China's first domestic built aircraft carrier

>>34049141
>Why did they put a ramp on her

Why ramps? Because ramps are rampy. Now go use a search engine you retarded piece of grabasstic amphibian shit.

Are all your questions this stupid? Now go redpill yourself on naval aviation you lazy retarded shitbag.

>>34049141
>her

Did you just assume that aircraft carrier's gender?

>>34049171
Not building glorious catapults like America

Do you even navy

File: future_chinese_carriers.jpg (116KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1000x562px

>>34049141
It's a trainer vessel more than a fully serious attempt at a proper carrier. They'd prefer to have this and the problem prone Liaoning around in service to help them whet their maritime skills while their actually respectable big-boy carriers are still in construction. So relax you autist, China's next few carriers, planned for a mid-late 2020s release WILL NOT have ramps.

TL:DR; Even the Chinese have signaled that they dont take the Russian ramp boats seriously anymore and will start building burger style supercarriers

File: 1300382651435.jpg (77KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1200x800px

>>34049368
>Flankers on a proper carrier

YES

>>34049368
Will they use steam or electro-magnets, also will they be nuclear. Anything else is basic bitch tier.

>>34049141
Cheaper, more reliable, and faster take offs.

>>34049141
>>34049184
im literally shaking over her

>>34050378
I have seen people on /k/ say that the later ones will be EM catapults but I thought that meant they would NEED to be nuclear powered? Am I wrong?

>>34050456

yes, first two rams, next two are steam, then next two are nukes with em

It would be a bit ironic if the next Chinese aircraft carrier will look like "Ulyanovsk".

>>34049141
To do sick flips and Cobra's with their Flankers