Dragunov semi-automatic sniper rifle

I don't think you've ever touched one. Let alone any "high tech sniper rifle" to warrant an opinion on anything other than aesthetics.

>>34114344
I think you've never touched a rifle outside of cawadooty. Come back here when you're 18.

Ah, as I imagined, classic 4channers, I still love you, though, ahh, have a nice day y'all!

>>34114344
>>34114367
>>34114378
>>34114432
What the fuck

>>34114344
That's a FAMAS, dumbass.

One heck of a shotgun

>>34114751
No dipshit that's an Aegis Ashore installation- you can tell by the shorter but more numerous aerials.

>>34114344
>extraordinary sniper rifle over many a lot more high tech sniper rifles that certainly do the job, and see the high tech sniper rifles (that cost just a couple o' dollars less) as leftovers that need to be recycled and put into rubble.
doesn't that gun have something like a 2 MOA?

>>34115131
At absolute best. 3moa average.

>>34114367
>>34114378
>>34114432
Samefag

>>34115148
>9 / 0 / 9 / 1

>>34115138
Oh I was just throwing a random number out there trying to remember what I read about it a few years ago, heard it's MOA was rediculously high like 4.5 or something.

>>34114378
That gun sucked so bad in black ops, it was dumb as hell. A computer AI could double tap with it, if a player tried your second bullet would disappear. I fucking hate fps games they all have the magic disappearing bullets like that.

>>34114344
1) You have to be 18 to post

2) It's not really a sniper rifle, it's a DMR

3) You can only really get good ones down to 2 - 1.5 MOA with a well-kept rifle and match ammo.

4) The gun was not made for sniping, it was made to do DMR things at DMR ranges

>>34114344
Liking the Dragunov is a sign of having shot a Dragunov.

>>34115165
This whole thread
>>/v/

File: tiger.png (1MB, 1328x747px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1328x747px

Won this tiger from the rock island auction house last month. The aesthetics are off the charts, my only regret is not having one with the full size barrel.

>>34115131
They're proofed at 1.25, but that's using the best ammo in production. In practice, it's anywhere from 2 on up

>>34118540
If you clue /v/ in on most of the multiplayer characters being bots the whole mmo industry would collapse. They have a nice little niche going on with fuckers that are compulsive and will play anyway, but if they figure out most multiplayer games are bots that make the whole thing impossible on purpose even the casuals would abandon it.

>>34114344
Literally still not as good as an AR. Gun looks incredible. But sadly, it's a meme

File: 1459784779266.jpg (681KB, 2343x1766px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 2343x1766px

>>34114344
SVD is best, can confirm. I get sub MOA accuracy with mine easily

>>34119826
That's like comparing a race car to a truck

Nigger, standard rifles and DMRs fill two completely different roles.

Go back to COD now faggot.

File: wallpaper-2025388.jpg (810KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 2560x1600px

>>34119882
been meaning to ask, how hard would it be to take off a barrel and re-install? at some point I wanna spend way too much money on an SVD and i have ideas to make a custom profile barrel
>and somewhere down the line try to engineer a full clone

>>34119882
Thank god you're here Flandre, please kill the summer /k/ with your actual ownership of all things SVD

>>34119882
>sub moa
I'd like to see some proof of that to be honest. Do you hand load or something? They're guaranteed 1.04 moa with sniper ammunition and 2ish moa with standard ball. Consistent sub moa results would be quite a bit better than the rifle was designed for