How many men has he killed?

I know of at least one:

http://www.wallowacountychieftain.com/20070619/harrell-freed-of-manslaughter-charges-in-troy-shooting

>>34132091
You should just spare us the effort and edit the Navy Seal copypasta yourself OP.

>>34132131
This man is not me, this man is Paul Harrell, a man so based I can only dream of surpassing.

Men, women, children. He's killed em all and lived to tell the tales.

>>34132091
Does Paul Harrell look the kind of guy who'd kill a man?

You be the judge.

>>34132120
>drunk asshole tries to run your wife over with his truck
>take him down in 5 shots

based AF. Paul's videos are god-tier as well

File: 1494028445458.gif (132KB, 326x52px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 326x52px

>>34132131

>>34132585
His videos are my favorite on Youtube right now. He cuts through the tactitard trash, and proves you don't need a G34 with 6 mags and and RMR as your EDC.

He's articulate, experienced, and intelligent. A+ in my book.

File: ph.png (632KB, 645x788px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 645x788px

I imagine this man's advice is the kind of stuff that was said in gun shops and police locker rooms in the 1970s.

>>34132752
He's the only guy I've seen who would recommend carrying a snub revolver or a .380 if that's what someone feels comfortable with.

Most people I encounter just recommend a Glock or something in 9mm Luger.

>>34132815
Who the fuck do you watch lmao

>>34132800
This. I was surprised when he upgraded his camera to realize that he's our contemporary. I'd just assumed that these videos were taken from old VHS tapes from before concealed-carry had its renaissance.

>>34132800
They are and they aren't, he has a bias towards the A1 but admits AK's are fine guns, he likes revolvers but admits they are bulky and low capacity and at snub ranges they tend to not make great use of all the powder in the cartridge.

He pretty much takes no sides in debates and simply says to train with what you have and be comfortable carrying it.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (7KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 320x180px

>>34132091
hes got some nice tits

>>34132883
he certainly is in shape.

>>34132878
I get the feeling that he would have been cutting edge in 1983, but there are many assumptions he makes, such as wearing an obviously oversized cover garment and his bias for 1911s, which modern carry philosophy has simply moved beyond. His videos are good because his system works for him and he can explain it for his audience to understand his thought process well enough to create their own individual carry philosophies. Not because his carry philosophy has broad appeal.

File: Screenshot_2017-05-31-20-36-42_1_1.jpg (30KB, 496x557px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 496x557px

>>34132883
OwO

>>34132752
>he cuts through the tactitard trash
it's a breath of fresh air, that's for sure. I wish he put out videos more often

>>34132924
Not like shooting people in self defense has exactly moved much in terms of science other than bullets and his concealed carry video lays out the basics.

I'd say his preference is more towards fullsized guns, the man carried a Styer for a couple years for christ's sake.

Though I will admit he is a rather big guy and lives in Oregon where it's pretty cool and people wear oversized garments.

File: right.jpg (23KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 300x400px

>>34133005
That's not really true. There HAS been a lot of advancement in gun design since the 1970s/80s, mostly in terms of making them lighter, thinner and smaller. In 1980, yes, they did have small, thin pistols, but not in as high pressure calibers as we have today. The LCP equivalents were all in .25 caliber, and most of them were cheap Saturday night specials. The Glock 43 equivalents were heavy metal frame guns. Kydex holsters for every make and model and carry position wasn't really a thing then either. These days, you can get a micro-compact single stack that fits in your pocket chambered in .40S&W if you really want.

>>34132852
People I encounter at shops and ranges, specifically.

Also, /k/.

>>34132469
i bet he slept like a baby that night

I really like the videos he produces.
The parts where he says he's going to yap about something are pretty good, like that an nutn's videos I tend to like those parts apparently a lot of people don't but I find it interesting, and they tend to go into stuff, I like how Harrals videos he can like go REALLY into depth about a topic but tends to compress it enough to get a point across, but it'll be like an hour or two later and I'll just be thinking to myself holy shit I just spent a lot of time watching some of these videos.

>>34132924
Perhaps preferences are for lighter guns but until a cartridge comes out (or technology such as directed energy weapons) that can't be made to fit the 1911, and also completely outclasses the ammo we have today, it will remain relevant to self defense use.
It is a slim gun with not much muzzle flip, good ergos, and a god tier trigger.
You'll be seeing people using it right up till the day you die.

>>34133312
It's about twice as heavy, half the capacity, and significantly bigger than a lot of other carry options. The 1911 hasn't been relevant for concealed-carry for a long time.

>You'll be seeing people using it right up till the day you die.
As long as 99.999999% of people who conceal-carry aren't actively involved in warfare and choose their guns based on preference and other, less relevant factors, that is a vapid statement. I'll be seeing people with tattoos on their faces until the day I die, but that doesn't mean there's any kind of advantage to a face tattoo.

Paul is a really good shot with snubs, just saying

>>34133352
Not being able to acknowledge the advantages of the 1911 is ignorance at best.

You go do your thing man because obviously you have it all figured out.

>>34133380
There are no advantages. Take your ego out of your carry choice and you'll realize it very quickly.

>You go do your thing man because obviously you have it all figured out.
Yeah, because you are that mentally immature that you simply can't deal with a person existing anywhere who has a different opinion than you. There is no need for the hostility.

>>34133401
I don't have an ego in my carry guns, I also don't have just one, different tools for different jobs.

If you had stated it was your opinion I would agree to disagree and left it at that but you come on stating what you did as fact.

I really have to wonder though why you would discredit Paul simply because he chooses a carry gun different than what you would carry? Seems kinda trivial to me to be so turned off by the 1911 that you can't listen to what the guy says.

>>34132091
He said he killed a guy in this vid: https://youtu.be/K4FESGjiH3s?t=317

>>34132883
Not bad at all.

>>34133450
You're not reading my posts. I don't have an axe to grind or any intention of "discrediting" him. Paul gives his opinion and he does a good job of it. I said that in my post earlier: >>34132924
>His videos are good because his system works for him and he can explain it for his audience to understand his thought process well enough to create their own individual carry philosophies.

Carry gun choice comes down to individual preferences....only to a certain, limited extent. I can say that I prefer cap-and-ball revolvers, but if my goal is to defend myself to the best of my ability, than a cap-and-ball revolver would be a terrible choice of a gun to carry, since it has been outclassed by other guns for more than a hundred years. I have to be honest with myself that objective truth exists. That said, different people may have different goals. Paul seems dead-set on his cover garment, so his goal is not exactly the same as my goal. But, there is such a thing as a gun that is objectively better suited for a given goal than another.

>>34133537
Yeah I jumped the gun on what you were saying about Paul.

I agree that there comes a point that certain guns become objectively inferior for a given task. I'm sure we have different opinions on what and when and I'd rather we leave it at that.

File: Snubnose.png (397KB, 373x464px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 373x464px

>>34132883
>>34132923
>>34132934
>>34133501
He's got a pretty nice figure, to say the least.

>>34132800
That ear pro case is giving me flashbacks.

>>34133570
b&

File: 1487799270018.jpg (371KB, 605x800px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 605x800px

>>34133570
what are you doing

>>34133481
The only guy that has made a video about using shotguns for HD that has actually killed someone with a shotgun in his house.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiHHgjaR0TI

some geeks got a hard on for hatin on the 1911. wtf do y'all care so much for?

>>34133669
>firing a revolver from pocket

wtf??

>>34133856
You can shoot a revolver from your pocket but not a semi auto. How useful that is is up to you to decide, but it's a true fact.

>>34133570
anon lived a hard life

>>34133870
That sounds like it could be useful if someone was threatening you but didn't know you had a revolver in your pocket.

File: pocket-sand.gif (227KB, 466x322px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 466x322px

>>34133936
POCKET REVOLVER!

>>34132156
>based
>murderer
are you a nigger, perchance ?

File: Paul.webm (397KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1280x720px

>>34134027
>defending yourself and family is murder
Oh wait, you're just shitposting.

>>34134041
>implying a trained gunman shouldn't be able to incapacitate an attacker without killing him
>implying self-defense isn't just an excuse for sociopaths to murder with impunity
trigger happy faggot

>>34133481
Fucker, no he didn't I watched all 21 minutes and change.

>>34133481
>>34134072
4:55
>"In real life I had to do that [rack the slide as a deterrent] once and it did not dissuade anyone and I ended up having to kill somebody."

>>34134072
My bad, wrong time stamp: https://youtu.be/K4FESGjiH3s?t=296

>>34134064

Even police say if you're going to shoot, shoot to kill. Damn dude I know I just took the bait but are you even trying to create good, quality bait? This bait tastes terrible.

>>34133856
You're an idiot if you dont see the usefulness of that especially since a lot of snubbies are pocket carried.
>>34133936
Or if your assailant is right up on you since a revolver cannot be pushed out of battery. So yeah see a pack of hooligans headed your way or a crazy at the gas station, grab your revolver in your jacket pocket and stay alert.

What a coincidence, I'm watching his stuff rn.

>>34134064
You give sir tyrone or sanchez a sporting chance, how gentlemanly of you. Surely your method for developing nerves of steel could be taught abroad.

I tip my fedora to you. Fellow brit.

Was he USMC and then went Orgegon NG?

>>34134298
He says in this video, but yes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKpfOc7iSeo

>>34133501

I read this exactly as you intended, including the voice. It struck my sides with maximum impact.

>>34134064

>incapacitate

What the fuck kinda of beta shit is this bait, but for all you betas reading

1) you cannot control the lethality of force-- eg: one punch kills

2) a person aggressing upon you loses their right to not be aggressed upon and its sum consequences

>>34132091
I would not be surprised if that creepy fuck turns out to be a serial killer

File: CerealKiller.png (700KB, 534x504px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 534x504px

>>34134602
You're god damn right.

File: 4wrSRBB.png (432KB, 628x481px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 628x481px

>>34134064
nice bait

>>34133401
Buckwild, is that you?

File: rare ian.jpg (242KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1536x2048px

>>34134064
You are either evil, or b8.

File: bphkek.jpg&MaxW=600.jpg (11KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 250x238px

artists rendering of paul

File: IMG_1510.jpg (174KB, 746x1000px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 746x1000px

>>34132585
Love paul Harrell

Have you guys seen John Lovells channel? Just a really nice guy who was also a ranger.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pHcRgRab4P4

>>34135939
"gaylord" on a carton ?
WTF!

>>34134625
Kek

>>34136125
Gaylord can be a last name, hence why someone would name their company Gaylord

>>34134064
why shouldn't he have killed them?
why are you insisting he's a sociopath, when he's nto the one who attacked a stranger and his family?

File: download.png (7KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 225x225px

>>34134064

File: 1496281052595.jpg (8KB, 166x133px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 166x133px

>not bad at all
>you be the judge
>favorite target soda jugs

the only 3 youtubers I need in my life are Paul, Ian and Steve

Reminder that his lack of knowledge about ballistics (like using soda bottles instead of gel) will get people killed.

>>34133481
I lost track of times I been told I was a retard and middle school science failure for thinking springs can get damaged by compression.

>>34137237
It's not a good system but it's not like he pretends to carefully dissect the damage the bullet caused. If we look at the video in the thread about home defense, all he's trying to see is if, after penetrating a house, can buckshot cause harm to someone on the other side. If something can tear up a plastic bottle, it can probably do *some* damage to a person. When he shows what different bullets do to bottles, he only really makes a qualitative difference when the bottle explodes rather than just bleeding out.

>>34137237
Why would you use gel instead of pig corpses by that logic?

>>34132091
he's a breath of fresh air but he gets shit wrong often

I want another video like the Miami shootout one

That intro music and editing of his make me want to play Jagged Alliance 2 all over again. Plus I could see a character based off of him as a merc for AIM.

>>34140151
Holy shit, he reminds me of the bad mercs you could get from the AIM competitor site, like they have the shit autistic people

>>34140151
fuck dude, love that shit, what's that mod? the 4. whatever? That added all that gun shit and expanded everything? God Iv'e played so much fucking JA2

>>34140229
If he was on the M.E.R.C. site he'd be in the higher tier category because he does have skill and is physically fit. Plus he has seen combat. Although I doubt he'd join up with M.E.R.C. on the basis that the owners and members are all ass-hats. He'd fit in better with A.I.M.

>>34140266
1.13 mod if I'm not mistaken, although they're always adding and doing more mods for it. Glad that JA2 UB got the 1.13 mod. Playing that on vanilla was difficult enough as it was.

>>34137916
>corpses
nope, you need live ones.

>>34133352
Preference is about the most important factor at this point in time. The major cartridges are all on par, carry systems are fantastic and excellent reliability is pretty much a standard. Preference is the reason the market has so many offerings

>>34132800
Dude feels so oldschool, I was able to correctly anticipate him leaving out appendix carry in his "methods of carry" video.

>>34142141
wat? His carry video covers appendix

>>34142166
Does it really?

>>34134064
THANK YOU FOR CORRECTING THE RECORD!!
3 CENTS HAVE BEEN DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT!

>>34142170
I know, he's a fun fresh distraction though right?

>>34133352
I dunno about your calipers but mime say even a double stack 1911 is thinner than a glock. I feel like weight complainers are manlets, really, it's a non issue. My fucking boots weigh more than an all metal gun but preference is preference. You have to cherry pick models to say, "sure its bigger and has less capacity" because it's one or the other. The ones with half capacity are smaller than almost every other gun. The funny thing about saying guns have come far in the last 30 years is that 1911s have come far too. They only get more popular.

>>34133144
This really

People really fail to grasp how much engineering goes into Shields/G43s and JHPs.

File: 1479114957733.png (142KB, 292x257px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 292x257px

>>34142335
>mfw when people legit get butthurt at the fact that quality guns cost +$400

Y'all niggas should be fucking grateful you can get a Shield for $220 right now.

>>34133380

Not him, but what advantages? A nice trigger and good ergonomics can be had in modern service pistols.

Weight, capacity, no drop-in parts, size, more complex, not as durable, and not as reliable as a plastic pistol.

>>34134064
are you retarded or just plain stupid?

>>34142364

>40 years ago have to buy a S&W 39 and send it to ASP to get an ideal carry pistol for about $1000 total (in 1970s dollars).

>Order a Shield from Buds, TLR-6, and have an excellent carry pistol with light/LAM for < $300

I'm not even going into the whole "build a quality AR-15 for less than $500" market, and people thinking it's not a big deal.

File: 1489011024194.jpg (27KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x600px

>>34142520
In the future, we will have options for accessible and affordable NODs. And suppressors small yet efficient enough to be used for conceal carry.

fucks yes.

>>34141961
Yeah well then you're probably going to get peta people putting car bombs on your shit if you post that online. Nobody cares where meat came from if the things already dead. You can eat it all day, give away the meat to eat, sit around and shoot a dead pig all day and nobody is going to ask where the dead pig came from or how it died, they don't care it's already dead.

Plus it might be a tad bit cruel to just simply shoot piggies just to shoot them and really no other purpose.

>>34132800
>>34132924
Well if somebody carries a full-size then his advice is fucking great, and there's a lot of reasons why somebody would carry specifically that too. I've never seen this guy in my entire life, but if >>34132878 is anything to go by his philosophy is pretty fucking solid.

>>34133312
>>34133380
>Not being able to acknowledge the advantages of the 1911 is ignorance at best.
I acknowledges that some people might call it the best gun ever and why, but that doesn't mean they're right. Or not completely fucking obnoxious. If I want a full-size handgun I won't be choosing the 1911, and honestly it's not because I don't like the good feeling when it fits in my mongor barbarian hand. It's because technology has come a ways in over a hundred years and yeah there are more effective options. (and definitely in the case of the .45 ACP itself)

>>34133870
You can too shoot a semi-auto from the pocket! I'm not so sure it would work with something with really thin and flimsy cloth, but with heaver fabric it works. I also think a heavy recoil spring and really good extraction would probably help a lot.

>>34142643
Swedes did just that to test hydrostatic shock and brain damage if pigs get shot in the limb, chinks shot dogs.

You dont really think militaries get thier data from gel blocks only?

The minute you kill something you throw away all the important pieces of information regarding how something living reacts to bullets.

>>34136122
>tfw ywn be able to pull off the all american soviet biker look of an 80's Anchorage cop

>>34136273
WHERE'S HICKOK, SENPAI

YOU NEED THE GRANDFATHER

>>34142520
Fuck you, I'd spend 1,000 in 70's dollars to get a custom asp if i could ;-;

>>34142849
No, just no.

>>34142863
Or you can get literally any other higher capacity CC pisyol that weighs 2/3s of the ASP and is a third of the cost.

Shit could be better but belly aching is to going to do anything.

>>34142249
First, I didn't mention width. I said size. Since there are many standard Glock sizes, right off the bat, you're being deceptive by comparing a 1911 to "a Glock." Second, the 1911 only seems thinner because you're measuring at the slide only, not the widest point, which is the grips, and which aren't thinner than a Glock's grip.

>I feel like weight complainers are manlets
That's because you've invested your ego into your carry gun. Don't even try to deny it. Why would you be concerned with other men's height if it weren't a competition to you. You're proud that you believe yourself to be "able to" carry a 1911, even though nobody ever said anything about ability. Even if you've convinced yourself to think that a full steel handgun on your side is comfortable, a polymer handgun of equivalent size will ALWAYS be more comfortable. Of course you're not capable of seeing this because of the fog that ego casts over your judgment.

>You have to cherry pick models to say, "sure its bigger and has less capacity" because it's one or the other.
That's not what cherry-picking is. Paul Herrel carries a Colt Government model, aka 1911. My argument uses that because I'm directly comparing his preferences to actual options available in the gun market in 2017. Concluding that some polymer single stack pistol is better for concealed carry isn't "cherry-picking" either. It's analysis.

>The funny thing about saying guns have come far in the last 30 years is that 1911s have come far too. They only get more popular.
This is a vapid statement. The conversation isn't about popularity, but about suitability. Once again, because you are viewing everything through the filter of your ego, you're unable to interpret a basic fact about the conversation, and have instead made it all about you.

>>34132091
His videos are by far the highest quality shooting videos I have seen, and I watch A LOT of shooting videos

File: 1492834780790-pol.jpg (14KB, 230x234px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 230x234px

>>34142982
Except I don't carry a 1911 ... so your entire post is Bulverism.

>>34143207
Who said you did?

File: 1492834299626-pol.jpg (5KB, 158x152px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 158x152px

>>34143218
Just like I thought, no self awareness.

>That's because you've invested your ego into your carry gun. Don't even try to deny it. Why would you be concerned with other men's height if it weren't a competition to you. You're proud that you believe yourself to be "able to" carry a 1911, even though nobody ever said anything about ability. Even if you've convinced yourself to think that a full steel handgun on your side is comfortable, a polymer handgun of equivalent size will ALWAYS be more comfortable. Of course you're not capable of seeing this because of the fog that ego casts over your judgment.

Good luck figuring out agency, champ.

>>34142784
Just because people got shoved in gas chambers at one point doesn't mean it's acceptable to keep doing it. You know what I mean.
There really is more factors than just shooting a thing. I wouldn't see a problem with it if it were hunting or a slaughter house or something, but just killing something for the sake of recording it seems rather pointless if you're just interested in what kind of damage it causes. It just sounds needlessly cruel, and the type of stuff serial killers in training would enjoy.

File: 1478464901011.jpg (22KB, 460x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 460x300px

>>34132091
I watched a few of his videos. He's a FUDD psychopath.

Would not wanna live even in the same county as him. He's a total wackjob.

>>34143246
What gave you this impression?

>>34142982
>>34143207
Jesus every thread doesn't have to be a glock discussion.
That being said the reason he gave for carrying a 1911, wasn't that it was superior to polymer pistols, but that he trained extensively with them in the military. That IS a viable reason for carrying one (so long as it's reliable), it's also the reason why he carries the beretta 92. When you're winning pistol competitions with these pistols and you know the operation of them like the inside of your hand, the advantages of going to a different gun are severely reduced. He also understands that just having a gun on you is often times more than enough to keep you alive, and sometimes it's okay to carry a gun for sentimental reasons (so long as it's reliable), like his 4 inch model 15.

>>34143236
Excuse me. You caught me not paying attention and across my 25 or so 4chan tabs, I did momentarily forget what I wrote. Shit happens. Looking back at the conversation, though, I'll have to stick to my earlier position that you DO claim to carry a 1911.

>>34143207
If not, what was the point of writing your entire post: >>34142249?

>is thinner than a glock.
Thinner being relevant to what, if not fitting the gun into your belt or covering it so it doesn't imprint in your clothing while conceal-carrying it? Thinking logically, there are no other options. Either you are talking about concealed-carry, or you made a completely irrelevant comment, like someone with Turret's syndrome.

>I feel like weight complainers are manlets, really, it's a non issue.
A non issue for what? How is your comment relevant if you're not talking about carrying a 1911?

>My fucking boots weigh more than an all metal gun but preference is preference.
Preference for what? A clue lies in the post you replied to: >>34133352
>people who conceal-carry aren't actively involved in warfare and choose their guns based on preference
>conceal-carry
>based on preference
Were you saying irrelevant things to the conversation? That reflects badly on your ability to hold an intelligent conversation. Were you being relevant and trying to have an intelligent conversation? That means you were talking about concealed-carry. Logically, you do not come out as an intelligent person if you don't conceal-carry a 1911.

>>34143244
Not to mention it's one thing for a fucking military to do something rather than a single civilian posting videos on YouTube. Do you guys even understand how expensive pigs are?
At any rate, though ballistic gel is superior, soda bottles and some times meat and fleece that he uses allow him to compare different rounds/ calibers. He's trying to make comparative assessments rather than definitive statements that one round or another is good enough to chamber in your carry gun.

>>34143281
Why? Why are you engaging with this cunt? Don't give him your (you)s. For people like this the amount of replies they get are like upvotes or likes. The more people they can provoke they more they feel they have succeeded. It's fairly interesting from a psychological point of view

>>34143326
I mistook him for someone serious and responded out of curiosity, my bad.

>>34143244
I was just noting how if you wanted to really get accurate you'd use pigs, ballistic gel really isnt that great for much besides salesmen promos or for slime monster hunters. People have a lot of bones, they wear diffrent clothes, they arent made up of one specific tissue all around thier body

>>34143336
It's alright bud, /k/ isn't as bad as some other boards in this regard, so people here seem to get baited in fairly easily.

Did you watch his top five edc vid he did recently?

>>34143341
Not the guy you responded to but that's a valid point, and why hunters can be a really good resource for the effectiveness of different calibers/ bullets.
Ballistic gel isn't really a good medium for seeing what a bullet will do to a human, but it IS good for showing the comparative effectiveness of different bullets in terms of expansion, weight retention, and ability to perform through heavy clothing. Its also very consistent from block to block, so many different bullets can be compared to one another

>>34143341
>ballistic gel really isnt that great for much besides salesmen promos or for slime monster hunters
>There are people who actually believe this.

The point of ballistic gelatin is to provide a consistent medium in which the performance of different loads/calibers can be compared. It is good specifically because it diminishes margins of error in measurements caused by shooting different places on a cadaver.

Additionally, the FBI has found a very strong correlation between performance in ballistic gel tests and performance in real world shootings. It is the reason why the recommended depths for penetration are 12'' to 18'' despite the fact that most people are not 12'' to 18'' deep; the extra takes into account bone and oblique angles.

>>34132878
His videos about carrying what you're comfortable with, even if it's a short-barrelled revolver, so you can have program compliance helped motivate me to think about carrying.

>>34143370
Couldn't have said it better myself, you know your shit

>>34143312
Pigs are technically pests in some parts of the country. I kind of wish I lived in an area with hogs because I really question a lot of bullet performance. I had been planning on going coyote hunting, but watching some of harrels videos makes me consider rabbit hunting instead.

>>34137411
Lol, you should try convincing people that speed limits and DUI related accidents have zero positive correlation with laws. I.E they do absolutely nothing.

>>34137237
Give me a single example. Read that example to yourself and then realize how stupid you sound and don't actually post it.

>>34136273
You left out " looks OK to me "