First pistol

>>33971195
>1911
You wasted your money.

>Taurus

You would have been better off with a Hi-Point.

>>33971195
You should have just gotten a Browning Hi power boi

>>33971195
Tell us how much it cost you so we can tell you what you should have bought.

>>33971215
$400 plus tax

>>33971210
Actually what I wanted but no where close had one at an agreeable price, used ones going like 1100-1200 claiming they're captured British pistols from WW2, when they're just recent browning production

File: TheLoostIsJoost.png (244KB, 474x435px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 474x435px

>>33971230
Taurus isn't the best brand in the world or anything but it will serve you well as a first gun.

>>33971249
Just grab a 305$, how do you fail so horribly?

>>33971249

Which is when you turn and ask to see a CZ-75 since it's literally a DA/SA Hi-Power with better ergos.

>>33971270
Have handled CZs before, better ergonomics sure but the slide leaves something to be desired, I can't get enough purchase on it, I'm not asking for like XD levels of slide just something a little bit more substantial than a CZ

>>33971230
You could have done worse. Taurus isn't bad for their copies like the 1911 or pt92. It's their original designs you have to watch out for.

>>33971291
pretty much this. you did okay for 400.