Should I buy a SIG MCX?

>>34010464
It's a cool gun, and it will do everything you want it to do, it just doesn't have the aftermarket support benefit of being as cheap as many AR15's

That said I like mine, and I'm excited for the geiselle MCX trigger to drop.

>>34010464

I will buy one the second sig gets their head out of their ass and offers an mlok rail standard.

>>34010464
It's a good gun, but the advantage is truly in .300 as an SBR. I own one in 5.56 and it is very nice, I don't think you would regret the purchase.
>>34010630
Literally just pop out the front pin and replace the hand guard when they come out with mlok.

>>34011056
But then you would have an inferior handguard laying around. You would also have to deal with it until that happens, if it even does.

>should I buy this thing that does the same stuff as an AR but costs 4x as much?
No.

>>34010464

It makes bullets go.

>>34011462
Where the fuck are you seeing $400 ARs?

>>34011474
He's comparing it to a DPMS oracle, the pinnacle of ar15 design

>>34011474
It was a bit of hyperbole. In all seriousness though I do not see the point in buying a weapon that has the same exact ergonomics as an AR, but is much more expensive. It seems like a huge waste of money to me.
If you really want an MCX for whatever reason and you have the cash to blow, then go right ahead.

>>34011619
>lack of buffer tube
lack of stoner DI

gain true folding stock capability
redirects cleaning focus, arguably easier to suppress

>>34010464
Great for killing faggots.

>>34011474
http://palmettostatearmory.com/