What watch /k/ wants for his birthday?
Some boring old school gshock, maybe solar.
I already have it.
Behold the best watch of all time.
>>34082000
>Water Resist
Nice watch but sorry mate it's not the best.
Also why would I want a second watch? Just get me money you dumb cunt.
>his
>assuming my gender
>>34082019
Too much money.
Gotta have a watch that you can also use to make things explode.
So cheap is kewl.
>>34082019
Wrong again
Go solar or go home
I've had this for a while and it's holding up pretty good.
>>34082232
Are you a child
>>34082232
Does that watch weigh more than your lanklet arm?
>>34082232
T-that your penis right? I-its not your arm right?
>>34082232
Is this just a really big watch or a really small arm
>>34082232
do 3 sets of 10 reps per day with that watch until you are done transitioning f to m
>>34082019
>not the tough solar
>>34082348
>>34082093
Do you even read?
>>34081930
>>34082093
doesn't the muilt band consumes quite a lot of battery?
Pic related is also a nice choise
>>34082232
I think those watches are sweet, but I'm not ready to reveal my tactidork power level like that. Also, >lol 1 year battery life
>>34082375
>circle watch face
>>34082371
Do you? > >>34082375
>>34082375
>doesn't the muilt band consumes quite a lot of battery?
No
Pro hint: set the watch face down, 12 o'clock facing window to get better chance of picking up the signal at night.
>>34082348
>>34082093
>>34082019
>>34082000
You are like a little baby.
>>34082373
>>34082403
Muh Jewish dick.
>>34082398
dafuq?
impatient much?
>>34082382
10 years is a long time but I've read that these tough solars can last up to 14 years without changing the battery.
>>34081930
>>34082420
I was specifically talking about the Sunto. I think the features on the Sunto are more well done on the Sunto, but Casio has solar. This is the dilemma I'm stuck in
>>34081930
looks like it's made of child-safe rubber
>>34082420
i'm confident any tough/g-shock solar casio will go 20 years or more
>>34082403
We are reaching levels of classy that shouldn't be possible.
>>34082417
s-sorry?
>>34082457
What is it with you and round watch faces?
>>34082442
parson my ignorance but, what features the Sunto has that casio doesn't on their watches?
>/k/ watches
>none of them have guns in them
>>34082093
My nigga. Best watch I own. Solar powered, auto backlight, water proof, shock proof, and it sets itself every night at midnight
>>34082232
I fucking love my Suunto
>>34081930
What weapon is this?
Sadly not getting pic related, but was told my grad gift is more than likely a less vintage sub or a 16610. One day I will get a Red.
>>34082466
Only what's necessary.
No frills.
Yet superior.
>>34082482
Time kills all things.
>>34082403
The ultimate in Jewish doctor wear.
>>34082496
If you can't operate in classiness then you aren't operating.
>>34082468
It doesn't have any that the Casio doesn't, I just think they're laid out in a better way. Just personal opinion.
>>34082403
>>34081930
>>34081930
.
>>34082508
ghetto gold
>>34082403
Do you even fancy wrist wear mate? Step up your fucking game.
>>34082466
Those were the imgs I have, it seems most watches are rounded? Idk mate
>>34082542
What a fucking pleb! Do you even know how to fancy?!!
>>34082576
If it ain't Casio it ain't classy.
>>34082000
>>34082019
>>34082093
>>34082348
Do they make one without all that writing everywhere?
>>34082585
What are you gay or something? That's the whole aesthetic of early 90s casios.
>>34082595
Forgot pic.
>>34082528
Tough!!
Lume + trititum = Win
IM ALREADY A DEMON
>>34082528
also, nice vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fguY8Lah3UI
>>34082622
at least get the right one
>>34082471
Mine does>>34082471
>>34082716
>No comfy as fuck cloth strap
I shiggy diggy
I wasn't aware watches were weapons.
>>34082807
Yea but a watch isn't time.
>>34082398
Alright I'm fuckin jelly now. This one says it can be used in rediclious conditions like jack hammer operation lol.
>>34082983
I have one of these!
Cannot confirm jackhammer
Can confirm GP100
>>34082508
That shit looks retarded
need moar LumTec, early adopter, Chris Wiegand stands by his product.
M1 #046/105
It's on my desk at work so have stock picture. I've also got a Hugo Boss (HBSUCES-1513131-G-IPRGO-ROU-GRE-S-LEBRN) but the Junkers just has a special place for me. Used to own the same model Junkers but with black background that I lost in Japan.
I also used to own a Deep Blue Fleet Admiral that I liked a lot but that thing as just a heavy fucking watch. It eventually had a piece break internally and I never bothered to get it fix and then I moved and never saw it again.
>>34083030
You're just not classy enough to understand.
>>34081930
Casio AWGM100B-1A, because it has all the features I want (digital and analog, solar powered, simple, elegant, robust).
I already have another G-shock (and have owned three previously) and they're excellent.
http://www.casio.com/products/watches/g-shock/awgm100b-1a
>>34082232
I unironically love that. what did it set you back?
>>34081930
thats the navy seal one?
>>34081930
So I get that paying alot for a nice watch is like a little gift for yourself. In my experience I have a Luminox Navy Seal watch, but instead I rather like wearing my Casio because if it gets fucked up in the field then its no biggy. Thing is a tank and only failed when the band let go after nearly 2 years of wearing it and having 100% deet sprayed on it multiple times.
>>34083308
Ah, so good to finally meet one as classy as I am.
apparently timex doesn't make this anymore
Looking for a good deal to pop up on one of these Ratniks, I like the look.
anyone have one, like/dislike?
Casio Pathfinder, solar powered, the best watch I have used. Wearing this one 11 years without any problems.
>>34082373
>Wears Submariner, doesn't even dive
I bet you wear Northface and don't even go on Expeditions
I am a man of simple tastes.
>>34084135
>that sweater
>pic from ablogtowatch
LOL
You don't even own one
LOL
LOL again
>>34081930
There's only one clear option here.
>>34084166
I thought it was supposed to be a thread about dream watches.
>>34084225
Still trying to figure out if you want the status symbol watch, or the status symbol sweater.
Either way gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
>>34084102
> modern northface
>suitable for anything but covering up sorostitutes on their way to starbucks
>>34081930
>his
>>34084300
>sorostitutes
kek. Hadn't heard that in a min.
>>34082838
Isn't it?
>>34083637
Lefty?
>image is feminine
>no guns
git
>>34082494
Rolex's are for people without means pretending to be people with means. It says "I've got enough disposable income for a four digit watch, but I'm still somebody's office bitch".
Get an Omega instead. At least there is less delusion there.
>>34084135
>simple tastes.
>Rolex
no, you're a man with poor tastes.
>>34081930
I already have a few "expensive" "operator" watches, but I still prefer the F-91W, it's light weight, comfortable and simple. Does everything I need on an everyday scenario.
So to answer your question I would like a nice looking watch to wear to business meetings or formal social events, it doesn't have to be very expensive, just look good with a suit.
take me back
I want to be casually operator
>>34085151
Take a look at tudor
>>34086443
You know what they say about mini and bmw, right? Same thing with tudor and rolex
>>34081930
Man, when I graduated highschool, my sister gave me this watch that was solar-powered, had a rudimentary compass function, and could also tell you your altitude and the time in other cities. I fucking loved that goddamn watch.
And then I went to sea on a ship with some Navy cunts on it, and one of them probably stole the damn thing. Yes, I'm still pretty bitter about it. What's a good watch that I could get with similar qualities to the one I've lost?
>>34082496
Holy shit i have the same watch but black and white... I thought i was alone in this world