Anyone have experience with kimber Micro 9s?

>>34110619
I own the .380 version and if its anything like that its a huge piece of shit.

>its a huge piece of shit.

it's an expensive piece of shit

File: Kimberdog.png (606KB, 818x544px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 818x544px

>>34110619

File: Kimber Quality.jpg (677KB, 3000x1989px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 3000x1989px

>>34110619

>>34110619
I'd rather buy a hi-point than a Kimber

>>34110619
I've shot the Springfield EMP and the fully loaded. They are fantastic.

>>34112895
And those aren't based on the colt mustang sooo

>>34111727
My rich as fuck uncle in law has that dog breed and a kimber 1911 in fuddy-five. He talks highly of it.

But I've seen lots talk shit about it here.


Hmmmmm

File: 1490760119398.png (482KB, 500x613px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 500x613px

>>34110619
Dont everyone of those expensive paper weights dont work worth a shit.

I have one. I like it.

It's kind of like Remington. Old models are spot-on, and the only reason anyone buys from them anymore is the last echoes of word-of-mouth that they're still that good (they aren't). Quality control is a mess, and customer support/service is condescending/unresponsive/unhelpful. Do yourself a favor and buy a cheaper, more well-made, more reliable 1911. There ought to be a 1911 buyer's guide floating around on /k/ or the wider Internet somewhere.

>>34113744
The SIG P238/938 is also based on the Mustang but 98% of them probably work out of the box.