Redpill me on the LAV 25 Are they any good? Does the Stryker

File: C5j5wxbUoAA1f3Z.jpg (220KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1200x675px

Lav 25, Lav 3 and Lav 6, Stryker for that matter are outdated and too small to benefit from any worthwile future updates. Best to move past and create a new (modular, common chassis) platform.

>>34128241
>outdated

I mean, I can understand it not being ideal for fighting a bunch of goat-humpers running around mountains and cities with RPG's, but that's not what they're designed to do

In an engagement against an actual military, I could see them performing well

>>34128111
LAV-25s is an armed reconnaissance vehicle. In that role, they have served very well. The Stryker is an APC. It also works pretty well in that role, but those are two separate roles.

>>34128111
Longer name

File: lav-comparison.jpg (80KB, 800x596px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 800x596px

The LAV-25 is amphibious, unlike the LAVIII.
Its small size makes projection and logistics simpler, I assume (its weight certainly does).
It has as many variants as the Stryker as.

As for the Stryker's advantages : all I can think of is it has probably more recent Command&Control systems and more space.

>>34128844
Styker can actually carry a full infantry squad.

>>34128241
>posting vehicles of the same generation as Strykers and LAV6

Recon vehicle with a stupid loud turbo diesel.

>>34128844
Strykers have a larger payload, better protection and better offroad ability. LAV-25's are amphibious and light enough to be airdropped with existing certified rigging.

>>34128241
>, Stryker for that matter are outdated and too small to benefit from any worthwile future updates

Fake and gay.

File: W8MTTDtOlow.jpg (77KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 960x540px

I'm in love with the 30mm on the Stryker
https://youtu.be/4UolMYY7QaA?list=PLaZ2VHGBwdKqVtoFLbFSWa9gVI3xqpSGH

pic kind of related