AR THREAD AR GENERAL /ARG/ AR THREAD GENERAL AR GENERAL THREAD

>>34039380
Best 1-6 optic under $1800?

Currently own a 1-4 Accupower on 14.5" rifle. Is it worth selling it and getting a 1-6 like a Kahles or MK6?

>>34039403
no

>>34039401
A k16i on sale

File: DSC_1011.jpg (658KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1800x1200px

>>34039401
accupoint?

>>34039401
Also does anyone have a picture of a Vortex Razor with a RIS II?

File: 9e434d5b3a3380da295301cb23881245.jpg (12KB, 265x325px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 265x325px

>>34039416
delete this

>>34039403
Mk6
Hope you like seizure inducing reticle strobing.

File: 1495253886505.jpg (90KB, 957x621px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 957x621px

>>34039416
>Vortex Razor with a RIS II?

File: 04.jpg (1MB, 2730x1908px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2730x1908px

Shhhh, they're sleeping.

>>34039448
That's a lot of stamped sheet metal

File: DSC_0070.jpg (575KB, 2440x2592px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 2440x2592px

>>34039380

>>34039422
>>34039433

What wrong? I might get it.

>>34039401
razor or a vcog bruh

File: IMG_6513.jpg (116KB, 964x1024px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 964x1024px

>>34039470
What's this?

>>34039401
kahles on sale or bump up your budget to 2k

>>34039403
prob not but tha doesnt make it a bad idea

>>34039416
i feel like ive seen it before but it was probably on a gurwitch rifle or something

File: IMG_6511.jpg (3MB, 2446x3062px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2446x3062px

>>34039487
They are definitely in the running

>>34039489
logo?

File: averagevortexowner.jpg (164KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1920x1080px

>>34039473
well it's vortex

also it's really fucking heavy and only comes in a fucking disgusting bronze color

>looking at sf lights for possibly replacing tlr
>inline scout light might actually be a neat idea
>only options are 300 lumens or pencil dick 600
Why is this

File: DSC_0042.jpg (747KB, 3872x1784px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 3872x1784px

>>34039489
giddy is correct>>34039501

>>34039502
does it come with mil turrets?
cause mil reticle and moa turrest tickles my autism

>>34039500
you might be able to get a zeiss or swarovski used in that range as well, it's the 1-8s that are more expensive in the $2500-3000 range if I remember correctly but I havent been on optics planet in a while

>>34039496
>gurwitch

Ill do some looking through his pics

File: IMG_3179.jpg (281KB, 1172x1260px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1172x1260px

this is shit

File: 18bd2d_6258965.jpg (148KB, 1062x982px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1062x982px

>>34039513
i doubt they managed to fuck that up

>>34039514
>>34039501
I figured that. Who's logo?

>>34039531
Have you ever tried eating just plain sugar canes? I bet you'd like it

>>34039521
>>34039533
clicking the wrong one

>>34039513
>not buying TWO 300 lumen surememes

>>34039537
Strike Industries

>>34039502
SOCOM operators are ok with them

Also it's color is one of the big draws to it with the RIS. I figure it might look good together

>>34039533
arr rook same

>>34039513
stay away from surefire

File: 1489465370186.png (195KB, 604x437px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 604x437px

>>34039554
no it doesn't matter that fucking seals use them
fuck

File: DSC_0050.jpg (248KB, 755x950px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 755x950px

>>34039537
Strike industries it is the jcomp

>>34039525
>Ill do some looking through his pics
a fate i wouldnt wish on many

his is some of the most turbofucked shit ive ever seen

>>34039531
>being a soda snob
their root beer is one of their worst. shoulda got sprechers, dum neet.

>>34039513
What's the problem?

What lumen output are you looking for?
Have you checked into the vampires?

File: Jeff_Gurwitch_AR-15_M4A1_Carbine_Tactical_Accessories_DefenseReviewcom_DR_Pic_A.jpg (70KB, 1024x526px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1024x526px

>>34039525
forgot pic

File: 100_0672_zps5f03e71c.jpg (154KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1024x768px

>some politicians and some dumb pogs decided on these rifle parts so I'm going to spend thousands of dollars copying them
why

File: illuminan.png (263KB, 493x332px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 493x332px

>>34039543

>>34039576
Find me a light that is over 500 lumens and not fuckhueg then

>>34039584
Bright as fuck but not too large. M300 looks like a decent size. Just don't want something much bigger than the TLR desu

>>34039599
whats wrong with an m600

File: 3107-2.jpg (3MB, 4313x2970px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4313x2970px

>>34039580
store doesnt have sprechers

>>34039612
Well for one it's uggo as fuck, also I don't want something that long since I don't want it extending too far passed the end of the handguard. It's already gonna be mounted at the front edge in front of my hand

>>34039595
How does he turn the light on?

File: pbtakesadaytriptothecity.jpg (156KB, 416x640px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 416x640px

>>34039620
cucked again

>>34039632
>>34039599

Dude, an m300 is going to throw light out a lot better than a TLR

File: 1482020630594.jpg (1MB, 2446x3120px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2446x3120px

>>34039644
wheres my flannel

>>34039632
Oh fuck the m600 ultra scout isn't 6.5 inches I read the specs wrong. That one might actually work

>>34039646
I don't need it to go super far where I'm at, that's actually why I like the TLR on it right now

File: bestrifleinARG.jpg (4MB, 1800x2700px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1800x2700px

>>34039380
>literally IN a TREE

File: High_Ready_Position_Weapons_Handling_for_Combat_Tactical_Shooting_Jeff_Gurwitch_DefenseReview.com_DR_1 (1).jpg (867KB, 2500x2211px) Image search: [Google]

867KB, 2500x2211px

>>34039633
the inner machinations of his mind are an enigma

File: 1494738395266.jpg (12KB, 327x322px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 327x322px

>>34039380
what rail is that on that rifle?

>>34039685
pretty sure its centurion

File: groupphotoonanoldtree.jpg (4MB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2400x1600px

>>34039685
Centurion CMR

File: 1492292539212.jpg (3MB, 3136x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3136x2448px

what shot timer should i buy

hypothetically, if i just wanted a high magnification scope to mount on different rifles to test out the limits of the accuracy, especially for rifles I dont have magnified optics on as primaries, could I just get a basic bitch poverty tier model, knowing that I'll just be using it on static ranges for a couple of shots for each rifle?

>>34039696
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0016C8Y2W/ref=asc_df_B0016C8Y2W4996084/?tag=hyprod-20&creative=394997&creativeASIN=B0016C8Y2W&linkCode=df0&hvadid=193124190188&hvpos=1o4&hvnetw=g&hvrand=16947221194860975192&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9060048&hvtargid=pla-308788714243

>>34039706
Yes.
Try a fixed SWFA SS

File: 1493068571382.jpg (98KB, 409x409px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 409x409px

>>34039711

>>34039660
Nevermind that's still too long

Other than the M300, are there any good scout lights that are about 4-4.5 max that I can throw in an offset mount?

>>34039691
>Centurion CMR
cant find it in the same color as OP...the quest for a rail continues..

>>34039741
he paints his shit all the time, not a stock color.

>>34039711
pocket pro ii

>>34039741
it was coated, otherwise youd see the centurion logo near the receiver

File: IMG_3287.jpg (248KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1200x900px

>>34039380

>inna tree [stand]

>>34039755
Sounds like a masturbation aid

File: IMG_6378.jpg (3MB, 1813x3114px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1813x3114px

>>34039673
So is he an actual operators or just a mall ninja faggot?

File: 1426827415694.jpg (110KB, 450x689px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 450x689px

>>34039775
>Bare YHM brake

>>34039448
do you sit them up in chairs and feed them dinner?

>>34039725
Check out inforce maybe? I think they have like an 800 lumen one

>>34039779
like me*

File: 43051169c7a7b8517db99fba709b618506ced2b1fdca827c2ef3b49916592071.jpg (76KB, 625x352px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 625x352px

>>34039754
>>34039764
>>34039775

hey what do you three think is better the jcomp or the B.E. Meyers 249F flash hider?

im trying to figure out which will give me better accuracy and manage recoil better.

>>34039816
>manage recoil better
jcomp

>>34039696
the blue one, they seem to be the most widely used

File: IMG_4013.jpg (272KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1200x900px

>>34039791

Can took like 10 months to clear. I wanted it VERY badly for deer season last year.

>>34039816

Honestly, I think the A2 is a fantastic muzzle device that has excellent flash suppression, decent compensation, and is light and compact. The only reason I'd ever swap it out is for suppressor compatibility.

>>34039816
The j comp very obviously

>>34039798
I considered the WML but the WMXL is still just a bit too long. I workin with a real short amount of rail space

Might just end up sticking with the TLR till a cheap M300 falls in my lap and I can swap between them I guess

>>34039836
The m300 is a fantastic light.

>>34039836
>real short amount of rail space
they both take up the same amount of rail

>>34039599
Pay your Gucci tax, tripfaggot
TWO surefires for you since 300 lumens isn't enough to illuminate you're mom's caverns

>>34039816
jcomp

>>34039855
The WMXL is an inch longer than the WML m8

>>34039853
Damn well better be for the cost

File: IMG_20161027_161913692.jpg (1MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4160x2340px

>>34039833
Know that pain

>>34039845
Yes thanks

>>34039874

Form 1s are clearing from mid-July of 2016, so the bottleneck is almost over

File: SLR lights.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34039867
I've already paid plenty gucci tax fuckboi

File: 2017-05-03 19.16.34.jpg (1MB, 1630x918px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1630x918px

>>34039887
I don't see a single gucci thing in that pic

File: 1 simple trick to make poorfags HATE you!.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34039898
>b5
r u rly gona do this
>sf on thursday too

>>34039898
Pot meet kettle?

File: IMG_2496.jpg (261KB, 799x740px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 799x740px

>>34039401
>>34039403
>>34039408
>>34039496
>>34039522
>Khales
>Barely durable enough for metro police and 3gun
https://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_18/713751_True-1x-to-6-8x-Combat-Worthy-Optics.html
Scroll down.

There's a reason why the Vortex HD GII is heavy. It's built like a tank.

>>34039920
No not really
I have at least one

>>34039927
i saw that too.
>kahles btfo

>>34039927

Vortex 1-6x Razor HD Gen 2 has been spotted in the wild on SOCOM rifles

File: IMG_4322.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

Is Ruger the mos anti-gucci of all companies?

Like, they're marketed and designed to appeal to autists. They have the strangest following. They have one of the few hammer forges in the US.

Their revolvers are insanely strong, and well built, but not polished like a Colt or S&W

>>34039956

>well built, but not polished

This applies to all their guns. Serviceable, but never premium.

File: cryptic.jpg (92KB, 671x934px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 671x934px

>>34039956
>marketed and designed to appeal to autists
That's gucci as fuck my man

>>34039973

I mean more of a fudd autism.

>muh Ruger only reloads
>muh Precision Rifle
>muh mini-14

File: IMG_9950.jpg (2MB, 4032x2938px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x2938px

>>34039448
>zebra rug
>oily guns where you sleep
>bed against wall

Wut r u doin

File: IMG_2497.jpg (285KB, 799x792px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 799x792px

>>34039934
So have the Khales. Also remember Eotech? Socom tests things in the field. Just because it's in the field, it doesn't mean it's objectively good.

>The Kahles K series scopes aren't that durable. Probably would be fine for a competition scope but not for serious hard use.
>My Kahles K624i suffered a catastrophic failure after only 300 rounds on my 300WM the scope was purchased new and had never been mounted to another rifle. Kahles originally declined to cover my shipping costs which was $80, shipping insurance on a $3, 000 scope is expensive.
>I would not rate these scopes as Steve has either. Kahles glass is very good and better than the Razor but not up to the quality of the MK8 scopes, which are as good as if not better than Schmidt and Bender.
>I won't buy another Kahles, but IMO the MK8 CQBSS is best 1-8 currently made, it seems to be very rugged in construction and the glass, H27 reticle, and turret system are unmatched but it's expensive I payed $3000 for mine. I believe the Razor to be one of the best bangs for the buck in LPV's.

>best Swarovski Austrian glass
>also built like glass
JUST

>>34039873
i'm talking about surefire

>>34040004
>fudd autism
fuck you're right. That's one of my least favorite kinds.


I hate fudds

>>34039927
kahles btfo

>>34040008
>One scope breaks early into use
This means nothing

Good bait though

File: IMG_3352.jpg (193KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 900x900px

>>34040008

>300 rounds on my 300WM

HAHAHA, my Vortex VIPER is close to that round count. That's a $500 scope.

File: fuddlogic.png (438KB, 417x480px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 417x480px

>>34040023

>fudd logic

File: REAP_IR_tr-1.jpg (255KB, 1024x928px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1024x928px

>>34039502
you can paint it also it's worth it to lug fuckheavy rifles around because they're going to kick ass when you need them to kick ass
and honestly the razor reticle is really nice, it needs an outer shape for quick acquisition and some windage dots but it's very clean, functional, and aesthetically pleasing

How do you nice friends feel about trijicons thermal sight?

>>34040029
You forgot the part where they initially refused to pay for return shipping of $80 on a $3k defective scope. Lmao. Vortex would send you RMA overnight, get you a new scope and maybe suck your dick too.

>>34040021
Takes up the same rail space as what then, the m600 ultra?

>>34040008
what's that little circle thing?

>>34040007
He clearly got a headboard you idiot

File: 20170427_201638 (2017x1113).jpg (1MB, 2017x1113px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1113px

>>34040045
all scout lights that don't end in "20" take up the same rail space

>>34040044
I work a mile away from vortex HQ, I'd just drop it off on my to work. But I don't own vortex anything anymore

File: IMG_2499.jpg (462KB, 800x506px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 800x506px

>>34040053
Read the thread on arfcom. Not me, but here's what he said.

>Here's some pictures of the Kahles on my rifle. The first pic is demonstrating the falure when the magnification was dialed up even slightly there was some sort of grease on the lens and the scope was unusable. The second pic is at low magnification after the falure. An internal piece of the scope can be seen in both pics. And third pic is of the scope on the rifle.

>For the scope to suffer this catastrophic of a failure after only 300 rounds is unacceptable of an optic at this price point IMO. I don't think I'm being unreasonable by having high expectations of scopes in the price range of the Kahles.

>The failed scope was also Kahles' K624i (6-24x56) the company's flagship scope. The K16i (1-6x24) maybe a different scope but is still a K series scope from the same manufacturer, probably made on the same assembly lines, to the same QC standards, designed by the same engineering team, and I wouldn't be surprised if they shared a few parts as well. The k12i & k624i have similar styling, finishes, identical glass as far as i can tell, even the magnification rings have the same feel. So I believe the comparison is a relative one. The OP stressed durability as a priority which is why I would not purse a Kahles. My scope was fixed under warranty however it's noteworthy that Kahles doesn't have a lifetime warranty like Vortex or Leupold nor are they state side like Vortex or Leupold. As stated Kahles refused to pay my shipping costs $80. It wasn't until I created a thread over the scopes failure on SH and a few members there took issue with the shipping and became upset with kahles over this that they agreed to reimburse the cost.

>I want to stress and I'm trying to be objective about this but that I don't believe Kahles glass is on par with the MK8's or Schmidt & Bender's. I think there's lots of reviews around the net which support that claim. Kahles as a brand does have great glass better than the Razor gen2 IMO and a very forgiving eyebox although I would not say that the Kahles matches the durability of the the Razor, or MK8 which was designed as a military scope and even has a reticle designed for the Marines.

>Trusting German Jews

>>34040068
I just need it to not go 1million miles passed the end of my handguard while taking up minimal rail space. M300 is only like an inch and some longer than the TLR. The extra 1.3 inches on the ultra is starting to push it though

>>34040109
all that matters is that it doesn't go past your muzzle

>>34040076
oh, i thought the second pic way your scope and they all had that.

>>34040100
Poverty must be awful.

Definitely buying a k624i

>>34040008
>mk8
sure, if you like looking at your target through a drinking straw

File: IMG_9978.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>34040061
And? Not relevant to what I said you wank stain

>>34040109
Better not pass muzzle or I will go full autisum on u

>>34040133
>bed against wal
kys poorfag

>>34040140
Look to the left of the bed

>>34039380
So I have an enhanced sopmod stock in which the QD on it does not work.

Anyone ever have this problem?

File: IMG_2498.jpg (86KB, 506x900px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 506x900px

>>34040128
Even the Strike Eagle is strong enough to survive combat and kill IS. Meanwhile the Khales got killed at a flat range. Lel.

>>34039927
>triji accupower 1-6x maybe? i like the fiber optic lit daylight bright reticle for the 1x shooting.

>>>accuPOWER
>fiber optic

>listening to anything on arfcom EVER

File: The best FAL.jpg (2MB, 3237x1246px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3237x1246px

>>34040120
Still don't want something sticking 3 inches ahead of my handguard. For pic related my hand is already like .5inch behind the TLR. Got no space to do shit m8. And the barrel this is going on will be shorter in the future

>>34040133
>complaining about lights
>no light
lmao

>>34040178
I don't care what it is

It just can't go past the muzzle

File: 5d543653-9b32-44d5-baf6-c86a647c3605.png (2MB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x900px

>>34039380
Hows your Monday boys?

File: 1474136812991.jpg (2MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1333px

>gigantic glass with thin metal bezels
>durable
I swear larpcom is just talking out of their asses half the time

seriously, bash the thing around in a vehicle and bang it into trees, doorways, and drop the rifle on it and see if it still works

>>34040190
Buy a light cuck. Also an optic, sling setup, and literally everything else your rifle needs
Also which BFG padded sling is best

>>34040008
Yeah is there a reason why the swarovski wasn't in that comparison?

>>34040233
What are you talking about? The Vortex?

File: IMG_9399.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>34040244
>light
Table gun. My shotgun typically has a light but I'll replace that sometime later
>sling
Table gun

>anon shut the fuck up about the bed argument
Interesting

>>34040247
Kahles and Swarovski use basically the same tubes and glass. Makes sense since they are essentially the same company

>>34040168
So he got similar scope names confused. That's easily understandable. Meanwhile, photographic proof of Khales fuck up.

How bad is your autism?

>>34040267
>table gun
Quit being a noodle armed p u s s y

My gun is just under 11 unloaded

>>34040030
That isn't a particularly effective comparison, did you even have a point to make you retarded tripfag?
>I haven't even shot 300 rounds on my ayy arr
1. Thats terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself for being so noguns
2. Making your raifu dirty and impure is filthy and degenerate
3. So what, irons are $3000 less and they're harder to break. Good optics give you a huge combat advantage.
4. Good for you poorfag, your shitty vietnamese glass hasn't broken

>>34040275
It was built for that purpose though

>>34039598
We'll they're doing better than that abortion you built.

>>34040233
I googled "broken vortex hd gen ii 1-6." Didn't find anything the first 5 pages. Let me know if you find something.

Even then, Vortex has lifetime no questions asked warranty, and the scopes are half the prices of the Khales, so who gives a fuck?

File: 15034943_127882927694256_674349529494978560_n.jpg (130KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1080x1349px

>>34040266
are you retarded or what
>trip
Never mind

>>34040247
Because they are the same company friend. Khales is supposed to be Swarovski's "tactical/military" line. Lel.
>premium European military optic
>surrenders from recoil

>>34040293
>implying it's mine
>implying I'm retarded enough to build a rifle like that

literally keymod yourself

File: tearsofthebutt.jpg (93KB, 432x600px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 432x600px

>>34040284

Oh god, your rage fuels me.

>shot 300 rounds on my ayy arr

Your image comprehension is low though, that was clearly a bolt action 300wm, senpai.

>>34040294
Try 30-40%

>>34040318
And it's one scope.
That's like saying because giddy has issues that SF is shit

>>34040318
What's the resale value on your viper?
Can you make some money back when you Un-Walmart your rifle?

>/arg/ is terrible again

>>34040356
He also SBRed a bunch of PDA lowers.

>>34040375
was it ever not

>>34040386
Unforgivable.

>>34040409
>hiss hiss come and collect it

>>34040410
I meant PSA lowers

>>34040344
their warranty dept is shit, they have good cs but it just takes way too long to get anything done.

File: 20170521_134350 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

>>34040419
explain

>>34040409
Paint the mags

>>34039927
Making me shift more and more towards the Razor

File: 20141018_164513_zps42cbcd12.jpg (74KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1024x576px

>>34040425
I got that. 200% haram

>>34040344
False equivalency. It's not about whether the scope broke. Everyone makes a lemon once in a while, even S&B are not infallible, but the fact that there's only like a 10 year shitty warranty on a "premium" scope more 40-50% expensive than middle class Vortex is hilariously bad.

>>34040441
>us takes out 20 bil from China and uses it to build largest military ever
>China can't collect denbts
>dont tread on me

Burris Ar332 or Vortex Spitfire 3x or burris ar536?

>>34040443
no

>>34040456
still don't get it

>>34040456
countries are not people you fucking dipshit, the US wasn't planning on retiring at 65 or dying at 85

functional dept is helpful to nations

File: IMG_2500.png (82KB, 640x711px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x711px

>>34040444
It might not be the best scope, but it is the best bang for your buck and has a killer warranty.

Pros that can afford to have any scope including S&Bs still use Vortex.

>>34040472
vortex is pretty gud but that graphic is pretty useless seeing as how competition shooters are sponsored

basically a metric of how good vortex's marketing is

>>34040453
>10 year warranty
I've known people who have sent prehistoric kahles optics in and been serviced. Something like 30-45 days round trip.

>>34040467
Suck my dick

>>34040472
Well shit. I guess that's what I'll probably end up getting then. I think the color will look good with a RIS II as well.

Now I just need to figure out a mount for it.

>>34040517
geissele

>>34040487
That's true, but as much as they like freeshit, they wouldn't give up winning too right? Imagine shilling NCSTAR for a PRS shoot and missing every shot.
>>34040501
That's just what I read about the new scopes.

I don't want to sound like a Vortex shill. I just wanted to make fun of Kahles fags a little. I'm done.

File: 20170522_194904.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

Just got my first AR. Pls no bully.

File: 20170521_134215 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

>>34040504
no thanks

>>34040312
>implying you even have one.

>>34040571
Fighting dicks/Improper Clone

File: 20170522_194933-3024x2268.jpg (1MB, 3024x2268px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x2268px

>>34040571

>>34040552
Vortex is fine. Heavy, but fine in their high end line. The US repair depot sure helps the speed of warranty work

>>34040601
what is that light

>>34040601
>mario optic
>dicks
>stolen valor
>waffle stock
>GI trigger
>toy light?
>16" carbine gov prof?
We've all been there/10

File: 20170522_195009-2268x3024.jpg (1MB, 2268x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2268x3024px

>>34040601

>>34040582
>implying I don't

>>34040571
Its fucking terrible

>>34040606
Their entire line up is fine. Their high end line is heavy because they are overbuilt. Just look at their old PST line, and you'll see they know how to make lighter optics but at a cost of less durability, not that the PSTs were not durable, just maybe not combat durable.

So does a 1-4 Accupower have any issues? Was looking at Kahles before reading this thread

>>34040645
>>stolen valor
>>waffle stock
>>GI trigger
these are all fine though.

>>34040684
Yes, it's only 1-4

>>34040684
the one i had was fine, few thousand rounds, went innawoods, no issues. G-man owns it now

>>34040684
The Kahles is probably fine m8. Just don't bang it around too much. But at $1800 usd, I'd rather just buy the Vortex and stfu about the weight.

File: Witcher_suppressor.jpg (2MB, 2988x1681px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x1681px

>>34039796
Of course.

>>34040007
>zebra rug
It's a tiger blanket. Do you put rugs on beds in Cuckifornia or something?

>>34040684
tritium fades over time and there isn't a good way to guarantee how old the tritium is that you're buying
the fiber optic isn't that great for shooting from dark areas into bright areas

>>34040684
Kahles is fine. Learn to fucking statistics.

>>34040637
Some fairly cheap light I picked up at the navy exchange. It's decent but temporary. Wrapped grip tape around it the make the mount hold.

>>34040645
>Mario optic

What does this mean?

File: 1477877806957.jpg (172KB, 1199x1200px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1199x1200px

>>34040571
>asks not to bully
>voluntarily comes to the bully zone

File: sixpence.jpg (1MB, 3077x2629px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3077x2629px

>>34040724

>>34040687
>stolen valor fine
If you only shoot at 200m plus with irons and only use it during bright daylight.
>waffle stock
Yea it's fine. [wobbling intensifies]
>GI trigger
Lel.

File: 1495346844587.jpg (52KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x640px

>>34040724
I secretly wanted bully

>>34040676
Had an old line.
Glass and turrets were great for the price. I didn't want a 'for the price' optic anymore though.

File: 14666479247.jpg (87KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 750x600px

>>34040719
weird but if it works thats better than no light. mario optic bc thats what the MRO looks like. ppl are triggered bc its an m4gery without colt or FN rollmarks and its 16" but if you dont care about clones its w/e

>>34040745
Anything other than S&B is "for the price" though...

>>34040745
Then buy a Hensoldt and be done with it.

File: IMG_9605.jpg (2MB, 3000x1707px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x1707px

>>34040746
pls replace dc

>>34040755
That's actually hilarious. Also I guess MRO sounds like 'mario' too.

And yeah, I expected improper clone autism.

Also, its 14.5" pinned/welded flash hider

File: 20160224081413_705x365.jpg (36KB, 705x365px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 705x365px

>>34040755
Whoa neat I made this picture shortly after the MRO was announce. Pretty neat to see it still circulating.

>>34040760
Kahles is better than S&B though. To be fair, the pm2 lineup is old as fuck and whenever the pm3 line comes out that will likely change

>>34040551
In the DDC?

>>34040770
Tell hendsoldt to come out with a solid 1-x optic and I'll pick one up.

>>34040740
Okay well your fixed front sight post is FUCKING GAY AND EVERYONE WITH A FIXED FRONT SIGHT POST ATTACHED TO THEIR GAS BLOCK SHOULD FUCKING KILL THEMSELVES
you don't have a sling, which means you're new as fuck, what do you think you're going to do when you need both hands? Drop your rifle? I don't think so.
The quadrail with plastic covers is bulky, heavy, ugly, and just shitty taste overall, and your covers dont even cover where you put your hands
that foregrip is ugly and I hate people who use those
also your rifle has that vintage pate/worn metal look to it, which is only aesthetic on colt commandos, not on your shitty Walmart AR15

>>34040746
You and roidaroo need to get some real optics

>tfw no Aimpoint 1-6 with SFP red dot and FFP reticle

File: Screenshot_2017-05-22-23-50-20-1.png (4MB, 1080x1615px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1080x1615px

Pressure switches in the mail.

>>34040755
Hahaha nice

File: IMG_9459.jpg (3MB, 2484x3312px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2484x3312px

>>34040781
>Also, its 14.5" pinned/welded flash hider
oh it is isnt it. whyd you go mro over a t1

>>34040791
thanks for the meems

>>34040795
might be fde overload

File: 1300044776986.jpg (34KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x600px

>>34040773
WHOA dude, Daniels Defends said specifically that the polymer dust cover did BETTER THAT METAL in their super secret drop testing, and I believe them.

Think of all the times you've dropped your rifle right on it's dust cover and broken it. Just think of all those times. Now reduce that number to ZERO and that's what I live with, son. Your dreams are my reality in the dust cover realm.

>>34040817
wat

>>34040809
I have several slings, just haven't put one on yet.

Don't care about the front sight post, desu.

Also, since when are Spike's and BCM Walmart brands?

>>34040773
you should an RMR, a 4grip, and a can
and also memes > sopmod

File: GA_06-660x426.jpg (100KB, 660x426px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 660x426px

>>34040795
yeah dont do this, it looks awful. black looks pretty slick tho

>>34040850
top kek

>>34040843
>fde overload

Could be. I like muh QD tho. Probably do a Bobro

>>34040852
Spikes is trash
>that rollmark
And bcm is keymod tier

>>34040843
It was a swap with a buddy. My Arsenal AK for an AR of equal value. Came with the MRO.

File: 20160522_201508_zpsim1gy7pw.jpg (110KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1024x576px

>>34040868
black looks good. ive thought about replacing my lt104 with one since they're apparently gtg on socom rifles now but the branding is a bit much

File: 35395.jpg (99KB, 240x300px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 240x300px

Post some of that sweet sweet Delaware Machinery

On a scale of 1-10, how bad of an idea would it be to get one of my friends, our plate carriers and ARs, and go around our city black bagging local drug dealers and dump them at the local Sheriff's office?

Asking for a friend.

File: 2017-02-06 13.43.17.jpg (1MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1440px

>>34040909
>not giving me the (you)

>>34040770
>buying an overpriced and shittier S&B
Why?

File: l65buC0.jpg (36KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 657x527px

>>34040914

File: IMG_9714.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>34040900
dem election panic brownells

>>34040909
He is under attack by gnats and is currently afk
>>34040914
Worst case scenerio you die

>>34040914
You'll die immediately acting like a larping retard

Do it

File: 20170523_000132-1024x576.jpg (123KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1024x576px

>>34040917
>>34040917
>>34040917
sry new to 4chans

Ever see one of these? I told a friend of mine I got that lower and he just gave this to me.

>>34040862
>colt
Mike Pence would like to have a word with you.
I'm going to miss at least 3 potential (You)'s if I go digging for the gay unicorn jpg, so I'm not going to do it right now.

>>34040939
wtf is that?

File: IMG_9738.jpg (1MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x3024px

>>34040944
>not owning colt
embarrassing

File: 20170523_000433-1024x576.jpg (127KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1024x576px

>>34040949
That is the box the "rare" large logo'd DM lowers came in. I really want to track one down now.

>>34040952
>thinking Colt means anything other than massively overpriced mediocrity in 2017

Yikes

File: 1466362871039.jpg (1MB, 2251x3067px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2251x3067px

Posted for TS

File: 2017-04-15 15.05.54.jpg (3MB, 1920x2560px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x2560px

>>34040959
huh, fucking nuts. Im going to Indy 1500 show and im gonna have to try and track one down now. That and some gen 2 pmag 20s

File: IMG_1226.jpg (3MB, 3981x2410px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3981x2410px

>>34040952
You used to be different.

>>34040794
>Khales better
>old
Old yes, but still the best glass. Based on PRS blog, Khales glass has bad CA.

File: shitpostingregisteredtrademark.jpg (66KB, 720x893px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 720x893px

>>34040962
>buy all sorts of parts with varying spec
>put it together in your garage with no training or professional worksmanship
>expecting it not to fall apart the moment you shoot it

vs

>All parts made by COLT in America, assembled in America
>Every part carefully and meticulously tuned by PROFESSIONALS so that the whole gun fits together in a way a parts gun can never fit together.
>The reliability that only the COLT is known for.

File: 43142137.jpg (69KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 400x400px

>>34040972
Apparently the shop in Muncie has one framed on the wall for sale...for $299

>>34041000
thats fucking a gay price

File: Huldra.jpg (223KB, 1133x731px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1133x731px

>>34040952
I prefer my rollmark

>>34041004
Yeah but you get all that quality Muncie manufacturing expertise in there. I'm sure that adds...accuracy...or something. At least +5fps gain at the muzzle.

File: f3a0cb7b.jpg (49KB, 1023x682px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1023x682px

posted for ts

File: 2017-04-23 15.29.21.jpg (2MB, 1920x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x2560px

>>34041017
+10 to charisma

>>34040988
>colt
>good
>2017

kek ok, then explain why they just had to get daddy to give them a bail out?

File: 1466058244814.jpg (1MB, 2343x3262px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2343x3262px

Posted for TeamSpeakerino

File: Selfie.jpg (3MB, 3315x2196px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3315x2196px

>>34041048
KMR unite

File: umm.jpg (774KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 1080x1080px

>>34041048
>keymod rail
>optic on top
How do you deal with the 14moa shift?

File: DSC_1006.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

>>34041048
>keymod
>2017

File: 065.jpg (558KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 1920x1280px

>>34041048
keymod best mod

>>34041030
100% heres-

oh wait thats kinda sexy

File: IMG_9139.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

>>34041032
Do you see this? Do you see this right here? Go grab your AR and look on the left side. Does it have a picture of a colt horse engraved in it? Does it have the most important 4-letter word in America, "COLT", right next to it?

Then I'm afraid I've got some bad news. You see, you wasted your money on a crappy AR made by some fly by night company that has absolutely no history. That has absolutely no heritage. That absolutely nobody outside of your hipster friends even knows about, and even if they did they wouldn't buy it because they'd be smart enough to realize there's no good reason to buy an AR from any other company besides COLT.

Because when you buy COLT, you buy quality. People like to bitch and moan and claim you're "paying extra for the pony". You're damn shitting right we are. We're paying extra for a high quality no-bullshit meant-to-be-used-and-abused-and-still-work (not kept in a safe so you can show it off to your internet "friends") product made by a high quality no-bullshit company that's been making guns in this country for CENTURIES. Not a couple of years. Not a decade. FOR ONE HUNDRED SIXTY MOTHER FUCKING YEARS. People buy AKs because of their "history"? All I can say is LOL.

Anyway, COLT owners feel free to post ITT. Non-COLT owners stay the fuck out.

File: 1494886255494.jpg (123KB, 957x1300px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 957x1300px

>>34041063

File: Lake1.jpg (3MB, 3328x2496px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3328x2496px

>>34041066
>2018
>not keymod

>>34041074
TL;DR

but have fun with that olt, im glad your passionate about something.

File: 1423602605459.jpg (1MB, 3257x2083px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3257x2083px

>>34041063
>imblying that there's MOA shift with a PVS-24
kek

>>34041058
Original formula KMR is best formula

>>34041066
refer to: >>34041069

>>34041089
I forgot something in my last post.

Posted for TS

File: 1485734484235.jpg (89KB, 733x798px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 733x798px

>>34041088
104.153.105.2:13140


get in here faggot

File: acogfixed.jpg (1MB, 3240x2072px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3240x2072px

>>34041089
Fixed

File: hmm.jpg (32KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 450x450px

>>34041089
>mount nv on keymod rail
>entire optic shifts so far left you're no longer looking through it
Keymod > flip to side?

>>34040890
G mount is kind of mall ninja. I like ADM's look the best but not the best return to zero. Bobro's cantilever looks retarded and the qd lever side is so bulky. Say goodbye to your rails if Larue.

Go spurh or go home.

File: DSC_1015.jpg (987KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

987KB, 1800x1200px

>>34041089

File: 10:22 + Sidearm 1.jpg (3MB, 3000x1993px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x1993px

>>34041118
kekaroons

posted for TS

File: AR9.png (2MB, 1598x688px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1598x688px

>>34041058
Are we KMR'ing in here?

>>34041132
nice vx-2 efr

File: DSC_0974.jpg (700KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 1800x1200px

>>34041136
sad

File: PDWMode.jpg (2MB, 4160x1952px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x1952px

>>34041136
Yes

>>34041128
Can we get a close up of the rear part of your top rail?

File: 10:22 + Sidearm 2.jpg (3MB, 3600x2391px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3600x2391px

>>34041147
thanks bud

>>34041136
confirmative

>>34041161
like this?>>34039409

File: rsz_20170510_222109.jpg (4MB, 3024x2268px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3024x2268px

>>34039824
Fuck. Why?!

File: A4-1.jpg (420KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 1600x900px

>>34041159
Totally my rich fag KAC rail

File: DSC_0611.jpg (721KB, 1200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1200x1800px

>>34041183

>>34041172
Lmao. Yes.
>Larue
>not even once
Rip your 6061 scar receiver

File: DSC_1099.jpg (2MB, 1800x2710px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1800x2710px

>>34041191
>not getting super cool SBR info seal
Posted for TS, senpai

>>34041089
>it's not even thermal
sad

File: mailbox.jpg (235KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 768x1024px

>>34041214
i knew you were going to be a little autistic bitch about something

File: 14b037f3c6be436441c93b696b68bb58.jpg (152KB, 640x525px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 640x525px

>>34041107
get a rail nigger

pic related

File: Log.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>34041217
When will you join the russian laser and ukranian helmet master race?

File: 1423423698361.jpg (976KB, 2333x3264px) Image search: [Google]

976KB, 2333x3264px

>>34041221
>it's not even thermal
confirmative

>>34040409
nice

>>34041224
>completely gouged scar receiver
>I'm autistic
If you weren't autistic about Larue, you'd have chosen a non-cantilever scar specific mount for your optic. And one that isn't so shittily engineered that it rips your receiver rails apart.

File: 2017-04-23 15.24.17.jpg (2MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1440px

>>34041231
i have a rail you retarded fuck. No need for meme lock

File: 2017-03-03 01.04.30.jpg (1MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1440px

best gun mods and rail attachment methods

>>34041125
How many fucking screws do you need

aero precision and also that AS eagle logo company make some Gucci ass mounts

File: 70e.jpg (28KB, 567x565px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 567x565px

>>34041245
>>completely gouged
wow you're actually retarded

>>34041247
Yours is gay
Get a Gucci rail

File: ARpistol.png (2MB, 1496x674px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1496x674px

>>34041293
>Not having a rail that gets defeated by trees
lmao'ing @your life sempai