ITT take an existing less lethal/ non lethal/ less than lethal idea and think of a way to make it more lethal or more effective
To start:
this device attaches to the front of a pistol to make a giant ball that can incapacitate but wont kill, you could make the ball explosive to cause an area shrapnel effect.
you can take the ball off and you get a lethal bullet to kill an attacker.
>>34016638
The entire concept of mixing non-lethal weaponry and lethal weaponry in the same device is retarded, and I am just waiting to see the first time someone accidentally double taps and the second shot is most definitely lethal.
Having a separate item for less than lethal is the safest most effective way of issuing less than lethal armaments.
>>34016638
it's clearly a glock, i don't see the need of explosives for obtaining area shrapnel effect
Pistol grenades?
>>34016667
Yes, but you want to project the explosion and shrapnel at the target, not have it in the palm of your hand.
>>34016638
Equip the sticky foam gun with a scope so you shoot the goo at the persons face so they suffocate
>>34016662
I would hope that the device at the very least prevents the weapon from cycling to prevent such an occurrence.
>>34016710
The device is a second chance add on that allows for a single less lethal round to be fired, prior to using deadly force
>>34016638
Why no attention to MORE than lethal devices?
Instead of a solid steel ball, design a grenade launcher mount for a glock that fires 30mm HEF rounds using a regular fired bullet to propel it.
>>34016920
Or a device that not only kills the body, but also kills the soul?
>>34016928
That'd be 10mm my dude.