Sihks shouldn't be permitted on ceremonial guard details

>>34148997
but sihk are based and he still has a dagger under his hat

PAJEET, MY GUN

Agreed. And they're not white
>>>/pol/

They need a bigger turban. Like, that one Sihk that had a turban about the size of a globe.

>>34149027
Agreed. A sufficiently silly turban would get them back into regs. Preferably also made of a fuzzy material.

>>34148997
>did not meet the minimum standard of silliness
you make an excellent point. while he does look silly, it's not silly enough.

... there's literally been Sikh soldiers in the British army for over a hundred years

File: remilia hat.jpg (39KB, 605x603px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 605x603px

>>34148997
>minimum hat silliness guidelines
Oh my, I remember participating in a thread on this very subject once.

>>34149171
And their hats still aren't silly

File: we need to go bigger.jpg (59KB, 300x411px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 300x411px

>>34148997
they need turbans like this and then they would be silly enough

>>34149247
fucking dark souls pvpers

>>34149247
Yeah, looks good. Is there any way to petition the British gov to enforce their fucking silliness regs?

>>34149195
Kawaiiiiii.

>>34149008
BASED SIKHS

>>34149027
This

>>34148997
>>>/pol/

why not wear the bear fur hat over the turban ?

>>34148997
Given that the turban is to cover all the uncut hair, why can't they wear the shaggy-hat over the top?

>>34149804
they would overheat

>>34148997
inb4 the thread gets run over by butthurt retards who didn't read the thread

>>34149904
Too late.

>>34149791
this is a thread on military uniform standards. it has nothing to do with politics or current events.