Revolver Porn

File: P1130946.jpg (437KB, 1400x1634px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1400x1634px

>>33978199

>>33978110

I would very happily take another man's life in order to own the third one down in that lineup.

File: ocelot.jpg (188KB, 1422x1152px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1422x1152px

>>33978211

File: 646Steel.jpg (283KB, 1800x792px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1800x792px

>>33978095

File: image014[1].jpg (54KB, 847x565px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 847x565px

S&W Model 1, 7 rounds of .22 short in a single action revolver. This was a viable option for self-defense once upon a time.

File: wm_7087482.jpg (90KB, 1215x514px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1215x514px

>>33978613
>This was a viable option for self-defense once upon a time.
No, there were people who thought it was.

>>33978641
Do you want to get shot with 7 rounds of .22 short?

File: Colt Trooper Mk. IV, 4'' Barrel, Deep Blue.jpg (89KB, 900x1053px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 900x1053px

>>33978662
Do you want to get shot with 7rds of 4.25mm Liliput? I don't, but that doesn't mean it's a valid carry choice.

>>>33978110
>I would very happily take another man's life in order to own the third one down in that lineup.

I'll duel you over it nigga

File: 1484528537103.jpg (31KB, 448x404px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 448x404px

>>33978140
I need

File: 20170515_174249-1512x2016.jpg (1MB, 1512x2016px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1512x2016px

I just put some Nills grips on one of my 629s and I am embarrassed to have paid this much for grips. But boy are they flashy. Sorry for shit picture quality

>>33978927

If only I could buy one

>>33978629
>>33978629
>>33978629
god so fucking sexy.
what model?

>>33981207
If you mean the 3" gun I'm guessing it's a model 10.

>>33978622
What's the name of this? I recognize it from Metro

File: IMG_20170508_094412.jpg (3MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4608x3456px

muh baby girl

>>33981859
Manurhin MR73

>>33979179
Whats the deal with this holster?
I'm no newguns but I feel baffled by this

>>33979154
What is the point of this trigger guard?

>>33982375
Weird custom job that does the same thing as a shoulder holster without the shoulder straps.

>>33982421
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitzGerald_Special

File: 2016-07-27 19.04.05.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33978095

>>33982255
its a beautiful guns and i love it but its so god damn big its not that fun to shoot.

>>33983136
That's a Colt 1917, right? How big is it relative to a S&W? L-frame?

File: 15355588_1173747765993677_4366818124537217663_n.jpg (65KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 960x720px

>>33983171
>That's a Colt 1917, right?
yep, correctomundo
>how big is it to a S&W
fucking huge in the hand. it doesnt seem that big til you get it in your hand or have next to another gun.

The most comfortable way to shoot it DA is to choke up really high but you get hammer bite.(not painful hammer bite).

>pic related
Colt M1917(top left)
S&W model 15 K frame(bottom left)

File: NCM_0030.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>33978095

File: IMG_0032.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>33978095

>>33983460
so i take it you hate your wrists but not as much as you hate bears

File: IMG_0042.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>33983460
With new grips

>>33978116

Dude, this pistol is too sexy to be on /k/. move that shit to /s/

File: IMG_0048.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>33983475
Hogs actually

File: 1379426258781.gif (356KB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 500x282px

>>33978958
I want that rifle

>>33981871
is she part Australian

>>33978562
>>33981871
man i can't decide if i want single or double action

>>33978629
what's the grip add on? I have a pre model 10 and that looks like it would help alot

File: 1287753566[1].jpg (45KB, 550x407px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 550x407px

Are there any modern break-action revolvers out there? I only know of pic related, and not only is it ~20 years old, it never even made it out of the prototype stage.

File: H&R 999.jpg (29KB, 444x385px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 444x385px

>>33985865

>>33978095
>love revolvers
>go to range rent model 686
It wasn't as fun or smooth as I imagined...
I only shot 45 and 9mm, maybe im not use to caliber.

What's a good barrel size for first timers?

File: 100_0496.jpg (328KB, 1600x770px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1600x770px

>>33986665
I miss my 999.
Im a complete fuckup for selling it.

File: 100_0497.jpg (256KB, 1600x734px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1600x734px

>>33986768
Why why why why why am i soooo fucking stupid?
I should just headbutt the FS knife i used to prop it up with for this pic.

>>33984035
Why not both?

>>33979154
How well would a .357 fitz special work? Would .38 or .45 be a better caliber for it?

test

>>33986851
If you have giant hands or wear gloves all the time and need a gun with a barrel so short you lose all the advantages of .357 go for it.

This concept was designed by a guy in a time WAY before there was a substantial number of people who CCW'd on a regular basis. We have so many better deep concealment options now there is no universe where a fitz special is the optimal choice.

It's only appeal is the aesthetic.

>>33978662
It would be painful.

>>33987360
How painful?

>>33987360
You look like a guy who could handle it.

>>33987369
Very.
>>33987452
Just to you.

what the fuck is wrong with the site? I can't upload any pics today.

>>33987614
Jackie 4chan has obviously opened a Korean email....sad thing is its possible

>>33988469
>>33988480
Where do you find mak grips for a k-frame?

>>33988469
KEK

Going to get my first [wheel] carry; is a .22 okay to start with so I can train before jumping to .357?

>>33979857
Those grips are worth it.
Makes the recoil feel like you´re shooting 357

File: RUGER-1.jpg (34KB, 450x299px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 450x299px

>>33989226
.22 revolvers are sweet, have fun. Also don't forget you can shoot .38spl out of .357 guns for milder recoil when practicing.

>>33983168
Don't talk to me or my son ever again

>>33987360
Especially the resulting infection, amputation and death

>>33978100
are there any good modern 45 degree break action revolvers? ...that aren't the rex?

>>33988321
Idk what's more out of place, the taurus, the microtec or the disparity between the two

>>33990687
History has spoken and the break action is a shit. Antiques or reproductions are pretty much your only choices.

>>33986772
>>33986768
is this really "modern" tho?

>>33990753
>History has spoken and the break action is more work
Ftfy

>>33978613
>This was a viable option for self-defense once upon a time

No - it existed because there were virtually no niggers and spics so 99% of them were never fired in anger.

>>33990773
No, it's really just fucking inferior.

If you want to make one as strong as a typical single-action or hand-ejector, you really need to add way more mass and make larger dimensions, making a .44 Magnum top-break would make for a bulky hunk of shit, trying to make one in .454 Casull or .480 Ruger would make for an unusable fucking beast of a handgun.

It's structurally inefficient.

>>33990792
>there was no blacks or spaniards in 1800's America
Look at the intellectual lightweight here.

>>33990797
And aside from the one Uberti in .45colt, who the fuck said it had to be a big bore magnum? The weakness gets brought up in every thread but nobody every has a link to a a No.3 that's been shot to pieces or one of the .38 specials that eaten too much +p. If the Rex gets brought up people shout that it's never been tested but the RUSSIANS thought it would work, and nobody has any ideas for how the lock may be improved.

Nobody is worried about making a big bore blaster or break action MR73, just a modern break action gun

>>33990803
Spic=/=Spaniard

Don't let either group here you confuse them and don't call other Latinos Mexicans

>>33990930
Yeah, so let's look at the centerfire break-action revolvers which are currently being made, the Anderson Wheeler .357 Webley, and the Uberti .45 Schofield

The Anderson Wheeler gun is approximately $9000, being in .357 Magnum, decent pressure, but who knows how well it holds up over time.

Then the Uberti, it is a $1000 to $1500 gun and is available in .45 Colt, .38 Special, and .44-40, notice how these are all relatively low pressure cartridges, all things considered, I doubt anyone is going to be shooting any barn-burning loads in of .45 Colt in those, probably because it couldn't handle it.

Both are replicas of old obsolete designs made for a modern collector market, and lots of money probably goes into making them safe to shoot for just modern target loads, these aren't really guns you'd carry, or keep in your glovebox, or take out hunting.

File: Webley-4.jpg (137KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 900x600px

>>33991373
>Anderson Wheeler .357 Webley
>£6500
>only 50 made per year
I wish I didn't know that this existed.

>>33991466
They're fucking sexy little things, if I was an American and had $$$$$$ then I'd absolutely have one.

File: 20170220_171436.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

Not exactly porn because of shit phone pic but here's my Colt Official Police, .38 Special. Hole in hole accurate.

File: 20170415_122853-1280x720.jpg (196KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1280x720px

My 686-1 with bobbed hammer and moonclip conversion

File: rugers.jpg (287KB, 1100x700px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1100x700px

GP Hunnerts

File: 149480273637.jpg (166KB, 1800x1135px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1800x1135px

This was mine.

Sold it via auction house early this month.

File: 149480276258.jpg (150KB, 1800x1127px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1800x1127px

>>33992668

File: 149481446050.jpg (109KB, 1615x913px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1615x913px

>>33992684
Proof.

Did a thread about it as well.

https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/30861381/#30861381

>>33992627
I didn't know there was a .22LR version of the Match Champion, that's radical!

>>33992737

There's no match version of the 22lr GP100 yet, but I did swap the grip for the same as the champion so they'd be bros. They both shoot REALLY well though. I've never been a big revolver guy, but I can shoot both of those as well as most of my semi autos.

File: IMG_0129.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

These are mine:

>>33992772

I desperately want to shoot one of these. Extreme sight radius handguns are my fetish.

>>33992668
>>33992684
>>33992716
I didn't know you were still around. I don't browse /k/ quite so much as I did years ago. Good to see you're still about BOOF

>>33992716
>sold it
I get it but it's sad.

How much did you get?

File: 1476395119664.jpg (35KB, 500x357px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x357px

>>33992668
>Sold it

its ok boof, nobody is perfect

>>33985865
>Are there any modern break-action revolvers out there? I only know of pic related, and not only is it ~20 years old, it never even made it out of the prototype stage.
Not really, the frame isn't strong enough to handle powerful magnum rounds (which is like 90% the point of having a revolver). There is a good reason why we moved away from break action wheel guns 120 years ago.

>>33993054
Years of production? Also, have you ever actually fired them?

>>33993941
>the frame isn't strong enough to handle powerful magnum rounds (which is like 90% the point of having a revolver)
>ever mention of .357 mags come up the biggest selling point is using .38 special
>.357 is the most ubiquitous revolver cartridge

>>33992603
That's neat as shit, but why go to all that trouble when there are out-of-the-box solutions that would fill that role perfectly well?

>>33994086

because
>german

>>33994071
And you'd still have a gun exhibiting excess wear compared to any Single-Action or hand-ejector.

>>33991373
>Both are replicas of old obsolete designs made for a modern collector market, and lots of money probably goes into making them safe to shoot for just modern target loads

Yeah, tightening them up since they don't have room function with black powder and using the same quality steel as anything since the 1880s.

>>33994071
>the biggest selling point is using .38 special (if you're a new shooter and need to work your way up to the recoil of a full-power service cartridge but don't have the money for a .22LR and a real gun)

>>33993996

1983 Python
1969 Diamondback

I've fired the Python. It's as amazing as people say it is. The Diamondback I haven't gotten around to, but it's basically just a Detective Special with a full underlug and vent rib barrel with adjustable sights- it's not nearly as nice.

If I wanted to shoot more I have a Colt Trooper for .357. Not the same but still nice.

File: k124839_IMG_3094.jpg (163KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1600x1200px

Does anybody on /k/ own a Webley in .455?

I've always wanted one but I have no idea what they're like to shoot.

File: 1426231827596.jpg (20KB, 500x367px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 500x367px

>>33995326
> I have no idea what they're like to shoot

expensive

>>33996982
Handload

File: Webley Mark VI.jpg (212KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1600x1200px

>>33995326
A large number of them have cylinders shaved down to accept .45ACP in moon clips. even with that they aren't rated for modern .45ACP pressures. I wanna say they are rated for like 13,000 PSI. With the weight of the gun and the mild ammo I bet it's pretty tame to shoot.

>>33983153
>DIY suicide kit

>>33998696
>SalientArmsInternationalMk.VIWebley.jpg

File: IMG_2430.jpg (2MB, 3689x1985px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3689x1985px

>>33992368
Here is a much better picture taken with an actual camera as opposed to my phone.

>>33988240
cursed image

File: 1489514896395.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

What is the easiest .22LR revolver to change the frame and barrel on ?

>>33999234
Why is your brain so dumb? Since it is the serialized part, changing the frame on a revolver is called buying a new revolver.

File: 11155013_855675391148006_61104993432445628_o.jpg (228KB, 1024x673px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1024x673px

>>33999269
Listen up niggerfaggot, I did not ask for your opinion on matters you don't know shit about.
You don't know about the laws in this shithole I am forced to inhabit, and even if you did, it wouldn't matter because my question was not open to discussion.
Unless you had an answer as to which would be the most practical option to exchange internal parts on, your opinion might have mattered, but right now on this topic, the importance of your opinion is equal to that of a liberal.
Thank you for your post, have a good day.

File: orig.jpg (200KB, 1095x821px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1095x821px

>>33999336
trolololol I can see you no engrish and are noguns. So sorry for the misfortune of your birth. Have a pic of a gun you will never own.

File: IMG_4322.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

Revolver general?

Just had a classic 80s production blued Ruger Security Six with target grips in 357 magnum follow me home from the gun store.

I couldn't let this beauty sit on the shelf without a home.

File: 1411014678718.jpg (186KB, 2000x1328px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 2000x1328px

>>33999460
Currently my collection is at 24, but I can see that simply being American makes you think you're not a little cuckold.
It does not.

File: raw.gif (2MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x400px

>>33994249
> when your snubby bare backs your long barrel.

>>33992792
someone who paints a revolver like that deserves to hanged

>>34001293
It's a cheap-ass Rough Rider

>>33988581
When did they make the blackhawk in 44special? Thats sexy,

I wonder if anybody makes an iwb holster for one

>>33992318
I would shit in my grandmothers mouth to have those in 44mag

>>33994101
And?
Excessive wear means a lot of different things to different people. It's not a mil qualification gun,a competition piece or something at battlefield vegas.

>>33999336
>hey you're stupid
>listen to be angrily express vagaries

>>34001751
This Christmas I think.

I guess it's nice if you handload and do Cowboy Action

>>34002059
Even older, like in 2009

>>33992301
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_bX8KRcGxA

File: ATF V8.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>33978095

>>34002173
And?

File: J SMLE 999 1.jpg (2MB, 4030x2746px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4030x2746px

I gotchu senpai

File: J SMLE 999 2.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>34004653

File: JA HR999 1.jpg (1MB, 4031x2158px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4031x2158px

>>34004659

File: JA HR999 3.jpg (1MB, 3589x2064px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3589x2064px

>>34004675

File: 1457121872331.jpg (285KB, 1600x842px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1600x842px

I know it's only a .22, but I am so excited for a few days from now when I can pick up the rough rider my dad bought for me out of the blue! Finally got a wheel gun of my own. Anybody else got one of them little fellers?

>>34004688

Yeah they are pretty good, but my one complaint is NEVER EVER accidentally dry fire it for some reason the chamber is fairly brittle and will chunk a piece off and render that chamber to have a 30/70 chance of firing

>>34004810
The frame/cylinder are probably cast, and not cast to nearly the same level of quality as a Ruger.

>>33988469
pepe and stacy
>>33988480
wojak

>>33988018
What a fucking pain in the ass

>>33997110
Hahahaha

Good one Carlos

>>34006676
>.455 Webley can't be handloaded
Just use .45 AutoRim brass with appropriate cast bullets and powder loads.

>>34006897
Just did some research for shits and giggles and it's totally no problem to reload for .455 webley but fucking shit brass is $2 a piece lawls. If you gots to have one and shoot it my advice is find a shaved gun and shoot low power .45acp in moonclips or use .45 auto rim.

>>34006954
There is no factory .45ACP ammo that's safe for Webleys, you must handload or buy the shittiest Fiocchi target loads that crud up your gun with loads of unburnt powder.

>>34007078
No shit hence my use of the words "low power". I'm sorry if that didn't imply strongly enough that I meant handloads.

>>33978110
>read manual before use
It hate this rollerstamp legalese bullshit. Ruins the aesthetic

>>34007682
You won't see them 99% of the time.

>>33999932
Congrats on joining the club, anon. There are quite a few of us here who have one and love it. What did it run you OTD?

>>33978738

Back in the day guns were even more uncommon among the populace, at least carrying them wasn't a common thing except for particular people involved in particular things.

Even today, a .22 with 7 shot capacity will make most dindus run, and even kill one.

But in the off chance they stay and get in a shoot out with me, I want to have a caliber that at least starts with a .32, I carry 9mm or .38+p of course.

>>33979179
This looks like a good way to shoot yourself. Holy shit. I don't mind the holster as much as I mind the cut trigger guard. But when you mix them two together, lol. I mean, hell, I sure wouldn't carry it that way.

>>33984035

Get a double action. The double actions can be reloaded fairly quickly and thus still pretty viable for self defense, shtf, etc you name it. Not to mention the can be cocked back and also shoot like a single action would.

>>34000094

This is one of the major things I dislike about us Americans, just because the Government allows us to have SOME guns that are a bit more than what other countries usually can get, they think we're not cucked in every other possible way.

>>34007792
>A bit more
A lot more faggot
>they think we're not cucked in every other possible way
Really fires the neurons. Name a less cucked country on earth (you can't). If you want to compare anywhere on earth to your dream world just to call it bad then you're a dumbass.

>>34007733
Hey, no argument that any gun can't intimidate, getting shot even with little .22 Short can ultimately be really dangerous even if it doesn't kill you on the spot, nobody wants to be shot.

But you're also seriously underarming yourself with a tiny little target gun like that.
A blackpowder .22 Short must have been really very modest in velocity, I'd think twice about using it even for trapping, wanting to at least step up to .22 Long

>>34007741
DA

>>34006954
That's shitty advice and the brass can be reloaded for a long time since it's so low pressure. And I don't mean 4 times, I mean more times than you would believe

>>34009955
What's shitty about it. Shaved guns are more common and cost less. If you want a shooter instead of an unmolested collector piece shaved is the way to go. I already reload for .45ACP so if I wanted a Webley I'd for sure be looking to get a shaved gun.

>>34009955
If youre handy, you can actually make .455 brass out of .45LC casings that are trimmed down to an appropriate length, and those will survive more reloadings than you will ever possibly put them through.

File: 1493678686131.jpg (45KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x375px

>>33992792
CS go tier shit in real life

I keep checking in on my local shops trying to get a pre lock smith 44mag. Got nothing yet. The struggle is real

File: ms16-webley-lead-682x383.1443468405.jpg (52KB, 682x383px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 682x383px

http://www.tactical-life.com/tactics/reloading-the-webley-revolver/#ms16-webley-lead
Everything you could ever need to know about handloading for your .455 Webley

>>34010568
Not a bad idea, but do they chamber right? Have you tried it?

>>34010764
It's a sub-$200 .22LR gun, it's basically Hi-Point tier.

>>34010898
Also like the Hi-Point, it seems a lot of people have pretty decent experiences with them.

>>33992596
>bobbed hammer
>with extended cylinder release
>and even protruding rear sights
For what reason? and the beveled front end is even more sillier. Match shooting of some sort? If that, then why not hourglass the hammer? That way you could use less powerful spring for the hammer without compromising reliability. I'm confused.

>>34010568
You would probably work harden and crack the mouths before anything.

File: Now I'll show you why they call me revolver.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>34004810
Thanks for the advice anon, will keep in mind when disassembling it. Dry firing with that safety engaged should protect the firing pin though, right?

>>34016308
Honestly I'd get some snapcaps.

>>34016556
Or some spent casings.

>/k/
>no hand nugget

>>34016872
Hand nuggets are really bafflingly expensive these days.
In a few years they'll be about the same pirce as new, good revolvers.

>>34016944
There is nothing baffling about it. The days of cheap milsurp are over for ever. Seriously if there is some 20th century milsurp you think you want. make it a priority to get it over newer production guns because they will only be going up in price from here on out.

>>34016872
They're not that good to look at.

>>34016944
It's amazing considering demand must be almost nothing because of how awful they are.

I mean how many people who buy them even shoot them all that much? The impression I get is that they just get one because they want to fill out their collection of slav guns.

>>34017182
silencing it comes to mind, not too many revolvers can do that.

i'd probably get one if i saw it locally under 200

>>34012671

USPSA revolver division. Target rear blade sight, extended release for speed (same as machining for moonclips), bobbed hammer for speed (lightweight action) and to keep me from reverting to old single action habits on long range shots. So yes, it's all competition specific. Hope that helps explain it.

>>34017421
What about Hour glassing the hammer like I said, couldn't you use lighter hammer springs then? Also thanks for clearing it up.

>>34017282
Well they do have that novelty, but how many people are gonna go about filing an NFA form for a gun that's actually really terrible and has little enjoyment beyond the novelty mentioned?