. Great for edc? Not ideal, but having an eminently shootable lightweight edc that fits man hands and has the option of doubling OEM capacity - beats everything in its class.

The bodyguard/lcp are far too small for anyone with man sizzled hands. It's the modern day PPK, but much, much better.

>>34156555
>The bodyguard/lcp
Am 6'7"
They call me banana hands
LCP fits fine
Your feckless opinion is discarded

>>34156495
Which pistol beats the size and capacity of a G19? Nothing
Which pistol has less parts than a Glock? None
Which pistol can you customize every last piece (like an AR) without filing, milling or gunsmithing (like an AR)? No other pistol can
>Muh stock USP is better than a Roland 19! Wah! Ayoob told me not to modify!

File: 1109-hillary-duff-coleman-6.jpg (74KB, 718x670px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 718x670px

>>34156400
this.

>>34156608
>Which pistol beats the size and capacity of a G19? Nothing
>Which pistol has less parts than a Glock? None
>Which pistol can you customize every last piece (like an AR) without filing, milling or gunsmithing (like an AR)? No other pistol can
The autismo tantrum is strong with this one

>>34156450
>Why settle for stock
Because a team of competent engineers design stock while a bunch of idiots designed all that aftermarket junk to work with stock.

>>34155642
>Why do people go crazy about them and try to collect the "glock family"
While the answers of glock having good marketing and an almost genius strategy of sucking LE dicks to make plebs think they're the shit are fine answers, I think something else is at play. Autists fucking love shit with numbers on them. Glock-17, -19, -26, -22, -20, etc. It really tickles their brains and makes them gaga. That's why shit like the SCP Foundation and Pokemans are so, so popular.

>>34156667
Don't Pokemons have names, though?

>>34156663
>Because a team of competent engineers design stock
Because a team of competent engineers designed a grenade
FTFY

File: Screenshot from 2017-06-04 12-34-35.png (60KB, 1366x660px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1366x660px

>>34156680
They have both a name and a number.

>>34156663

I'm not talking about lone wolf connectors or cherry bomb mufflers

>Straight six Ford 300cid is one of the most durable engines ever made
>Competent engineers did a hell of a job
>What's this m8? That air circulation is a little constricted
>Aftermarket exhaust, 2" dump, flowmaster not cherry bomb muffler HP and torque gains, no sacrifices in durability

Just like an APEX trigger enhances the trigger in a Glock without sacrificing reliability

>>34155915
OOSHTBHFAM

>>34156471
Except glock 17 and 21 have very similar height and length, only the width is really noticable, and a thin kydex holster negates a lot of that. The 17 is certainly lighter than the 20/21, but 40 ounces fully loaded isn't all that bad.

>>34156184
I can corroborate the poster you're shitpost-replying to. You're confirmed nogunz.

>>34155681
Fuck off muzzie piece of shit.

>>34156682
>old and tired meme
>>34156652
Restating everything he said isn't an argument
>>34156555
This guy bought into the hype. They're too large for pocket carry in anything but baggy cargo pants. Just because you can force it in there doesn't mean shit when you have to finagle it out when you draw. Based Hickok can handle an lcp, why can't you?

Also 38+p(even from a snub)>>>380

>>34156947
Glock grenade is true
Confirmed gen 1, gen 2 and gen 4

>>34155797
Beretta

>>34156912

What do you want to see?

>>34156994
Are you on drugs m8?

>>34156962
glockinade was only the gen 1 and 2 .40s.

>>34156902

Glock 17 is 32oz loaded

A half pound in a good rig isn't a night and day difference, but it is noticeable, much more so than the 2oz difference between a 19/17

>>34156947

>G42 won't fit in muh skinny jeans

I'm a lanklet and the G42 fits just fine in my 5.11 Apex front pockets, as well as the cargo pockets - again, same length as a snub

Which gun does Hickock45 perform better with? Never said the lcp was unshootable, just a much less controllable piece than the soft recoiling G42

If you can't conceal the slightly bigger jframe/G42, the lcp beats carrying nothing, but it's not a better gun

Thinking about getting a GLock 17 or 19 to throw in my glovebox because I won't care about it, but I want it to work when I need it. My previous pistol for that role was a CZ-82, but it's developing a problem with feeding and it's gotta go.

It's gonna stay stock. I guess having a 33rd mag mitebcool.

Anyways, my real question is Gen 3 or Gen 4? I've heard Gen 4 has some problems. Truth?

>>34155681
You're a poorfag, you have 2 guns and spout
>muh hk.

I bought my USP for less than a Glock costs.

>>34157232
gen 4 HAD some problems with the extractor that have been ironed out for a long while now.

Sometimes I just wish all these shitposters would die of unknown causes because I don't know how else would you make them disappear.

The only way to get some advice on pistols from /k/ is a thread excluding glocks to start with. As soon as one guy mentions glock, the (you) train comes in and crash into a flaming pile of shit. A thread ABOUT glocks would never go anywhere in the first place.

File: IMG_0811.jpg (62KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1000x563px

>>34157232

I always stick to Gen3 personally

You can throw a "brace" on a 17 and it's not an NFA item. Best car gun

>>34155642
I don't understand it. I'm a pretty big hater of glock. Those triggers just kill it for me, disturbingly bad.

File: f27850382de1e1180f7298ecec968c02--glock-accessories-hand-guns.jpg (28KB, 328x266px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 328x266px

>>34155642
Glock "Perfection" isn't about being the "perfect handgun". There are a number of other handguns that edge it out in one area or another. That's not what makes the Glock perfect. What makes the Glock perfect is that it represents such an overbalance in value over price. That quality, that one alone, is responsible for the overwhelming popularity that Glocks enjoy.

Look: People in the market for a handgun can be split up into 3 basic groups:

1. People who will only buy the most INEXPENSIVE product available -- in other words, poorfag morons (niggers, NEETS, white trash, etc.)

2. People who will only buy the most EXPENSIVE product available -- in other words, richfag morons (fanbois, label slaves, ego-status fags, etc.)

3. People who will actively seek out the GREATEST VALUE for the LOWEST PRICE... in other words, THE REST OF US.

It is with group 3 that the Glock stands out. In terms of price point, it is light-years better than firearms only a few hundred dollars less than it, vastly superior to firearms at comparable price, and able to stand toe-to-toe with firearms that several hundred dollars more expensive than it is.

You can see how this explains the hate for the Glock. No one, and I mean no one, having just spent $800-$1400 for some super-elite turbo-operator fanboi status gun, wants to stand in the next lane to a guy with a $500 Glock who can match him shot for shot in accuracy, reliability, reload time, ergonomics, etc. etc. It strikes at the very HEART of the ego-driven label-chasing gearfags identity as a human. So, in an attempt to assuage his anal anguish, he has to... well... just make shit up!
>hurr glocknade
>hurr brick
>hurr grip dont like
>hurr tupperware gun
and so on and so on. That is why the Glock is Perfection: Because it pisses off EXACTLY the right people with the precision of a fucking laser.

tl;dr - Glockhate has nothing to do with the Glock, and everything to do with the fragile ego of the Glockhater.

>>34157217
>the G42 fits just fine in my 5.11 Apex front pockets
>he wasted money on 5.11 clothes

Tactifag/"gray man" detected.

i got my 17 for free cuz my uncle died :(
its my first pistol of my own so i don't really have any reference but it works just fine

>>34157475
>it is light-years better than firearms only a few hundred dollars less than it, vastly superior to firearms at comparable price, and able to stand toe-to-toe with firearms that several hundred dollars more expensive than it is

Could you qualify this statement by explaining if you think this applies to all Glocks or only some of them? I agree wholeheartedly that some of their products are unbeatable.

Their 10mm pistols, for instance, are pretty much the only 10mm pistols that hold up well to hard use and are offered at a price that is 1/2 to 1/4 of the competition. They are a great deal.

Their 9mm service pistols are the industry standard, and they are an obvious choice for anyone who doesn't know what he wants beyond wanting a no-frills gun that will not fail him in his time of need. They are a solid choice, although there are some other offerings at the same price point that are of comparable quality and reliability (92FS, for instance).

Their subcompacts are not that great. Glock was extremely slow in responding to market demand in this area to the point of being years late, and my experience with them is that they are picky about what ammunition they will run and that their reliability is such that I would not pick them as a first choice unless I had no other options. At the same time, their price isn't that great either. Both the 42 and 43 will cost you a minimum of over $400 OTD if purchased new, when things like an LCP can be had for $200 or a Shield or PPS can be had for $240 OTD.

File: IMG_0054.jpg (75KB, 636x469px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 636x469px

>>34157496

>>34157642
Where the fuck are NIB glock 42/3s 400$? I've never seen one for less than 530$

>>34157690
The fact that people actually dress like this blows my mind. The fact that they think they look lile normal people is almost unbelievable.

Here's a better question; why do people hate Glocks?

Answer is because they are popular.

>>34157699
>Glock 42

https://www.sportsmansguide.com/product/index/glock-42?g=29297

>Glock 43

http://www.brownells.com/firearms/handguns/semi-auto/g43-handgun-9mm-w-2-6-round-magazines-prod84679.aspx

The 42's more like $420 OTD and the 43's more like $470 OTD, but yeah.

File: IMG_0814.jpg (29KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 650x650px

>>34157496

Most of the 5.11 stuff sucks and sticks out like a sore thumb
The APEX pant however, is the best pant I've ever tried so far

> comfy and lightweight, stretches a bit for IWB
>has large pockets with reinforced seams for a knife clip
>stealth cargo pockets
>flexible
>Not obvious "shoot me first" tacticool appearance

$60 Black Friday. Easily worth the extra $40 over shitty Carhartt pants

>>34157756
These look autistic as fuck. Unless you're on a skateboard, cargo pants of any design scream "I have a gun on me and post edc pics on instagram"

>>34157756
I guess it depends on your occupation. If you were an electrician, a mechanic, or something along those lines, those pants would not look out of place. In an office though? You would immediately come under suspicion and probably be violating dress code in many places.

File: IMG_0816.jpg (59KB, 549x964px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 549x964px

>>34157783

The cargo pockets are flat, can't really be seen until up close

File: 1494315898135.jpg (79KB, 858x472px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 858x472px

>>34157718
I think in some cases it's an attempt to broadcast that you are carrying. Implied carry, if you will.

>>34157718
>>34157783
holy shit this, I people really want to blend wear a pair of comfy jeans

>>34156387
OP here. The one Glock I actually owned was a G43. It was the most overpriced piece of shit ever made. I ended up trading for a M&P Shield which I found to be leaps and bounds better than the G43.

To say the G43 & G42 are overrated is an understatement.

>>34157806
>>34157756
>>34157783
>>34157801

You're thinking about it too hard. The general public is oblivious and they are not scrutinising your person every moment you are outside. Almost no one thinks about it, and no one cares about your choice of fashion.

>>34155937
They are snake owners, thus naturally edge lords.

>>34155890
They are.
>>34155915
>cucks acting tough
Thats really cute.
>>34156000
>I'm obsessed with making fun of poorfags
You're right it's fucking hilarious. >>34157244
>I own two guns because one image I posted had two of my guns in it
>this means these are the only ones I own
>he bought a used usp
>calling someone else a poorfag
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

>>34155844
Who the fuck feeds a pupper to a snake?

Fucking rustled my jimmies hard.

Captcha is strangely the name of my dog....

File: IMG_0817.jpg (17KB, 295x295px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 295x295px

>>34157801

I'm sure there are a few places where these wouldn't fly, but for any other job that doesn't require a strict dress code, I don't think there is a better edc friendly pant.

They make an office friendly pair as well, not sure how great they are though

>>34155642
lightweight (why LEOs like them)
reliable
accurate
metric shit ton of accessories
good trigger out of the box

>>34157974
The general public doesn't give a fuck about your sheepdawg fantasies. People have their own lives to worry about. Its like manlets that think wearing cuban heel boots makes them look taller. Everyone notices, nobody cares.

>>34157806
I saw them on the thumbnail. Fuck out of here with that shit.

>>34157820
Might as well wear a chest rig.

>>34157720
Because they're cheaply made but msrp for x2 their worth

Because they have a tendency to crack slides even on 9mm and its sweept aside as non critical damage

Because they weren't designed for a shooter's hand. You cannot hit the mag release or slide stop without fidgeting around.

Because their marketing came up with a terrible slogan which coincides with having to replace most of the oem components to make it usable beyond casuals.

Because their marketing team has bastardized the word polymer when they actually mean glass reinforced nylon.

Because their patented plastic frame has a habit of failing and all plastic frames fail by grenading through your hand.

Because the fangirls are toxic and not something i would ever want to be confused for or associated with

>>34158027
You're so deep in the memes you have no idea what you're doing anymore.

>>34158111
I guarantee if you told them to their face they'd bluster about how they aren't that obvious, but I mean...

So, redpill me on the g26. I'm about to be a 1st time gun owner C&C. For a double stack 9mm, it seems uncomplicated and easy to pickup.

Fired it during 2 range visits and it didn't explode like a meme grenade.

>>34158088
>nobody notices
>everbody notices

pick one, idiot

>>34155642
Glock owner here.

I like them because they're reliable, functional and I've had exactly Zero problems with mine.

I also know that mags and parts are everywhere. My collection is also planned around SHTF scenarios and you have to admit if you could have one handgun in bad times it would be a Glock.

File: glock.jpg (117KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 800x600px

>>34155642
because they work, it's a tool

there are a lot more striker pistols out there now than 10-15 years ago, Glock is the reason for that

>>34158270
They're low performance unless you swap everything out

They have terrrrrible ergonomics unless you have skeltal hands

They might glocknade if you use hot ammunition (this kills the hand)

No safety. If something pulls the trigger it goes off. Could be your finger, could be a holster, could be anything.

They work fine though. No problem being a first pistol. They were made for the lowest denominator

File: IMG_0333.jpg (834KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 2048x1536px

I originally got into glocks because the Makarov and SA Champion that were my carry guns prior would sometimes get surface rust after a long day of carry and that made me paranoid, also the AWD had just expired and I liked the idea of 15 rounds of 9mm so I got a used 2nd gen Glock 19. Then I traded that towards a new 3rd gen when those came out and sometime later picked up a used 2nd Gen G20.

>>34158276
>i cant read
Everyone notices but nobody is going to tell you how obvious you look because they're not autistic like you.

>>34158322

>Why do people love Glocks?
marketing and fanboy hype from manchildren who invest their ego into it

>>34157034
gen 4 10mm

>>34157475
>Glock "Perfection" isn't about being the "perfect handgun". There are a number of other handguns that edge it out in one area or another. That's not what makes the Glock perfect. What makes the Glock perfect is that it represents such an overbalance in value over price. That quality, that one alone, is responsible for the overwhelming popularity that Glocks enjoy.
We found the Glock salesman

>>34157718
my job gave me a bunch of those 5.11 pants to work in. i'm going to wear my free pants and not give a shit about what you think.

>>34158660
Nobody is trying to stop you fampai. Just don't expect to have any element of surprise in any dgu situation.

Glock owners vs nogunz hipsters: the thread

>>34157940
>jeans
How about no. Cargo or milsurp is the only way to go. Also shorts are a no go.

>>34155681
>falls for the HK marketing

What's it feel like to be a retard, Ahmed?

I think its like google chrome for guns, it "just works"

>>34158561
I heard about this on here, but i have never come across anything about. Do you have articles or videos about it? The only reason I am considering a glocks is for the g40, and I don't want to buy a $600 mistake.

File: DSCF0440.jpg (629KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 1600x1200px

10mm

Reminder that the only Glocks with fully supported chambers are .357 SIG

>>34157720
Exactly

>>34158016
>doesnt post pictures of his guns
>expect us to take his word for it

You're a poorfriend, sorry. Once you own more than a dozen maybe we'll consider you middle class.

>pays retail for guns

Laughin at you senpai.

>>34159068
It was a single incident in a gun news article due to out of spec ammo from Lehigh which was loaded by underwood. It in no way was a fault of the glock 20

File: IMG_1549.jpg (105KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 533x800px

>>34157217
I have a job

Meaning on weekends I'm in khakis or jeans, and on work days I wear dress slaks/ suit pants. No a g42 will not work unless I want to look like a fucking idiot.

>>34158448
Glock rolled out the 3rd gen in Jan 1998. The AWB was from 1994-2004.

>>34157642
>beretta 92 comparable quality
Thicker, heavier, and just generally bulky in every way.
They're shit for civilians, unless you want a range gun for "muh aesthetics".

>inb4 home defense pistol
Use a rifle or shotgun you faggot

>>34157720
4chan is a board of contrarians.
Why? Because instead of likes or upvotes, the only way desperate faggots receive gratification is from replies. In order to guarantee replies, the user will make outlandish posts over things that are generally accepted to be good, riddling them with insults and caustic language. Like bees to honey other users swarm to these posts, all the while the original user feels the sweet, sweet, warmth of attention

File: IMG_1510.jpg (174KB, 746x1000px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 746x1000px

>>34157971
M&P shield accepts that is a very concealable belt gun. The Glock 43 is ashamed of its large size and tries to compensate to try fit the bill for pocket carry. In doing so it's unergonomic and has shit capacity

>>34159469
>4chan is a board of contrarians.
>Why? Because instead of likes or upvotes, the only way desperate faggots receive gratification is from replies. In order to guarantee replies, the user will make outlandish posts over things that are generally accepted to be good, riddling them with insults and caustic language. Like bees to honey other users swarm to these posts, all the while the original user feels the sweet, sweet, warmth of attention
tl;dr

>>34159247
Which doesn't matter for 9mm, 45 acp, or even 10mm. I own a glock 20, and having put quite a bit of buffalo bore and underwood Im happy to say semi supported chamber is just fine, other glock 20 owners have similar responses.

Furthermore, you really don't hear about problems with the 40 glocks anymore, most of the issues surrounded the early generations

>>34155642
The Glocks® are able to suprise you

>>34159469
truth.

>>34159569
It does matter for all cartridges.

File: slim-jesus-drill.png (267KB, 634x352px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 634x352px

>>34159569
>40 glocks

File: IMG_1550.jpg (85KB, 720x478px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 720x478px

>>34158016
Most of the western world hates you dirty goat fucking fiend. You're people are garbage and they know it. The rich muslims try to compensate by buying tasteless and gaudy clothing and cars, the poor, so angry at their own culture, religion, and races inferiority LITERALLY FUCKING EXPLODE! How long will it be before you decide to take Allah's call and kill some infidels? I hope me following you here, reminding you of what a pathetic shitskin you are, drives you to it, so that even more Americans will understand what vile people muslims are and will always be.

>>34157381
>$400 gun
>$2000 for your RMR'd slide
Why are you here Gabe?

>>34159287
>he owns a dozen used guns
>thinks he is somehow not a poorfag because he has to penny pinch and eat dog food for a year to afford a half price gun
You don't even have to project, your post is rich with poorfag logic that only a true poor person would possess. Enjoy your day pleb.
>>34159649
I'll have to use this for copy pasta later, I'm sorry your feels have been so ravaged.

File: IMG_1551.png (582KB, 598x543px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 598x543px

>>34159713

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com

>Looks like the hungry muzzies are getting cranky

>>34159754
No need to hide those feefees from anyone girlfriend

>>34159712
Pistol mounted red dots are just a meme anyways. From self defense distances they make no difference. Only at ranges commonly found in pistol competitions do they really help

File: IMG_1552.jpg (100KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 540x304px

>>34159769
>feefees
What are you talking about shitskins?

Don't you have some white women you need to accost?

>>34159812
I'm talking about your feelings you little snowflake

File: IMG_1553.jpg (126KB, 769x798px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 769x798px

>>34159841
Okay

>>34158027
>office-friendly edc pants
Or just buy a pair of pants with a waist size 1 more than you wear. Holy shit, it isn't that hard.

>>34158322
>0 problems
right because exploding is a feature.

>>34158900
I'm taking the bait. Eat a dick you Gray man piece of shit. No one wears shirt that aren't jeans, shirts or chinos. God I hate it here.

>>3415564I don't like they way they feel in my hand or shoot.... would never own one!

>>34155681
All this faggot does is derail threads. It would be nice if MODS fucking did something about it.

>>34159862
Glad to see a new twist on the classic tub girl.

>>34159953
>All this faggot does is derail threads. It would be nice if MODS fucking did something about it.
Your contribution to the thread is equally feckless

File: IMG_1555.jpg (3MB, 2336x3504px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2336x3504px

>>34159953
It's his own personal NEET jihad. He blows up threads with incredibly stupid posts about his superior hks locked and loaded with practice ammunition.

>/k/rusade when?

File: straight_edge2_PiS.png (43KB, 1024x1012px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1024x1012px

>>34159953
Fuck up. b4 i fuk u up.

Because people like to belong to a team and beat the other team.

File: IMG_1556.jpg (12KB, 150x162px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 150x162px

>>34160090
HEY ACHMED!

you forgot your trip

>>34159901
Or not. You moron.

File: Gen3Glock20-cracked.png (198KB, 838x476px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 838x476px

>>34160153
http://americanshootingjournal.com/gen3-glock20-goes-wrong-while-testing-against-level-iiia-plate/

>>34155642
Cheap, reliable, light 10mm handguns with great aftermarket

File: GlockPerfektion.jpg (202KB, 1037x778px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1037x778px

http://glock.pro/glock-pistols/4804-g19-gen-4-frame-cracking.html

>>34160187
Lol when ammo manufacturers fuck up, shit like this is liable to happen in any firearm.
Read the fucking article before posting it you faggot

>>34160217
>molding voids common on gen 4s that in no way affect function


DIG
DEEPER
FAGGOT

>>34160187
Moron. Again

File: 1431363568140.jpg (35KB, 577x577px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 577x577px

>>34155679
As expected of country grown vegetables

>>34160220
>Read the fucking article before posting it you faggot
I did you retard
>Could have been
>Could have been
A lot of "could"
You are nothing more than a fanboy, blind to the hundreds, if not thousands, of catastrophic failures across ALL gens of Glock
Happy Glock leg or Glock hand to you!!!

>>34160247
I work in plastic injection molding
molding voids are horrifying to think about in polimer pistols
STFU basement dweller and get your BSME

File: 2016-11-19 17.15.37.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>34155642
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt3vyK9ld_c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E03mV2QtIlg
probably why

>>34160253
How much Glock stock do you have that you ignore hundreds, if not thousands, of catastrophic failures?

>>34160247
Google "Glock malfunction" or "Glock frame crack"
You could dig deeper but it would destroy the foundation of your fanboy cultism

>>34159712
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwbaOgOPyFI
Gabe "Crank Call" Suarez?

>>34160276
Not once in my post did I even say could. If a bullet is not loaded correctly and it blows up the gun it's not the guns fault. If it was Underwood would not have reimbursed him for the cost of the glock

>>34160301
>Thousands
Kek

>>34160286
Some faggot on the 4chan<<<<< the most widely adopted pistol in the world. I bet you cried when the seals adopted the glock 19, didn't you?

>>34160373
>most widely adopted pistol in the world
You think you have a valid argument, but you really don't.
Agency, police force, and military adoption has more to do with alcohol and bribes than something that makes sense.
Source: my opinion/experience having worked DoD most of my life.

>>34160409
Your absentee father who served as a muhreen doesn't count you flaming homo

>>34160437
>Your absentee father who served as a muhreen doesn't count you flaming homo
This is how idiots reply.

>>34160448
75225

Fight me irl

I got my Glock 20 because I washed something cheap in 10mm. $400 for a gen 3 with 4 mags. I have no desire to buy any other glocks.

>>34160456
>Fight me irl
MODS, do I report, or do you take care of?

File: 2017-03-19 13.02.04.jpg (954KB, 2829x1590px) Image search: [Google]

954KB, 2829x1590px

>>34160479
*wanted. Whoops.

>>34160479
That's how I started but after falling in love with the 20, I ended up picking up a 19 for cheap training/ familiarity of platform/ and smaller size for easy carry

>>34160409
Do you have anything that could serve as proof that you were in a position to influence procurement? Post it with a timestamp if you could.

>>34160521
Of course he doesn't, where do you think you are?

>>34160521
>>34160553
Wants my ID
Fuck off
I have provided writtern testimony in a DoD ethics violation case
Go review all recent cases
I'm in there somewhere
Hope that whittles it down enough for you, sperg

>>34155681
Except striker fired guns are objectively better than hammer fired guns and hk's only striker guns (the vp9 and vp70) are both shit. Therefore Glock>HK.

>>34160757
My dad also works for Nintendo.

>>34160788
Do Nintendos come with tracks?
Moron

>>34160773
Now this is some logic I can get behind!

>>34158127
>Because their patented plastic frame has a habit of failing and all plastic frames fail by grenading through your hand.

You know that the frame doesn't contain the pressure from the round going off right? If you don't understand how guns work, why pretend?

File: file.png (568KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1600x900px

>>34160357
Christ.
But "Anon's" gun matches quite well, don't you think?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbXo540lIME&index=29&list=PLyr_eTQASjhRlx5rtC6kcSzANDrlWbmtY

>>34158383
>They're low performance unless you swap everything out

What do you mean by "low performance"? They're as accurate and reliable as any gun in its price range or above. They also have the highest capacity to weight/size ratio of any 9mm handgun. They have a bad trigger or sights? Triggers a matter of opinion. I quite like the stock trigger and every handgun needs the sights replaced so no difference there.

>They have terrrrrible ergonomics unless you have skeltal hands

I'm 6'1" 190 and I lift and I think they're pretty comfortable, especially with the gen 4 large backstrap. I also think they point more naturally than the PPQ, vp9, and P07 I tried out.

>They might glocknade if you use hot ammunition (this kills the hand)

No they won't.

>No safety. If something pulls the trigger it goes off. Could be your finger, could be a holster, could be anything.

Cuck switches are outdated and don't belong on defensive handguns. I've carried a loaded g19 for almost 4 years and there's no risk relative to a 1911 or something. Safeties are just another thing that can go wrong.

>>34158383
>They were made for the lowest denominator

*and SOCOM

>>34160301
Where are the records of these failures then moron?

>>34155962
Being this mad.

>>34161488
i fail to see how calling an anon a moron will help get the info when you could easily google it yourself

353,000 results for "Glock malfunction"
I'm sure you can find plenty even going 20-50 pages back if you wanted

>>34161587
And yet it's still on sale in the US, the most litigious country in the world. Doesn't quite add up...

>>34156318
>>34161843
Personal Incredulity

>>34155642
>aftermarket
>magpul mags
>thin and light
Glocks are incredibly easy to own and live with. Other guns may be better but Glock arguably has the best overall ownership experience.

>>34156000
Chekt

>>34155937
Idk but they all are str8 trash

>>34161924
Yes. Literally grenades. Fingers or whole hands lost. Yet still on sale. Riiiiight.

>>34156410
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: GlockPerfektion.jpg (46KB, 564x564px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 564x564px

>>34162162
Here you go
Enjoy!

>>34155642
you ever see those idiots that talk about Chevy like it's the only kind of car you should ever buy?
or people that call you retarded for not buying a Ford?
it's kind of like that.
it comes from ego

a gun, like a car, is a big investment, one that generally you should put some thought into.
so as a result, what should be simply "a tool" becomes attached to ones pride, they have invested not only their money but also their ego.
as a result, to even suggest that they could be wrong, that it is not the ultimately best firearm ever engineered is an attack on them personally.

>>34162223
And in a country where the smallest issue with any type of product results in a recall, Glocks are still on sale.

I don't really care about Glocks either way but this type of shit is just tedious.

>>34156083
https://youtu.be/cLnJrYYdzq0?t=10

>>34155642
>me and best friend of 15 years go and buy our first handgun
>he's set that G17 is gonna be his first handgun
>hasn't even bought it and says it's the best handgun because aftermarket parts and such
>I decide on getting CZ75 B as first handgun
>both me and friend have same birthday and get our handguns on our 21st
>i buy CZ and he buys Glock
>CZ happens to be on sale for 499, same price as glock at the store
>shot his glock, was okay
>he shot my CZ, couldn't put it down
>literally every time we would go shooting he would ask if I'm bringing my CZ
>didn't even bring glock

I honestly don't get how people can be glock fanboys. You're either buy a glock because you're an insufferable fanboy or you bought it over peer pressure

>>34156083
Assuming you bought a G17 4th gen when it released you would have needed to fire 2000 rounds a year since then to reach that.

Going off of your previous statement of the research you did prior to buying it, it sounds like you didn't have much of an idea prior to what you wanted.

Most people new to firearms wouldn't shoot their carry gun that much and still carry it without the assumption that sooner or later you would wear out the gun. I'm guessing you ment 1500, not 15000.

>>34162223
fuck off. the glock is perfect. Just hand it to the niggers and the gun will blow their hand off for you.

>>34155833
I have always believed this and I view both groups with disdain

>>34162697
I got a gen 4 G17 for $350. I like my CZ way better so I just gave the Glock to my dad.

>>34157475
>It is with group 3 that the Glock stands out. In terms of price point, it is light-years better than firearms only a few hundred dollars less than it

So you're saying it's better than a Hi Point? I'll give you that glocks aren't that expensive but a couple hundred bucks below is Hi Point territory

What you fail to realize is spending 50 to 100 more and the quality gets much better than a glock and I don't have to pay 200 bucks to make it decent

>>34162707
Ive had my carry piece for 10 months and have put almost 3k rounds through it.

>>34162990
3000 is a much more respectable number for practicing with your carry gun than 5x that.

>>34162997
I feel that 3-4k a year should be what the average shooter puts through their carry piece for adequate training.

>>34163049
The quantity per year isn't what I'm getting at. At 15k rounds through the same gun there is a much higher likely hood of wearing the gun out, and that cannot be denied no matter which brand or model you choose.

The poster just seems to be overexagerating or hasn't ever had a gun of their own that they wore out and isn't aware that it can happen.

>>34155642
Only retards love glocks

I'm pretty neutral on them, they work well enough but are fucking ugly and i don't think they feel all that great in the hand

>>34163118
I mean if your not changing springs and slide lock before 10k you're asking for a fuck up. Guns have maintenance schedules just like cars.

>>34155844
Is the pupper ok?

>>34162710
>the glock is perfect
perfect grenade

All the pros confirm that glock is the best handgun.

Your $1k metallic range toys will break the moment they fall on the ground. Not Glocks.

>>34165542
That argument is dumb and you know why.

Are you also saying a tough book would be better than a handbuilt liquid cooled desktop running top specs w/ dual 4K monitors because you could probably drop it better?

>>34165542
>All the pros confirm that glock is the best handgun.
Absolute statements like this prove your bias, and therefore eliminate your opinion.
There is no way humanly possible for >>>ALL<<< pros to agree.
Fail reply.
>Your $1k metallic range toys will break the moment they fall on the ground.
Again with bias and gravity memes.
If the metal shatters, it was shit metal.
I watched torture tested 1911's that were dragged behind an ATV and still worked.
Stop being biased and people will be able to engage in meaningful conversation with you.

These clothing store captchas are the worst.

>>34165560
>>34165562
>taking the bait this hard
wow

>>34165681
anon is BTFO
resorts to "meh, it was only bait"

>>34162697
Glock is thinner and lighter making it more comfy for edc.
Glock has $15 magpul mags.

I don't even a Glock currently. I do own an sp-01 and it is much nicer shooting but Glocks are reportedly more durable due to simpler design and they're easier to stock mags for and carry around.

Consider cost including
>gun
>6 magazines
>2 holsters

>>34156608
As a gunsmith there isn't a single pistol on the market you can customize every last piece without filing, milling, or fitting. Period. You have to be dog fucking retarded to think a glock is any different.

>>34155972
>glock 20 or 21
Why would he want to sacrafice capacity for a negligably thicker gun that offers no discernable improvements over the 17?

glocks are nice

>>34155642
>This is why so many police forces use them.
And because they get massive discounts on them.
>Why do people go crazy about them and try to collect the "glock family"
They're not flashy, they're available in most common handgun calibers, They're reliable, they have an insane aftermarket.

if glocks are such a piece of shit what should I buy after selling mine

>>34159953
the only reason he derails threads is because you retards chimp out about him posting because he has muslim in his name

>>34156555
g42 is a .380 pistol that is larger than most 9mm pocket pistols with the same capacity. It's fucking trash.

Give me one reason why I would ever consider a g42 or even a g43 over a CM9.

>b-but is too small
That's the fucking point of pocket pistols.

>>34166107
>Why would he want to sacrafice capacity for a negligably thicker gun that offers no discernable improvements over the 17?
>9mm v 10mm
uhm. are you aware of the differences? You wouldn't use a glock 17 in bear country.

>>34161023
You know the easiest place to escape when the gas isn't contained (ie glocknade) is through the trigger area right?


If you know nothing on malfunctions why even post?

>>34161186
>Every handgun needs the sights replaced.

Try again.

>>34166482
This.

Cheap, reliable, accurate, and extremely easy to get parts and accessories for it.

No one "loves" Glocks. They are ugly as plain as paper. People love "Glock Ownership"

I could toss my $2000 glock in a lake after commiting a crime with it and I wouldn't bat an eye. I'd just build up something just as good with bolt on parts in 10 minutes.

>>34162697
One is a fun range toy (cz)

The other is a serious defensive tool

>czfedorafags are actually worse than any other group of firearm fanboys

File: hushpuppysar_2_2.jpg (48KB, 745x421px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 745x421px

>>34155937
No, the real question is why dog owners are such trash.

File: 209000_01_lg_0.jpg (15KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x500px

I hate Glocks. Sure they do the job well but they feel so shit to use. They feel really not ergonomic to hold, that crappy polymer will chafe my hands after a while, and that slide grip is terrible. Its an awkward gun to use. Does the job well, I'll admit, but fuck.

I have a S&W MP40 and haven't looked back since

>>34156083
>15k rounds
>no ftf
That's 99.9% probably wrong, 9x19 is tapered so at some point some round will be sitting slightly wrong and it won't feed properly.

At 15k it probably should have happened once or twice at least.

>>34155844
Fucking why?

>>34166431
This.

>>34168182
Is that how you justify spending 1500 on a 500 dollar gun?

>>34169366
Only thing more disgusting then Glock and AR fanboys are M&P fanboys
At least Glock and AR are proven platforms that dont need tools to field strip

>>34170215
The fuck do you mean >fanboy ???

I said the glock is a good gun, but I just don't like it. Fuck outta here

>>34160190
Just bought a G20. I never have liked glocks, but your post perfectly summarizes why I bought one

>>34155642
>Affordable
>Rugged
>Easy to maintain
>Lots of aftermarket parts
>Does the job

Wow I wonder why its popular

>>34170859
>rugged
>notoriously prone to breaking
If you wanted to say "easy to replace" then you would have something, and that can sometimes be more of a virtue than being rugged. Glocks are the highest tier of disposable gun.

>>34170215
The M&P doesn't need a tool to field strip, are you retarded?

File: 1300339724557.gif (618KB, 200x133px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 200x133px

>>34171447
>notoriously prone to breaking

>>34165560
So other guns might have fancy shit you dont need while a glock will work when it counts? Sounds like the glock is the right choice.

>>34166482
Yeah every combat handgun at least. A gucci custom 1911 might come with good sights you like but sig, hk, cz, walther, glock, beretta, fnh, etc. ALL have garbage oem sights. There's no reason to pay a premium for shitty throwaway metal luminescent sights (hk) or shitty oem night sights (sig, glock), when you can just get shitty throwaway plastic sights and buy trijicon hd's or pro-idots (my choice). In fact, I would prefer if guns didn't come with sights installed at all. It'd save me a step.

>>34171447
Other than like a Manurhin mr73 or an hk mk.23/usp, I can't think of any handguns less prone to breaking than glocks.

>>34172719
In no way does that support the defense of a Glock. There are several lower priced handguns available that will fit the bill of "always shooting the same every time" than a Glock. No one should be pushed onto one brand because of a single gun. I own at least a single Ruger, Sig, Walther, Taurus, and Springfield because each fill their own role.

>>34172808
>I cant see so all sights are trash and glocks are the best

>>34155642
Because it does everything I want for a good price.
>precise
>endless supply of parts
>trigger not as bad as some make it out to be
>reliable, no 1911 diva behavior
>low bore axis
>retrofuturistic looks (robocop)
>better quality than CZ
>cheap magazines
Surprisingly enough, it also fit my hand pretty well.

>>34155642
Cause if you run out of ammo you can throw it at your enemy and it will explode so it basically means if you have say a 19 round mag you actually get 20 tries to kill your enemy

File: 1278728021774.jpg (46KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x450px

Cheap and easy to rice.

>>34172808
Of all the modern handguns i've ever owned glocks had the second worst sights. The only reason they did that well is because steyr's sights don't personally agree with me. Glocks and steyrs are the only guns I've bought where i immediately look down the sight and think to myself about how im definitely going to have to replace them with something non shit. Everbody else's sights were fine.

>>34169366
Sam?

>>34162890
examples of guns $50-100 more expensive that are also of higher quality?

>>34164082
I'm sure he's fine, they're just playing

>>34168552
go away Mr. ATF-man, you're not welcomed here

File: 1488694595571.jpg (17KB, 320x218px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 320x218px

>>34155642
>Why do people go crazy about them and try to collect the "glock family"?

Literally nobody does this.

>>34155642
They shoot really well. I sold a hk usp and a sig p220 , yet kept two glocks, and in .40. that should rustle your jimmies.

>>34174822
I wish this was true. But instagram paints a different picture.

>>34162707

I shoot IPSC competitions in Norway.. That means on average 2k rounds a month if you include practice.

Like I've said previously, I really don't care if you believe me or not. These are the facts.

>>34155642
Because they're accurate, reliable, handle well, easy to maintain compared to older designs, and are reasonably cheap (at least when looking at agency purchases or the blue label program).

>>34162707
Not everyone is a poorfag like you. Some people actually train.

>>34158016
>HAHAHAHAHAHA
Kys /r/edditor

>>34176542

>THIS

I can take almost anyone off the street and teach them to how to (decently) shoot a glock in 30 minutes

>>34155642
I prefer my glock for carry because if I ever have to shoot someone and the police confiscate my gun, I'd rather have them take my $300 glock than my $1000 sig.

File: image.jpg (132KB, 888x590px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 888x590px

This thread is still alive. Why? It's fucking June 6th and the only thread about D Day was the one I made and it died. Fuck /k/.

>>34177066

4chan is a NatSoc site. D-day was a disgrace.

>>34171447
All guns break.

>>34177073
It was a disgrace because 4channers, like Redditors, are almost entirely comprised of pussies? Ya, makes sense, sorta.

>>34175979
instagram users arnt people

>>34177642
this still makes d-day a disgrace by your own arugment lol. well done. also literally no one cares, d-day is just that level you see in some videogames to the modern world

File: 1496490982307.jpg (42KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x450px

>>34155642
Cause there's a lot of retards out there. Inevitably some of those retards will like things in an autistic manner.

>mfw I have a sig and a glock and enjoy each for their own merits

File: Makarov_4.jpg (56KB, 350x281px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 350x281px

>>34155956
You what mate?

>>34156083
I have a G19 gen4 and I have put 1300 rounds from box and never cleaned it. Had exactly 1 stovepipe dropping round into chamber from slide, no magazine.

>that's why I bought a glock