Best weapon to kill a drone?

Good quality 12ga bird shot. It isn't armoured.

Don't do this, you'll get arrested

Document this, with time-stamped video

Make sure to report to police for paper trail

>>33989674
A gun probably

>>33989674
just shoot the neighbor boy with whatever you have laying around no reason to get special equiipment

>>33989674
Microwave cannon.

>>33989674
.556
That way while it's down two more of its drone buddies have to buzz in and take it to the drone mechanic.

>>33989808
Kek

Net at the end of a rope, so you can drag it down and steal it.

>>33989674
report him the the atf and sit back and watch the fun

File: 302232-spongebob-square-pants-you-like-krabby-patties-dont-you-squidward.jpg (23KB, 599x399px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 599x399px

>>33989808

Weather balloon on a cable.

File: zzzhere.png (65KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 200x200px

>>33989674
>Get your own drone
>equip with similar munitions
>Next time neighbor decides to demonstrate air superiority
>BOGEY BOGEY
>SCRAMBLE FIGHTERS
>Launch your drone to defend your airspace
>Dogfight the shit outta that bitch
>win, see if neighbor will try to assert his military might again

>>33989945
I kinda like this

>>33989798
This too

>>33989674
As it's an aircraft, a 40mm Bofors gun

Why don't you make friends with the kiddo and offer him better weaponry to mount on his drone

>>33989782

Beta cuck faggot

>>33989800
/THIS
Basically any kind of directed EMP

>>33989972
>not having an early warning and intercept radar system in place
>not having ground based AA assets already in place, plus decoys
>not having distributed STOL drones for immediate intercept

File: DRONES GET OUT.webm (861KB, 800x410px) Image search: [Google]

861KB, 800x410px

>>33989674
Javelins.
No, not the missile.

>>33990090
>No, not the missile.
But mooooom!

>>33989686
/thread

File: 561dba218bc11.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

The Mosin...Of course!

>>33989674
Maybe try making friends with him, sounds cool as fuck.

>>33990090
He didn't even hit it with the point. what a shit throw

>>33989782

This is /k/, we dont go for the most logic of choices, we go for what's most fun and retarded. So fuck yourself.

>>33989674
Op, you need to get a drone yourself. Arm it with dual 22s, have mid air drone fight.

>>33990090
Did he think it was a dragon?

>>33989782
If it were a regular drone yes but in this scenario it has been weaponized so you should be in the clear. "Those rockets coulda set much house on fire, I didn't know they was just fireworks", that's what you tell the pigs when they come round.

>>33989674
Train a bird of prey like a falcon or something to fight it
I know someone has done that before

Sorry I disappeared guys. That kid was flying his drone outside my backyard so I threw a rock at it.

>>33989808
just use .22LR and it'll bounce around inside the shell and destroy all the electronics

File: 1417384052188.jpg (130KB, 1476x981px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1476x981px

>>33989674
>Real answer?

Tell his parents to make him cut that shit out. If he doesn't call the FAA and FBI. It's some kind of aerospace/weapons violation, make that little faggot cop a felony charge.

>/k/ answer?

Attach your own bottle rockets to a drone, dogfight. Alternatively, tape some knives or like a cowcatcher to it and ram it over your property and smash it with a sledgehammer, piss on it, and throw it back over the fence to send a message.

If possible, though,
>>33990090
That's fucking neat.

>>33990478
What is this, Robot-Wars? I'm too stupid to do that.
I think I'll just get three BB-Guns, tie them together, mount them over the grill and shoot when the fucker fixes his thing again.
I think I clipped a wing. It fell over on his side.

>>33990486
It might be done, get ready for angry parents.

But seriously, most commercial drones have to be registered with the FAA now. They don't like this kind of shit. He's technically attaching explosives to it. The feds would not like this fucker.

Tell his parents, and if they don't care and he doesn't stop, tape it, call, crack a beer, watch the raid. That's probably much more satisfying than hitting it with a BB-gun.

>>33990486
Or somehow time a grenade to make a flak shell

>>33990500
Good point.
Lemme go over and talk to his dad.

In all honestly, I think he just taped them to the wings for show. I've not once seen them used.

>>33989674
Why would you want to shoot something like that down, that would be fucking awesome.

File: K_fucks_with_peta.png (64KB, 1156x580px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1156x580px

>ctrl+f "RC A-10" not found.

>>33990366
what a fag.

File: 640px-8,8-cm-Flugabwehrkanone_37.8.8_cm_anti-aircraft_cannon_37.jpg (112KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 640x426px

Find a beater truck and make pic related

>>33989674
Spotter RF

>>33990619
Because that greentext is fake as fuck

I hope that kid's parents are just as intolerant of your firearms as you are of that kids toy. Way to be "That guy" in the neighborhood you nervous piece of shit.

>>33990742
>Trespassing
>Somehow this is okay

File: 1342628848411.jpg (198KB, 1028x1513px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1028x1513px

>>33990736

>>33989674
L337 H4X$
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CzURm7OpAA

>>33989674
Call the FAA, these things are heavily restricted and I guarantee is not actually allowed to fly it around your houses.

But to answer your question regarding the stupid and illegal solution, use a 12 gauge shotgun with bird shot. It will be very easy to hit and you won't accidentally kill someone collaterally with falling bullets.

>>33989674
you're overthinking it.

smash a brick into the back of the operator's skull. And hey, free drone.

File: bfa2f86f68c6dfec31c358ae43c526bc.jpg (75KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 720x480px

>>33990769
Show me where this fag said it was trespassing? All I've seen him say is that the kid modified his RC toy.

OP is basically pic related.

>>33990313
Won't matter. Drones are currently considered aircraft as of January this year. If you interfere with it at all, much less fire on one, you are in deep shit with the feds.

>>33990874
Property rights > aircraft protections

>>33989674
microwave gun

>>33990901
Nope. FAA will rape you. Call the police if its a problem. Otherwise you will be charged with a felony.

>>33990736
You're the kind of person to take 'A modest proposal' at face value aren't you.

Id just pay the kid way too much fucking money to mow my lawn and show him how to import better fireworks.
Then i complain to him about neighbors I don't like.

File: That fortnight many a wench he layeth within.png (725KB, 479x607px) Image search: [Google]

725KB, 479x607px

>>33990090
They put in on a runestone painting

>>33989674
2.4ghz jammer

>>33989674
Get a bigger armored drone and equip it with better bigger fireworks and shoot is down that way.

>>33990262
Dual semiautomatic .22, attach servo with X poundage pull on a channel slaved to that servo (or actuator, so it only has one action like a button), and...how are you gonna aim it? FPV?

Don't get me wrong, it sounds like some James Bond shit, and I want to see it done. There is a problem called the FAA.

>>33991224
Mah nigga.

>>33991380
Epic.

>>33991445
Because broad range jammers aren't exactly legal, some dude made a cell phone app that hijacks the drone for you.

http://www.popsci.com/learn-how-to-disable-popular-drone-with-cheap-computer

>>33990929
Strapping pyrotechnics to your drone violates several FAA regulations. If you shoot it down they won't do shit because it's their job to keep that shit from happening in the first place. You're literally doing their job for them at that point, and instead of wasting thousands of taxpayer dollars trying to get cops to take it down you can spend nothing more than a single 12ga shell

>>33992085
>The feds won't go after you cause the other guy is in the wrong
>Your doing their job for them, they will dig that
>Committing violent felonies is OK if it's against a potential criminal

Turn off your 1980's vigilante action movies for a bit and THINK about what you just posted.

Better yet, go ahead and go shoot down somebody's RC toy and see what happens. Prove me wrong Anon.

>>33992194
you'd still probably get fucked up the ass for
>discharging of a firearm
>reckless endangerment
>possibly destruction of property
and that's in somewhere like texas where you might be able to not have your case demonized within 2 seconds, god help you on the coasts.

>>33992194
I don't think you realize just how illegal it is to strap fireworks to a drone. At that point self defence is a totally viable argument since your safety and property are literally at risk

You're not even reading anything I'm posting. This isn't timmy down the street flying his new rc helicopter over my house, it's someone taking a done and fucking arming it with explosives and pyrotechnics. If you don't think someone should be able to defend themselves from that I guess you can't defend yourself from anything.

>>33989800
Hmm....could I rip a magnetron out of an old microwave oven and turn it into an anti-drone ray?

>>33991903
Firing a gun remotely with servos is easily doable, but expect to come home to dead dogs all over your house if you do it.

a trained hawk or falcon

>>33992884
And if it's on private land, with nobody for miles?

>>33989800
>Microwave Weapons cleared for battle

>>33990904
>>33990044
>>33989800


>>33992555
There is a video of a Ukrainian doing exactly that and using an Aluminium(?) can to direct the Microwaves in a crude beam.

He is able to fry shit a few meters away. If the guy had a budget to make an actual antenna he could probably zap shit a mile out.

>>33993144
civilian use

File: Generals_Microwave_Tank.jpg (64KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 300x300px

>>33993206
>civilian use

>>33992485
>Roman candles
>"Highly dangerous explosives"
Stop being a faggot.

Is he actively shooting/dropping "explosives" on you or your property or is this a "One of those COULD come over here and..." deals?

Kinda sounds like you started out by being an asshole who wanted to shit on some kid's good times and now that you are being called out for it are trying desperately to justify it.

Most of us here on /k/ have used firearms before, and some of us have used explosives before. Do you really expect anyone here to feel your panic over remote controlled roman candles and M80s is anything other than pathetic?

>firearms of any kind
Shotguns are effective, but you WILL get weapons charges if you shoot something down in an urban/suburban setting without a good fucking reason. In more rural settings, if the drone is actually demonstrably invading privacy or causing a disturbance, you could probably shoot it down and be okay.

>airsoft/pellet guns
Less effective but far safer and less for neighbors or the police to get pissed about. Also saves your guns from the evidence locker. Just practice first and realize that in an urban setting pellet guns look exactly like real guns and will still get the police called on your ass.
>Directed energy weapons
A high-power handheld laser would be the easiest thing to use, although more dangerous than a pellet gun, and the FAA loves to bust people's nuts over lasers
>Nets/net guns
If you want to spend a lot of money you can buy a net launcher, or you could string a net between two trees like they have behind football goals to "surprise" drones.
>Falcons
The most impractical yet patrician method for home airspace defense. Don't do this unless you actually practice falconry as a hobby.

Honestly of all of these just get a pellet gun. Easiest to use and maintain, and probably won't get you charged with reckless endangerment or unlawful discharge.

>>33990245
He just didn't hit the camera fuck head.

go medieval on its ass with a few kites with razorblades and wire for tails.
or slingshot plus m80s for flak action.

>>33989674
http://www.budk.com/12-Gauge-Skynet-Drone-Defense-%E2%80%93-3-Pack-35975

>>33991380
kek

>>33991380
this is pretty cool but also really fucking faggy

>>33989674
This is the only good use for airshit.

https://youtu.be/jVWAUNWj4NA

>>33989674
.22 revolver with rat shot or pellet rifle to remove drone. Or you can buy a drone and square up

>>33990090
>TODAY THE GODS DECIDE YOUR FATE

File: C56-BU4303.jpg (128KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1000x1000px

>>33989674
Skynet 12 ga shells.

They expand and create a 6' in diameter net of sorts.

Regarding directed-energy methods, here's two:
Microwave magnetron gun that can evidently cause enough EMF to trip circuitbreakers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80kDn4vit_w
Infrared laser that could feasibly cut the drone to bits with enough exposure time and good aim (a few seconds, I'd estimate): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHqWvgi3IKE

Both these options have the advantage that they could be used discreetly, i.e. you could shut the drone down, it falls and breaks, and it could be somewhat difficult to show it was you. It could look like the drone went out of range and crashed

File: 1492478332040.jpg (12KB, 545x324px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 545x324px

>>33990809
>>33990742
This. Based on what you've told us, there's been absolutely no threat or offence to you, and you haven't made any attempt to so much as ask the kid directly to stop. You aren't clever. Nobody will think you're cool or powerful. You'll just be hated. Jumping at an opportunity to levy law or force on someone else (for, close as anyone can tell, the purpose of jacking yourself off with a sense of empowerment) is the very thing destroying liberty in the modern world. You want to use it on him, thousands of raving liberals are hyped to use it on both of you. Everyone wants to feel in control, even if it's just for a second, and the more this attitude proliferates, the more they're willing to destroy each other for it. Any force you want to levy is force others want to levy on you. Every time this shit happens, be it someone's drones, guns, fireworks, frizbees, or whatever, the snek gets stepped on a little more. It's your snek too, whether you can see that or not.

If this really presents a problem rather than simply an opportunity to exercise control, ask the kid to stop. If he won't, talk to his parents. If that doesn't help, go to the law or remove drone as necessary. But do not be part of the problem. Let the kid be a kid, and make sure he owns up to any damage he causes. We built a nation on trust and responsibility.

All that said, drone skeet would be FUN AS FUCK

File: typeface.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>33994170
>Arial trespassing

File: IMG_2687.png (981KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

981KB, 750x1334px

>>33994659
AREOLA TRESPASSING

Goddamn captchas

File: 1428384878997.jpg (29KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 720x720px

>>33994673
that sounds dangerous

>>33994610
>drone skeet
I'm now thinking of drone races, you know...these: https://youtu.be/fGlBLBwvFRo

Now, instead of just hauling ass around parking lots or buildings, they have a stretch where people shoot at the drones with shotguns (minimum distance, 20 yds) in some bizarre tusken raider-esque trial-by-fire.

>>33989782
You could legally shoot it down on two premises:
1. Fearing for your life (because it's weaponized)
2. Defending your property (assuming its hovering above your property)

>>33989945
Similar thing happened to me in January, non combative situation though

>post christmas so at least 3 drones flying around my suburb fairly frequently
>waterhole 150m from my house is a common spot for the drones to come and look (think kangaroos to dams)
>these things are all phantom 3s and 4s. Clear picture, easy control but not highly manoeuvrable
>send up my 210 sized racing quad with shit picture but handling absolutely out of this world
>buzz around their cameras to attract attention
>flip, spin and show off to assert dominance in the air space
>drone leaves shortly after


That was actually the only air to air encounter I had. Saw a few families recovering one that they crashed not very long after. Was a good laugh.

>>33990071
I wish it where that easy to build a half decent pulse Doppler radar for exactly this purpose

>>33989674
If it's not flying too high, and it's operated remotely from the camera, a water hose with enough pressure is ideal and gets it easily. Doesn't make a sound, can't see it coming, no proof left behind.

I live in a nice house near the beach, and there are plenty people flying their drones largely over my property, not to mention some attempting to visit my house with it. I took down about twenty, many of which crashed into nearby rocks, and I captured three Parrot drones and a custom one so far. No one ever suspected a thing.

There's less drones around these days, seems they were all poorfags that burnt all their money on it and gave up after that deadly crash.

>>33993100
you still talked about it on an online honeypot
might as well say farewell to the doggos and go full retard with explosives and full-giggle stuff

>>33989674
Paintball marker, wind the pressure up and unload like you've not shit for a week.

Fewer legal complications.

>>33995325
>farewell to the doggos
why do people always say this?

>>33995244

No and no. These items are not covered under state or local laws. All Drone Operations over the United States are covered expressly and explicitly by the FAA and the CAP. There are no legal circumstances to allow the destruction of an in flight aircraft over civilian airspace. None. Even the government can't shoot down an aircraft over civilian space (not to say they *wouldn't* but it's still illegal to do so). Even if threat to one's person is present, destruction of a drone is illegal, a felony level offense at the Federal level (meaning no guns for life for you). I cannot emphasis this enough, you *cannot* destroy an in flight drone. Castle doctrine, stand your ground, or anything similar, are state laws, not federal, and it's federal laws that protect aircraft.

>>33995348
https://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules-man-had-right-to-shoot-down-drone-over-his-house/

>>33995059
Especially if the drones can be armored in attempts to handle the shot. That shit would be fun as hell on both sides.

>>33989782
Realistically, this.
>>33989686
Badassly, this.

File: 1475117434765.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>33989674

I keep a $40 Hubsan drone for exactly this purpose. I plan to ram it into the rotors of whatever is hovering over the property and record it all in glorious high-def.

>but anon, it'll probably never happen!

Yeah, true. But in the meantime I have a great little quad to tool around with.

File: A-10.jpg (475KB, 3472x1300px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 3472x1300px

>>33990619
>>33990736
Fake or not, it's my favorite funny story on /k/

Have a wallpaper.

>>33989686
With the addendum that if you're far enough out in the stix, turkey loads might be more effective at longer range.

>>33989674
Birdshot will kill a drone

Like a dji phantom 5

They're pretty fragile.

So there is a rc controller, a GPS unit(find home automatically when battery is low) and a motor control unit.

You can't really hit a drone from the bottom because there is a first person camera gimbal that allows the operator to see where the drone is.

And incorporated into the gimbal is a stand.

But if you can nail one of the quad copter motors where the plastic is thin it will fall

Not the blade or blade guard. The actual motors mounted under the blades

File: images(66).jpg (40KB, 735x413px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 735x413px

>Not sending your rc B52 on a Arc Light mission to drone operatprs house.

Destroying the drone is just treating the sympton. He violated the NAP first.

>>33995513
Someone needs to see how far away you can be and still pierce the plastic of a Phantom rotor blade with birdshot. I'll bet you it's farther than you think.

File: IMG_20170415_090135.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>33995521
I don't know how thick or what material the blades are made of but No.2 shot at 20m bounced of these safety glasses.

Still sent them flying though and shattered a few.

File: IMG_20170415_124140.jpg (2MB, 2016x3584px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2016x3584px

>>33995535
~15 Hits, no penetrations

>>33989674
A sleeker, faster, more agile drone armed with airsoft machine guns, or a cheaper one, to Allah Akbar into it

>>33995535
Might require turkey loads to guarantee a kill,which will mean having a much larger safe area around the drone.

>>33993237
Yeah man third degree burns are for pussies, fuck me for not wanting firecrackers and fireballs launched at me.

This started out with OP saying a kid was strapping fireworks to a drone, which is highly illegal and dangerous to not only him but everyone around him. If you think that's fine ill come set off some Walmart fireworks all over your house, theyre just fireworks right? They can't ever hurt anything.

Ive been flying drones for years and really it sounds like you spent too much on one and feel the need to justify your purchase by defending drones at every turn. That or you flew one too close to someone's house and they took it down, either way I don't know why you're defending kids putting their safety and everyone else's at risk

>>33995335
Because the atf has a history of doggocide

Lurk more this is like the oldest joke on k

>>33993892
/thread
Also that shit is cool as fuck

File: 2D73739900000578-0-image-m-11_1444933440832.jpg (52KB, 636x358px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 636x358px

Pic related.

Directional gps-jammer rifle.

>>33995348
FALSE

A drone is not an aircraft. It's a remote control TOY. Secondly, said TOY is ARMED. Threat to life or imminent threat of harm authorizes use of force to defend oneself or property from said threat. An armed flying TOY can be shot down.

>>33991380
filename kek

>>33990090
It's actually a hand axe. Dude's a good throw either way.

This thread question comes up once every two months. This time the drone is armed though.

>>33989782
If it's on your property (I believe property extends 100 feet in the air) you can fuck it up as an intruder. Personally, I hope people do. The last thing we need is widespread acceptance of robots hanging around our homes.

File: 1492928814395.png (273KB, 793x794px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 793x794px

>>33989945

>>33993892
Doesn't really work all that well. The weights don't really stabilize well or don't fully deploy and it's expensive

File: OPisafaggot.jpg (74KB, 758x426px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 758x426px

>>33995600
Still have not seen where OP says he was being fired upon, or that this thing was over his property. The original post was just that he saw a kid modifying his toy and wanted to shit on someone else's fun.

And have you seriously never had roman candle fights when you were a kid?

>>33996922
>people firing roman candles at your house dindu nuffin
>it's not HE so any fires caused by it are completely harmless

>>33989782
>>>/lgbt

>>33989674
going over to his house and kicking the shit out of him and breaking his hands would be a good start

>>33996940
Again, OP said nothing about them being fired at his house, just that some kid was attaching them to a drone and having fun.
>"Say that you noticed the neighbor boy >modified his drone to fire bottle rockets and >drop fire-crackers.
>What would be the best weapon/ammo type >to kill a drone that big?"
>-OP
Rereading that it doesn't even say roman candles, which have a very small chance of causing a fire, it says bottle rockets, which have 0% chance of causing fire. OP is just a scared faggot.
I'm not even defending the kid, it sounds like maybe someone should talk to his parents or if that doesn't work, call the police. What I am saying is that from the first post this has been about "Someone looks like their having fun, how can I violently ruin that"
>>33994610
^This sums it up perfectly.

If OP is absolutely THAT terrified of a RC toy with bottle rockets on it, then by all means he should (in this order)
1. Go talk to the parents like a functional adult.
2. If that doesn't resolve it call the police

It is that simple to solve. OP just doesn't get to act like a toughguy shooting down some kid's toy.

>>33997223
>shooting bottle rockets at somebody else's property doesn't violate the NAP
Yeah no.

>>33997271
Show me where OP said the kid was shooting them at him or his house?

>>33997271
In fact, that's besides the point. If the kid does that go talk to his parents like a rational adult instead of running out in the yard to throw rocks or shoot at it like a fucking moron.

>Get giant inflatable towers
>Wait for the drone to crash in it, since they're kids
>My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalitions forces.flac

>>33989782
>not stealing his idea for your own use
>not modifying it to shoot bbs when the fire crackers/rockets run out
>not using your drown to protect your airspace and destroying his drone

Come on do you not even Drone combat.

>>33990352
Dutch police actually do this.

>>33997293
Show me in the FAA regulations involving drones where it says it's fine to strap pyrotechnics onto whatever you want?

>>33997223
So you're not allowed to proactively prepare for the highly likely scenario of this kid blowing out your windows with bottle rockets?

That's all this thread is for, preparation for the possibility of people using drones violently and how to respond

Also
>call cops
>talk to parents
This is /k/

>>33996356
You have to register them as aircraft to the FAA when you get a drone, not that anyone actually does

Nonetheless if it's weaponized take it down

File: BXwI34iCQAAniBA.jpg (40KB, 599x513px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 599x513px

>>33996922
No because I saw what happened to the neighbor kid that did get in Roman candle fights

Sorry we weren't all retards with no idea of how dangerous fire and explosives are

>>33989674
Tell the neighbor you're scared of his toy and ask him not to spook you with it anymore

>>33999077
It's not okay hence why you report it and get charges slapped on the kiddie. You shoot it you are now fucked in addition to the kid.

>>33999190
Roman candles? Lol.

>>33989988
I second this.

>>33994069
Pretty in line with the rest of reenacting.

>>33995513
....literally all you have to do is hit one of the blades with a pellet or two to break it. A single blade breaking will desabilize the fuck out of these things enough that itll go down..

>>33995612
and for some reason in the last week it's been said 10 times as often as before.

>>33995321
Did you mount them on your wall?

>>33990513
> Anon gets a babby grounded
Summer's coming

File: A Modest Proposal.jpg (129KB, 389x600px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 389x600px

>>33990971
The OG greentext

>>33999378
^THIS
>>33999116
>Blowing out windows with bottle rockets
>This is /k/ so acting like a belligerent manchild is ok
This is bait right?
>>33999190
Lol, "Roman candles"
>>33999341
This is the appropriate response.. but I guess here on /k/ your supposed to behave like the very stereotype of the paranoid, gun-toting social retard the media likes to portray us gun-owners as..

>>33996922
2 kids shooting eachother with roman candles=/=someone attacking people with an armed drone.

>>33997223
I agree that op is a fag, but bottle rockets and roman candles can easily start fires.

>>34000306
nowhere is it stated that anyone was being attacked.

>buy small cheap drone
>attach small case of tannerite and a blasting cap to it
>allahu akbar

>>34000338
It's implied, why else would someone shoot it down.

>>33990366
Why do you care?

>>33990486
So it was over his property, not yours? If that's the case you're just a autistic sperg lord reeeee-ing over nothing

>>33999341
/thread

>>33991380
Neato

>>33993220
Mostly useless tbqh

>>33994673
>not using clover
Nigga you're missing out

File: Screenshot_20170518-174302.png (264KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 720x1280px

>>33994673
I forgot to shill my screenshots