This is the FN SCAR. Say something nice about her.
>you could've been better
u have smol feet
>>33975978
You are thick.
>>33975978
im not really sure what the point is besides a more expensive ar10/ar15
>>33975978
I don't really understand what's so special about her.
>>33975978
You have nice footwear.
considering getting a baby scar in 22lr
>>33975978
7.62x51mm variation and the brown stock color is cool.
>>33975978
It's not an L85
>>33975978
No Compromise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZL8H_UGQqE
>>33975978
Its... tan?
>>33976153
jesus hk relax nd have a drink
>>33975978
an ar15 with 25% more polymer.
If you put enough bags on her head you might even forget that she's a byproduct of a failed abortion from the 1960s
>>33975978
the SCAR 17 is probably the best 7.62 NATO rifle on the market right now
>>33976200
you're thinking of the SA-80 which is literally a bullpup AR18
>>33976224
This. I own a competitor (predatar) but the 17 is an amazing rifle.
>>33975978
i like yur ugg boot miss
>>33975978
>her
Did you just assume my rifles gender bigot.
>>33976224
>>33976235
>mfw when you can build an ar10
>>33976265
*jams*
Why are there AR-10s that are more expensive than even a Scar 17?
Every H&K, Knights armament and LWC are more expensive even though they are just all AR-10s which are nothing special besides quality while the Scar 17 is quality and a unique rifle.
An AR-10 variant should never be over $2k.
>>33976293
A SCAR is technically easier to make than an AR. The upper is extruded aluminum and the lower is injection molded plastic.
>>33976224
What makes it better than other 7.62 rifles?
>>33975978
will you say something nice about my scar?
Shooting the 7.62 version was really fucking fun
>>33975978
Maybe later, I'm busy.